Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Off topic & small talk: Crime & Myths (Page 6)

Topic created on 06th Feb. 2023 | Page: 6 of 6 | Answers: 85 | Views: 6,956
Stromberg
Legend
Anonym
Stromberg wrote on 12.02.2023 at 13:29:
Now you're having a laugh with the silent readers, aren't you? 🤣✌️


I take note of these videos, just like the Ouija Board, one of the most famous cases is that of the Gulf Breeze Six
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz9Rijabb4o&ab_channel=MythenMetzger
Furthermore, I believe that there is a connection between these paranormal events and the cases of the "Enfield Poltergeist" or Rosenheim Exorcism around Anneliese Michel. These are perfectly documented cases with videos, original sounds etc. Partly these are the most inexplicable recordings that have ever been made in our history

This post has been translated automatically

Xavi22
Expert
Ever since I have been interested in Crime & Mistery, one case has never let me go. That was the Frauke Liebs case.

Appropriately, there are good videos from Insolito on YouTube, but also a well-researched podcast from star.

I must honestly confess that I am one of the few who does not assume that she was kidnapped and held by a person (or persons) known to her. Both the police and the family assume so, after all, since she would not have gotten into a car with anyone else.

For me, the phone calls speak a different language. If Frauke knew her perpetrator, the Risk would be much too high that she would mention him. Especially during the last phone call, when she herself might have assumed that it would be her last call. How can the perpetrator keep control that it doesn't happen? In my opinion, only because she can't reveal anything about him. She doesn't know him, maybe she only sees him in a blur on the spot or even a masked perpetrator?

Overall, the case is incredibly tragic for the family and friends. As is so often the case, the family is broken. Something similar, for example, with Tanja Mühlinghaus, whom I just took a closer look at again.

Has anyone of you ever dealt with the case of Frauke Liebs? How do you see it?

This post has been translated automatically

refucs
Top Member
It looks like it was a tragic accident, but nothing is confirmed yet.

But the fact is: Nicola Bulley was found dead in the river Wyre about 3 weeks after she disappeared. RiP

My first assumption was also that she fell into the river, all indications spoke for it. Let's see if in retrospect more comes to light what exactly happened. But if it was an accident/medical emergency, it is of course more than tragic. The poor family and the poor dog.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym

refucs wrote on 21.02.2023 at 06:59: It looks like it was a tragic accident, but nothing is confirmed yet.

But the fact is: Nicola Bulley was found dead in the river Wyre 3 weeks after she disappeared. RiP

My first assumption was also that she fell into the river, all indications spoke for it. Let's see if in retrospect more comes to light what exactly happened. But if it was an accident/medical emergency, it is of course more than tragic. The poor family and the poor dog.

RIP also from me. Am very curious what the autopsy will bring to light now. I found the theory of drowning at the beginning but honestly not very plausible. The relatives said that she never goes directly to the water. She must have fallen directly from a bridge into the deeper water where the current was. That she slowly wades into this river and then drowns would be strange, wouldn't it?


But that the dog didn't run after her when she drifted off, hmmm. Maybe it happened so fast that he didn't realize what was happening. For me still very many ? in the case.

@xavi never heard of the case, I'll take a look when I get a chance


Watch at the moment often these videos of the interrogations in the USA. Something like this:

This post has been translated automatically

Falke
Expert
There are a lot of "True Crime" episodes on Youtube. They are presented there quite exciting. But don't watch too many of them at once, you can easily get paranoid.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
I also hope that the case of Nicola Bulley will be cleared up, the site is after all 1.6 km away and according to various sources, the river there had a level of only 60 cm, others speak of a depth of up to 4.50 meters. In addition, there are other open questions and allegations,...

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym

Xavi22 wrote on 02/15/2023 at 3:26 pm: One case has never let me go since I became interested in Crime & Mistery. That was the Frauke Liebs case.

Appropriately, there are good videos from Insolito on YouTube, but also a well-researched podcast from star.

I must honestly confess that I am one of the few who does not assume that she was kidnapped and held by a person (or persons) known to her. Both the police and the family assume so, after all, since she would not have gotten into a car with anyone else.

For me, the phone calls speak a different language. If Frauke knew her perpetrator, the Risk would be much too high that she would mention him. Especially during the last phone call, when she herself might have assumed that it would be her last call. How can the perpetrator keep control that it doesn't happen? In my opinion, only because she can't reveal anything about him. She doesn't know him, maybe she only sees him in a blur on the spot or even a masked perpetrator?


Has anyone of you ever dealt with the case of Frauke Liebs? How do you see it?

I have also watched the Frauke Liebs case several times on Insolito. During the reenacted phone call, I always get a shiver down my spine, especially when she says 'Mama' three times. The fact that she was allowed to make regular phone calls at all, and later also emphasized that she would not be coming back, amazed me; moreover, she sounded neither nervous nor frightened.
I had first thought of the criminal case Höxter, however, there is no evidence. I don't have a real explanation, maybe the perpetrator was overcome by fear to murder her, which is why Frauke survived a few more days.

I am convinced that Frauke uttered words and sentences in the phone call specifically to convey a message.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym

SlottiKarotti wrote on 21.02.2023 at 13:21:

Watch at the moment myself often these videos of the interrogations in the USA. Something like this:


My English is unfortunately too bad to watch something like that for hours. But recently I found a channel that translates the interrogations. Very interesting!
https://www.youtube.com/@Mudaro222/videos

By the way, he himself had a near fatal altercation when he saved a woman's life. All documented...
https://youtu.be/T3gbbEkcRy8

This post has been translated automatically

Olli_Eule
Elite
Today, there was another XY file and the case of Sonja Engelbrecht.
The young people with whom Sonja has arranged to meet have delivered quite beautiful contradictions.
Allegedly they sat in the pub at a table of 4 and there were only tables of 6.
The schoolmate, who saw Sonja last, allegedly asked the streetcar driver for the time, but that is normally not possible during the ride. And there were still some inconsistencies and contradictions. Or it was all coincidences.
The police suspect that she got into the car with a stranger!

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym



A super documentary about internet activist and co-founder of Reddit, Aaron Swartz. How an intelligent young man fights for freedom and justice and comes to a very tragic end.

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics27th Apr. 2024 at 12:43 pm CEST

GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately