Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Online Casinos in general: Charge of unauthorized gambling ( 285 StGB) (Page 23)

Topic created on 23rd Jan. 2021 | Page: 23 of 23 | Answers: 226 | Views: 66,757
Anonymus
Rookie

Telsos wrote on March 25th, 2024 at 5:25 pm:

Hey,

don't worry about it. I also received the summons as a defendant at the beginning of February.
I would definitely advise you to contact a lawyer. I did the same and he requested access to the file. Once the file is there, he will discuss your options with you.
In my case, it's currently still open what will happen, from a dismissal of the case to a penalty order with payment of a fine, but don't let it spoil your day, bad thoughts and/or upsets won't make it better or worse.
Instead, take it as a positive reason to stop gambling. That's what I've decided for myself.
VG

Hi Telsos,

any news from you yet? Adjustment? What did you find out?

This post has been translated automatically

Ladybug1998
Visitor
Hi folks,
Short update.

Received access to file and discussed with lawyer.
File is 60 pages of transactions and of course it was the Sparkasse that reported me.

The lawyer is now going to write a letter asking for the proceedings to be discontinued on the grounds of "first offender", ignorance, etc.'

I'll keep you up to date

This post has been translated automatically

Langhans
Expert

Ladybug1998 wrote on 06.05.2024 at 11:45 am: Moin guys,
Short update.

File inspection received and discussed with lawyer.
File amounts to 60 pages of all transactions and of course it was the savings bank that reported me.

The lawyer is now going to write a letter asking for the proceedings to be discontinued on the grounds of "first offender", ignorance, etc.'

I'll keep you up to date

60 pages of deposits and withdrawals in connection with casinos? Or what do the 60 pages consist of?

This post has been translated automatically

garfield68
Elite
i think that will probably only include all transactions to the casino and payouts. 60 pages is of course quite a lot.

This post has been translated automatically

Langhans
Expert

garfield68 wrote on 06.05.2024 at 12:20: I think there will certainly only be all transactions to the casino or payouts from it. 60 pages is of course quite a lot.

which is why I asked again, somewhat incredulously I don't know how tightly meshed such a "page" is structured, but it could be a four-digit number of transactions, which I would describe as gigantic. Maybe it's only 5 per page with lots of details in the subject line or similar....but that would still be 300 in number. Heavy in any case

This post has been translated automatically

Ladybug1998
Visitor
Ne it concerns all transactions not only those related to the casino.

This post has been translated automatically

btssultan
Amateur
Ladybug1998 wrote on 18.04.2024 at 13:24:

Yeah exactly I'm freaking out because I'm studying law and could never Risk an entry. Can you give me the assurance that nothing will happen after the CID questionnaire? After such a letter, either a letter from the public prosecutor's office about the discontinuation of the proceedings or a penalty order. Only then will it be much more expensive and riskier to call in a lawyer. You should inform yourself well, thank you.

Going to the police or, in your case, the criminal investigation department and answering a questionnaire can have a negative impact on the proceedings. Just because you mean well doesn't mean that the state means well, this is just about gathering information about you in advance.

Same with the police, in the worst case they mean well (typical for the good citizen, friend and helper, I have to tell the truth, lenient punishment etc.) but unfortunately the officer only writes a memory log of what happened to you, with vague short notes, and the words can be twisted in your mouth.

Whether you fill out the questionnaire or not, you should not be blamed for protecting yourself, but it is your right and the public prosecutor's office will contact you one way or the other, either about the dismissal or with a summons that there will be a court hearing and that they want to hear you about the case mentioned.

And by the way, you can start and finish a law degree even with a criminal record. There are enough murderers in this world who have tried to study law while in prison - stupid example, I know, but in my opinion, this is more of a trivial offense and, if it is ever questioned in an application, can probably be explained without any problems.

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics6th May. 2024 at 10:54 pm CEST

GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately