Patizi wrote on 01/11/2020 at 18:18
You need the account. It doesn't matter how old the card is. Even if it was 100 years old, you'd have to get an account.
This account thing excites me but meanwhile very much, I entered a code several times wrong and now the account is locked, unlock also does not go in 5 minutes. Should your account then upgrade to unlimited with ID Now etc. and that somehow does not work - so small warning, do not enter wrong several times!
Will777 wrote on 02.11.2020 at 11:09: I'm thinking about whether I should make a picture ready to participate. Only then surely our madame will revoke the action completely. The reasons are of course not mentioned... understands itself by now
--> the madame <-- finds your again and again interspersed impertinence simply ridiculous
already at the last riddle, where the 2 closest are to me should report, were you, will777, the 1st the pn wrote with the claim you are one of the winners, loooool. have me deliciously amused since you are much too clever not to check who had won and who had not, it was also more than brazen of you. well, we know you, just tried it once a psc abzustauben
the madame will also nothing revoked just because will777 suddenly wants to participate in protest or just sticheln as so often.
why should i justify every little change? especially since such changes were and are always positive for the participants.
one time I will do it here now --> this extension here has e.g. the sense that so far 7 participants are there and who has read the 1st post correctly there is only with 10 participants more or higher psc
so why the hate posts on the part of will777 and his followers? just because the participants can not have fast enough the psc? will777 is not (yet) even participant, so no right to even get upset about it or interfere.
such riddles are always dynamic and you have to adapt as a cyclist and so estimate some things even if it then comes to such moronic hostility.
--> there are also people who write me pn they would like to participate, but have only on xx time to complete the task --> out of fairness I consider such a thing gladly if it fits promptly into the framework.
why are some here again echauffieren? take the chance or leave it, but do not rush against my puzzles, especially not if you do not even want to participate and only again frustrated for some other reasons and then want to take it out on me.
believe rather that here a few participants who have dropped out (may everyone as he wants) simply the skins of it swim because they notice that others a much better implementation of the task purely, only a presumption;-)
0815 is just nothing in my riddles, hang in and give effort and that must be able to recognize as a reader --> is also clear in the opening post. therefore also my post regarding the likes so I see how many still like the one or the other picture and the implementation to it.
where, however, your likes have come I do not know, maybe one or the other of you has made himself unpopular in the meantime and the liker have changed their mind, who cares? what can I do about it? besides, I had written --> I'll see how I can integrate it, if the likes appear and disappear again we are back to the dynamic from above, then I have to adapt and can also not take into account.
and to you mowolum, yes, in the background the wheels run differently, there is a madame who makes clear with success sponsors so that certain participants can win again and again, almost constantly psc, and that for a long time
i also know that your frustration towards me comes from the fact that i don't answer your pn or write to you for some time now. if you don't know the reason yourself, i won't tell you
mowolum wrote on 02.11.2020 at 11:23 am: No reason ---- Oh yes You are still a bit fresh ) behind the scenes the wheels turn differently )
such statements on your part against me in any threads (was not the first time) should then probably bring your frustration across where you are now but otherwise so much effort to talk everything nice.
see here just one example of you a few posts above
mowolum wrote on 01.11.2020 at 22:30: are not so nasty
if it was not clear enough lately then now and here --> i do not want any contact with you, neither pn nor your insinuations that behind the scenes the wheels turn differently or any other taunts, thank you.
however, I will not discuss this further here or by pn.
and in conclusion,
honestly, i have no problem to cancel this or the following puzzles under certain circumstances and give back the money to the sponsors. those who like to participate (even without psc) can then thank the long time complainers.
everyone who still likes can participate in the current task in my puzzle thread until wednesday evening
Iseedeadpeople wrote on 02.11.2020 at 17:35: I put that in here now.
if it was not clear enough lately then now and here --> i do not want any contact with you, neither pn nor your insinuations that behind the scenes the wheels turn differently or any other taunts, thank you.
however, i will not discuss this further here or by pn.
and in conclusion,
honestly, i have no problem to cancel this or the following puzzles under certain circumstances and give back the money to the sponsors. those who like to participate (even without psc) can then thank the persistent complainers.
everyone who still likes can participate in the current task in my puzzle thread until wednesday evening
I think the problem with your puzzles is that there is no one clear solution. So an outsider can't understand which criteria are used to choose the winners, and you have the feeling that the decision is made by sympathy only, which is why the number of participants is rather limited. In addition, most here probably do not jump on your philosophical esoteric track and are rather different.
most like you are happy that there is something going on here and you can eat popcorn and be distracted from your real problems --> how pathetic are you who are only out for show?
Iseedeadpeople wrote on 02.11.2020 at 17:35: I put that in here now.
if it was not clear enough lately then now and here --> i do not want any contact with you, neither pn nor your insinuations that behind the scenes the wheels turn differently or any other taunts, thank you.
however, i will not discuss this further here or by pn.
and in conclusion,
honestly, i have no problem to cancel this or the following puzzles under certain circumstances and give back the money to the sponsors. those who like to participate (even without psc) can then thank the long time complainers.
everyone who still likes can participate in the current task in my puzzle thread until wednesday evening
@Iseedeadpeople,
since you do not want to discuss by PN and here, I will answer you here then.
And I also do not care if GJ deletes it, but I have the same right as you.
There was a time it looked wonderful between us.
That has changed from the time when I no longer accepted your paternalism and insult.
Then you are dropped like a hot potato.
I still have the correspondence.
Unfortunately, you have rejected the reconciling hand that I have given you, which could have actually come from you, with a new insolence.
I am very sorry for what can happen to an initially good interpersonal relationship.
Iseedeadpeople, I have it not necessary to talk something beautiful.you know exactly my attitude.
What is that, frustration because of 2 not answered PN`s.Do not think that is ridiculous.
Refrain from the insinuations.Better is, one writes something, what corresponds to the facts.
Assumptions are poison and enough of it is sprayed.
You are not the ultimate here.My grandmother has always said,naked are all the same.
Also you are, like all of us, a gambler, further I would like to express myself in addition also no more.
unicorn wrote on 02.11.2020 at 18:32: I think the problem with your puzzles is that there is no one clear solution. An outsider can't understand which criteria are used to choose the winners, and you have the feeling that the decision is made based on sympathy, which is why the number of participants is rather limited. In addition, most here probably do not jump on your philosophical esoteric track and are rather different.
think I send you the answer by pn, here there is nothing to see, please move on, no show today, no popcorn.
Chatterbox
Liked this post:
garfield68
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
This account thing excites me but meanwhile very much, I entered a code several times wrong and now the account is locked, unlock also does not go in 5 minutes. Should your account then upgrade to unlimited with ID Now etc. and that somehow does not work - so small warning, do not enter wrong several times!
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post:
Kleinkariert, k****8, 
Saphira, 
snopsim
--> the madame <-- finds your again and again interspersed impertinence simply ridiculous
already at the last riddle, where the 2 closest are to me should report, were you, will777, the 1st the pn wrote with the claim you are one of the winners, loooool. have me deliciously amused
since you are much too clever not to check who had won and who had not, it was also more than brazen of you. well, we know you, just tried it once a psc abzustauben
the madame will also nothing revoked just because will777 suddenly wants to participate in protest or just sticheln as so often.
why should i justify every little change? especially since such changes were and are always positive for the participants.
one time I will do it here now --> this extension here has e.g. the sense that so far 7 participants are there and who has read the 1st post correctly there is only with 10 participants more or higher psc
so why the hate posts on the part of will777 and his followers? just because the participants can not have fast enough the psc? will777 is not (yet) even participant, so no right to even get upset about it or interfere.
such riddles are always dynamic and you have to adapt as a cyclist and so estimate some things even if it then comes to such moronic hostility.
--> there are also people who write me pn they would like to participate, but have only on xx time to complete the task --> out of fairness I consider such a thing gladly if it fits promptly into the framework.
why are some here again echauffieren?
take the chance or leave it, but do not rush against my puzzles, especially not if you do not even want to participate and only again frustrated for some other reasons and then want to take it out on me.
believe rather that here a few participants who have dropped out (may everyone as he wants) simply the skins of it swim because they notice that others a much better implementation of the task purely, only a presumption;-)
0815 is just nothing in my riddles, hang in and give effort and that must be able to recognize as a reader --> is also clear in the opening post.
therefore also my post regarding the likes so I see how many still like the one or the other picture and the implementation to it.
where, however, your likes have come I do not know,
maybe one or the other of you has made himself unpopular in the meantime and the liker have changed their mind, who cares? what can I do about it? besides, I had written --> I'll see how I can integrate it, if the likes appear and disappear again we are back to the dynamic from above, then I have to adapt and can also not take into account.
and to you mowolum, yes, in the background the wheels run differently, there is a madame who makes clear with success sponsors so that certain participants can win again and again, almost constantly psc, and that for a long time
i also know that your frustration towards me comes from the fact that i don't answer your pn or write to you for some time now. if you don't know the reason yourself, i won't tell you
such statements on your part against me in any threads (was not the first time) should then probably bring your frustration across where you are now but otherwise so much effort to talk everything nice.
see here just one example of you a few posts above
if it was not clear enough lately then now and here --> i do not want any contact with you, neither pn nor your insinuations that behind the scenes the wheels turn differently or any other taunts, thank you.
however, I will not discuss this further here or by pn.
and in conclusion,
honestly, i have no problem to cancel this or the following puzzles under certain circumstances and give back the money to the sponsors. those who like to participate (even without psc) can then thank the long time complainers.
everyone who still likes can participate in the current task in my puzzle thread until wednesday evening
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post:
Jenn-R
i think she is still googling
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post: Anonym,
Jenn-R, 
Nik89, 
RebellYell, T****s, 
x00NY
I think the problem with your puzzles is that there is no one clear solution. So an outsider can't understand which criteria are used to choose the winners, and you have the feeling that the decision is made by sympathy only, which is why the number of participants is rather limited. In addition, most here probably do not jump on your philosophical esoteric track and are rather different.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post:
Jenn-R, 
RebellYell, 
supermode, 
x00NY
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
most like you are happy that there is something going on here and you can eat popcorn and be distracted from your real problems --> how pathetic are you who are only out for show?
will answer you right away unicorn.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post:
RebellYell
@Iseedeadpeople,
since you do not want to discuss by PN and here, I will answer you here then.
And I also do not care if GJ deletes it, but I have the same right as you.
There was a time it looked wonderful between us.
That has changed from the time when I no longer accepted your paternalism and insult.
Then you are dropped like a hot potato.
I still have the correspondence.
Unfortunately, you have rejected the reconciling hand that I have given you, which could have actually come from you, with a new insolence.
I am very sorry for what can happen to an initially good interpersonal relationship.
Iseedeadpeople, I have it not necessary to talk something beautiful.you know exactly my attitude.
What is that, frustration because of 2 not answered PN`s.Do not think that is ridiculous.
Refrain from the insinuations.Better is, one writes something, what corresponds to the facts.
Assumptions are poison and enough of it is sprayed.
You are not the ultimate here.My grandmother has always said,naked are all the same.
Also you are, like all of us, a gambler, further I would like to express myself in addition also no more.
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
think I send you the answer by pn, here there is nothing to see, please move on, no show today, no popcorn.
write me briefly if you want it
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically