Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Online Casinos in general: Class action AdvoFin - experiences? (Page 2)

Topic created on 12th Dec. 2020 | Page: 2 of 23 | Answers: 226 | Views: 76,086
Falko
Icon
Ultimately, however, it is so that the honest players have to pay this bill in the end, if others have gambled away the money they have afterwards booked back or complain. That something like this hardly finds any supporters here is quite normal.

This post has been translated automatically

xzxzxz911
Unfortunately, I have to agree with the OP - in Austria, gambling is a monopoly = Casinos Austria. Therefore, I see the responsibility and Risk on the operator side (e.g. bWin). bWin wants to make money in an "illegal" market. Look that you get back as much as possible - most (80%) here probably have no idea how it is to lose a lot of money. I have lost at least EUR 150.000,- with bWin over the last 5 years (alone from 1.12 until today about EUR 12.000,-).

And those who talk about MORAL and honest players here - they don't exist, they just haven't lost enough yet!

This post has been translated automatically

Avicii
In Austria, only Win2Day is allowed to offer online gambling
That is why I am trying to get the money back from Bwin
I can understand that some posts here are very cynical and aggressive

Still, maybe someone who has experience with this will answer me. I thought this forum here is a good place to maybe find someone who can tell me about their experience

Depending on how the whole thing turns out for me, of course I'll be happy to let you know

And because someone asked how I finance it: The law firm keeps a certain percentage of the lost money if I win (less if there is an out-of-court settlement, more if there is a lawsuit - still better than nothing for the amount I am talking about). So you do not bear the Risk of legal costs.

And since the law firm has taken over my case, I assume that they are optimistic

Do some people here have something against Austrians? It reads like that in parts

Thank you for your answers and best regards

This post has been translated automatically

T****z
gamble1 wrote on 12.12.2020 at 22:33: Everyone eats in good German times shit because he has put himself in a stupid situation

Yeah right, that's what it looks like.

But in some cases the casino eats the shit. It's their own fault if they offer their services despite the prevailing illegality in the respective region.
When it comes to paying out, the stores often refer to existing rules (ABG) - why shouldn't a gambler be allowed to do this?

It's a give and take




This post has been translated automatically

T****z
sippi wrote on 12/12/2020 at 10:21 pm
Yes, but he is right now. Also has nothing to do with defending. The example with the butcher fits quite well. You can not eat the whole pork knuckle and then say, upsi, I'm actually a vegetarian, please give me back the money.

You put grocers on the same level as providers of highly addictive Internet toys?

Apparently you are already very deeply rooted in the matter...

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
It's always the same discussions after all. The important thing here is to get away from the idea that you get your money back from a casino
Every judge who has ruled in favor of gamblers so far has not understood something! This is a very lousy decision and just imagine if we would all sue for our losses tomorrow because of a lawyer running along or because we once read a ruling that yes, it works
And it explains itself by the way that nobody is in cahoots with any casino who gambles himself! One can understand everyone, which has it times over triebe n. But then still every day with casino game to deal I hold for very underdone. Then you have to make a cut and see that you look for other hobbies and do not break and embittered by the whole matter

This post has been translated automatically

upola
Legend
Avicii wrote on 13.12.2020 at 07:38: In Austria only Win2Day is allowed to offer online gambling
That's why I'm trying to get the money back at Bwin
I can understand that some posts here are very cynical and aggressive

Still, maybe someone who has experience with this will answer me. I thought this forum here is a good place to maybe find someone who can tell me about their experience

Depending on how the whole thing turns out for me, of course I'll be happy to let you know

And because someone asked how I finance it: The law firm keeps a certain percentage of the lost money if I win (less if there is an out-of-court settlement, more if there is a lawsuit - still better than nothing for the amount I am talking about). So you do not bear the Risk of legal costs.

And since the law firm has taken over my case, I assume that they are optimistic

Do some people here have something against Austrians? It reads like that in parts

Thank you for your answers and best regards

Why do you need experience reports?
As you write here, you have already won?

Here no one has anything against Austrians, how do you come to...only because you are not unreservedly right

This post has been translated automatically

eierlothar
Top Member
gamble1 wrote on 12/12/2020 at 22:33
This has nothing specifically to do with casinos I also stand by the players when I think this site is right

If the player is locked and can gamble his money with the same data the casino has made a mistake and has to pay it back but why on earth if you lose normally ? This is unfair and then everyone would theoretically have the right to do so and then everyone in the world can do what he wants because you can sue the coal back yes

Notice even you can extend the scenario to everything the leasing car does not like lawsuit or the kebab does not taste lawsuit

There are rules for that and the rule for gambling is just play only what you can afford and expect it to be gone and if you can't do that don't expect father state to take you by the hand and say poor bubu here take back your money the bad bad casinos took from you at gunpoint

Everybody eats shit because he got himself into a bad situation whether by gambling or not

Lack of OWN RESPONSIBILITY!

Is the evil of our society, for which neither the understanding, or even the insight is hardly still present.
With incisions of the private sphere, the screaming is rightly large, but if politics then personal responsibility presupposes,
the whining starts. Of course, a limit of 100 euros a month would be a good idea for some, but the other way around a bad for people who
can invest far more. It is unfortunately the loss of the generation of types in the course, where a code of honor without large words to lose
was commonplace. Whether you liked the person or not, but you knew where you stood. Where a word still had an incredible weight.
And today is paid for months, and then completely asocial and wanked trying to get money. And that mostly still
the types that others call social parasites. I get the choke.

This post has been translated automatically

Jubla2014
Top Member
Very good contribution!


Full agreement!

This post has been translated automatically

xzxzxz911
eierlothar wrote on 12/14/2020 at 02:30 PM
Lack of OWN RESPONSIBILITY!

Is the evil of our society, for which neither the understanding, or even the insight is hardly still present.
When cutting the privacy, the cry is rightly Great, but if politics then assumes personal responsibility,
the whining starts. Of course, a limit of 100 euros a month would be a good idea for some, but the other way around a bad for people who
can invest far more. It is unfortunately the loss of the generation of types in the course, where a code of honor without large words to lose
was commonplace. Whether you liked the person or not, but you knew where you stood. Where a word still had an incredible weight.
And today is paid for months, and then completely asocial and wanked trying to get money. And that mostly still
the types that others call social parasites. I get the choke.

Alone that you see a Deposit at Online Casinos as an investment is already very twisted. You talk about a "code of honor" - at online casinos and call people who insist on your right as wankered ? Exactly so talk only people who have not lost enough, but please remain a good and loyal customer of online casinos so we can reclaim our losses THANKS

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics3rd May. 2024 at 07:14 am CEST

GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately