Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Online Casinos in general: Casinos where you should not play under any circumstances (loss is not a reason!) (Page 34)

Topic created on 16th Dec. 2021 | Page: 34 of 75 | Answers: 743 | Views: 209,258
Jubla2014
Top Member
@Royal777

Sorry to butt in, but there are some MGA casinos that have been proven to cheat.

Experienced myself at 2 reputable casinos.

What did the MGA do? Haha, nothing, even though I could prove everything.

This license does not deserve the good reputation in any way.

The Curacao license, which you always deny any seriousness, is in no way worse than the corrupt MGA.

And on top of that, if you play or bet in a reputable Curacao casino, you will be in much better hands than in any MGA casino.

I myself trust only one MGA casino, otherwise only Curacao.

@Krabbenburger's posts are mostly well written, largely share his opinions.

No hard feelings!

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Jubla2014 wrote on 06/16/2022 at 23:21: @Royal777

Experienced it myself at 2 well-known casinos.
What did the MGA do? Haha, nothing, although I could prove everything.

Link me times the two cases provided that you have described here in the forum.
In my opinion, there was only one conflict in the forum in recent years, where I sensed fraud. Nevertheless, I would also tend to the MGA in this case.
https://www.gamblejoe.com/forum/online-casinos/allgemeines/hilfe-n1-konfisziert-gewinne-in-hohe-30k-139482/

This post has been translated automatically

Jubla2014
Top Member
Nope, didn't describe the cases here.

Dated from the years 2017 and 2018.

I have only been registered with GJ since the beginning of 2020.

In one case I was accused of Bonus abuse, although I did not play with a bonus.

In the other case I was accused of a double account, which was not true.

Regarding 1) Win plus Deposit was confiscated.

2) The win was confiscated and the deposit returned.

As I have written here a few times, I have received the exact guidelines of the MGA from EveryMatrix.

There are very many casinos that arbitrarily make any decisions, not now as far as I am concerned, but in general.

I find the approach to the SOW check particularly tragic.

Only pay out when the test is successfully passed.
This is not legal.

Deposits can and must be stopped after a certain deposit amount and the SOW performed.
After successful Verification, deposits may be made again.

Very important: Withdrawals are not affected by this, must be carried out.

The majority of MGA casinos do not act this way, although the MGA prescribes just that.

All terms and conditions of the respective casinos that violate the guidelines of the MGA are null and void.

Only: the MGA itself does not care.

Is just one example of many why I think nothing at all of the MGA and 99% of the casinos under this licenseź.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Jubla2014 wrote on 06/17/2022 at 00:49: Nope, didn't describe the cases here.
Dated from 2017 and 2018.
(...)

In hindsight, of course, it is difficult to impossible to write anything about it.

I am still of the opinion that the MGA continues to offer the strongest protection with regard to player protection. How strong one actually interprets Player protection is probably in the eye of the beholder. In any case, it is unfortunate that you had to suffer this experience, so I can certainly understand your views.

Meanwhile, I also have the impression that most players don't care about both the license and the legislations. The main thing is that the needs of an example fast payout are promised . Such an empty promise is already enough for many to make a deposit....

This post has been translated automatically

Jubla2014
Top Member
@Royal777

Of course the MGA offers more security in terms of Player protection, no question about that.

I was a loyal customer in countless MGA casinos for many years, only one really convinced me, and I have remained loyal to this day, because everything there is simply in the best order, apart from technical problems now and then.

Such casinos as Platin, Videoslots or the entire Kannix Group, recently also the N1 Casinos are anathema to me, for various reasons, which I have already clearly pointed out in another thread.

With the matter of fast payouts you are of course right, but I can understand the people, fast payouts are very important, it usually does not matter what license the respective casino has.

Curacao casinos have never disappointed me, but even there I had the SOW check in some, but it was very fast everywhere.

Many players think that is not necessary in Curacao's, but this is not true.
They also require it sometimes, but only for extremely high deposits.

But withdrawals during the SOW Verification are possible at any time, which is of course a serious advantage over the vast majority of MGA's.

Most of them do not act according to the guidelines of the MGA, but do their own thing, which is not legal.

Only a handful of MGAs are worthy of praise in this respect.

In the end, everyone has to decide for himself where he plays and whom he trusts.


Have a nice weekend!

This post has been translated automatically

upola
Legend
Pribet has Fake Slots e.g. Book of Rar

This post has been translated automatically

Nik89
Experienced
upola wrote on 19.06.2022 at 22:26: Pribet has Fake Slots e.g. Book of Rar

Book of RA upola, RAR are maximum only the wins

This post has been translated automatically

upola
Legend
Nik89 wrote on 19/06/2022 at 22:37
Book of RA upola, RAR are maximum only the wins


This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Hyperreels, a copy of WP

This post has been translated automatically

R3hab
Expert
Well I had ma deposited at slott.com
Total disaster
I deposited and only 3 or 4 days later the money was in the casino
Wolltem also see the transfer
I have never experienced
Since I was but really f**ked up
Do they pay out at all? Does anyone play

Wanted to play Roulette so I deposited there
Habs from some nen thread here that it is okay

But was all full funny
But the slotts and Live Casino was already okay

But have not deposited again
Was me then but too Schrothaft

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics29th Apr. 2024 at 05:52 am CEST

GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately