Online Casinos in general: Experience with Fortune Legends - the new online casino on GambleJoe (Page 2)
Topic created on 02nd Sep. 2019 | Page: 2 of 10 | Answers: 95 | Views: 29,349
Anonym
Former Member
Experience with Fortune Legends - the new online casino on GambleJoe
2nd Sep. 2019, at 09:22 pm CEST#11
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Konnts of course not let and have times 25 euros PSC paid. What can I say: If I give my boss a job like that, I'll be lucky if I don't get fired
Normally I am always pro Gamblejoe, but: That you are not embarrassed to advertise such a casino? If you value quality, I would remove it again. So immature and technically vulnerable
What exactly should they find out for themselves
Experience with Fortune Legends - the new online casino on GambleJoe
2nd Sep. 2019, at 10:16 pm CEST#12
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Logged on.... . When I go to the account area and click on transactions, personal data nothing happens. It says something about missleading or something else. So technically already a disaster. How to set the limits if this does not work? It is certainly done on purpose. In the account area is what works only Deposit, withdraw and log out. If you click on e.g. play safe nothing comes at all. So there is no shortage of people who can fix this in no time. Probably rather in casino managers and what also belongs to it the times him direction benevolent and not corrupt go. Such a thing does not belong listed here. Just like Magic red or GOWILD
Experience with Fortune Legends - the new online casino on GambleJoe
2nd Sep. 2019, at 10:46 pm CEST#13
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Since you can fill the vault there with Roulette, the spontaneous idea would come to me if someone plays there and red + black each with a 50er occupied he can build up a slot credit. The only thing that must not come is the green 0. In the description it said that from the slot play and also from all of the roulette bets 0.05% real money flows into the vault purely....
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
Experience with Fortune Legends - the new online casino on GambleJoe
3rd Sep. 2019, at 01:14 am CEST#14
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Had deposited there once a few weeks ago and wanted to gamble relaxed from the cell phone.
After the page crashed several times and no single game had loaded reasonably I gambled from the PC. Has also not brought much... constantly crashes and jerking.
I had my account closed right after that.
If I want to gamble then I want to gamble and not constantly upset about crashes. Since the casinos can be so new or not.
I understand and accept your opinions, as well as Christoph's opinion, which he can freely express here - the review didn't turn out very well either. But what bothers me is your mentality. You really notice how many here are looking for a reason to criticize us all the time. Please loosen up a bit.
Whoever meets the minimum requirements can be accepted by us - even if the casino is not perfect. Every casino that can prove an EU license and we assume that this casino will not refuse payouts without reason or other serious messes will occur, can basically be accepted by us.
We proceed as follows:
We get requests from Online Casinos that want to be listed with us.We look at the casinos, research and if we find nothing seriously negative and the licenses fit, then we respond
We name our price, which we want to have per player.
If the casino is willing to pay our price (which is the rule, since our prices are lower than those of affilaites of comparable size), we test it ourselves with an account that does not suggest GambleJoe. In other words, the casino usually does not know that someone from GambleJoe is testing the casino.
Then we record the casino and publish a test report as soon as possible. Our copywriter may and should publish his own opinion and experience uncensored in this test.
Since we can have a good but also a bad day and we can also overlook deficiencies, our test report must not and cannot always reflect reality. So that our visitors (not every visitor is a member here) can better assess a casino, we also have user reviews, which - with very few exceptions - are also not censored.
Our members and visitors can then form a picture of the casino based on our ratings and the ratings of the users and decide whether they want to play there or not.
Of course, we do not accept casinos that we know from the beginning are risky for us, our visitors or members due to their license or past behavior. However, any casino that does not possess these negative characteristics at the time of admission can be admitted in principle.
I personally think that this is a good thing. If we would only include perfect casinos, then we would only have a handful of casinos. If we only included perfect providers, then there would be almost exclusively positive reviews and this leads to torches and pitchforks, because then the accusation would come that we write reviews ourselves and everything is fake
Since there are very few German-language portals where the users themselves have their say, potential customers would also have little opportunity to inform themselves about a particular casino. If FortuneLegend turns out to be bad in the long run, then the reviews on our site will save potential customers frustration and hassle.
Someone asked why we don't have some well-known casinos in our comparison. Well, the reason for this is sometimes many of our users who use every opportunity to unpack torches and pitchforks. Many casinos also do not want to be listed in such an environment. Many casinos do not like our "marketing". When I published the guide articles back then, two casinos jumped off and didn't want to work with us anymore, because this could have a deterrent effect. In fact, there are always users (mostly very young players who are at the beginning of their gaming career) who have stopped gambling because of us. There are not many but still ...
Also the emergence of a community in the German-speaking area was not seen with pleasure. A casino, which is on our greylist, advised us not to let the players have their say: A bad idea, we were told. Our way was not the easiest and partly risky. In the short and medium term, our competitors passed us financially. We drove an old VW Golf, while our competitors started with sports cars and had a head start with them.
How did FortuneLegends get started?
The whole thing went as follows:
A manager from Videoslots wrote to me saying that he left Videoslots because he was looking for new challenges. He said Videoslots is still a top casino but it has become so gigantic and rigid that he can no longer contribute and develop freely as he used to.
The manager said that he now works at Mobilt Ltd. and whether FortuneLegend Casino could be interesting for us.
I looked at the site, saw the following and my interest was piqued
Christoph told me that the casino has some technical shortcomings.
I spoke with the former Videoslots manager. I told him that the Sloagan "no bonus, no problems" leaves a very positive impression on me and I would like to see it in our comparison. However, I don't advise it until the technical issues are fixed. We can record it but the community will surely tear you apart and that won't be a good start.
The manager told me that he will address the issues and get in touch with Matthias as soon as they are fixed.
The casino has been included and unfortunately it looks like there are still problems.
The casino is run by a relatively young (in the gambling industry) company. However, I definitely see potential, as I believe to see an honest and trustworthy foundation. Transparency and trustworthiness are for me personally the most important characteristics of a good casino and that's why it was included. I can be wrong of course but I think that this casino basically deserves a chance and I hope that in the future this will develop into a top casino a la Videoslots, SlotsMillion, sunmaker, sunnyplayer(**). And if it doesn't, then it will just go down as a NoName.
Although I see potential, we have written and published an honest review (which unfortunately could not be positive). Of course, you can also rate the casino objectively (positively or negatively), as long as you have already had experiences there. However, we do not force you to play there and we do not see you as a guinea pig either!
(**) For guests and new community members: I mean casinos that do not have "traps" like the 5€ Maxbet rule for Bonuses in their terms and conditions - unfortunately a rarity in this industry. Such bonus rules lead, especially with inexperienced players, again and again to the cancellation of wins or the refusal of payouts. Unfortunately, the law allows such terms and conditions and therefore the market must eliminate this problem - I try to change the market by deliberately pushing casinos that do not have such rules or these rules are implemented in such a way that inexperienced players can not accidentally violate them. We are not only pursuing financial goals with GambleJoe - believe it or not.
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
Experience with Fortune Legends - the new online casino on GambleJoe
3rd Sep. 2019, at 04:30 am CEST#16
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Daniel wrote on 03/09/2019 at 04:05: I understand and accept your opinions, as well as Christoph's opinion, which he can freely express here - the review did not turn out very well, after all. But what bothers me is your mentality. You really notice how many here are looking for a reason to criticize us all the time. Please loosen up a bit.
Whoever meets the minimum requirements can be accepted by us - even if the casino is not perfect. Any casino that can prove an EU license and we assume that this casino will not refuse payouts without reason or other serious messes will occur, can basically be accepted by us.
We proceed as follows:
We get requests from Online Casinos that want to be listed with us.We look at the casinos, research and if we find nothing seriously negative and the licenses fit, then we respond
We name our price, which we want to have per player.
If the casino is willing to pay our price (which is the rule, since our prices are lower than those of affilaites of comparable size), we test it ourselves with an account that does not suggest GambleJoe. In other words, the casino usually does not know that someone from GambleJoe is testing the casino.
Then we record the casino and publish a test report as soon as possible. Our copywriter may and should publish his own opinion and experience uncensored in this test.
Since we can have a good but also a bad day and we can also overlook deficiencies, our test report must not and cannot always reflect reality. So that our visitors (not every visitor is a member here) can better assess a casino, we also have user reviews, which - with very few exceptions - are also not censored.
Our members and visitors can then form a picture of the casino based on our ratings and the ratings of the users and decide whether they want to play there or not.
Of course, we do not accept casinos that we know from the beginning are risky for us, our visitors or members due to their license or past behavior. However, any casino that does not possess these negative characteristics at the time of admission can be admitted in principle.
I personally think that this is a good thing. If we would only include perfect casinos, then we would only have a handful of casinos. If we only included perfect providers, then there would be almost exclusively positive reviews and this leads to torches and pitchforks, because then the accusation would come that we write reviews ourselves and everything is fake
Since there are very few German-language portals where the users themselves have their say, potential customers would also have little opportunity to inform themselves about a particular casino. If FortuneLegend turns out to be bad in the long run, then the reviews on our site will save potential customers frustration and hassle.
Someone asked why we don't have some well-known casinos in our comparison. Well, the reason for this is sometimes many of our users who use every opportunity to unpack torches and pitchforks. Many casinos also do not want to be listed in such an environment. Many casinos do not like our "marketing". When I published the guide articles back then, two casinos jumped off and didn't want to work with us anymore, because this could have a deterrent effect. In fact, there are always users (mostly very young players who are at the beginning of their gaming career) who have stopped gambling because of us. There are not many but still ...
Also the emergence of a community in the German-speaking area was not seen with pleasure. A casino, which is on our greylist, advised us not to let the players have their say: A bad idea, we were told. Our way was not the easiest and partly risky. In the short and medium term, our competitors passed us financially. We drove an old VW Golf, while our competitors started with sports cars and had a head start with them.
How did FortuneLegends get started?
The whole thing went as follows:
A manager from Videoslots wrote to me saying that he left Videoslots because he was looking for new challenges. He said that Videoslots is still a top casino, but it has become so huge that he can no longer contribute and develop freely as he used to.
The manager said that he now works at Mobilt Ltd. and whether FortuneLegend Casino could be interesting for us.
I looked at the site, saw the following and my interest was piqued
Christoph told me that the casino has some technical shortcomings.
I spoke with the former Videoslots manager. I told him that the Sloagan "no bonus, no problems" leaves a very positive impression on me and I would like to see it in our comparison. However, I don't advise it until the technical issues are fixed. We can record it but the community will surely tear you apart and that won't be a good start.
The manager told me that he will address the issues and get in touch with Matthias as soon as they are fixed.
The casino has been included and unfortunately it looks like there are still problems.
The casino is run by a relatively young (in the gambling industry) company. However, I definitely see potential, as I believe to see an honest and trustworthy foundation. Transparency and trustworthiness are for me personally the most important characteristics of a good casino and that's why it was included. I can be wrong of course but I think that this casino basically deserves a chance and I hope that in the future this will develop into a top casino a la Videoslots, SlotsMillion, sunmaker, sunnyplayer(**). And if it doesn't, then it will just go down as a NoName.
Although I see potential, we have written and published an honest review (which unfortunately could not be positive). Of course, you can also rate the casino objectively (positively or negatively), as long as you have already had experiences there. However, we do not force you to play there and we do not see you as a guinea pig either!
(**) For guests and new community members: I mean casinos that do not have "traps" like the 5€ Maxbet rule for Bonuses in their terms and conditions - unfortunately a rarity in this industry. Such bonus rules lead, especially with inexperienced players, again and again to the cancellation of wins or the refusal of payouts. Unfortunately, the law allows such terms and conditions and therefore the market must eliminate this problem - I try to do this by deliberately pushing casinos that do not have such rules or these rules are implemented so that inexperienced players can not accidentally violate them.
Point 3 and 4 you have listed twice or are the same oh have already seen it nvm
Daniel, thanks for the comments. I can understand that the financial aspect of promoting casino candidates is appealing. But you are "playing" with your most important asset, the participants in this forum. There are certainly 200 here who are trusted with common sense and who approach the matter with a certain amount of detachment. You don't have to worry about them, they will be able to digest the 20 Euros paid in for testing. But then there are about 500 completely crazy people, who push several hundred into the casino without thinking much, because it is on a list and "then it can't be bad". They then get out pitchforks and torches and spread unrest.
I would think it would be better to offer casinos an "acclimation and improvement period". This is where they can shine during the time with special test offers and thus gradually learn to swim in the shark tank with the other casinos through healthy feedback. Pack them also a special list and call these "the newcomers for 2020".
Right now, what the casino has to offer is a mid-level disaster. There are about 1500 casinos on the market that offer a DEEPLY better gaming experience, and about 50 of them I'd choose over Fortune Legends' appearance even if I got a 1000% bonus. Not that I would put any value on something like that, it's just to make it clear which direction it's going.
In my opinion (just my personal one), the casino has made a real pipe-cracker with the false start. To let an unfinished product loose on the customer is a strong piece in the industry. I for one will certainly not look in there again, not even with 1000 freespins
Don't forget, we're talking about real money here, and as we all know, that's where friendship ends.
Otherwise the GJ appearance is a round thing. Keep it up!
Experience with Fortune Legends - the new online casino on GambleJoe
3rd Sep. 2019, at 12:32 pm CEST#19
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Zockertyp89 wrote on 02/09/2019 at 19:01: So we should pay the casino money and then still give feedback to improve? I find honestly more than Grenzwertig of you...
As mentioned: With e.g. a no-deposit bonus, that would have been something else. So I find that very brazen.
And the no Deposit bonus fixes the slow verifzieren and the technical flaws? As long as it has such shortcomings do not play there at all, if you know that a casino meets you at the Verification with a big grin and the <Herausforderung>player rings...I can do without it directly and do not have to do that again.
The deficiencies are there guaranteed to a large extent known and in this sense it is as you write brazen sowas to publish from the casino manager. If the deficiencies had been addressed and the manager is sure that now not much is missing... only then he could call and vllt. in the flight of emotions give out a few wagerfree spins.
That it was listed here is not a problem for me, in my opinion, any casino can be listed here as long as you evaluate it halfway honestly.</Herausforderung>
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
Experience with Fortune Legends - the new online casino on GambleJoe
The thing that gives me the most stomach ache with the casino is the verification.
Daniel has yes when he himself still played, often enough stressed that it is important that is paid out quickly. If you then get mails in Finnish, documents disappear and the payouts can be canceled as long as (and we know what very many from the forum then do).... Then I'm sure what there is then for a theater here.
And when I read that the games neither on Pc or mobile run properly and the games crash again and again. Then I ask myself seriously, what this casino has to look here
But the good thing is, no one is forced to pay in there.
Since I vow me the Twin Casino, which is also still quite new here. There I have today the first time deposited and paid out and this was in 5 minutes through! Class. It goes evenly also in such a way.
Experience with Fortune Legends - the new online casino on GambleJoe
Nobody has liked this post so far
Normally I am always pro Gamblejoe, but: That you are not embarrassed to advertise such a casino? If you value quality, I would remove it again. So immature and technically vulnerable
What exactly should they find out for themselves
This post has been translated automatically
Experience with Fortune Legends - the new online casino on GambleJoe
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Experience with Fortune Legends - the new online casino on GambleJoe
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Experience with Fortune Legends - the new online casino on GambleJoe
Nobody has liked this post so far
After the page crashed several times and no single game had loaded reasonably I gambled from the PC. Has also not brought much... constantly crashes and jerking.
I had my account closed right after that.
If I want to gamble then I want to gamble and not constantly upset about crashes. Since the casinos can be so new or not.
This post has been translated automatically
Experience with Fortune Legends - the new online casino on GambleJoe
Liked this post:
garfield68, 
RiverSong
Whoever meets the minimum requirements can be accepted by us - even if the casino is not perfect. Every casino that can prove an EU license and we assume that this casino will not refuse payouts without reason or other serious messes will occur, can basically be accepted by us.
We proceed as follows:
Of course, we do not accept casinos that we know from the beginning are risky for us, our visitors or members due to their license or past behavior. However, any casino that does not possess these negative characteristics at the time of admission can be admitted in principle.
I personally think that this is a good thing. If we would only include perfect casinos, then we would only have a handful of casinos. If we only included perfect providers, then there would be almost exclusively positive reviews and this leads to torches and pitchforks, because then the accusation would come that we write reviews ourselves and everything is fake
Since there are very few German-language portals where the users themselves have their say, potential customers would also have little opportunity to inform themselves about a particular casino. If FortuneLegend turns out to be bad in the long run, then the reviews on our site will save potential customers frustration and hassle.
Someone asked why we don't have some well-known casinos in our comparison. Well, the reason for this is sometimes many of our users who use every opportunity to unpack torches and pitchforks. Many casinos also do not want to be listed in such an environment. Many casinos do not like our "marketing". When I published the guide articles back then, two casinos jumped off and didn't want to work with us anymore, because this could have a deterrent effect. In fact, there are always users (mostly very young players who are at the beginning of their gaming career) who have stopped gambling because of us. There are not many but still ...
Also the emergence of a community in the German-speaking area was not seen with pleasure. A casino, which is on our greylist, advised us not to let the players have their say: A bad idea, we were told. Our way was not the easiest and partly risky. In the short and medium term, our competitors passed us financially. We drove an old VW Golf, while our competitors started with sports cars and had a head start with them.
How did FortuneLegends get started?
The whole thing went as follows:
Image source: FortuneLegends.com
The casino is run by a relatively young (in the gambling industry) company. However, I definitely see potential, as I believe to see an honest and trustworthy foundation. Transparency and trustworthiness are for me personally the most important characteristics of a good casino and that's why it was included. I can be wrong of course but I think that this casino basically deserves a chance and I hope that in the future this will develop into a top casino a la Videoslots, SlotsMillion, sunmaker, sunnyplayer (**). And if it doesn't, then it will just go down as a NoName.
Although I see potential, we have written and published an honest review (which unfortunately could not be positive). Of course, you can also rate the casino objectively (positively or negatively), as long as you have already had experiences there. However, we do not force you to play there and we do not see you as a guinea pig either!
(**) For guests and new community members: I mean casinos that do not have "traps" like the 5€ Maxbet rule for Bonuses in their terms and conditions - unfortunately a rarity in this industry. Such bonus rules lead, especially with inexperienced players, again and again to the cancellation of wins or the refusal of payouts. Unfortunately, the law allows such terms and conditions and therefore the market must eliminate this problem - I try to change the market by deliberately pushing casinos that do not have such rules or these rules are implemented in such a way that inexperienced players can not accidentally violate them. We are not only pursuing financial goals with GambleJoe - believe it or not.
This post has been translated automatically
Experience with Fortune Legends - the new online casino on GambleJoe
Nobody has liked this post so far
Point 3 and 4 you have listed twice or are the same oh have already seen it nvm
This post has been translated automatically
Experience with Fortune Legends - the new online casino on GambleJoe
Nobody has liked this post so far
I have already seen and corrected. Something went wrong during formatting. But thanks for the Tip!
This post has been translated automatically
Experience with Fortune Legends - the new online casino on GambleJoe
Liked this post: Anonym, Anonym,
RiverSong
I would think it would be better to offer casinos an "acclimation and improvement period". This is where they can shine during the time with special test offers and thus gradually learn to swim in the shark tank with the other casinos through healthy feedback. Pack them also a special list and call these "the newcomers for 2020".
Right now, what the casino has to offer is a mid-level disaster. There are about 1500 casinos on the market that offer a DEEPLY better gaming experience, and about 50 of them I'd choose over Fortune Legends' appearance even if I got a 1000% bonus. Not that I would put any value on something like that, it's just to make it clear which direction it's going.
In my opinion (just my personal one), the casino has made a real pipe-cracker with the false start. To let an unfinished product loose on the customer is a strong piece in the industry. I for one will certainly not look in there again, not even with 1000 freespins
Don't forget, we're talking about real money here, and as we all know, that's where friendship ends.
Otherwise the GJ appearance is a round thing. Keep it up!
This post has been translated automatically
Experience with Fortune Legends - the new online casino on GambleJoe
Nobody has liked this post so far
And the no Deposit bonus fixes the slow verifzieren and the technical flaws? As long as it has such shortcomings do not play there at all, if you know that a casino meets you at the Verification with a big grin and the <Herausforderung>player rings...I can do without it directly and do not have to do that again.
The deficiencies are there guaranteed to a large extent known and in this sense it is as you write brazen sowas to publish from the casino manager. If the deficiencies had been addressed and the manager is sure that now not much is missing... only then he could call and vllt. in the flight of emotions give out a few wagerfree spins.
That it was listed here is not a problem for me, in my opinion, any casino can be listed here as long as you evaluate it halfway honestly.</Herausforderung>
This post has been translated automatically
Experience with Fortune Legends - the new online casino on GambleJoe
Liked this post:
trekki
Daniel has yes when he himself still played, often enough stressed that it is important that is paid out quickly. If you then get mails in Finnish, documents disappear and the payouts can be canceled as long as (and we know what very many from the forum then do).... Then I'm sure what there is then for a theater here.
And when I read that the games neither on Pc or mobile run properly and the games crash again and again. Then I ask myself seriously, what this casino has to look here
But the good thing is, no one is forced to pay in there.
Since I vow me the Twin Casino, which is also still quite new here. There I have today the first time deposited and paid out and this was in 5 minutes through! Class. It goes evenly also in such a way.
This post has been translated automatically