Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Online Casinos in general: Class action AdvoFin - experiences? (Page 17)

Topic created on 12th Dec. 2020 | Page: 17 of 23 | Answers: 226 | Views: 76,122
Avicii
Late but still wanted to give feedback here. Have filed claims against several casinos and all were successfully enforced. Duration was just under a year.
I have received a lot of beastly and spiteful feedback here, but still wanted to finally write down this info. I can only recommend this path to everyone. For me, the topic of gambling is closed forever

This post has been translated automatically

moody
Experienced
Very good.I'm happy for you👍

This post has been translated automatically

Matara
Rookie
Avicii wrote on 01/12/2021 at 17:50: Late but wanted to give feedback here. Have filed claims against several casinos and all have been successfully enforced. Duration was just under a year.
I have received a lot of nasty and spiteful feedback here, but still wanted to write down this info. I can only recommend this path to everyone. For me, the topic of gambling is closed forever.

I am very happy for you! Congratulations!

This post has been translated automatically

Lukifisch
Visitor
Since we are confronted in the meantime ever more frequently with bad debts (Mr Green, William Hill, TSG, N1, etc. let themselves be executed meanwhile all in Malta which leads to delays of several years and Titanium Brace marketing and bet-at-home.com have even already initiated insolvency procedures, so that a total loss must be feared!

This post has been translated automatically

t****o

Lukifisch wrote on 31.01.2022 at 12:11 pm: Since we are now more and more often confronted with bad debts (Mr Green, William Hill, TSG, N1, etc. can now all be executed in Malta which leads to delays of several years and Titanium Brace Marketing and bet-at-home.com have even initiated insolvency proceedings, so that a total default must be feared!)

That's how it is when you want to suck everything out of people, even though the legal situation is different.

Bad CEO.

By the way, this concerns the business area in Austria, should be mentioned before again
Hildurama and Co. run after the people with pitchforks!

It's clear that people are fighting back.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
i also think it is not okay to sue for his money. Both have entered into a contract of sale.Everyone has fulfilled his duty.Against Deposit, you get the opportunity to gamble.Guaranteed profits are not promised.If you go to the bakery, and want to buy a loaf of bread, and the baker but says, in the bread are possibly mouse droppings, and you buy the bread anyway.And so it is with gambling, we know that you can lose, and can not ask for his money back afterwards, because you have taken this Risk, as with the bread.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Ditmar wrote on 31.01.2022 at 23:55: I find it also not in order to sue his money. Both have entered into a contract of sale.Each has fulfilled its obligation.Against Deposit, you get the opportunity to gamble.Guaranteed profits are not promised.If you go to the bakery, and want to buy a loaf of bread, and the baker but says, in the bread are possibly.And so it is with gambling, we know that you can lose, and can not ask for his money back afterwards, because you have taken this Risk, as with the bread.

so a baker bakes here no day longer bread.

This post has been translated automatically

Lukifisch
Visitor
Ditmar wrote on 31.01.2022 at 23:55: I find it also not in order to sue his money. Both have entered into a contract of sale.Each has fulfilled its obligation.Against Deposit, you get the opportunity to gamble.Guaranteed profits are not promised.If you go to the bakery, and want to buy a loaf of bread, and the baker but says, in the bread are possibly.And so it is with gambling, we know that you can lose, and can not ask for his money back afterwards, because you have taken this Risk, as with the bread.

and so that this correctly represents: you go to a butcher / baker who sells his goods illegally he sells because he has no commercial license. do you still go there?

This post has been translated automatically

DieWunderharke5000
Top Member
Lukifisch wrote on 01.02.2022 at 05:33
and so that represents correctly: you go to a butcher / baker who sells his goods illegally that he sells because he has no business license. do you still go there?

The comparison with the baker is lame, but in that case it would probably be more like this:

You go for years to the baker in the knowledge that he has no business license. But you don't care, because you can buy a better and cheaper bread than at the competition. Now the baker is taken and all of a sudden you realize that you want to have your money back for the bread you have bought and eaten for years

This post has been translated automatically

t****o

DieWunderharke5000 wrote on 01.02.2022 at 10:06 am
The comparison with the baker is lame, but in that case it would be more like it:

You go for years to the baker in the knowledge that he has no business license. But you don't care, because you can buy a better and cheaper bread than at the competition. Now the baker is taken and all of a sudden you realize that you want to have your money back for the bread you have bought and eaten for years.

And that is exactly the Risk of the baker. He also saves himself the trade license, and other annoying

Controls. He bakes illegally. In return, he must always count on the fact that a dissatisfied customer complains
complains. That is then now times the occupational hazard.

Even if the customer has been buying there for years!

Can also be that the quality decreases, and then I say: Not so.

Just blame yourself, that you can turn and turn as you want. The legal situation is just so, and if
i want to take the coal of certain countries, although there is no regulation, then I give me
consciously into this situation. Why do you always blame the players who want their money back?
The casinos are not to blame, or what?

Only the buyer of weed is a ******, the Dealer did everything right.
Typical perpetrator-victim reversal!

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics4th May. 2024 at 08:10 pm CEST

GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately