Permanent wins with dozens and columns ? Science says there is no such thing....
31st Dec. 2022, at 12:00 am CET#11
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
tEquilA wrote on 12/30/2022 at 10:55 PM
Gee, someone was actually nice enough to put a tutorial on the internet on how to get filthy rich playing Roulette with no risk. And blitzmerker like you think - yup, that sounds serious!
Ouch dude...
Now you've taken away all my hope...:D
I was once convinced that you can win with this two-thirds system in the long run. You just always have to double the next bet after a loss and that can go 10-15 rounds. With a capital of 1 million +x I still believe that this can work then permanently win to make. But so much you need if really times to 15 rounds or more no hit comes.
All quite nice but in the end just too much luck in the game, in the end always wins the bank (in the long run)
Permanent wins with dozens and columns ? Science says there is no such thing....
31st Dec. 2022, at 01:38 am CET#12
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
refucs wrote on 31.12.2022 at 00:00
Now you have taken away all hope from me...:D
I was once convinced that you can win with this two-thirds system in the long run. You just always have to double the next bet after a loss and that can go 10-15 rounds. With a capital of 1 million +x I still believe that this can work then permanently win to make. But so much you need if really times to 15 rounds or more no hit comes.
All quite nice but in the end just too much luck in the game, in the end always wins the bank (in the long run)
With 1 million to verballern you certainly have other thoughts than systems to gamble
I was once convinced that you can win with this two-thirds system in the long run. You just always have to double the next bet after a loss and that can go 10-15 rounds. With a capital of 1 million +x I still believe that this can work then permanently win to make. But so much you need if really times to 15 rounds or more no hit comes.
All quite nice but in the end just too much luck in the game, in the end always wins the bank (in the long run)
The probability to win after the 15th game is not greater than after the second or third. After the end, the stakes become quite fast, quite high. There helps then partly already the million no longer and in the case of the arrival, one wins also only the original employment. That is, the first set would also have to be correspondingly high, which becomes all the more expensive out the back. I do not know any statistics, but color sequences of 20-30 times should probably occur more often than one imagines.
With a first bet of 100€ that is in round 16 already 3.276.800€ bet to win in the best case 100€, because one has lost before already 3.276.700€.
Permanent wins with dozens and columns ? Science says there is no such thing....
1st Mar. 2023, at 06:45 pm CET#14
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
FachstelleGSSkoeln wrote on 01.03.2023 at 18:10:
After all, the probability of winning after the 15th game is no greater than after the second or third. After the back out the stakes become quite fast, quite high. Since then partly also already the millions does not help any more and in the case of the arrival, one wins also only the original employment. That is, the first set would also have to be correspondingly high, which becomes all the more expensive out the back. I do not know any statistics, but color sequences of 20-30 times should probably occur more often than one imagines.
With a first bet of 100€ that is in round 16 already 3.276.800€ bet to win in the best case 100€, because one has lost before already 3.276.700€.
Yes as I said, without proper starting capital the system is not worth it. If it's worth it at all^^ But thanks for the illustration again
Permanent wins with dozens and columns ? Science says there is no such thing....
1st Mar. 2023, at 07:20 pm CET#15
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Not to mention that there is a table limit that could slow you down even before your million.... If it is higher than the million, the minimum bet will probably be very high.
The whole thread is just from the basis already nonsense.
"Permanent wins..." in connection with "roulette" makes no sense.
Mathemathically there is no way to achieve permanent wins in roulette.
This thread is quite old, but this misconception has been around for a long time. And this can be dangerous for the inexperienced player. At the end of every Martingale strategy there is a 99,9 % total loss. Except if you stop at an earlier point in time, but who will do that if you play according to the Martingale strategy?
It makes much more sense to play with flat bets on the 2/3 chance. There you have the longest game fun
Permanent wins with dozens and columns ? Science says there is no such thing....
2nd Mar. 2023, at 01:01 pm CET#17
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Everyone who gets involved in Roulette should know that the master of generators decides about win or loss. Very nice to observe at roulette. The permanent profit does not exist, one can only optimize. Systems are their easiest prey, because predictable. You have to play like them: legally sneaky, every spin different, tested, secured, from a different system. In front of them sit professionals, to whom you have to put a lot of work to win. Incl.basic rules you have win, despite losses in between. One wants to be good to them also times. To get there, also professionals need years, with many losses before. Ideally favor Netent.
I have been playing Roulette for over 30 years and I have met more than 100 people who have tried any system. Not one of them has become rich, rather the opposite. I can only say that in the long run the most successful players are those who play with higher stakes randomly on a simple chance, in the loss at some point double the stake (only once) and end the game as soon as they are one or two pieces in the plus and if it does not run at all also end the game with loss (the limit must be fixed beforehand). This requires an iron discipline because a game session can last sometimes only a few minutes but more often a few hours.
Permanent wins with dozens and columns ? Science says there is no such thing....
5th Mar. 2023, at 06:45 pm CET#19
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
wettibernd wrote on 02.03.2023 at 13:03: I have been playing Roulette for over 30 years and I have met more than 100 people who have tried any systems. Not a single person has become rich, rather the opposite. I can only say that in the long run the most successful players are those who play with higher stakes randomly on a simple chance, in the loss at some point double the stake (only once) and end the game as soon as they are one or two pieces in the plus and if it does not run at all also end the game with loss (the limit must be fixed before). This requires an iron discipline because a game session can last sometimes only a few minutes but also more often a few hours.
Success here is probably also interpretation. Someone who plays randomly less often has in principle the same chances to win and no more. However, only those who keep the win and do not continue to play can win.
Permanent wins with dozens and columns ? Science says there is no such thing....
5th Mar. 2023, at 08:20 pm CET#20
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Greed and loss of control were often the problem with me!
one weekend I won 60 euros and the next weekend I lost another 60.
Often it was a back and forth... However, I have managed over the years, not to come into the minus. Something in win remained then nevertheless over. But actually it was all too nerve-racking.
Permanent wins with dozens and columns ? Science says there is no such thing....
Nobody has liked this post so far
Now you've taken away all my hope...:D
I was once convinced that you can win with this two-thirds system in the long run. You just always have to double the next bet after a loss and that can go 10-15 rounds. With a capital of 1 million +x I still believe that this can work then permanently win to make. But so much you need if really times to 15 rounds or more no hit comes.
All quite nice but in the end just too much luck in the game, in the end always wins the bank (in the long run)
This post has been translated automatically
Permanent wins with dozens and columns ? Science says there is no such thing....
Nobody has liked this post so far
With 1 million to verballern you certainly have other thoughts than systems to gamble
This post has been translated automatically
Permanent wins with dozens and columns ? Science says there is no such thing....
Liked this post:
Der_Puppenspieler
The probability to win after the 15th game is not greater than after the second or third. After the end, the stakes become quite fast, quite high. There helps then partly already the million no longer and in the case of the arrival, one wins also only the original employment. That is, the first set would also have to be correspondingly high, which becomes all the more expensive out the back. I do not know any statistics, but color sequences of 20-30 times should probably occur more often than one imagines.
With a first bet of 100€ that is in round 16 already 3.276.800€ bet to win in the best case 100€, because one has lost before already 3.276.700€.
This post has been translated automatically
Permanent wins with dozens and columns ? Science says there is no such thing....
Nobody has liked this post so far
Yes as I said, without proper starting capital the system is not worth it. If it's worth it at all^^ But thanks for the illustration again
This post has been translated automatically
Permanent wins with dozens and columns ? Science says there is no such thing....
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Permanent wins with dozens and columns ? Science says there is no such thing....
Liked this post:
Harald_B, 
HuKu_Koln
"Permanent wins..." in connection with "roulette" makes no sense.
Mathemathically there is no way to achieve permanent wins in roulette.
This thread is quite old, but this misconception has been around for a long time. And this can be dangerous for the inexperienced player. At the end of every Martingale strategy there is a 99,9 % total loss. Except if you stop at an earlier point in time, but who will do that if you play according to the Martingale strategy?
It makes much more sense to play with flat bets on the 2/3 chance. There you have the longest game fun
This post has been translated automatically
Permanent wins with dozens and columns ? Science says there is no such thing....
Nobody has liked this post so far
Edit by Caro: Post visually adjusted
This post has been translated automatically
Permanent wins with dozens and columns ? Science says there is no such thing....
Liked this post:
HuKu_Koln
This post has been translated automatically
Permanent wins with dozens and columns ? Science says there is no such thing....
Nobody has liked this post so far
Success here is probably also interpretation. Someone who plays randomly less often has in principle the same chances to win and no more. However, only those who keep the win and do not continue to play can win.
This post has been translated automatically
Permanent wins with dozens and columns ? Science says there is no such thing....
Nobody has liked this post so far
one weekend I won 60 euros and the next weekend I lost another 60.
Often it was a back and forth... However, I have managed over the years, not to come into the minus. Something in win remained then nevertheless over. But actually it was all too nerve-racking.
This post has been translated automatically