I just wanted to inform you about n1casino.com and advise everyone not to play there, they are scammers, you will regret it.
Verifications you have to do with every damn withdrawal and not even an account statement or something but the whole program ala selfie with card, selfie with ID, proof of identity, etc. (See screenshots)
After everything has been done, you then wait 3 weeks until the data are verified.
then comes such a mail:
and the fun starts all over again....
So my conclusion stay away from this scammer club, only headache.
I just wanted to let you know about n1casino.com and advise everyone not to play there, they are scammers, you will regret it.
Verifications you have to do with every damn withdrawal and not even an account statement or something but the whole program ala selfie with card, selfie with ID, proof of identity, etc. (See screenshots)
After everything has been done, you then wait 3 weeks until the data are verified.
then comes such a mail:
and the fun starts all over again....
So my conclusion stay away from this scammer club, only headache.
So in the thread you can read my answers, and strangely enough at every n1casino thread you are discussing and defending the casino, feel free to out yourself as an employee of those
N1casino size dirt casino keep away and do not regret later.
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
verified
Former Member
n1casino.com scammer casino verification,scam
8th Feb. 2023, at 04:10 pm CET#4
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
apox1337 wrote on 08.02.2023 at 15:42:
So in the thread you can read my answers, and strangely enough at every n1casino thread you are discussing and defending the casino, feel free to out yourself as an employee of theirs
N1casino size dirt casino keep away and do not regret later.
I am indirectly defending the casino but rather the licensor (MGA), this is the strongest license ever. Any conflict will be resolved, we have the arbitration authorities for that. At N1Casino it is "The POGG". But there is no problem at all, so I advise you not to open a case there.
So in the thread you can read my answers, and strangely enough at every n1casino thread you are discussing and defending the casino, feel free to out yourself as an employee of theirs
N1casino size dirt casino keep away and do not regret later.
be happy if you at all someone responds. why do you feel immediately attacked? should now all write in here that this casino is modest & you're right? you must also come to terms with other opinions and experiences.
Royal777 that is because of your red head ... red stands for danger ...
gamble1 wrote on 11.02.2023 at 10:24 am: There he is again the employee saying if one is not spoken after the nose simply cool
Gibt da actually a club for it or why comes every second on the statement one would be a casino employee because you do not share the view?
Yes, is a stupid argument.
Nevertheless the TE is right. The N1 group is a bunch of scammers who pervert the lax "legislation", deliberately delay payouts and apply extreme chicanery during verification. There was a thread open here not too long ago where a casino from this group asked for bank confirmation from the brother. What else but illegal and criminal is that supposed to be? What else but extortion and violation of the GDPR is that supposed to be?
So, even though I don't believe that users here are casino employees, it is incomprehensible how a player can defend such a procedure and dismiss it as a "bit of annoying verification".
Every court would condemn this procedure and this data striptease and it is recognizable from 3 km away what the intention behind this chicanery should be and that it violates the GDPR.
it's true that the N1 Group makes it very difficult for many at the moment but I recently read that the regulations regarding money laundering should be stricter at the mga casinos.but unfortunately I don't know where & how reliable this article was!
it is hard for me to believe that they can not afford to pay out a few wins
roccoammo11 wrote on 11.02.2023 at 11:55 am: is true that the N1 group probably makes it very difficult at the moment but I have recently read that the rules regarding money laundering should be stricter at the mga casinos.but unfortunately no longer know where & how reliable this article was!
i find it hard to believe that they can not afford to pay out a few wins
We are going around in circles here. The same discussions were already hundreds of times before, with the same arguments.
It may be that money laundering laws have become stricter. But that has nothing to do with Verification harassment, and nothing to do with the fact that the data is always required only when you want to make a payout.
If it were about the money laundering law, then the casino would have to ask for confirmation immediately. If you Deposit 20,000 € and lose, the casino is not interested in where you got the money and who you actually are. Does the casino then accept money that may have been acquired illegally?
Furthermore, there is simply no reason to require verification for every withdrawal. The submitted data does not change as a result.
And why do not all casinos proceed in the same way? There are enough reputable and large platforms where you are not annoyed and which certainly have enough lawyers who also know about the money laundering laws and certainly do not violate them.
And by this fact alone, you can see that money laundering laws are only a pretextual argument, for a fraudulent and very transparent approach.
It is all the more annoying when players themselves fall for such dubious casinos and somehow try to defend this approach. For what reason? What do consumers get out of it?
We are going around in circles here. The same discussions were already hundreds of times before, with the same arguments.
It may well be that the money laundering laws have become stricter. But that has nothing to do with Verification harassment, and nothing to do with the fact that the data is always required only when you want to make a payout.
If it were about the money laundering law, then the casino would have to ask for confirmation immediately. If you Deposit 20,000 € and lose, the casino is not interested in where you got the money and who you actually are. Does the casino then accept money that may have been acquired illegally?
Furthermore, there is simply no reason to require verification for every withdrawal. The submitted data does not change.
And why do not all casinos proceed in the same way? There are enough reputable and large platforms where you are not annoyed and which certainly have enough lawyers who also know about the money laundering laws and certainly do not violate them.
And by this fact alone, you can see that money laundering laws are only a pretextual argument, for a fraudulent and very transparent approach.
It is all the more annoying when players themselves fall for such dubious casinos and somehow try to defend this approach. For what reason? What do consumers get out of it?
i am therefore not on the side of a casino & would never deposit there after what you read here so! nevertheless, I just think that this approach will have its reasons and I do not mean such meaningless as, "they do not want to pay out"
this is a casino-there is daily win & deposited and paid out!
if you deposit 20k and lose it all then that's not money laundering..that's money burning if then & nothing more!it can only come to money laundering when the casino pays you back money by whatever means!
i would also find it fairer if a verification before a deposit would be necessary to avoid such a thing
roccoammo11 wrote on 11.02.2023 at 12:34 clock:
i am therefore but not on the side of a casino & would never Deposit there after what you read here so! nevertheless I just believe that this approach will have its reasons and I do not mean such meaningless as, "they do not want to pay out"
this is a casino-there is daily win & deposited and paid out!
if you deposit 20k and lose it all then that's not money laundering..that's money burning if then & nothing more!it can only come to money laundering when the casino pays you back money by whatever means!
i would also find it fairer if a Verification was required before a deposit to avoid such a thing
If you deposit 20,000 €, then the casino does not care if it is illegal money. The bottom line is that they may be taking drug money, black money or whatever with it. So yes, they are accepting money that theoretically should have been used to launder money.
And your other arguments are just not arguments. That is only based on a feeling that you "can't imagine" or that you "don't believe" or "will have its reasons".
But the comparison with other big casinos refutes that immediately. Because, strangely enough, they manage to pay out without the harassment and they are subject to the same laws as the N1 group. So what you "imagine" or "believe" is completely irrelevant.
Either the N1 Group is deliberately trying to delay payouts so that players lose the money again, or all other casinos are acting illegally and breaking the laws and only the N1 Group is abiding by the laws.
How likely which is and which is more true, you can think for yourself.
Nevertheless, the TE is right. The N1 group is a bunch of scammers who pervert lax "legislation", deliberately delay payouts and apply extreme chicanery to verification. There was a thread open here not too long ago where a casino from this group asked for bank confirmation from the brother. What else but illegal and criminal is that supposed to be? What else but extortion and violation of the GDPR is that supposed to be?
So, even though I don't believe that users here are casino employees, it is incomprehensible how a player can defend such a procedure and dismiss it as a "bit of annoying verification".
Any court would condemn this procedure and this data striptease and it is recognizable from 3 km away, what the intention behind this chicanery should be and that it violates the GDPR.
Yes I'm with you one hears more often from all but Dux and Pino this nonsense and I have even written at the time as I stand by it and I still find this is a disproportionate requirement because somewhere must also be time end otherwise we must sometime still prove the origin of the money to print
Yes, a notarized confirmation of the central bank and in addition still another MEP must sign, where one has the 20 € for the deposit. And only around times to clarify: Nobody would accept such a procedure in offline casinos or stores. Imagine you go to a casino, change 500 € there and want to pay out 400 € at the cashier again at the end (so 100 € loss). Now the employee tells you that you have to present 5 documents, which will be checked and you should come back in 2 weeks. After 2 weeks you go there and they tell you that they still need a confirmation from the brother. Again 2 weeks later...... . Seriously, anyone here would accept that? No one would accept that, but with Online Casinos it has been drilled into people's heads that this is quite normal, that people put up with everything and some even defend it.
Would not directly say that all N1 providers are the same, some of them also pay out without any problems, others unfortunately mostly the best known providers, delay it unnecessarily to try that you lose your win again and if you are so stubborn, they simply the most curious of documents required, which has absolutely no connection with a regular KYC to do.
Those who want to launder money will certainly not do it with real data and proofs, which run through a regular bank account and in their own name.
Also, there is enough evidence and reports on the net from reputable websites, including lawyers who have dealt exactly with the scam of N1, who all write the same. Disproportionate request for documents, delaying payouts, faking technical problems with the respective payment Provider etc.
Quite apart from that, the MGA does not stipulate which documents are to be requested, but only that the player is to be checked accordingly (very broadly interpreted), not to mention that the MGA does not want to know anything about problems and refers to corresponding EU regulations in order to avoid corresponding issues.
What is needed is a uniform and state-approved platform on which every player worldwide can register, upload or Deposit the documents on the person and payment, etc. and these are then officially confirmed -> player then receives an ID and can deposit this accordingly in the respective casino.
Thus, one would not have to re-verify in each casino and providers such as N1, Gammix and Co. would no longer have the opportunity to deceive players accordingly and who does not play from the big players, simply gets the license revoked and a penalty imposed! Would give the whole finally once a uniform picture.
When I have not yet gambled with crypto I was also at 1-2 N1 Casinos must honestly say that there were no problems with me as far as withdrawals were concerned. In the time I used but also only Neteller as a Deposit and withdrawal method.
But if it's like the thread creator really happened so then that's really bitter. Especially with larger wins.
n1casino.com scammer casino verification,scam
Liked this post:
sigi36
I just wanted to inform you about n1casino.com and advise everyone not to play there, they are scammers, you will regret it.
Verifications you have to do with every damn withdrawal and not even an account statement or something but the whole program ala selfie with card, selfie with ID, proof of identity, etc. (See screenshots)
After everything has been done, you then wait 3 weeks until the data are verified.
then comes such a mail:
and the fun starts all over again....
So my conclusion stay away from this scammer club, only headache.
This post has been translated automatically
n1casino.com scammer casino verification,scam
Liked this post:
Max_Bet
You had won over 40.000€ at n1, was the money paid out to you in the meantime?
https://www.gamblejoe.com/forum/online-casinos/casino-verifizierung/42k-big-win-n1-casino-auszahlungsprobleme--286234/7/
This post has been translated automatically
n1casino.com scammer casino verification,scam
Nobody has liked this post so far
So in the thread you can read my answers, and strangely enough at every n1casino thread you are discussing and defending the casino, feel free to out yourself as an employee of those
N1casino size dirt casino keep away and do not regret later.
This post has been translated automatically
n1casino.com scammer casino verification,scam
Nobody has liked this post so far
I am indirectly defending the casino but rather the licensor (MGA), this is the strongest license ever. Any conflict will be resolved, we have the arbitration authorities for that. At N1Casino it is "The POGG". But there is no problem at all, so I advise you not to open a case there.
I admit that my last answer was rather cynical, because you didn't mention a problem, just that the constant verifications are annoying you. In addition, you speak in another thread of rip-off.
https://www.gamblejoe.com/forum/online-casinos/allgemeines/casinos-wo-man-auf-keinen-fall-spielen-sollte-260320/53/#p325805
This post has been translated automatically
n1casino.com scammer casino verification,scam
Liked this post: Anonym,
Horsepower44, 
Max_Bet
be happy if you at all someone responds. why do you feel immediately attacked? should now all write in here that this casino is modest & you're right? you must also come to terms with other opinions and experiences.
Royal777 that is because of your red head ... red stands for danger ...
This post has been translated automatically
n1casino.com scammer casino verification,scam
Liked this post: Anonym,
Horsepower44
Gibts there actually a club for it or why comes every second on the statement one would be a casino employee because you do not share the view?
This post has been translated automatically
n1casino.com scammer casino verification,scam
Nobody has liked this post so far
Yes, is a stupid argument.
Nevertheless the TE is right. The N1 group is a bunch of scammers who pervert the lax "legislation", deliberately delay payouts and apply extreme chicanery during verification. There was a thread open here not too long ago where a casino from this group asked for bank confirmation from the brother. What else but illegal and criminal is that supposed to be? What else but extortion and violation of the GDPR is that supposed to be?
So, even though I don't believe that users here are casino employees, it is incomprehensible how a player can defend such a procedure and dismiss it as a "bit of annoying verification".
Every court would condemn this procedure and this data striptease and it is recognizable from 3 km away what the intention behind this chicanery should be and that it violates the GDPR.
This post has been translated automatically
n1casino.com scammer casino verification,scam
Nobody has liked this post so far
it is hard for me to believe that they can not afford to pay out a few wins
This post has been translated automatically
n1casino.com scammer casino verification,scam
Liked this post:
CashOut
We are going around in circles here. The same discussions were already hundreds of times before, with the same arguments.
It may be that money laundering laws have become stricter. But that has nothing to do with Verification harassment, and nothing to do with the fact that the data is always required only when you want to make a payout.
If it were about the money laundering law, then the casino would have to ask for confirmation immediately. If you Deposit 20,000 € and lose, the casino is not interested in where you got the money and who you actually are. Does the casino then accept money that may have been acquired illegally?
Furthermore, there is simply no reason to require verification for every withdrawal. The submitted data does not change as a result.
And why do not all casinos proceed in the same way? There are enough reputable and large platforms where you are not annoyed and which certainly have enough lawyers who also know about the money laundering laws and certainly do not violate them.
And by this fact alone, you can see that money laundering laws are only a pretextual argument, for a fraudulent and very transparent approach.
It is all the more annoying when players themselves fall for such dubious casinos and somehow try to defend this approach. For what reason? What do consumers get out of it?
This post has been translated automatically
n1casino.com scammer casino verification,scam
Nobody has liked this post so far
i am therefore not on the side of a casino & would never deposit there after what you read here so! nevertheless, I just think that this approach will have its reasons and I do not mean such meaningless as, "they do not want to pay out"
this is a casino-there is daily win & deposited and paid out!
if you deposit 20k and lose it all then that's not money laundering..that's money burning if then & nothing more!it can only come to money laundering when the casino pays you back money by whatever means!
i would also find it fairer if a verification before a deposit would be necessary to avoid such a thing
This post has been translated automatically
n1casino.com scammer casino verification,scam
Liked this post:
CashOut
If you deposit 20,000 €, then the casino does not care if it is illegal money. The bottom line is that they may be taking drug money, black money or whatever with it. So yes, they are accepting money that theoretically should have been used to launder money.
And your other arguments are just not arguments. That is only based on a feeling that you "can't imagine" or that you "don't believe" or "will have its reasons".
But the comparison with other big casinos refutes that immediately. Because, strangely enough, they manage to pay out without the harassment and they are subject to the same laws as the N1 group. So what you "imagine" or "believe" is completely irrelevant.
Either the N1 Group is deliberately trying to delay payouts so that players lose the money again, or all other casinos are acting illegally and breaking the laws and only the N1 Group is abiding by the laws.
How likely which is and which is more true, you can think for yourself.
This post has been translated automatically
n1casino.com scammer casino verification,scam
Liked this post:
CashOut
Yes I'm with you one hears more often from all but Dux and Pino this nonsense and I have even written at the time as I stand by it and I still find this is a disproportionate requirement because somewhere must also be time end otherwise we must sometime still prove the origin of the money to print
This post has been translated automatically
n1casino.com scammer casino verification,scam
Liked this post:
CashOut, 
chilliy, 
Max_Bet, 
sigi36
This post has been translated automatically
n1casino.com scammer casino verification,scam
Liked this post:
chilliy
Those who want to launder money will certainly not do it with real data and proofs, which run through a regular bank account and in their own name.
Also, there is enough evidence and reports on the net from reputable websites, including lawyers who have dealt exactly with the scam of N1, who all write the same. Disproportionate request for documents, delaying payouts, faking technical problems with the respective payment Provider etc.
Quite apart from that, the MGA does not stipulate which documents are to be requested, but only that the player is to be checked accordingly (very broadly interpreted), not to mention that the MGA does not want to know anything about problems and refers to corresponding EU regulations in order to avoid corresponding issues.
What is needed is a uniform and state-approved platform on which every player worldwide can register, upload or Deposit the documents on the person and payment, etc. and these are then officially confirmed -> player then receives an ID and can deposit this accordingly in the respective casino.
Thus, one would not have to re-verify in each casino and providers such as N1, Gammix and Co. would no longer have the opportunity to deceive players accordingly and who does not play from the big players, simply gets the license revoked and a penalty imposed! Would give the whole finally once a uniform picture.
This post has been translated automatically
n1casino.com scammer casino verification,scam
Nobody has liked this post so far
But if it's like the thread creator really happened so then that's really bitter. Especially with larger wins.
This post has been translated automatically