Yes, unfortunately true. As long as it is worth it there will be no end. So I hope GJ will set the conditions so high that it is just not worth the effort anymore. I mean, there is no disadvantage anyway. You can then just give the ratings later, whether I do that with 100 posts or 1000 posts is irrelevant. Since you can only do that once anyway, nothing is lost or you have no disadvantage.
It has for these people probably the disadvantage that it is not fast enough. One wants everything directly. 🙄
Maybe it would make sense to adjust the compensation for casino reviews and, for example, the most original / best casino review per casino once or twice a month to award with a higher sum and in compensation no longer reward everyone. Or to reward the best three. By which is not meant that you have to praise the casino if you are not convinced of it. The others get then just nothing, but can try again and again. So that it becomes for Gj no loss and for those, which collect now on devil come out, an incentive represents. But maybe that is not thought through, just occurred to me.
Well, let's wait and see what will be decided after the team meeting.
I guess it has the disadvantage for these people that it's not fast enough. After all, you want everything right away. 🙄
Maybe it would make sense to adjust the compensation for casino reviews and, for example, the most original / best casino review per casino once or twice a month to award with a higher sum and in compensation no longer reward everyone. Or to reward the best three. By which is not meant that you have to praise the casino if you are not convinced of it. The others get then just nothing, but can try again and again. So that it becomes for Gj no loss and for those, which collect now on devil come out, an incentive represents. But maybe that is not thought through, just occurred to me.
Well, lets wait and see what is decided after the team meeting.
Ooh no..Please don't!😵💫 I'm always unlucky with lotteries 😂
well then from me... Oh man...today is really one of the harder days here at GambleJoe. There are abysses... financially and also humanly (with it are not meant now you)
Saphira wrote on 07.10.2023 at 23:45:It probably has the disadvantage for these people that it does not go fast enough. After all, you want everything directly. 🙄
Maybe it would make sense to adjust the compensation for casino reviews and for example award the most original/best casino review per casino once or twice a month with a higher sum and in compensation not reward everyone anymore. Or to reward the best three. By which is not meant that you have to praise the casino if you are not convinced of it. The others get then just nothing, but can try again and again. So that it becomes for Gj no loss and for those, which collect now on devil come out, an incentive represents. But maybe that is not thought through, just occurred to me.
Well, let's wait and see what is decided after the team meeting.
Or limit it that only one casino rating per month is remunerated? I see no problem in it. To whom the forum is really important and not only the rewards, which can live also very well with it, if it 2 or 3 years at time need, until all casinos listed here with a remuneration were evaluated. Lost would be one there also nothing.
Stake7 does not verify on the WE ? Uploaded all my documents now last night exactly payment method at about 15:00 and ID and electricity bill in the middle of the night (that's when the links arrived first)
So first payout made on 05.10 until now nothing processed and nothing verified
Somehow everything is not so really timely alone Pino has me today 4 withdrawals after not even 3 hours on hold done
I guess it has the disadvantage for these people that it's not fast enough. After all, you want everything right away. 🙄
Maybe it would make sense to adjust the compensation for casino reviews and, for example, the most original / best casino review per casino once or twice a month to award with a higher sum and in compensation no longer reward everyone. Or to reward the best three. By which is not meant that you have to praise the casino if you are not convinced of it. The others get then just nothing, but can try again and again. So that it becomes for Gj no loss and for those, which collect now on devil come out, an incentive represents. But maybe that is not thought through, just occurred to me.
Well, let's wait and see what is decided after the team meeting.
To reward only the best would require a lot of effort. You have to read through all the reviews and that for each casino and betting provider. On the other hand: what criteria? What is a "good" and what is a "less good" rating? That would bring a lot of disadvantages.
Falko wrote on 08.10.2023 at 00:59:
Or limit it that only one casino rating per month is remunerated ? I see no problem in it. To whom the forum is really important and not only the rewards, which can also live very well with it, if it takes 2 or 3 years of time, until all casinos listed here have been evaluated with a remuneration. Lost would be one there also nothing.
A limit as you suggest it would not stop coinfarming. Then you just advertise 1x a month a casino and logs out. Coinfarming can only be stopped if the standards are set so high that it is no longer worthwhile. How to stop it: set a minimum of words (100 words) for users who have the rank "newbie" and "visitor". Otherwise we have such heroes, who then just try to get together the contributions on cramp and write only one sentence, which brings no added value for the thread (especially with completed surveys). In addition, you should unlock the compensation for casino reviews from 1000 posts.
I know my suggestions are very strict, but I personally don't see any other solution there. You have to be aggressive about it. GJ did try a softer approach at first, but as you can see, it doesn't work. Not because the basic idea is bad, but because the hurdles have simply been set too low.
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
It has for these people probably the disadvantage that it is not fast enough. One wants everything directly. 🙄
Maybe it would make sense to adjust the compensation for casino reviews and, for example, the most original / best casino review per casino once or twice a month to award with a higher sum and in compensation no longer reward everyone. Or to reward the best three. By which is not meant that you have to praise the casino if you are not convinced of it. The others get then just nothing, but can try again and again. So that it becomes for Gj no loss and for those, which collect now on devil come out, an incentive represents. But maybe that is not thought through, just occurred to me.
Well, let's wait and see what will be decided after the team meeting.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
Ooh no..Please don't!😵💫 I'm always unlucky with lotteries 😂
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post:
Saphira
you don't get paid for a survey. So don't do it
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post:
Saphira
For some you do.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
Wouldn't be a lottery in that sense, but a reward for quality
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post:
Hanshanshans
well then from me... Oh man...today is really one of the harder days here at GambleJoe. There are abysses... financially and also humanly (with it are not meant now you)
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
Or limit it that only one casino rating per month is remunerated? I see no problem in it. To whom the forum is really important and not only the rewards, which can live also very well with it, if it 2 or 3 years at time need, until all casinos listed here with a remuneration were evaluated. Lost would be one there also nothing.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
So first payout made on 05.10 until now nothing processed and nothing verified
Somehow everything is not so really timely alone Pino has me today 4 withdrawals after not even 3 hours on hold done
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
To reward only the best would require a lot of effort. You have to read through all the reviews and that for each casino and betting provider. On the other hand: what criteria? What is a "good" and what is a "less good" rating? That would bring a lot of disadvantages.
A limit as you suggest it would not stop coinfarming. Then you just advertise 1x a month a casino and logs out. Coinfarming can only be stopped if the standards are set so high that it is no longer worthwhile. How to stop it: set a minimum of words (100 words) for users who have the rank "newbie" and "visitor". Otherwise we have such heroes, who then just try to get together the contributions on cramp and write only one sentence, which brings no added value for the thread (especially with completed surveys). In addition, you should unlock the compensation for casino reviews from 1000 posts.
I know my suggestions are very strict, but I personally don't see any other solution there. You have to be aggressive about it. GJ did try a softer approach at first, but as you can see, it doesn't work. Not because the basic idea is bad, but because the hurdles have simply been set too low.
This post has been translated automatically