>>(Basically, the bank doesn't give a damn what you do with your own money. Because your money is your business and although it is obviously forgotten by the general public. The bank works for you and not you for the bank, because produce tuen the yes nothing! and need you or your money to be able to work with it.no one is forced to own a bank account. You can if you want to have no bank account at all. Brings to the nowadays annoying circumstances with itself. But the fact is that every employer and government agency is required to pay you your salary, wages, unemployment benefits or pension in cash or via cashier's check. Since this is actually the original payment method and money movements take place longer there is Internet.
So just mentioned in passing
Completely my opinion. In the end, it is even a general suspicion when a bank throws someone out when you Deposit on a wallet.
They talk themselves out of it because they can kick anyone they like anyway. I think I would actually no longer open an account out of spite if I were terminated. Would I then have to continue to pay GEZ? The take but no cash
They talk themselves out of it because they can kick anyone they like anyway. I think I would actually no longer open an account out of spite if I were terminated. Would I then have to continue to pay GEZ? The take but no cash
IN THE HAUPTZENTRALLE, THE CONTRIBUTION COUNTED ONLY IN COINS (OF COURSE ONLY COPPERS!) AND THE AS LONG AS, WITH NER HANDFUL BESCHMEISSEN UNTIL THE MONTHLY CONTRIBUTION IS PAID😂😂
Nah, for transfers without a bank account is the post office responsible! At some banks, this is also offered that a non-customer can instruct cash to a bank account but the post office must. Of course, for a fee. Whereby this is very high with banks u the transaction much longer than the usual 1-3T.dauern can. I once worked at the post office. Whether the processing fee has changed since then I don't know. Costs were for cashier's check submission to 5 € transfer to 10 euros maximum
Dagmarlena wrote on 29.05.2020 at 15:45 IN HAUPTZENTRALLE, THE CONTRIBUTION COUNTED ONLY IN COINS (OF COURSE ONLY COPPERS!) AND THE AS LONG AS, WITH EACH NER HANDFUL BESCHMEISSEN UNTIL THE MONTHLY CONTRIBUTION IS SETTLED😂😂
Nah, for transfers without a bank account is the post office responsible! At some banks, this is also offered that a non-customer can instruct cash to a bank account but the post office must. Of course, for a fee. Whereby this is very high with banks u the transaction much longer than the usual 1-3T.dauern can. I once worked at the post office. Whether the processing fee has changed since then I don't know. Costs were for cashier's check submission to 5 € transfer to 10 euros maximum
And GEZ just allowed themselves that you can not pay with cash? Unbelievable :|
They want to enforce their monopoly with brute force and all casinos that do not belong to the
belong to the German tax coffers, are a thorn in their side. Only in such a way it does not go,
because the rest of the Germans are worse off than SH and all Germans also
worse off than any European in the EU. It is also not possible that all German
Gamblers as potentially addicted to German laws and bans to maintain the monopoly
and bans to maintain the monopoly position. We now have
globalization on the Internet with worldwide online casinos. Legalize means
equal treatment of all Europeans, as the EU stipulates according to the service
stipulates. There are also no illegal casinos, but rather a government that is moving
in a legal gray area moves. All the more I welcome the push in 2021
and only hope that they all do the right thing
So slowly pile up here the reports about this topic... there comes one already in the brooding... me extra for it nem new account to make... nee...
Then I go nevertheless rather for the time being only into the gaming house and wait for what the regulation next year brings...
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
Haspa now also
30th May. 2020, at 09:14 pm CEST#27
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Katharina2 wrote on 30.05.2020 at 08:04
because the rest of the Germans are worse off than SH
Worse off than SH?
The opposite is true.
SH residents have only disadvantages due to SH licenses, however this is misrepresented in almost all reports.
People from SH have e.g. no access to Interwetten and Betfair.
At Bet-at-home there is no casino area and also at Tipico you can only place sports bets, there you can only access sh.tipico.de
At Bwin you can only play on Bwin.de. Sports betting with Casino-SH offer.
The Schleswig-Holstein licenses can be safely forgotten and the game selection on the SH sites is ridiculous. No Table games, no live games and the slot selection is also very limited.
In addition, SH players are automatically redirected to the SH pages, respectively cannot register on the page with MGA license.
Whoever seriously claims that SH players have an advantage has no idea about this license.
You can't play at LeoVegas as a SH player either, you will be redirected to sh.leovegas.de automatically.
The offer there consists of 5 slots.
Sorry, but I can't take anyone first who sees an advantage for the players from Schleswig-Holstein.
The illegality at casinos with MGA license is of course identical with the by the way federal states.
Many players do not understand this. They hear on TV "Online Casinos are legal in Schleswig-Holstein" and then play, for example, at Videoslots with MGA license. Participation there is just as illegal, but many do not understand this, because no one makes the effort to deal with the licenses.
roros wrote on 30.05.2020 at 21:14
Worse off than SH?
The opposite is true.
SH residents have only disadvantages due to SH licenses, however this is misrepresented in almost all reports.
People from SH have e.g. no access to Interwetten and Betfair.
At Bet-at-home there is no casino area and also at Tipico you can only place sports bets, there you can only access sh.tipico.de
At Bwin you can only play on Bwin.de. Sports betting with Casino-SH offer.
The Schleswig-Holstein licenses can be safely forgotten and the game selection on the SH sites is ridiculous. No Table games, no live games and the slot selection is also very limited.
In addition, SH players are automatically redirected to the SH pages, respectively cannot register on the page with MGA license.
Whoever seriously claims that SH players have an advantage has no idea about this license.
You can't play at LeoVegas as a SH player either, you will be redirected to sh.leovegas.de automatically.
The offer there consists of 5 slots.
Sorry, but I can't take anyone first who sees an advantage for the players from Schleswig-Holstein.
The illegality at casinos with MGA license is of course identical with the by the way federal states.
Many players do not understand this. They hear on TV "Online Casinos are legal in Schleswig-Holstein" and then play, for example, at Videoslots with MGA license. Participation there is just as illegal, but many do not understand this, because no one makes the effort to deal with the licenses.
But we don't need a regulated gambling contract in Germany, if it then comes to these restrictions for all as you describe here. Then you can also not bet on live games? Because that is also planned in the gambling contract that you can then after come into force no more live bets placed. Many can hardly wait for this regulation comes, but I also believe that then also come many negative changes.
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
Haspa now also
30th May. 2020, at 09:41 pm CEST#29
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Falko wrote on 30.05.2020 at 21:32
Since we need but no regulated gambling treaty in Germany,if it then comes for all to these restrictions as you describe here. Then you can also not bet on live games? Because that is also planned in the gambling contract that you can then after come into force no more live bets placed. Many can hardly wait for this regulation comes, but I also believe that then also come many negative changes.
If there is a SH license, the MGA page of the casino is blocked for players from SH.
Rizk, for example, is also blocked for players from Schleswig-Holstein. You could get to the site and register, but their T&Cs are clear. https://rizk.com/de/terms
" Many can hardly wait for this regulation to come, but I also believe that many negative changes will come."
Here's the problem. Many people have a completely wrong idea about the coming regulation next year. They think everything will stay the same and maybe there will be the 1000 euro limit and certain live bets would be dropped.
Of course, much more will change
By the way, you can read all this yourself. The draft of the State Treaty on Gaming 2021 can be viewed online.
ErikS wrote on 29.05.2020 at 16:46
And GEZ just allowed themselves that you are not allowed to pay with cash? Unbelievable :|
One does not exclude the other!
The supposedly no longer be state so no authority that is legally bound to the duty
As a private company you give the specifications and if the customer with the AgBs nucht agrees, he can not use the offer!
Since you can not avoid the contribution despite the apparent privatization and everyone is taken into the duty, whether he uses the no matter in what form or as a hermit without Stom in a wooden hut lives and no TV and radio wants. Is and remains it factically a compulsory levy and is thus a tax equal! Would it but lt Basic Law not, would that really be true, what the one there times again want to sell
BUT EVERYWHERE it is hooted like jumped whether the GEZ cash transactions offer or no more. Since you are bound to in the payment obligation, you must send to your duty to meet your cash via the post office. Have thus also without existing bank account and with cash your contribution paid. In which you can digitize your cash from the post office for you!
Therefore, this is ne cash payment has been
Haspa now also
Nobody has liked this post so far
Completely my opinion. In the end, it is even a general suspicion when a bank throws someone out when you Deposit on a wallet.
They talk themselves out of it because they can kick anyone they like anyway. I think I would actually no longer open an account out of spite if I were terminated. Would I then have to continue to pay GEZ? The take but no cash
This post has been translated automatically
Haspa now also
Liked this post:
Herr_D
IN THE HAUPTZENTRALLE, THE CONTRIBUTION COUNTED ONLY IN COINS
(OF COURSE ONLY COPPERS!)
AND THE AS LONG AS, WITH NER HANDFUL BESCHMEISSEN UNTIL THE MONTHLY CONTRIBUTION IS PAID😂😂
Nah, for transfers without a bank account is the post office responsible! At some banks, this is also offered that a non-customer can instruct cash to a bank account but the post office must. Of course, for a fee. Whereby this is very high with banks u the transaction much longer than the usual 1-3T.dauern can. I once worked at the post office. Whether the processing fee has changed since then I don't know. Costs were for cashier's check submission to 5 € transfer to 10 euros maximum
This post has been translated automatically
Haspa now also
Nobody has liked this post so far
And GEZ just allowed themselves that you can not pay with cash? Unbelievable :|
This post has been translated automatically
Haspa now also
Nobody has liked this post so far
I just deposited with Visa in a casino just now. But that's right it doesn't work everywhere anymore. Too bad only PP now Visa
This post has been translated automatically
Haspa now also
Nobody has liked this post so far
belong to the German tax coffers, are a thorn in their side. Only in such a way it does not go,
because the rest of the Germans are worse off than SH and all Germans also
worse off than any European in the EU. It is also not possible that all German
Gamblers as potentially addicted to German laws and bans to maintain the monopoly
and bans to maintain the monopoly position. We now have
globalization on the Internet with worldwide online casinos. Legalize means
equal treatment of all Europeans, as the EU stipulates according to the service
stipulates. There are also no illegal casinos, but rather a government that is moving
in a legal gray area moves. All the more I welcome the push in 2021
and only hope that they all do the right thing
This post has been translated automatically
Haspa now also
Nobody has liked this post so far
Then I go nevertheless rather for the time being only into the gaming house and wait for what the regulation next year brings...
This post has been translated automatically
Haspa now also
Nobody has liked this post so far
Worse off than SH?
The opposite is true.
SH residents have only disadvantages due to SH licenses, however this is misrepresented in almost all reports.
People from SH have e.g. no access to Interwetten and Betfair.
At Bet-at-home there is no casino area and also at Tipico you can only place sports bets, there you can only access sh.tipico.de
At Bwin you can only play on Bwin.de. Sports betting with Casino-SH offer.
The Schleswig-Holstein licenses can be safely forgotten and the game selection on the SH sites is ridiculous. No Table games, no live games and the slot selection is also very limited.
In addition, SH players are automatically redirected to the SH pages, respectively cannot register on the page with MGA license.
Whoever seriously claims that SH players have an advantage has no idea about this license.
You can't play at LeoVegas as a SH player either, you will be redirected to sh.leovegas.de automatically.
The offer there consists of 5 slots.
Sorry, but I can't take anyone first who sees an advantage for the players from Schleswig-Holstein.
The illegality at casinos with MGA license is of course identical with the by the way federal states.
Many players do not understand this. They hear on TV "Online Casinos are legal in Schleswig-Holstein" and then play, for example, at Videoslots with MGA license. Participation there is just as illegal, but many do not understand this, because no one makes the effort to deal with the licenses.
This post has been translated automatically
Haspa now also
Nobody has liked this post so far
But we don't need a regulated gambling contract in Germany, if it then comes to these restrictions for all as you describe here. Then you can also not bet on live games? Because that is also planned in the gambling contract that you can then after come into force no more live bets placed. Many can hardly wait for this regulation comes, but I also believe that then also come many negative changes.
This post has been translated automatically
Haspa now also
Nobody has liked this post so far
If there is a SH license, the MGA page of the casino is blocked for players from SH.
Rizk, for example, is also blocked for players from Schleswig-Holstein. You could get to the site and register, but their T&Cs are clear. https://rizk.com/de/terms
Instead, the player is allowed to play on SH at https://www.rizkcasino.de/.
" Many can hardly wait for this regulation to come, but I also believe that many negative changes will come."
Here's the problem. Many people have a completely wrong idea about the coming regulation next year. They think everything will stay the same and maybe there will be the 1000 euro limit and certain live bets would be dropped.
Of course, much more will change
By the way, you can read all this yourself. The draft of the State Treaty on Gaming 2021 can be viewed online.
This post has been translated automatically
Haspa now also
Nobody has liked this post so far
One does not exclude the other!
The supposedly no longer be state so no authority that is legally bound to the duty
As a private company you give the specifications and if the customer with the AgBs nucht agrees, he can not use the offer!
Since you can not avoid the contribution despite the apparent privatization and everyone is taken into the duty, whether he uses the no matter in what form or as a hermit without Stom in a wooden hut lives and no TV and radio wants. Is and remains it factically a compulsory levy and is thus a tax equal! Would it but lt Basic Law not, would that really be true, what the one there times again want to sell
BUT EVERYWHERE it is hooted like jumped whether the GEZ cash transactions offer or no more. Since you are bound to in the payment obligation, you must send to your duty to meet your cash via the post office. Have thus also without existing bank account and with cash your contribution paid. In which you can digitize your cash from the post office for you!
Therefore, this is ne cash payment has been
This post has been translated automatically