Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Off topic & small talk: House search on suspicion of money laundering (Page 2)

Topic created on 19th Jan. 2021 | Page: 2 of 6 | Answers: 57 | Views: 16,137
Anonym

House search on suspicion of money laundering

19th Jan. 2021, at 01:33 pm CET#11
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
My question would be when was the account closed? Also, only now, or in 2018 after the wins? Sounds like dad was already done in 2018

This post has been translated automatically

supermode
Expert

House search on suspicion of money laundering

19th Jan. 2021, at 03:04 pm CET#12
1 Like

Liked this post: Avatar von Jesss711 Jesss711
So remember for the future, when you hit big, withdraw the money from the ATM with eWallet credit card and put it under the bed instead of in the bank

Think the banks make there only big eyes when there is a 5 digit amount of Neteller / Skrill etc. from nothing lands, if you send times a 1-5k over does not really happen.

This post has been translated automatically

SLOTMASTER
Rookie

House search on suspicion of money laundering

19th Jan. 2021, at 03:36 pm CET#13
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
TeddyWestside wrote on 01/19/2021 at 1:33 pm: My question would be when was the account closed. Also just now, or in 2018 after the wins? Sounds like dad had already done it in 2018

That was cancelled in a timely manner. What also found friends strange, was that my bank account or accounts were not frozen now. If the suspicion is so great that ne search is initiated, then accounts should be frozen. I have rather the feeling that they are clueless and desperately looking for reasons. Why do they not want to admit that you pay out 50k which is even in the transactions. That they don't even care that I could give them the statements. Rather look for drugs and other things. PS: In the decision was even payments via Trustly, Paysafe and Neteller in connection with gambling and the transactions can not be assigned

This post has been translated automatically

Falko
Icon

House search on suspicion of money laundering

19th Jan. 2021, at 03:49 pm CET#14
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
SLOTMASTER wrote on 01/19/2021 at 15:36
That was cancelled in a timely manner. What also friends found funny, was that my bank account or accounts were now also not frozen. If the suspicion is so great that ne search is initiated, then accounts should be frozen. I have rather the feeling that they are clueless and desperately looking for reasons. Why do they not want to admit that you pay out 50k which is even in the transactions. That they don't even care that I could give them the statements. Rather look for drugs and other things. PS: In the decision was even payments via Trustly, Paysafe and Neteller in connection with gambling and the transactions can not be assigned.

So you are in the big plus area as far as Online Casinos are concerned, which only very few manage ? Since you have written here, the money comes all only from online casinos.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym

House search on suspicion of money laundering

19th Jan. 2021, at 04:12 pm CET#15
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
SLOTMASTER wrote on 01/19/2021 at 15:36
That was cancelled in a timely manner. What also friends found funny, was that my bank account or accounts were now also not frozen. If the suspicion is so great that ne search is initiated, then accounts should be frozen. I have rather the feeling that they are clueless and desperately looking for reasons. Why do they not want to admit that you pay out 50k which is even in the transactions. That they don't even care that I could give them the statements. Rather look for drugs and other things. PS: In the decision was even payments via Trustly, Paysafe and Neteller in connection with gambling and the transactions can not be assigned.

So it was terminated in 2018? Sounds weird to me honestly. Which bank was it then?

This post has been translated automatically

SLOTMASTER
Rookie

House search on suspicion of money laundering

19th Jan. 2021, at 04:59 pm CET#16
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
Falko wrote on 19.01.2021 at 15:49
So you are as far as Online Casinos in the big plus area, which only very few manage ? Since you wrote yes here, the money comes all only from online casinos

Have since then only draft and loose 50 k skeleton. That probably does not juckt the. They only see the numbers from back then. There is hardly anything left over

This post has been translated automatically

Sprengsatz
Experienced

House search on suspicion of money laundering

19th Jan. 2021, at 11:57 pm CET#17
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
SLOTMASTER wrote on 01/19/2021 at 15:36
That was cancelled in a timely manner. What also friends found funny, was that my bank account or accounts were not frozen now. If the suspicion is so great that ne search is initiated, then accounts should be frozen. I have rather the feeling that they are clueless and desperately looking for reasons. Why do they not want to admit that you pay out 50k which is even in the transactions. That they don't even care that I could give them the statements. Rather look for drugs and other things. PS: In the decision was even payments via Trustly, Paysafe and Neteller in connection with gambling and the transactions can not be assigned.

Why freeze? Evidence is secured. In general, where there is no imminent danger, it can take forever until you get a house search. But I find it strange that 2 policemen do it?
Know it to third. CID, court and witness

This post has been translated automatically

SLOTMASTER
Rookie

House search on suspicion of money laundering

20th Jan. 2021, at 07:13 am CET#18
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
Explosive wrote on 01/19/2021 at 23:57
Why freeze? Evidence is secured. In general, Schnulli where no danger is imminent, it can take forever until you get a house search. Find it but funny that 2 policemen do that?
Know it to third. CID, court and witness

Well, even if evidence that is not there are secured. With money laundering where you are already so sure that you initiate a search, it should actually be so until it is clarified

They came only two in civilian clothes and have also made no search. Computer and cell phone was sufficient and otherwise as I had already mentioned, the official simply could not believe that one can have so much luck

This post has been translated automatically

Slothot
Amateur

House search on suspicion of money laundering

20th Jan. 2021, at 07:40 am CET#19
2 Likes

Liked this post: Avatar von Jesss711 Jesss711, Avatar von Max_Bet Max_Bet
Ok, let's slow down... They must have had, if they were in your apartment, a DS resolution according to 102StPO. In the formal requirements 104 StPO is an independent witness, absolute obligation

The witnesses usually come from some administration and take the matter, as a rule, extremely seriously

If no witness was present, his signature is also missing on the form of seizure / confiscation of your items
Hopefully, you have not voluntarily handed over the items, because then they must be confiscated

You must also have received a confirmation of the search

If no witness was actually present, there is a prohibition on the use of evidence due to an irremediable formal error

The times in which state actors can do whatever they want have been over since 1990 at the latest...

So be sure to discuss this with your lawyer


Or did they just stand in front of your door, didn't come in, and "asked" you for the items, which you then "voluntarily" handed over?

This post has been translated automatically

SLOTMASTER
Rookie

House search on suspicion of money laundering

20th Jan. 2021, at 08:09 am CET#20
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
Slothot wrote on 20/01/2021 at 07:40: Ok, slow down... They must have had, if they were in your apartment, a DS resolution under 102StPO. In the formal requirements 104 StPO is an independent witness, absolute obligation

The witnesses usually come from some administration and take the matter, as a rule, extremely seriously

If no witness was present, his signature is also missing on the form of seizure / confiscation of your items
Hopefully, you have not voluntarily handed over the items, because then they must be confiscated

You must also have received a confirmation of the search

If no witness was actually present, there is a prohibition on the use of evidence due to an irremediable formal error

The times in which state actors can do whatever they want have been over since 1990 at the latest...

So be sure to discuss this with your lawyer


Or did they just stand in front of your door, didn't come in, and "asked" you for the items, which you then "voluntarily" handed over?

They rang the doorbell and had a search warrant from the prosecutor. They directly said that they would take the computer and cell phone anyway. Another witness was not present. They have also after they have taken the things of a further search apart. Since I have nothing to hide, I just have to wait for the evaluation.

What I do not understand is that it says that they do not understand the amount, although I have told my bank as well as several times that they are wins and I even had payout receipts at the time.

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics8th May. 2024 at 12:25 am CEST

Jackpots
0
Miscellaneous
0
Miscellaneous
0
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.
© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com
✕

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately