Deposit once convert VS. "does not run" and you notice it :/ VS....
29th Nov. 2019, at 09:14 pm CET#1
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Evening,
i deposited 300,- Euro with 3 x 100,- PSC at Videoslots
And already after a short time, while playing several slots from different developers, you clearly notice - THAT will be nix today.
And still you have to convert the 300, - once.
I find it simply impudent that these OC's do not make it possible - that one e.g. after 50, - or 100, - euro loss, the remainder simply again to pay out can. Because one notices: With this session simply fast everything is eaten away
In the offline-Spielo this also works.
But luck depends, as we all know, on the Malta coincidence
Good evening. And good luck to you all
Deposit once convert VS. "does not run" and you notice it :/ VS....
29th Nov. 2019, at 09:38 pm CET#4
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
KnutHut wrote on 29.11.2019 at 21:14: Evening,
have just deposited 300,- Euro with 3 x 100,- PSC at Videoslots
And already after a short time, while playing at several slots of different developers, you clearly notice - THAT will be nix today.
And still you have to convert the 300, - once.
I find it simply impudent that these OC's do not make it possible - that one e.g. after 50, - or 100, - euro loss, the remainder simply again to pay out can. Because one notices: With this session simply fast everything is eaten away
In the offline-Spielo this also works.
But luck depends, as we all know, on the Malta coincidence
Good evening. And good luck to you all.
It's not "cheeky", it's required. Deposit with PSC or whatever cash-out then to the account.
What do you think a government agency would do if a reputable and licensed Provider did this?
It's all spelled out in the Money Laundering Act and the Regulations for Combating the Financing of Terrorism.
In addition, such things are generally regulated in the terms and conditions, VS is with 1x implement at the lowest limit of what is allowed. Only very few providers do that by the way!
This post has been translated automatically
v****2
Forum posts:621Member has been banned
Deposit once convert VS. "does not run" and you notice it :/ VS....
29th Nov. 2019, at 09:53 pm CET#5
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
yo I find such a thing of course also annoying but I have soger
already 3x convert and 5x convert experienced...I do not know more
in which casino but that has of course blown me away...
5x hello gehts still
Deposit once convert VS. "does not run" and you notice it :/ VS....
29th Nov. 2019, at 10:01 pm CET#6
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
vomvom12 wrote on 29.11.2019 at 21:53: jo I find such a thing of course also annoying but I have soger
already 3x convert and 5x convert experienced...I do not know more
in which casino but that has of course blown me away...
5x hello gehts still
That have very many of the smaller casinos. 24bettle and Co. are there at the forefront
Deposit once convert VS. "does not run" and you notice it :/ VS....
29th Nov. 2019, at 10:05 pm CET#7
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
MarcT22186 wrote on 11/29/2019 9:38 PM
It's not "cheeky", it's required. Deposit with PSC or whatever cash-out then to account.
What do you think a government agency would do if a reputable and licensed Provider did this?
It's all spelled out in the Money Laundering Act and the Regulations for Combating the Financing of Terrorism.
In addition, such things are generally regulated in the terms and conditions, VS is with 1x implement at the lowest limit of what is allowed. Only very few providers do that by the way!
Exactly Marc.
Because online casino gamblers fall exactly predominantly into this target group
The "mini-jobber" money launderer and the "normal earner" terrorist
I believe, there the "goat becomes the gardener".
Best regards and good luck to you furthermore
This post has been translated automatically
s****n
Forum posts:10Member has been banned
Deposit once convert VS. "does not run" and you notice it :/ VS....
29th Nov. 2019, at 10:46 pm CET#8
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
MarcT22186 wrote on 11/29/2019 9:38 PM
It's not "cheeky", it's required. Deposit with PSC or whatever cash-out then to account.
What do you think a government agency would do if a reputable and licensed Provider did this?
It's all spelled out in the Money Laundering Act and the Regulations for Combating the Financing of Terrorism.
In addition, such things are generally regulated in the terms and conditions, VS is with 1x implement at the lowest limit of what is allowed. Only very few providers do that by the way!
How good that of all the casinos of the alleged bill (which I have never seen, and you probably
also not) profit. They do not want it at all, and must however. And now, when they do it once, someone loses their money
his money. Oh no. That's the last thing casinos want!
Deposit once convert VS. "does not run" and you notice it :/ VS....
29th Nov. 2019, at 10:51 pm CET#9
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
KnutHut wrote on 11/29/2019 at 10:05 pm
Exactly Marc.
Because online casino gamblers fall exactly predominantly into this target group
The "mini-jobber" money launderer and the "normal earner" terrorist
I believe, there the "goat becomes the gardener".
Best regards and good luck to you furthermore
You will be amazed how terrorists and Co. Wash your money or have washed money what Europe and North America concerns
Money laundering and terrorist financing is not about gambling, there is also not made the buck to the gardener. How easy do you think it was to launder money in an OC when this turnover rule did not exist? For example, you paid in with a stolen credit card and paid out to a bank account
This was possible for quite some time before the last 3 tightenings. With 1x turnover, the danger is still there, but in combination with the verifications, it becomes immensely more difficult. The Risk for such people is simply extremely increased
In the same way, the MLA is not intended to affect the average citizen, which is why this requirement is so difficult to implement.
It is actually almost a miracle that VS does not want to have carried out a meticulous investigation/verification. 3x 100€ PSC can indeed arouse suspicion, because such amounts are usually not deposited over it.
Deposit once convert VS. "does not run" and you notice it :/ VS....
Nobody has liked this post so far
i deposited 300,- Euro with 3 x 100,- PSC at Videoslots
And already after a short time, while playing several slots from different developers, you clearly notice - THAT will be nix today.
And still you have to convert the 300, - once.
I find it simply impudent that these OC's do not make it possible - that one e.g. after 50, - or 100, - euro loss, the remainder simply again to pay out can. Because one notices: With this session simply fast everything is eaten away
In the offline-Spielo this also works.
But luck depends, as we all know, on the Malta coincidence
Good evening. And good luck to you all
This post has been translated automatically
Deposit once convert VS. "does not run" and you notice it :/ VS....
Liked this post: Anonym,
supermode, 
trekki
Alternatively play the next day?
I have also done once, when I had the feeling it goes nichst and could not pay out.
I lost it then the next day
This post has been translated automatically
Deposit once convert VS. "does not run" and you notice it :/ VS....
Nobody has liked this post so far
Ok. Thanks. Good hint
Good luck to you furthermore and a nice WE!
This post has been translated automatically
Deposit once convert VS. "does not run" and you notice it :/ VS....
Nobody has liked this post so far
It's not "cheeky", it's required. Deposit with PSC or whatever cash-out then to the account.
What do you think a government agency would do if a reputable and licensed Provider did this?
It's all spelled out in the Money Laundering Act and the Regulations for Combating the Financing of Terrorism.
In addition, such things are generally regulated in the terms and conditions, VS is with 1x implement at the lowest limit of what is allowed. Only very few providers do that by the way!
This post has been translated automatically
Deposit once convert VS. "does not run" and you notice it :/ VS....
Nobody has liked this post so far
already 3x convert and 5x convert experienced...I do not know more
in which casino but that has of course blown me away...
5x hello gehts still
This post has been translated automatically
Deposit once convert VS. "does not run" and you notice it :/ VS....
Nobody has liked this post so far
That have very many of the smaller casinos. 24bettle and Co. are there at the forefront
This post has been translated automatically
Deposit once convert VS. "does not run" and you notice it :/ VS....
Nobody has liked this post so far
Exactly Marc.
Because online casino gamblers fall exactly predominantly into this target group
The "mini-jobber" money launderer and the "normal earner" terrorist
I believe, there the "goat becomes the gardener".
Best regards and good luck to you furthermore
This post has been translated automatically
Deposit once convert VS. "does not run" and you notice it :/ VS....
Nobody has liked this post so far
How good that of all the casinos of the alleged bill (which I have never seen, and you probably
also not) profit. They do not want it at all, and must however. And now, when they do it once, someone loses their money
his money. Oh no. That's the last thing casinos want!
This post has been translated automatically
Deposit once convert VS. "does not run" and you notice it :/ VS....
Nobody has liked this post so far
You will be amazed how terrorists and Co. Wash your money or have washed money what Europe and North America concerns
Money laundering and terrorist financing is not about gambling, there is also not made the buck to the gardener. How easy do you think it was to launder money in an OC when this turnover rule did not exist? For example, you paid in with a stolen credit card and paid out to a bank account
This was possible for quite some time before the last 3 tightenings. With 1x turnover, the danger is still there, but in combination with the verifications, it becomes immensely more difficult. The Risk for such people is simply extremely increased
In the same way, the MLA is not intended to affect the average citizen, which is why this requirement is so difficult to implement.
It is actually almost a miracle that VS does not want to have carried out a meticulous investigation/verification. 3x 100€ PSC can indeed arouse suspicion, because such amounts are usually not deposited over it.
🔼 This is really not meant badly
This post has been translated automatically
Deposit once convert VS. "does not run" and you notice it :/ VS....
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically