It does not matter how much he has deposited.Paysafeguthaben e.g. you could never really control.The money for it could come from anywhere.But no matter.It can not be the documents are requested with data that do not concern you.Apart from that, he had already paid before the now upcoming KYC several times in and out.There you had of course no concerns.And if he had lost his money before completely, you would have simply taken it without what to question.So if he now 2000 € (where I think the limit is before you have to verify) would have lost just like that without a withdrawal he would certainly have to make no KYC with the next Deposit, but of course with a withdrawal.A very bad business policy is that and has nothing to do with the licensor, see other casinos and their verification
Donnie wrote on 15.03.2022 at 22:34: It does not matter how much he has deposited.Paysafeguthaben e.g. you could never really control.The money for it could come from anywhere.But no matter.It can not be the documents are requested with data that do not concern you.Apart from that, he had already paid before the now upcoming KYC several times in and out.Since you had of course no concerns.And if he had lost his money before completely, you would have simply taken it without what to question.So if he now 2000 € (where I think the limit is before you have to verify) would have lost just like that without a payout he would certainly not have to make a KYC with the next Deposit, but of course with a payout.A very bad business policy is that and has nothing to do with the licensor see other casinos and their verification
Well think the TE has certainly deposited even higher sums from 2,000 € only takes the normal Verification with identity and address and payment method
CashimashiSupport wrote on 03/15/2022 at 22:16
It is as I said a very normal process in ANY casino with MGA license with a certain amount of deposits. Whether you are happy with it or not. However, it is also explicitly in the AGB's, which you have also read and accepted. And for reasons of Player protection, we are obligated to check with the sum, whether you can finance it yourself or whether you are in financial problems and basically have a Gambling addiction problem. You are free to make the SOW. Nobody can force you to do it. However, we are obliged to check it. As sorry as I am. You can also consult Caro and ask her. She will confirm it to you
So it is up to him to perform the SOW.
It is also possible for him to waive the SOW and ask for the account to be closed and the balance to be paid out.
SOW and payment are two different processes, which have nothing to do with each other in this case
Therefore, to hold a payout hostage for this purpose is not legitimate.
Especially since "voluntariness" is thus ad absurdum and in reality thus a coercion
gamble1 wrote on 15.03.2022 at 22:32
That you have to do that is clear and also right because you have a responsibility as a casino
If we now assume the player refuses then it is your right to close his account but there is no basis to withhold the payout but that would never legally stand then you would retain the Deposit and the win in the end
Also if you find out he has a gambling problem what happens then ? Will the account be closed ? Is the money still kept? Since you would have to either pay out and close the account or declare the contract invalid then close the account and refund the contractually made deposit or not?
I would be interested on the one hand how this is decided and then with what basis because everything on the AGB's push then but not the can not infrequently also be declared in certain points for illegal
According to the AGB's he is obliged to submit the documents. The payment will be withheld until the documents are provided. If this does not happen in 30 days, the account will be closed and the payout will be credited back to his player account. However, he has no access to it until he submits the documents
Enclosed is the excerpt from the terms and conditions:
5.3.4 We may require a user to provide additional proof of identity or proof of origin of funds if deemed necessary based on a Risk-based approach, as part of a more detailed Verification for regular players or in cases where the risk to which the company is exposed is deemed high. Gammix may suspend the account and defer all outstanding payouts until such evidence is provided and accepted in accordance with regulatory standards.
In case of an indication of Gambling addiction, the procedure will be different but even then the account will be closed yes
gamble1 wrote on 15.03.2022 at 22:38
Well think the TE has certainly deposited even higher sums from 2,000 € only the normal Verification with identity and address and payment method takes effect
Yes at 2000€ Deposit is only a KYC, that's right. It must have been deposited already much in the shortest time
CashimashiSupport wrote on 03/15/2022 at 22:50
He is required by the T&C's to submit the documentation. The payout will be withheld until the documents are provided. If this does not happen in 30 days, the account will be closed and the payout will be credited back to his player account. However, he has no access to it until he submits the documents
Enclosed is the excerpt from the terms and conditions:
5.3.4 We may require a user to provide additional proof of identity or proof of origin of funds if deemed necessary based on a Risk-based approach, as part of a more detailed Verification for regular players or in cases where the risk to which the company is exposed is deemed high. Gammix may suspend the account and defer all outstanding payouts until such evidence is provided and accepted in accordance with regulatory standards.
In case of an indication of Gambling addiction, the procedure will be even different but even then the account will be closed yes
He can also ask for closure of the account and after the 30 days you are obliged to pay him his balance
Donnie wrote on 15.03.2022 at 22:34: It does not matter how much he has deposited.Paysafeguthaben e.g. you could never really control.The money for it could come from anywhere.But no matter.It can not be the documents are requested with data that do not concern you.Apart from that, he had already paid before the now upcoming KYC several times in and out.Since you had of course no concerns.And if he had lost his money before completely, you would have simply taken it without what to question.So if he now 2000 € (where I think the limit is before you have to verify) just lost without a payout he would certainly not have to make a KYC with the next Deposit, but of course with a payout.A very bad business policy is that and has nothing to do with the licensor see other casinos and their verification
Paysafecard credit can be verified by the transaction list of Paysafecard. If only Paysafecards were deposited without the money on the Paysafecard account from, for example, casino winnings, the money must come from somewhere and be proven. And as I said before, he has exceeded this threshold with his last deposit, so it would have been requested anyway now. And 2000€ is the limit for a KYC not for a SOW. So please inform properly before
CashimashiSupport wrote on 03/15/2022 at 22:56
As already stated, the TE knows how to proceed and is welcome to have Caro confirm what the normal procedure is
Cashimashi Payroll
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Cashimashi Payroll
Nobody has liked this post so far
Well think the TE has certainly deposited even higher sums from 2,000 € only takes the normal Verification with identity and address and payment method
This post has been translated automatically
Cashimashi Payroll
Nobody has liked this post so far
So it is up to him to perform the SOW.
It is also possible for him to waive the SOW and ask for the account to be closed and the balance to be paid out.
SOW and payment are two different processes, which have nothing to do with each other in this case
Therefore, to hold a payout hostage for this purpose is not legitimate.
Especially since "voluntariness" is thus ad absurdum and in reality thus a coercion
This post has been translated automatically
Cashimashi Payroll
Nobody has liked this post so far
According to the AGB's he is obliged to submit the documents. The payment will be withheld until the documents are provided. If this does not happen in 30 days, the account will be closed and the payout will be credited back to his player account. However, he has no access to it until he submits the documents
Enclosed is the excerpt from the terms and conditions:
5.3.4 We may require a user to provide additional proof of identity or proof of origin of funds if deemed necessary based on a Risk-based approach, as part of a more detailed Verification for regular players or in cases where the risk to which the company is exposed is deemed high. Gammix may suspend the account and defer all outstanding payouts until such evidence is provided and accepted in accordance with regulatory standards.
In case of an indication of Gambling addiction, the procedure will be different but even then the account will be closed yes
This post has been translated automatically
Cashimashi Payroll
Nobody has liked this post so far
Yes at 2000€ Deposit is only a KYC, that's right. It must have been deposited already much in the shortest time
This post has been translated automatically
Cashimashi Payroll
Nobody has liked this post so far
He can also ask for closure of the account and after the 30 days you are obliged to pay him his balance
This post has been translated automatically
Cashimashi Payroll
Nobody has liked this post so far
Paysafecard credit can be verified by the transaction list of Paysafecard. If only Paysafecards were deposited without the money on the Paysafecard account from, for example, casino winnings, the money must come from somewhere and be proven. And as I said before, he has exceeded this threshold with his last deposit, so it would have been requested anyway now. And 2000€ is the limit for a KYC not for a SOW. So please inform properly before
This post has been translated automatically
Cashimashi Payroll
Nobody has liked this post so far
As already said, the TE knows how to proceed and can also be happy to confirm from Caro, as the normal procedure is
This post has been translated automatically
Cashimashi Payroll
Nobody has liked this post so far
This is just beating around the bush.
This post has been translated automatically
Cashimashi Payroll
Nobody has liked this post so far
Nah that's just the facts
This post has been translated automatically