Topic created on 11th Jul. 2018 | Page: 9 of 16 | Answers: 155 | Views: 45,859
s****e
Forum posts:1.004Member has been banned
Lapalingo declares €8,000 win void
12th Jul. 2018, at 04:02 pm CEST#81
1 Like
Liked this post: W****m
In principle, it is usually one and the same who more or less
defend the casinos. One should actually overlook it, since the
Answers from them are predictable.
upola wrote on 07/12/2018 at 15:57
I would be interested to know if the users defending the casino are only doing it because someone else is aggrieved.
Would those same users do it if they were the aggrieved party themselves?
I probably won't get an honest answer.
If I did get an honest answer, it would make the whole argument absurd.
I don't want to defend the casino, I don't even play there anymore.
However, I understand what is there just as clear...
Attention: Even after converting bonus funds into real money funds, the maximum payout amount of the wins is also 100€. This means that the entire balance won with bonus funds can be paid out once up to a maximum of 100€.
I know but also, and I had already mentioned more often, that this was not yet in the terms and conditions, when the first complaints came up here!
upola wrote on 12/07/2018 at 15:57
I would be interested to know if the users defending the casino are only doing it because someone else is aggrieved.
Would those same users do it if they were the aggrieved party themselves?
I probably won't get an honest answer.
If I did get an honest answer, it would make the whole argument absurd.
As I mentioned before, I have been through such conditions myself and had my account balance cut, albeit in a different casino. At that time I had several thousand euros in the account, when suddenly it was only 100. I played very high to implement the conditions, have not seen that I have only 100 and have turned again, with 50€ stake. It came a good picture and I was again at about 700€.
Thereupon I wanted to withdraw directly, but honestly not with the hope that I will ever see money, was some Curacao casino or similar and I actually never believed in it. Shortly after came a mail I should send documents and the maximum withdrawal amount is 100€, my balance was cut again. So I still with faint hope times documents submitted. Money came of course never, but that's not the point, it was a very unseriöses casino.
I did not feel cheated to be honest. I just felt like I didn't read the rules. I did check if there was a Maxbet rule but I somehow missed the sentence "The maximum you may withdraw is 100", which was at the top.
I may be different than others here, but I don't play to win money in the first place. I always know that there will never be any cash in my hand, that's okay. That's why something like this doesn't frustrate me. However, I can imagine that I would be p**sed at a reputable casino like Lapalingo and a €8000 win. But at the end of the day, it's not fraud and 100€ is better than nothing.
Question to the TE: Do you actually get at least the 100€ or nothing at all? That would still be interesting.
This post has been translated automatically
W****m
Forum posts:40Member has been banned
Lapalingo declares €8,000 win void
12th Jul. 2018, at 04:11 pm CEST#84
1 Like
Liked this post: s****e
upola wrote on 12/07/2018 at 15:57
I would be interested to know if the users defending the casino are only doing it because someone else is aggrieved.
Would those same users do it if they were the aggrieved party themselves?
I probably won't get an honest answer.
If I did get an honest answer, it would make the whole argument absurd.
Yes they would, because they are good people.
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
Lapalingo declares €8,000 win void
12th Jul. 2018, at 04:14 pm CEST#85
1 Like
Liked this post: s****e
Stromberg wrote on 12/07/2018 at 16:06
I do not want theCasino in protection, I do not even play there anymore.
However, I take what is there just as clear...
Attention: Even after converting bonus credits into real money credits, the maximum payout amount of the wins is also 100€. This means that the entire balance won with bonus funds can be paid out once up to a maximum of 100€.
I know but also, and I had already mentioned more often, that this was not yet in the terms and conditions, when the first complaints came up here!
And why is there this senseless regulation?
Not even there you get the idea that it could be because their software runs better with bonus?
Otherwise, the regulation makes zero sense.
If the player would have the same chances of winning when he pays out and then deposited again or immediately continues to play with it, you would not need such a rule. Even with something so clear you do not stutzig?
Random wrote on 07/12/2018 at 4:14 PM
And why is there this pointless regulation?
Not even there you get the idea that it could be because their software runs better with bonus?
The regulation has otherwise zero sense.
If the player would have the same chances of winning when he pays out and then deposited again or immediately continues to play with it, you would not need such a rule. Even with something so clear you do not stutzig?
That is now another question.
With me personally it runs with Bonus money not necessarily better.
However, many people seem to feel the same way, or I have read about it several times.
I can not judge.
And of course I also get suspicious about some things and have my own theories about what's going on.
That's probably what most players have.
Stromberg wrote on 12/07/2018 at 16:28
Well, that's a different question now.
For me personally, it's not necessarily better with bonus money.
Many it seems to go but so, or I have read more often.
I can not judge.
And of course I also get suspicious about some things and have my own theories about what's going on.
That's probably what most players have.
Of course, this is also about why Lapalingo introduces such a stupid senseless regulation.
If we assume an always same system in which the odds are always the same, you do not need such a rule.
That says already the common sense.
Therefore, the word fraud is completely appropriate here because the rule alone shows that Lapalingo is doing something ominous here.
Bone wrote on 12/07/2018 at 16:08
As mentioned before I made it through such conditions myself and I got my account balance cut, albeit in a different casino. At that time I had several thousand euros in the account when suddenly it was only 100. I played very high to implement the conditions, have not seen that I have only 100 and have turned again, with 50€ stake. It came a good picture and I was again at about 700€.
Thereupon I wanted to withdraw directly, but honestly not with the hope that I will ever see money, was some Curacao casino or similar and I actually never believed in it. Shortly after came a mail I should send documents and the maximum withdrawal amount is 100€, my balance was cut again. So I still with faint hope times documents submitted. Money came of course never, but that's not the point, it was a very unseriöses casino.
I did not feel cheated to be honest. I just felt like I didn't read the rules. I did check if there was a Maxbet rule but I somehow missed the sentence "The maximum you may withdraw is 100", which was at the top.
I may be different than others here, but I don't play to win money in the first place. I always know that there will never be any cash in my hand, that's okay. That's why something like this doesn't frustrate me. However, I can imagine that I would be p**sed at a reputable casino like Lapalingo and a €8000 win. But at the end of the day, it's not fraud and 100€ is better than nothing.
Question to the TE: Do you actually get at least the 100€ or nothing at all? That would still be interesting.
I honestly do not know what to think of your answer.
Either you are really such a person who is not angry about a loss of several thousand euros and does not feel cheated....or you are just telling stories here.
I can't quite place this yet.
I honestly don't know what to make of your response.
Either you are really such a person who is not angry about a loss of several thousand euros and does not feel cheated....or you are just telling stories here.
I can't quite place this yet.
Has to do with the expectation. If it is clear to me from the beginning that I will never see money and I only gamble for my entertainment then I feel cheated maybe but not bad. If I Deposit in a casino, follow the rules, want to pay out and something would not work (which has never happened) then I would feel cheated and also try to take steps to get my money.
This post has been translated automatically
s****e
Forum posts:1.004Member has been banned
Lapalingo declares €8,000 win void
12th Jul. 2018, at 05:13 pm CEST#90
1 Like
Liked this post: W****m
So slowly you really can't listen to it anymore.
No expectations...
If I know from the beginning that I will never see any money......
Do the casinos have to abide by nothing when it comes to giving away money, and you don't care?
You don't care at all?
That's really interesting!
Lapalingo declares €8,000 win void
Liked this post: W****m
defend the casinos. One should actually overlook it, since the
Answers from them are predictable.
This post has been translated automatically
Lapalingo declares €8,000 win void
Nobody has liked this post so far
I don't want to defend the casino, I don't even play there anymore.
However, I understand what is there just as clear...
Attention: Even after converting bonus funds into real money funds, the maximum payout amount of the wins is also 100€. This means that the entire balance won with bonus funds can be paid out once up to a maximum of 100€.
I know but also, and I had already mentioned more often, that this was not yet in the terms and conditions, when the first complaints came up here!
This post has been translated automatically
Lapalingo declares €8,000 win void
Nobody has liked this post so far
As I mentioned before, I have been through such conditions myself and had my account balance cut, albeit in a different casino. At that time I had several thousand euros in the account, when suddenly it was only 100. I played very high to implement the conditions, have not seen that I have only 100 and have turned again, with 50€ stake. It came a good picture and I was again at about 700€.
Thereupon I wanted to withdraw directly, but honestly not with the hope that I will ever see money, was some Curacao casino or similar and I actually never believed in it. Shortly after came a mail I should send documents and the maximum withdrawal amount is 100€, my balance was cut again. So I still with faint hope times documents submitted. Money came of course never, but that's not the point, it was a very unseriöses casino.
I did not feel cheated to be honest. I just felt like I didn't read the rules. I did check if there was a Maxbet rule but I somehow missed the sentence "The maximum you may withdraw is 100", which was at the top.
I may be different than others here, but I don't play to win money in the first place. I always know that there will never be any cash in my hand, that's okay. That's why something like this doesn't frustrate me. However, I can imagine that I would be p**sed at a reputable casino like Lapalingo and a €8000 win. But at the end of the day, it's not fraud and 100€ is better than nothing.
Question to the TE: Do you actually get at least the 100€ or nothing at all? That would still be interesting.
This post has been translated automatically
Lapalingo declares €8,000 win void
Liked this post: s****e
Yes they would, because they are good people.
This post has been translated automatically
Lapalingo declares €8,000 win void
Liked this post: s****e
And why is there this senseless regulation?
Not even there you get the idea that it could be because their software runs better with bonus?
Otherwise, the regulation makes zero sense.
If the player would have the same chances of winning when he pays out and then deposited again or immediately continues to play with it, you would not need such a rule. Even with something so clear you do not stutzig?
This post has been translated automatically
Lapalingo declares €8,000 win void
Nobody has liked this post so far
That is now another question.
With me personally it runs with Bonus money not necessarily better.
However, many people seem to feel the same way, or I have read about it several times.
I can not judge.
And of course I also get suspicious about some things and have my own theories about what's going on.
That's probably what most players have.
This post has been translated automatically
Lapalingo declares €8,000 win void
Liked this post:
Skitch22, W****m
Of course, this is also about why Lapalingo introduces such a stupid senseless regulation.
If we assume an always same system in which the odds are always the same, you do not need such a rule.
That says already the common sense.
Therefore, the word fraud is completely appropriate here because the rule alone shows that Lapalingo is doing something ominous here.
This post has been translated automatically
Lapalingo declares €8,000 win void
Nobody has liked this post so far
I honestly do not know what to think of your answer.
Either you are really such a person who is not angry about a loss of several thousand euros and does not feel cheated....or you are just telling stories here.
I can't quite place this yet.
This post has been translated automatically
Lapalingo declares €8,000 win void
Liked this post:
Counter
Has to do with the expectation. If it is clear to me from the beginning that I will never see money and I only gamble for my entertainment then I feel cheated maybe but not bad. If I Deposit in a casino, follow the rules, want to pay out and something would not work (which has never happened) then I would feel cheated and also try to take steps to get my money.
This post has been translated automatically
Lapalingo declares €8,000 win void
Liked this post: W****m
No expectations...
If I know from the beginning that I will never see any money......
Do the casinos have to abide by nothing when it comes to giving away money, and you don't care?
You don't care at all?
That's really interesting!
No one can take you for full anymore!
This post has been translated automatically