Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Off topic & small talk: Chatterbox (Page 931)

Topic created on 14th Jan. 2019 | Page: 931 of 1173 | Answers: 11,723 | Views: 1,479,855
gamble1
Legend

Dan7ela wrote on 08/10/2023 at 19:45: I didn't see that a poll was closed. Wonder why they were displayed to me then. I was just giving my opinion on polls like others do .
Getting upset about it I don't find more meaningful than my opinion on a poll .



We say not everything you wrote is bad but if even one of the team in the case it was think in Andre what to say there must be something at least I would not claim in this case the fault is not with you


And of course I understand you want to be quickly eligible for compensation again and I do not deny you a participation in the past but currently you are really a little overshot the mark you must see for yourself

This post has been translated automatically

Blubbo33
Elite

gamble1 wrote on 08.10.2023 at 23:46:

We say not everything you wrote is bad but if even one of the team in the case it was believe in Andre what to say there must be something to it at least I would not claim in this case the error is not with you


And of course I understand you want to be quickly eligible for compensation again and I do not deny you a participation in the past but currently you are really a little overshot the mark you must see for yourself

She has not made a mistake!

She has followed all the rules, so the error is in the system!

Find it rather cheeky to insinuate her what and certainly not from a mod, and if the thread would be 10 years old, it is legitimate to collect 100 posts no matter how !

With what justification Andre has to criticize that?

If he starts, he has but ne lot to do what would have to be censored here!?

This post has been translated automatically

frapi07
Expert
gamble1 wrote on 08.10.2023 at 23:46:

We say not everything you have written is bad but if even one of the team in the case it was believe in Andre what to say there must be something at least I would not claim in this case the fault is not with you


And of course I understand you want to be quickly eligible for compensation again and I do not deny you a participation in the past but currently you are really a little overshot the mark you must see for yourself

I have extra not answered because it makes me partly speechless, as some people are not insightful. You can make mistakes, it's no problem. We are all people, not robots. Nobody is perfect. You can't know the rules. I have understanding for that. What I don't understand is when people don't understand and confess their misconduct despite being admonished and instructed, but try to justify their behavior ("I was simply giving my opinion on surveys, like others " )


The funny thing is that the said user was ranting earlier about people having multiple accounts, but in the same move she spams the forum full. Until GJ's (Andre) admonishment, she was only posting one-liners. That both offenses (spamming and coinfarming) are not allowed, the user does not understand, but that does not prevent her from pointing the finger at others.

I really hope GJ takes drastic measures (and yes I would be affected too).

@Blubbo so in your opinion is it fair to circumvent the system just to gain your own benefits from it? Long live selfishness.

This post has been translated automatically

gamble1
Legend

Blubbo33 wrote on 09/10/2023 at 00:11:

She did not make a mistake!

She followed all the rules, from there the mistake is in the system!

Find it rather cheeky to insinuate her what and certainly not from a mod, and if the thread would be 10 years old, it is legitimate to collect 100 posts no matter how !

With what justification Andre has to criticize that?

If he starts with it he has but ne lot to do what would have to be censored here!?

But Blubbo now but times hand on heart just because a system allows things or would be possible in theory it can still be a mistake or just wrong


If I now go to the office and register twice to collect double money it would be possible by the system sometimes is it right? I do not think so ! Just as I could agree with someone to fake a damage to the Insurance the system allows it or the means for it are there but it is still wrong and not ok

Someone who writes relatively meaningless posts or in a short time with sentences consisting of two words digs up several threads that are partly very old to get to the 100 posts can recognize in the core and I just assume whether this method is now rather positive or negative if you consider how many users write here over several years sometimes more sometimes less good and meaningful contributions to have a number on their contribution account

In this case I do not even deny her a participation in the past of course she has been a member of GJ for a long time but that can also be appreciated positively but her approach in this case can be criticized in my opinion even if the rules do not prohibit it for the time being to act so it is not appropriate

I have also had the one or the other bullshit times written so simply made mistakes but if something is not well received I have apologized and my mistake acknowledged bear it me no one does

This post has been translated automatically

Andre
Top Member
Blubbo33 wrote on 09/10/2023 at 00:11:

She did not make a mistake!

She followed all the rules, from there the mistake is in the system!

Find it rather cheeky to insinuate her what and certainly not from a mod, and if the thread would be 10 years old, it is legitimate to collect 100 posts no matter how !

With what justification Andre has to criticize that?

If he starts with it, he has but ne lot to do what would have to be censored here?

Oh man, if I have to read something like that again.

It is my right and my job to keep the forum "clean" and that includes the maintenance of clarity, as minimalist as that may sound. In my first post I directly tried to smooth the waters a bit. I also wrote to Daniela via Communicator and we had a normal exchange. I am also convinced that she is not "mad" at me, but understood my point - just as I understood her point. It was simply a matter of the frequency of posts being too high in proportion and especially commenting on old, completed surveys not making sense. I don't know exactly how to put this, but the forum thrives on organic development. Current topics should be continued and old threads are primarily for information gathering.




This post has been translated automatically

hustlehoff
Expert
Am at JackpotPiraten and BingBong since today suddenly no longer verified, and can not play the free spins always says I should make KYC. Although I was always verified before, anyone had this before? What documents do I have to upload again? Before I go there in the Live Chat and ask (which is not possible now at night anyway)

This post has been translated automatically

BinGOLDiG
Expert

hustlehoff wrote on 09.10.2023 at 03:44 clock: Bin at JackpotPiraten and BingBong since today suddenly no longer verified, and can not play the free spins always says I should make KYC. Although I was always verified before, has anyone had this before? What documents do I have to upload again? Before I go there in the Live Chat and ask (what now at night anyway not possible)

So I had to upload only my ID card! But I also moved and wanted to change only my address!

The other Verification process does not work with me at first, without uploading documents! But are verified at the latest against 08:30 clock if you upload the ID card before

This post has been translated automatically

BinGOLDiG
Expert
Andre wrote on 09.10.2023 at 01:35:
Oh man, having to read something like this again.

It is my right and my job to keep the forum "clean" and that includes maintaining clarity, as minimalistic as that may sound. In my first post I directly tried to smooth the waters a bit. I also wrote to Daniela via Communicator and we had a normal exchange. I am also convinced that she is not "mad" at me, but understood my point - just as I understood her point. It was simply a matter of the frequency of posts being too high in proportion and especially commenting on old, completed surveys not making sense. I don't know exactly how to put this, but the forum thrives on organic development. Current topics should be continued and old threads are primarily for information gathering.





But I wanted to have said that even before the gj coin compensation there were already people who have dug out very old contributions and commented!

Once even the Daniel had commented, so that my heart stopped first and I thought he would have come online again 😂 has already taken some time until I had noticed that the contribution was from 2019 🤦‍♀️😂

This post has been translated automatically

frapi07
Expert
BinGOLD wrote on 09.10.2023 at 06:36:
But I wanted to have said that even before the gj coin compensation there were already people who have dug out very old posts and commented!

Once even the Daniel had commented, so that my heart stopped first and I thought he would have come online again 😂 has already taken some time until I had noticed that the contribution was from 2019 🤦‍♀️😂

This is different. The small but subtle difference is that polls were dug up here. It's pointless to comment on a poll that's already finished, especially if you only add 3 words to it and do it 5-6 times in a short time. What kind of added value should there be?

This post has been translated automatically

gamble1
Legend
Someone there who happens to be able to test something at stake7 ?

I currently have another payout open and just wanted to log in but get the message I have excluded myself which I have not and the support says it is a bug that affects all players

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics10th May. 2024 at 12:45 pm CEST

GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately