Caro wrote on 03/23/2022 at 10:20 am: That's nice that you think you know better than me who worked for Compliance.
https://www.mga.org.mt/wp-content/uploads/02072020_FIAU-Sector-Specific-Guidance-Document.pdf
Page 31 Item 3.6 INABILITY TO COMPLETE CDD MEASURES
It says exactly what the process is supposed to be, doesn't it? And as far as I can see and evaluate from the outside, that's not how it's done here
gamble1 wrote on 23.03.2022 at 11:20 am
It's quite simple legally CashiMashi could pay the TE the money and then see what happens if the check is made everything is ok if not then the account is just closed
Cashimashi but does not pay out and not because they are highly unseriös but because it is so in your terms and conditions is only paid out when the test is completed whether we like or not and whether these are great or crap not interested because these conditions were accepted and are therefore binding
And yes I also hate this point in the AGB's and also the majority here does not find it good but you have explicitly agreed to this yes
The casino also has to justify where the money comes from what do you think is going on when funds on the company account have a non-legitimate origin and that was simply accepted without asking?
It is not so that the terms and conditions are always binding only because you have agreed.
It is irrelevant whether you have agreed or not if they are illegal.
Whether this is the case with Cashimashi, would have to evaluate a lawyer who is familiar with Maltese law.
Since it is here but about 600 €, it is very unlikely that the TE goes this step.
And on the subject that companies must also justify themselves:
You are already clear what for company constructions and disguises on a corporate basis in Malta are possible, right?
Very topical is the case with the yacht of the Russian oligarch in Hamburg, which can not be confiscated because the registration runs through a company network in Malta.
That such constructions are possible on the one hand, while small players have to drop their pants shows how hypocritical this whole procedure is.
DieWunderharke5000 wrote on 03/23/2022 at 11:33 AM
Page 31 Item 3.6 INABILITY TO COMPLETE CDD MEASURES
It says exactly how the process has to be. And as far as I can see and evaluate from the outside, that's not how it's done here
i have honestly not read through the point, I was more interested in the recording when you have to prove what...I'll do it later in peace, when I have a few quiet minutes
I will close the thread and update as soon as there is info about it. Unfortunately I can no longer help the player, I have already told the player this. He now said that his salary does not cover the deposits, but savings/share sales and he would never have told the casino that the funds come from his salary...Now of course the casino has requested evidence of this, which the player does not want to send. The player is now hiring a lawyer.
Edit: before now some again think it would be censorship or unnecessary to close the thread....first it said salary, then confidentiality clause, now savings and / or stock sales...I can not figure out the matter and also no longer have the nerve to write in the thread. The only thing I know is that the casino has good reason to request records again.
Cashimashi Payroll
Nobody has liked this post so far
Page 31 Item 3.6 INABILITY TO COMPLETE CDD MEASURES
It says exactly what the process is supposed to be, doesn't it? And as far as I can see and evaluate from the outside, that's not how it's done here
This post has been translated automatically
Cashimashi Payroll
Nobody has liked this post so far
It is not so that the terms and conditions are always binding only because you have agreed.
It is irrelevant whether you have agreed or not if they are illegal.
Whether this is the case with Cashimashi, would have to evaluate a lawyer who is familiar with Maltese law.
Since it is here but about 600 €, it is very unlikely that the TE goes this step.
And on the subject that companies must also justify themselves:
You are already clear what for company constructions and disguises on a corporate basis in Malta are possible, right?
Very topical is the case with the yacht of the Russian oligarch in Hamburg, which can not be confiscated because the registration runs through a company network in Malta.
That such constructions are possible on the one hand, while small players have to drop their pants shows how hypocritical this whole procedure is.
This post has been translated automatically
Cashimashi Payroll
Nobody has liked this post so far
i have honestly not read through the point, I was more interested in the recording when you have to prove what...I'll do it later in peace, when I have a few quiet minutes
This post has been translated automatically
Cashimashi Payroll
Nobody has liked this post so far
the case is now with a lawyer from Malta.
i had sent some more documents showing enough cash receipts to cover the deposits made.
Unfortunately, parts of CashiMashi that I had blacked out were made visible again without my permission
Thanks for your help anyway.
This post has been translated automatically
Cashimashi Payroll
Nobody has liked this post so far
Edit: before now some again think it would be censorship or unnecessary to close the thread....first it said salary, then confidentiality clause, now savings and / or stock sales...I can not figure out the matter and also no longer have the nerve to write in the thread. The only thing I know is that the casino has good reason to request records again.
This thread was closed
This post has been translated automatically