Permanent wins with dozens and columns ? Science says there is no such thing....
2nd Feb. 2021, at 11:52 am CET#1
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Found on the net
The only way to beat Roulette is : ZEROLINE " Statistics beats Mathematics" ( C.Otto), .... or to steel the money when the Dealer`s not looking !
Statistical Ecart = 6,0 ! No progression games necessary. Test base 15.000 bets, 150.000 coups.
System success not disproved to date !
Zahlenfuchs wrote on 02.02.2021 at 11:52: Found on the net
The only way to beat Roulette is : ZEROLINE " Statistics beats Mathematics" ( C.Otto), .... or to steel the money when the Dealer`s not looking !
Statistical Ecart = 6,0 ! No progression games necessary. Test base 15.000 bets, 150.000 coups.
System success not disproved to date !
Good luck,
Zahlenfuchs
Hello number fox! Do your fellow men a favor and become a silent fox
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
verified
Former Member
Permanent wins with dozens and columns ? Science says there is no such thing....
There you can still find so much on the net on the subject, the awesome strategies
None works, it's like chemtrails or the comeback of the Wendler: It doesn't exist.
Permanent wins with dozens and columns ? Science says there is no such thing....
8th Feb. 2021, at 04:48 pm CET#5
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
A note about the comments on my post. So, without a positive playtest, I wouldn't have posted anything here. This only after this online test result:
Total coups: 9,000 coups, 1,000 games ( won 33.8% ), total 359 system series, 239 bets, of which won 88 (36.8% ), lost 151 (63.2%). No progression bet, system win at factor 1 =+25.
Clearly, the base is still small, but the result lies in the trend of the numbers described in the book with a much larger test volume. It is up to everyone what conclusions he draws from this.
Permanent wins with dozens and columns ? Science says there is no such thing....
9th Feb. 2021, at 10:57 am CET#7
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Zahlenfuchs wrote on 08.02.2021 at 16:48: A note on the comments on my posting. So, without a positive playtest, I would not have posted anything here. This only after this online test result:
Total coups: 9,000 coups, 1,000 games ( won 33.8% ), total 359 system series, 239 bets, of which won 88 (36.8% ), lost 151 (63.2%). No progression bet, system win at factor 1 =+25.
Clearly, the base is still small, but the result lies in the trend of the numbers described in the book with a much larger test volume. It is up to everyone what conclusions he draws from this.
Permanent wins with dozens and columns ? Science says there is no such thing....
1st Nov. 2022, at 01:13 pm CET#8
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
The discussion about the Roulette system ZEROLINE is more serious in another forum.
A forum member has agreed to test the system in early September 2022 and publish the results in the forum !
To date, no result has been posted. I guess the system is not that easy to judge after all.
I assume that he came to the same result as I did after my test.
Remains exciting, how book author and forum member express themselves to the test results.
Perhaps the tester will also decide to remain silent permanently, the reason for which should then be clear.
Number cruncher
Edit by Sabine: Link to the competition has been removed
Zahlenfuchs wrote on 02.02.2021 at 11:52: Found on the net:
The only way to beat Roulette is : ZEROLINE " Statistics beats Mathematics" ( C.Otto), .... or to steel the money when the Dealer`s not looking !
Statistical Ecart = 6,0 ! No progression games necessary. Test base 15.000 bets, 150.000 coups
System success not disproved until today !
Good success,
Number cruncher
Well, someone was actually so nice and put an instruction on the Internet, how to get rich with roulette without risk. And people like you think - yup, that sounds serious!
Permanent wins with dozens and columns ? Science says there is no such thing....
Nobody has liked this post so far
The only way to beat Roulette is : ZEROLINE " Statistics beats Mathematics" ( C.Otto), .... or to steel the money when the Dealer`s not looking !
Statistical Ecart = 6,0 ! No progression games necessary. Test base 15.000 bets, 150.000 coups.
System success not disproved to date !
Good luck,
Number cruncher
This post has been translated automatically
Permanent wins with dozens and columns ? Science says there is no such thing....
Liked this post:
supermode
Nice that there are still people who are too good for nothing.
This post has been translated automatically
Permanent wins with dozens and columns ? Science says there is no such thing....
Liked this post: Anonym, B****e,
Bluff, 
roccoammo11, 
saschamk
Hello number fox! Do your fellow men a favor and become a silent fox
This post has been translated automatically
Permanent wins with dozens and columns ? Science says there is no such thing....
Liked this post:
Harald_B
None works, it's like chemtrails or the comeback of the Wendler: It doesn't exist.
This post has been translated automatically
Permanent wins with dozens and columns ? Science says there is no such thing....
Nobody has liked this post so far
Total coups: 9,000 coups, 1,000 games ( won 33.8% ), total 359 system series, 239 bets, of which won 88 (36.8% ), lost 151 (63.2%). No progression bet, system win at factor 1 =+25.
Clearly, the base is still small, but the result lies in the trend of the numbers described in the book with a much larger test volume. It is up to everyone what conclusions he draws from this.
Number fox (who now becomes a silence fox! )
This post has been translated automatically
Permanent wins with dozens and columns ? Science says there is no such thing....
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Permanent wins with dozens and columns ? Science says there is no such thing....
Nobody has liked this post so far
I hope that you then permanently silent.
This post has been translated automatically
Permanent wins with dozens and columns ? Science says there is no such thing....
Nobody has liked this post so far
A forum member has agreed to test the system in early September 2022 and publish the results in the forum !
To date, no result has been posted. I guess the system is not that easy to judge after all.
I assume that he came to the same result as I did after my test.
Remains exciting, how book author and forum member express themselves to the test results.
Perhaps the tester will also decide to remain silent permanently, the reason for which should then be clear.
Number cruncher
Edit by Sabine: Link to the competition has been removed
This post has been translated automatically
Permanent wins with dozens and columns ? Science says there is no such thing....
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Permanent wins with dozens and columns ? Science says there is no such thing....
Liked this post:
Arschi
Well, someone was actually so nice and put an instruction on the Internet, how to get rich with roulette without risk. And people like you think - yup, that sounds serious!
Ouch dude...
This post has been translated automatically