1232153 wrote on 03/27/2019 00:30 PM
What is your problem anyway?
Nobody knows how much others know about you. Or can you show something that proves otherwise?
Also here's no longer makes sense, you wrote that in a chargeback your liquidity worsens. And I only answered that this is normally true for several bookings but only internally at the bank
Or do you mean that my tax office knows that I have booked back my micky Maus subscription?
Blubbo33 wrote on 03/27/2019 00:35 PM
Also here's no longer makes sense, you wrote that in a chargeback your liquidity deteriorates. And I just replied that this is true in the normal case already with several postings but only internally at the bank
Or do you mean that my tax office knows that I have booked my micky Maus Abo back?
Yes, your tax office knows more than you think. Tax offices have registered all accounts that you have or had including all the data that belongs to it. You can easily retrieve
Wunderino is also on TV from time to time. That must be serious ...:-D
He said Jehovah:
Great behavior a factual discussion I would have preferred.
I do not know Wunderino and have never played there, I thought the name may no longer be mentioned here?...
Be that as it may...
I think it is already something else whether a lawyer shows up on TV with his name, because I think so a lawyer as a person and private person has a reputation to lose. A casino pays for the fact that it may advertise... one should not generalize these things.
For your information:
I had also tried
After I had looked out all the data / losses, then came at some point the hint from them that you also have to specify the wins! These are offset against the losses, from which only the final sum, which one can claim back, results
One would not be allowed to enrich oneself finally
This fact is also not apparent at all. It was all a waste of time.
The more it became clear that this "business" was not worthwhile for them, the tone became more and more disrespectful.
Begbie wrote on 03/27/2019 at 09:35: FYI:
I had tried this as well
After I had searched out all data/losses, then came at some point the hint from them that one must also indicate the wins! These are offset against the losses, from which only the final sum, which one can claim back, results
One would not be allowed to enrich oneself finally
This fact is also not apparent at all. It was all a waste of time.
The more it became clear that this "business" was not worthwhile for them, the tone became more and more disrespectful.
You play, know that it is illegal and you want to charge back money?
That's called fraud!
Wherever you tried, I personally think it's a good thing that they turned you down!
Begbie wrote on 03/27/2019 at 09:35: FYI:
I had tried this as well
After I had searched out all data/losses, then came at some point the hint from them that one must also indicate the wins! These are offset against the losses, from which only the final sum, which one can claim back, results
One would not be allowed to enrich oneself finally
This fact is also not apparent at all. It was all a waste of time.
The more it became clear that this "business" was not worthwhile for them, the tone became more and more disrespectful.
Haha how cool is that?
You just wanted to reclaim the pure losses without considering your wins?
Oh man, you're not serious?
So brazen it does not go
So I find it perhaps morally somewhat reprehensible.
Otherwise, everyone should do it as he wants.
And if one gets the money, he gambles it away again anyway.
And if you're honest, the "reputable casinos" only suffer from it.
And if you look at how many have fallen for some casino, then it is not necessarily unfair if you get his money.
The money remains in the end in the casino cycle.
As the saying goes, your money is not gone, it just belongs to someone else.
If someone does not know that he has played illegally, has fallen for Nepper-Tarigues-Pitcher-Lock offers
(e.g. deceitful bonus offers - or Deposit 10 euros and we give you 50 euros in addition, etc.) ... well that is then stupidly run, but justifies for me (conditionally) a chargeback, of course under the condition never again to deposit more in an online casino.
But if someone knows that he plays illegally, a chargeback due to his losses in veranlasst, which belongs in my opinion locked up
wirholendeingeld.de - Your experience?
Nobody has liked this post so far
Also here's no longer makes sense, you wrote that in a chargeback your liquidity worsens. And I only answered that this is normally true for several bookings but only internally at the bank
Or do you mean that my tax office knows that I have booked back my micky Maus subscription?
This post has been translated automatically
wirholendeingeld.de - Your experience?
Nobody has liked this post so far
Yes, your tax office knows more than you think. Tax offices have registered all accounts that you have or had including all the data that belongs to it. You can easily retrieve
This post has been translated automatically
wirholendeingeld.de - Your experience?
Nobody has liked this post so far
Great behavior a factual discussion I would have preferred.
I do not know Wunderino and have never played there, I thought the name may no longer be mentioned here?...
Be that as it may...
I think it is already something else whether a lawyer shows up on TV with his name, because I think so a lawyer as a person and private person has a reputation to lose. A casino pays for the fact that it may advertise... one should not generalize these things.
This post has been translated automatically
wirholendeingeld.de - Your experience?
Nobody has liked this post so far
I had also tried
After I had looked out all the data / losses, then came at some point the hint from them that you also have to specify the wins! These are offset against the losses, from which only the final sum, which one can claim back, results
One would not be allowed to enrich oneself finally
This fact is also not apparent at all. It was all a waste of time.
The more it became clear that this "business" was not worthwhile for them, the tone became more and more disrespectful.
This post has been translated automatically
wirholendeingeld.de - Your experience?
Liked this post: Anonym
There see yes THE losses ... that is net loss.
There you always have to offset the win
This post has been translated automatically
wirholendeingeld.de - Your experience?
Nobody has liked this post so far
You play, know that it is illegal and you want to charge back money?
That's called fraud!
Wherever you tried, I personally think it's a good thing that they turned you down!
This post has been translated automatically
wirholendeingeld.de - Your experience?
Nobody has liked this post so far
Haha how cool is that?
You just wanted to reclaim the pure losses without considering your wins?
Oh man, you're not serious?
So brazen it does not go
This post has been translated automatically
wirholendeingeld.de - Your experience?
Liked this post:
table1
handkerchief?
This post has been translated automatically
wirholendeingeld.de - Your experience?
Nobody has liked this post so far
Otherwise, everyone should do it as he wants.
And if one gets the money, he gambles it away again anyway.
And if you're honest, the "reputable casinos" only suffer from it.
And if you look at how many have fallen for some casino, then it is not necessarily unfair if you get his money.
The money remains in the end in the casino cycle.
As the saying goes, your money is not gone, it just belongs to someone else.
This post has been translated automatically
wirholendeingeld.de - Your experience?
Nobody has liked this post so far
(e.g. deceitful bonus offers - or Deposit 10 euros and we give you 50 euros in addition, etc.) ... well that is then stupidly run, but justifies for me (conditionally) a chargeback, of course under the condition never again to deposit more in an online casino.
But if someone knows that he plays illegally, a chargeback due to his losses in veranlasst, which belongs in my opinion locked up
This post has been translated automatically