Conspiracy theories: My personal sobering conclusion about online casinos with the support of 8 other players (Page 2)

Blubbo33 wrote on 06/20/2019 at 11:39 AM
How do you KNOW they don't have an impact, just like RTP.
There is no evidence for or against it

That's why I'm always amazed with what matter of fact you keep writing this to people
The only thing that is certain is that everyone will end up in the red at some point.

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

Bones wrote on 06/20/2019 11:46 AM
Yes of course they all end up in the red. Explains the RTP.

If you really understood what RTP means, you wouldn't even doubt that it is true. That's probably why I can't explain it to you, but I'll try one last time. The RTP is nothing else than the house edge of the casino. 96% RTP means that the player gets 96% of his bet IN A CUT PER SPIN. This may sound okay, but it is shockingly low. Let's say you play a round of book of Dead. First spin 0X. Second spin 2X

Sounds pretty normal, but is actually already above average luck. ABOVE AVERAGE.

Why can't the RTP actually be manipulated at all? Because that would be the worst, most obvious and nonsensical fraud of all time.

Everybody can see his RTP by himself. If not on the casino site, then he could always just sit at home and take notes. Anyone who does this will find in the long run that the RTP is somewhat spot on. The more spins, the closer you usually get. The cheating would be conceivably bad, anyone could detect it. Besides, you don't need it at all. A casino makes so much more win with 96% RTP than some would think. For comparison: Roulette has a RTP of 98%. Already 200 years ago, casinos made such a turnover that entire cities or principalities were financed by it. A roulette game also lasts much longer than a slot game AND the player loses less

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically

Bone wrote on 06/20/2019 12:44 PM: What a bullshit. So now I'm working for a casino again, right?

Someone who claims that the stated RTP is bullshit is already very much affected by a perceptual disorder. How do you explain all the winning pictures on Gamblejoe? Are you complaining that the RTP is higher than stated? Surely not. By the way, there is also a second important factor: Variance

If you play games with low variance, you will probably be frighteningly close to the RTP after 200-300 spins, and you will hardly change it much. Games with high variance, such as BoD, may well run a few 10000 spins until the specified RTP is reached. And of course there is no guarantee on this, it is pure mathematics

Imagine a ball rolling randomly across a large map. On the map are different fields painted. A super big field with 0X and a smaller field with 1x. These two fields alone occupy more than half of the map. So it goes on and on until somewhere in the very last corner there is a very small field with 5000x. Every time the ball rolls you pay a bet and get the amount back.

Would you play this game? Probably not, because it sounds boring as shit and the chances to win are pretty bad. But a Slot machine is basically nothing else. Some machines may not have a tiny 5000x field, but a slightly larger 500x field, but basically it always comes down to the same math: the longer you play, the more you lose. After 10 tries it is absolutely realistic to still be in the plus. But who spins only 10 times? Most players play several thousand spins per session. With every single spin they lose on average 3-6%. How should you be in the plus?

This post has been translated automatically

This post has been translated automatically