Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Online Casinos in general: Class action AdvoFin - experiences? (Page 18)

Topic created on 12th Dec. 2020 | Page: 18 of 23 | Answers: 226 | Views: 76,002
t****o
And one more thing: if I already know that I am playing in a state where gambling is forbidden, then I should
i should not take it to the extreme by unnecessarily provoking players with Bonuses, verification
Or simple non-payout unnecessarily. Then I must be especially stupid as a casino.

That then the Boomerang comes back is so logical.

And they do all this in a country where gambling is forbidden. Stupid and dumber.

And as soon as the first lawsuit is through, others will follow, that's also logical.

In my eyes, the casinos are to blame for the situation.

Or to say with the bread baker:
If I don't have a business for baking bread, but annoy my clientele with obscure
Promotions like: Buy 4, get 8, but you can still take only 4, you get no rolls at all,
but I'll take your money, and I'll need a certified copy of your ID..,
before you get your buns. I'll keep your money as long as I'm not surprised about certain reactions..
i should not be surprised.
If I make the whole thing illegal, I am actually no longer to be surpassed in stupidity.

Then I must not be surprised,
if my store blows up.

This post has been translated automatically

Makbarbrother
Amateur
I have to say something about this now, because in my opinion there are too many people here in this forum who are conspicuously pro-casino.

Which gambler, who has been around for quite some time, and has certainly made more bad than good, would take the side of the OC's! Not to mention quite a few stalling tactics and dubious actions, etc. that everyone here has already experienced!

As if you all would be so correct and lenient and say: "that was now times a fair game, the player knew what he is getting into"?!

Such a bullshit high 10.

If you all had the 100% chance to get your bets back you would do it. As if you are so Robin Hood moderately on the road as with the baker example, I laugh myself to death

EVERYONE knows that all this is not right. But you do it anyway in the hope of a big profit, because then again everything is secondary. Then you're back in the safe boat and everything runs correctly, if you have the coal on the account.

That's the way it is, if we're honest.

As if not at least 90% here an animal neck on the OC's would have. So how in the world do you get to defend the OC's? That is so incomprehensible.

I haven't taken any legal action yet either, but if I had the certainty that it would work, I would do it immediately. As if I would feel sorry for them. They are only out for your misery and you defend them? Unbelievable of death.

This post has been translated automatically

t****o

Makbarbrother wrote on 01.02.2022 at 23:49: I must now also say something about it, because in my opinion there are too many people here in this forum who are conspicuously pro-casino.

What gambler, who has been around for quite some time, and has certainly made more bum than plus, would side with the OC's!!!? Not to mention quite a few stalling tactics and dubious actions, etc. that everyone here has already experienced!

As if you all would be so correct and lenient and say: "that was now times a fair game, the player knew what he is getting into"?!

Such a bullshit high 10.

If you all had the 100% chance to get your bets back you would do it. As if you are so Robin Hood moderately on the road as with the baker example, I laugh myself to death

EVERYONE knows that all this is not right. But you do it anyway in the hope of a big profit, because then again everything is secondary. Then you're back in the safe boat and everything runs correctly, if you have the coal on the account.

That's the way it is, if we're honest.

As if not at least 90% here an animal neck on the OC's would have. So how in the world do you get to defend the OC's? That is so incomprehensible.

I haven't taken any legal action yet either, but if I had the certainty that it would work, I would do it immediately. As if I would feel sorry for them. They are only out for your misery and you defend them? Unbelievable of death.


Best content contribution for a long time. Can only fully agree!

This post has been translated automatically

t****o
Here still current judgements, since here only Trashnachrichten are to be read:

https://rechtecheck.de/news/online-casino-erstattung-urteile/

https://www.anwalt-leverkusen.de/aktuelles/detail/landgericht-verden-verurteilt-online-casino-zur-rueckzahlung-von-rd-130-000.html

This post has been translated automatically

LittleFu
Amateur
I could bet now that the players who got the money back, the very next day the next
the next day the next deposits
And the game starts all over again...

This post has been translated automatically

t****o
LittleFu wrote on 02.02.2022 at 14:21: I could bet now that the players who got the money back, the very next day, the next deposits
the next day the next deposits
And the game starts all over again...

Doesn't matter at all! What someone does with the money he won in court is his business.

You can't dictate to him what he should do with this money.

Only a 2nd complaint will then be difficult......

Let the casinos not be so greedy, and offer their offer in states where it is not allowed.
Greed is sometimes punished, as with the gambler mostly also!

This post has been translated automatically

Makbarbrother
Amateur
tequiero wrote on 02/02/2022 at 11:47 AM

Best substantive post in a long time. Can only fully agree!

Yes, and the funny thing is that no one ever comments on such news Who himself really has a gambler career through with all the ups and downs (Especially downs), who would not argue so

You should stick to the truth. In the end, we all know that gambling is death. You can't talk about profits anyway, as someone else wrote in another thread, because it's only a profit, if at all, if you pay out the first time you gamble and then never play again

Everyone who plays regularly is addicted, knowingly or unknowingly. Otherwise it would be pure stupidity to keep playing, even though you mostly lose, no matter if you have enough money available. There is a reason why you keep trying again and again, despite knowing how it mostly goes.

And everyone who is in this cycle would never choose the casino
And it is also understandable that more and more take the measure to want to get the money back, if you consider how you are now ripped off
Because the casinos work with exactly the same strategy, which is not about your well-being XD It's just about squeezing as much as possible out of you. Then they should just bite the bullet and feel it on their own body. Because FAIR was the whole never, we all know that, ALSO! So if you argue "you knew what you were getting into" the casinos must also be prepared in reverse, if you work with full awareness with such methods.

However, I am also skeptical about the lawyers, whether they don't just want to fill their own pockets and are not interested in the well-being of the client, because a chance of success is not guaranteed. It can then quickly be said "Unfortunately, we couldn't do anything about it" and by then you've already paid enough money. For them, this also opens up a new market where they can generate sales.

This post has been translated automatically

gamble1
Legend
tequiero wrote on 02/02/2022 at 15:18
Doesn't matter at all! What someone does with his money won in court is his business.

One can dictate him badly, what he should do with this money.

Only a 2nd complaint will then be difficult......

Let the casinos not be so greedy, and offer their offer in states where it is not allowed.
Greed is sometimes punished, as with the gambler mostly also!

Strictly speaking, it will not be difficult with the second lawsuit it becomes fraud and then one can also be quite quickly imputed to the first time an intent

This post has been translated automatically

t****o
gamble1 wrote on 03.02.2022 at 04:10
Strictly speaking, it will not be difficult with the second complaint it becomes fraud and then you can also be accused of intent quite quickly the first time


As far as I am informed, there is not only the prohibition of double punishment, even if the deadline has passed at the first judgment,

this can no longer be challenged/changed.

Fraud can then be imputed to one in the second case, since he knows through the first case that it is forbidden, and tries it anyway
tries. Thus, the illegal intention is also recognizable.

Exception would be that the court would not be based on the Deposit, but purely on the illegality of the casino, and therefore
no valid legal contract comes into being.



This post has been translated automatically

t****o
Makbarbrother wrote on 02/03/2022 at 02:24 PM
Yes, and the funny thing is that no one ever comments on such news Who himself really has a gambler career through with all the ups and downs (Especially downs), who would not argue so

You should stick to the truth. In the end, we all know that gambling is death. You can't talk about wins anyway, as someone else wrote in another thread, because it's only a win if you pay out the first time you gamble and then never play again

Everyone who plays regularly is addicted, knowingly or unknowingly. Otherwise it would be pure stupidity to keep playing, even though you mostly lose, no matter if you have enough money available. There is a reason why you keep trying again and again, despite knowing how it mostly goes.

And everyone who is in this cycle would never choose the casino
And it is also understandable that more and more take the measure to want to get the money back, if you consider how you are now ripped off
Because the casinos work with exactly the same strategy, which is not about your well-being XD It's just about squeezing as much as possible out of you. Then they should just bite the bullet and feel it on their own body. Because FAIR was the whole never, we all know that, ALSO! So if you argue "you knew what you're getting into" the casinos must also be prepared in reverse, if you work with full awareness with such methods.

However, I am also skeptical about the lawyers, whether they don't just want to fill their own pockets and are not interested in the well-being of the client, because a chance of success is not guaranteed. It can then quickly be said "Unfortunately, we couldn't do anything about it" and by then you've already paid enough money. For them, this also opens up a new market where they can generate sales.

You are absolutely right. Read the arguments of the "experienced" users. Always make the down, which report,

that they have not won. Gamble themselves and are up to their necks in the muck, but still laugh at those where the head is
has gone down in the crap. If it were not so sad, one could laugh about it.

See the same with the stupidity. No one would gamble. It is not a hobby, that is nonsense. Would be like, my hobby is smoking.
But no matter, the world is beautifully talked, cost it what it will.

And if then still people like Blubbo, bone or Wunderharke and Co. what to the best give, a la is nevertheless clear that one loses
that is just gambling, make fun of the losers, but gamble yourself, and put up as smart, so then I fall out of the chair laughing!
Chair! Best irony ever! So they are proud that they lose, and do not complain. Ah yes. Sure. They are really very smart.

Lawyers do their job, and know that people would go along with almost any claim if they just repeated their money.
It's like always, money is made out of desperation. Once you hit bottom, you've lost!

I have over 30 years of gambling behind me, and can understand anyone complaining.
I know how you used to lose and what the regulations were, and know it today, even though I no longer
gamble anymore
Then you still have to be lectured by a verdigris, about RTP, you should stop after all, is frustrated,
angry and whatnot, etc etc.

If then still someone with punctuation comes, (in a Zockerforum)!!!!!!!!, then I pee me really in the trousers.
There is then so the summit reached!
They would get the code red everywhere at work, but still let themselves be celebrated here. Mad.


This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics28th Apr. 2024 at 01:40 pm CEST

GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately