Topic created on 11th Jul. 2018 | Page: 12 of 16 | Answers: 155 | Views: 45,860
Anonym
Former Member
Lapalingo declares €8,000 win void
12th Jul. 2018, at 06:45 pm CEST#111
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Julian wrote on 07/12/2018 at 6:39 PM: Briefly FYI, since the discussions are escalating DAILY in ANY thread, I'm going to draw a bit of a line.
I ask you ALL to stay on topic and treat each other with respect, irrelevant how different your opinions may be.
Due to the last posts which contain extreme provocations & insults I will now give Mike1975 & also stkrie a temporary time out.
I ask the rest of you to pull yourself together and not let your frustrations out on other users.
So Mike should be permanently banned for such statements.
Worst insults and death threats should be sufficient for this or?
And stkrie has related the loser to casino losses.
Could certainly have been done differently, but I do not think much worse than to call others paranoid.
So Mike should be permanently banned for statements like that.
Worst insults and death threats should be enough for that or?
And stkrie has related the loser to casino losses.
Could certainly have been done differently, but I do not think much worse than to call others paranoid.
The user Mike has already deleted himself. But yes he would have otherwise received a lifetime ban.
And stkrie is temporarily banned since I have already given him all warnings and also talked to him about his behavior just yesterday.
But the ban is only temporary. More I will not go into it here now. If you have any questions about this you can contact me via Communicator.
So... I'm a little speechless at how much I'm being attacked by you here Random. So I speak up in every single complaint thread and "defend" the casino? You mean like you did last time? You know, back when I told the user that documents are probably still missing and then a withdrawal should be possible without any problems? You then attacked me directly and labeled me as a "casino defender". The end of the story was: The user had to submit another document and got his money.
Even then I already said: I try to help instead of screaming senseless "fraud". From 90% of all complaint threads I stay away completely, because I already know the story in it anyway. Either a Curacao Casino or just violation of the bonus conditions. Since I'm slowly tired of it and of course this is not completely past me, but change or help I can not.
What you do, however, is actually paranoid. Wasn't it you who accused me of being a Wunderino employee on my first day here? Later I was also a troll and now I have double accounts? I'm just a normal person, with a single account and I don't work for any casino. I just have a different point of view and am portrayed as if I were the bad guy from the casino lobby.
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
Lapalingo declares €8,000 win void
12th Jul. 2018, at 07:18 pm CEST#114
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Bone wrote on 07/12/2018 at 7:01 pm: So... I'm a little speechless at how much I'm being attacked by you here Random. So I speak up in every single complaint thread and "defend" the casino? You mean like you did last time? You know, back when I told the user that documents are probably still missing and then a withdrawal should be possible without any problems? You then attacked me directly and labeled me as a "casino defender". The end of the story was: The user had to submit another document and got his money.
Even then I already said: I try to help instead of screaming senseless "fraud". From 90% of all complaint threads I stay away completely, because I already know the story in it anyway. Either a Curacao Casino or just violation of the bonus conditions. Since I'm slowly tired of it and of course this is not completely past me, but change or help I can not.
What you do, however, is actually paranoid. Wasn't it you who accused me of being a Wunderino employee on my first day here? Later I was also a troll and now I have double accounts? I'm just a normal person, with a single account and I don't work for any casino. I just have a different point of view and am portrayed as if I were the bad guy from the casino lobby.
So bones, I have written everything there is to say about it and also stand by it.
And yes, that's exactly how I feel about it because it also corresponds to the truth.
Remember the time when you had no idea about Online Casinos, as probably 90% of the people who register here in a complaint thread.
Wouldn't you have fallen for some casino back then?
Exactly these users you verklickerst but again and again the terms and conditions are set in stone and the casino is always in the right.
I do not understand a person who apparently has nothing of it and still defends fraudulent behavior.
That you can not do anything legally unfortunately is so.
But that many terms and conditions are nevertheless or just because of fraudulent and criminal that is also so.
Then no one needs your comments according to the motto: Players too stupid to read the terms and conditions - it's their own fault.
The problem is not the inexperienced players but the fraudulent casinos. But you always convey the former.
This post has been translated automatically
l****r
Forum posts:1Member has been banned
Lapalingo declares €8,000 win void
12th Jul. 2018, at 07:23 pm CEST#115
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Random wrote on 12.07.2018 at 19:18
Exactly these users you but always verklickert that T&Cs are set in stone and the casino is always in the right.
---- User was banned because he was banned on permanent time and had created a new account ----
Are you perhaps confusing me with someone else? When did I write "Terms and conditions not read - your own fault" - even if only in spirit? I have at most times pointed out that the terms and conditions have been violated and therefore canceled? The whole thing, by the way, mostly without valuation, if with valuation then as you have already noted as "I find it also not good..." which is also so. I simply give a realistic and truthful answer.
I try to give an answer to the player who has a problem. Not everyone has to like it, but it should be correct in spirit. Of course, the problem is the casinos, as is clear from countless posts of mine, I share this position. But that does not change the current situation in which the respective player is. In some cases, however, the player is also to blame and I think sometimes you have to understand the casinos which have to comply with laws and at the same time are simply economic enterprises whose goal is to make a profit. Players who Deposit from other people's accounts or register multiple times are, for example, in my opinion, themselves to blame. If a player violates conditions, it is not necessarily his own fault, but the fact that the casino does not let it pass, can not be changed.
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
Lapalingo declares €8,000 win void
12th Jul. 2018, at 07:25 pm CEST#117
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
lowrollerplayer wrote on 07/12/2018 at 19:23
What the heck are T&Cs?
I only know AGB
Stop your flat provocation for once. Julian has said that now is quiet on the subject. Since everyone should stick to it.
Zockertyp89 wrote on 07/12/2018 at 19:25
Stop your flat provocation for once. Julian has said that there is now silence on the subject. Everyone should stick to it.
The admins and moderators have long lost the upper hand here. Here everyone can do what he wants. Provoke, rush, cheat people, etc. That's what you get when you have no assertiveness. Now that you know that you are first warned umpteen times, people do here but what they want.
Dokado1212 wrote on 07/12/2018 at 8:35 PM
The admins and moderators have but long lost the upper hand here. Here but everyone can do what he wants. Provoke, rush, cheat people, etc. That's what you get when you have no assertiveness. Now that you know that you are first warned umpteen times, people do here but what they want.
I see it differently. After my admonition, I specifically tried in my contribution to do without any provocation and to remain objective, as far as it goes in such a situation. I think Julian has solved this very well by only admonishing us how we say something, but not taking sides or forbidding opinion by closing the topic. A warning is a good solution, as long as it is followed by punishment, which is what happened in strkie's case.
Did you know guys that you are mainly involved in illegal gambling, you are liable to prosecution, precisely because in Germany online gambling is prohibited?!
And then to the lawyer and sue an online casino...hahahaha
Thus, of course, there is no right at all to a win, no matter what you play!
At best, you can get the deposited coal back, precisely because transactions such as PayPal are also ILLEGAL.
Exception SH - they have a few licenses (list of approved casinos are on the net)
What I do not understand,
why clarifies the admin in this regard is not, or have I read something over?
Lapalingo declares €8,000 win void
Nobody has liked this post so far
So Mike should be permanently banned for such statements.
Worst insults and death threats should be sufficient for this or?
And stkrie has related the loser to casino losses.
Could certainly have been done differently, but I do not think much worse than to call others paranoid.
This post has been translated automatically
Lapalingo declares €8,000 win void
Nobody has liked this post so far
The user Mike has already deleted himself. But yes he would have otherwise received a lifetime ban.
And stkrie is temporarily banned since I have already given him all warnings and also talked to him about his behavior just yesterday.
But the ban is only temporary. More I will not go into it here now. If you have any questions about this you can contact me via Communicator.
This post has been translated automatically
Lapalingo declares €8,000 win void
Nobody has liked this post so far
Even then I already said: I try to help instead of screaming senseless "fraud". From 90% of all complaint threads I stay away completely, because I already know the story in it anyway. Either a Curacao Casino or just violation of the bonus conditions. Since I'm slowly tired of it and of course this is not completely past me, but change or help I can not.
What you do, however, is actually paranoid. Wasn't it you who accused me of being a Wunderino employee on my first day here? Later I was also a troll and now I have double accounts? I'm just a normal person, with a single account and I don't work for any casino. I just have a different point of view and am portrayed as if I were the bad guy from the casino lobby.
This post has been translated automatically
Lapalingo declares €8,000 win void
Nobody has liked this post so far
So bones, I have written everything there is to say about it and also stand by it.
And yes, that's exactly how I feel about it because it also corresponds to the truth.
Remember the time when you had no idea about Online Casinos, as probably 90% of the people who register here in a complaint thread.
Wouldn't you have fallen for some casino back then?
Exactly these users you verklickerst but again and again the terms and conditions are set in stone and the casino is always in the right.
I do not understand a person who apparently has nothing of it and still defends fraudulent behavior.
That you can not do anything legally unfortunately is so.
But that many terms and conditions are nevertheless or just because of fraudulent and criminal that is also so.
Then no one needs your comments according to the motto: Players too stupid to read the terms and conditions - it's their own fault.
The problem is not the inexperienced players but the fraudulent casinos. But you always convey the former.
This post has been translated automatically
Lapalingo declares €8,000 win void
Nobody has liked this post so far
---- User was banned because he was banned on permanent time and had created a new account ----
This post has been translated automatically
Lapalingo declares €8,000 win void
Nobody has liked this post so far
I try to give an answer to the player who has a problem. Not everyone has to like it, but it should be correct in spirit. Of course, the problem is the casinos, as is clear from countless posts of mine, I share this position. But that does not change the current situation in which the respective player is. In some cases, however, the player is also to blame and I think sometimes you have to understand the casinos which have to comply with laws and at the same time are simply economic enterprises whose goal is to make a profit. Players who Deposit from other people's accounts or register multiple times are, for example, in my opinion, themselves to blame. If a player violates conditions, it is not necessarily his own fault, but the fact that the casino does not let it pass, can not be changed.
This post has been translated automatically
Lapalingo declares €8,000 win void
Nobody has liked this post so far
Stop your flat provocation for once. Julian has said that now is quiet on the subject. Since everyone should stick to it.
This post has been translated automatically
Lapalingo declares €8,000 win void
Nobody has liked this post so far
The admins and moderators have long lost the upper hand here. Here everyone can do what he wants. Provoke, rush, cheat people, etc. That's what you get when you have no assertiveness. Now that you know that you are first warned umpteen times, people do here but what they want.
This post has been translated automatically
Lapalingo declares €8,000 win void
Nobody has liked this post so far
I see it differently. After my admonition, I specifically tried in my contribution to do without any provocation and to remain objective, as far as it goes in such a situation. I think Julian has solved this very well by only admonishing us how we say something, but not taking sides or forbidding opinion by closing the topic. A warning is a good solution, as long as it is followed by punishment, which is what happened in strkie's case.
This post has been translated automatically
Lapalingo declares €8,000 win void
Nobody has liked this post so far
And then to the lawyer and sue an online casino...hahahaha
Thus, of course, there is no right at all to a win, no matter what you play!
At best, you can get the deposited coal back, precisely because transactions such as PayPal are also ILLEGAL.
Exception SH - they have a few licenses (list of approved casinos are on the net)
What I do not understand,
why clarifies the admin in this regard is not, or have I read something over?
This post has been translated automatically