Tribeholz wrote on 01/20/2021 at 10:48 AM
But I also know of someone who got their coals back
He didn't make a big fuss about it, but as I understood it, he was first in therapy, then in an addiction group and didn't relapse for a year - and then he got his money back
But this was used to settle old debts.
This only referred to "everything clarified by mail"
I went to the website because I was interested in it...... .
So this is not only for Austrians, but also for Germans
Only with certain Casino's (in which I, by the way, do not play) is sued.
The minimum loss is 10,000.00 EUR at ONE Provider (minus the wins mind you).
37% of the proceeds is also not a pittance (but still more than half of the loss - to have or not to have.....)
Thanks, I'm out of there....
However, I can absolutely understand people who meet the above criteria and want to get at least some of the losses back
The question remains though... will they keep gambling?
Klabisto wrote on 20.01.2021 at 15:20: I went times on the Internet site, because me then nevertheless interested...... .
So this is not only for Austrians, but also for Germans
Only with certain casino's (in which I, by the way, do not play) is sued.
The minimum loss is 10.000,00 EUR at ONE Provider (minus the wins mind you).
37% of the proceeds is also not a pittance (but still more than half of the loss - to have or not to have.....)
Thanks, I'm out of there....
However, I can absolutely understand people who meet the above criteria and want to get at least some of the losses back
The question remains though... will they keep gambling?
What exactly can you understand? They go here and gamble away 5-digit sums and then have the audacity to sue the providers. This is the lowest drawer. Stupidity is rewarded and that can't be
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
Class action AdvoFin - experiences?
20th Jan. 2021, at 04:29 pm CET#76
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Klabisto wrote on 20.01.2021 at 15:20: I went times on the Internet site, because me then nevertheless interested...... .
So this is not only for Austrians, but also for Germans
Only at certain casino's (in which I, by the way, do not play) is sued.
The minimum loss is 10.000,00 EUR at ONE Provider (minus the wins mind you).
37% of the proceeds is also not a pittance (but still more than half of the loss - to have or not to have.....)
Thanks, I'm out of there....
However, I can absolutely understand people who meet the above criteria and want to get at least some of the losses back
The question remains though... will they keep gambling?
I also think that this must be tied to conditions. Similar to a suspended sentence, where you get a helper at your side. It is not to be underestimated if someone sells his financial means completely and stands there at the end without what or with many debts. The danger is too great that this person will make the same mistake again
A period of 3 - 5 years under control, I think in these cases it makes sense
stevbuam wrote on 06.01.2021 at 12:11 pm: servus avicii
I am also Austrian and play for about 10 years in various large Online Casinos
That you attach yourself to this class action suit I find totally brave and awesome!
These OC giants should be asked to pay once properly anyway!
I find that all these negative contributions here, these are very envious and each of these has probably already gambled away a 5 digit amount himself!
Why I say that is because all these clever people are registered here in this forum, so these are for me all addicted to gambling and in the end not as great and super as they think!
Please keep me informed about the lawsuit!
thank you Best regards stevbuam
Edit: Provocations against the community removed
I don't understand why everyone who loses a lot or doesn't speak well of such behavior is called a frustrated gambling addict
I mean if someone is willing to spend so much you can still be happy even if it's gone that's called investing money for hobbies and one buys railroads the other collects things and still another prefers to gamble with it
You are but the people who spend money and then crying all run to daddy state and all want to sue so you apparently have a gambling problem and not the people who continue to participate nicely and politely here on the subject of casino
And why should someone be jealous when I need money I just do not gamble so simple is that I do not need to be jealous when someone makes himself small in public and his weaknesses outwardly carries
I understand it fully and completely if a casino in some form stupid things makes the coal back to demand but ask yourselves really times the question would you also with 100k win the money would have given if the casino had said
Mr./Mrs. XYZ unfortunately there is no money from us we know they have used the service but what should we say we are unfortunately addicted to gambling or it is purely theoretically considered forbidden for them from Austria to play therefore gibts nix
Would anyone have done that ? ... . NO no one would have made then here would be the next thread with MIMIMI Casino XYZ does not pay the money
And please explain to me why these people have more rights than the people who have to pay their employees
gamble1 wrote on 01/21/2021 at 01:24 PM
Why always all those who lose a lot or do not speak well of such behavior are called frustrated gambling addicts I do not quite understand
I mean if someone is willing to spend so much you can still be happy even if it's gone that's called investing money for hobbies and one buys railroads the other collects things and still another prefers to gamble with it
You are but the people who spend money and then crying all run to daddy state and all want to sue so you apparently have a gambling problem and not the people who continue to participate nicely and politely here on the subject of casino
And why should someone be jealous when I need money I just do not gamble so simple is that I do not need to be jealous when someone makes himself small publicly and his weaknesses outwardly carries
I understand it fully and completely if a casino in any form stupid things makes the coal back to demand but ask yourselves really times the question would you also with 100k win the money would have given if the casino had said
Mr./Mrs. XYZ unfortunately there is no money from us we know they have used the service but what should we say we are unfortunately addicted to gambling or it is purely theoretically considered forbidden for them from Austria to play therefore gibts nix
Would someone have done that ? ... . NO no one would have made then here would be the next thread with MIMIMI Casino XYZ does not pay the money
And please explain to me why these people have more rights than the people who have to pay their employees
Carefully, please. The proponents of this measure do not have that much logic and sense. Your words here are the proverbial pearls cast before swine.
What exactly can you understand? They go here and gamble away 5-digit sums and then have the audacity to sue the providers. This is the lowest drawer. Stupidity is rewarded and that can't be
What are you bluffing at me so?
I can understand it, YOU can not. Point.
Jokerboy wrote on 20/01/2021 at 16:29
I also think this needs to be conditional. Similar to a suspended sentence where you get a helper at your side. After all, it's not to be underestimated when someone completely sells off their financial resources and ends up with nothing or a lot of debt. The danger is too great that this person will make the same mistake again
A period of 3 - 5 years under control, I think in these cases it makes sense.
I think this is a very good idea!
I assume that AdvoFin is not concerned about the gambling addicts, but only about their 37%....
Class action AdvoFin - experiences?
Nobody has liked this post so far
This only referred to "everything clarified by mail"
This post has been translated automatically
Class action AdvoFin - experiences?
Nobody has liked this post so far
So this is not only for Austrians, but also for Germans
Only with certain Casino's (in which I, by the way, do not play) is sued.
The minimum loss is 10,000.00 EUR at ONE Provider (minus the wins mind you).
37% of the proceeds is also not a pittance (but still more than half of the loss - to have or not to have.....)
Thanks, I'm out of there....
However, I can absolutely understand people who meet the above criteria and want to get at least some of the losses back
The question remains though... will they keep gambling?
This post has been translated automatically
Class action AdvoFin - experiences?
Liked this post:
Jubla2014
What exactly can you understand? They go here and gamble away 5-digit sums and then have the audacity to sue the providers. This is the lowest drawer. Stupidity is rewarded and that can't be
This post has been translated automatically
Class action AdvoFin - experiences?
Nobody has liked this post so far
I also think that this must be tied to conditions. Similar to a suspended sentence, where you get a helper at your side. It is not to be underestimated if someone sells his financial means completely and stands there at the end without what or with many debts. The danger is too great that this person will make the same mistake again
A period of 3 - 5 years under control, I think in these cases it makes sense
This post has been translated automatically
Class action AdvoFin - experiences?
Liked this post:
Counter
I don't understand why everyone who loses a lot or doesn't speak well of such behavior is called a frustrated gambling addict
I mean if someone is willing to spend so much you can still be happy even if it's gone that's called investing money for hobbies and one buys railroads the other collects things and still another prefers to gamble with it
You are but the people who spend money and then crying all run to daddy state and all want to sue so you apparently have a gambling problem and not the people who continue to participate nicely and politely here on the subject of casino
And why should someone be jealous when I need money I just do not gamble so simple is that I do not need to be jealous when someone makes himself small in public and his weaknesses outwardly carries
I understand it fully and completely if a casino in some form stupid things makes the coal back to demand but ask yourselves really times the question would you also with 100k win the money would have given if the casino had said
Mr./Mrs. XYZ unfortunately there is no money from us we know they have used the service but what should we say we are unfortunately addicted to gambling or it is purely theoretically considered forbidden for them from Austria to play therefore gibts nix
Would anyone have done that ? ... . NO no one would have made then here would be the next thread with MIMIMI Casino XYZ does not pay the money
And please explain to me why these people have more rights than the people who have to pay their employees
This post has been translated automatically
Class action AdvoFin - experiences?
Nobody has liked this post so far
Carefully, please. The proponents of this measure do not have that much logic and sense. Your words here are the proverbial pearls cast before swine.
This post has been translated automatically
Class action AdvoFin - experiences?
Nobody has liked this post so far
What are you bluffing at me so?
I can understand it, YOU can not. Point.
This post has been translated automatically
Class action AdvoFin - experiences?
Liked this post: Anonym
I think this is a very good idea!
I assume that AdvoFin is not concerned about the gambling addicts, but only about their 37%....
This post has been translated automatically
Class action AdvoFin - experiences?
Liked this post:
Klabisto
I also don't think AdvoFin employs therapists and addiction counselors
Whether they get 37% commission, no idea? - that they want money for their job, however, I have great understanding.
This post has been translated automatically
Class action AdvoFin - experiences?
Nobody has liked this post so far
I was not bluffing (?) at you. I merely asked you a normal question to which you have no reasonable answer.
This post has been translated automatically