*yours truly! I'm glad you realize that. Because pedagogy now hardly argues about parenting style. The "laissez fair" style is outdated. You obviously have little idea about young people or education, but on the other hand you obviously have not understood what I meant.
Involving the youth welfare office and the judiciary would be the optimal solution in a system where you have to verify yourself before you start playing. Personally, I do not think that a Maltese casino has an educational mandate towards a young person. A casino and a teenager have nothing to do with each other. If a young person (again, in the hypothetical perfect system) demonstrates enough criminal energy to gamble anyway, then of course an authority outside the parental home should immediately intervene to clarify where this gambling instinct comes from.
Adolescents are much more susceptible to gambling than adults. I don't want to go into detail about which biochemical processes in the body are responsible for this, it is enough to simply state the fact that some studies have come to this conclusion: Those who start gambling in their youth are much more likely to be unable to stop as adults. The addiction is stronger and in many cases almost impossible to overcome later in life. The relapse rate of people who have already started gambling at the age of 14 is enormous.
Personally, I think young people should be protected from gambling. Current case law doesn't go far enough in that regard. Some of the most popular streamers (and streamers are, after all, the stars of today's youth) shamelessly advertise gambling, there's one commercial after another on TV, and every other kebab store happily flashes money gambling machines. You can't just say that a 16-year-old is mature enough. He is not.
so how do I find that then.
as I have written my opinion, which is very similar to yours, I was here only times again verrissen
but I'm glad that I'm not alone in this
Thanks bones
*yours truly! I'm glad you realize that. Because pedagogy now hardly argues about parenting style. The "laissez fair" style is outdated. You obviously have little idea about young people or education, but on the other hand you obviously have not understood what I meant.
Involving the youth welfare office and the judiciary would be the optimal solution in a system where you have to verify yourself before you start playing. Personally, I do not think that a Maltese casino has an educational mandate towards a young person. A casino and a teenager have nothing to do with each other. If a young person (again, in the hypothetical perfect system) demonstrates enough criminal energy to gamble anyway, then of course an authority outside the parental home should immediately intervene to clarify where this gambling instinct comes from.
Adolescents are much more susceptible to gambling than adults. I don't want to go into detail about which biochemical processes in the body are responsible for this, it is enough to simply state the fact that some studies have come to this conclusion: Those who start gambling in their youth are much more likely to be unable to stop as adults. The addiction is stronger and in many cases almost impossible to overcome later in life. The relapse rate of people who have already started gambling at the age of 14 is enormous.
Personally, I think young people should be protected from gambling. Current case law doesn't go far enough in that regard. Some of the most popular streamers (and streamers are, after all, the stars of today's youth) shamelessly advertise gambling, there's one commercial after another on TV, and every other kebab store happily flashes money gambling machines. You can't just say that a 16-year-old is mature enough. He is not.
sorry bone, you live in a dream world
I don't know where you as a young person think you know how education works
The reality is just another, even prohibitions such as advertising and the like do not keep many from it.
The most important thing is to sensitize the child/youth beforehand and to make them aware of the dangers and to talk about it.
Otherwise it does not work, and still some burn their fingers what is normal in life
You can just control only to a certain extent
And sorry but with what should the youth welfare office or the police deal, what do you think?
You will not stop a teenager from smoking a cigarette or drinking a beer, should the police come or the youth welfare office?
Voodoodreams refuses to pay out to minors.
Nobody has liked this post so far
so how do I find that then.
as I have written my opinion, which is very similar to yours, I was here only times again verrissen
but I'm glad that I'm not alone in this
Thanks bones
This post has been translated automatically
Voodoodreams refuses to pay out to minors.
Nobody has liked this post so far
sorry bone, you live in a dream world
I don't know where you as a young person think you know how education works
The reality is just another, even prohibitions such as advertising and the like do not keep many from it.
The most important thing is to sensitize the child/youth beforehand and to make them aware of the dangers and to talk about it.
Otherwise it does not work, and still some burn their fingers what is normal in life
You can just control only to a certain extent
And sorry but with what should the youth welfare office or the police deal, what do you think?
You will not stop a teenager from smoking a cigarette or drinking a beer, should the police come or the youth welfare office?
The reality is crucial not as you would like it
This post has been translated automatically
Voodoodreams refuses to pay out to minors.
Nobody has liked this post so far
The thread will therefore also be temporarily closed.
This topic has been closed
This post has been translated automatically