-
frapi07, today at 09:04 pm CEST
-
upola, on 30th Apr. 2024 at 08:14 am CEST
-
Dr-Strange, today at 10:56 pm CEST
-
Optilenz35, today at 10:24 pm CEST
-
garfield68, today at 09:54 pm CEST
-
frapi07, today at 09:51 pm CEST
-
Langhans, today at 07:49 pm CEST
-
garfield68, today at 07:26 pm CEST
-
Butterbrezel, today at 06:46 pm CEST
-
H****2, today at 06:11 pm CEST
-
gamble1, today at 05:54 pm CEST
-
Terrodrag444, today at 05:05 pm CEST
-
danny005, today at 05:00 pm CEST
-
frapi07, today at 02:47 pm CEST
-
nightforce1979, today at 01:35 pm CEST
-
Lizzy0805, today at 09:33 am CEST
-
Masterboerner97, today at 08:34 am CEST
-
roccoammo11, yesterday at 11:36 pm CEST
-
Maja80, yesterday at 09:12 pm CEST
-
H****2, yesterday at 09:12 pm CEST
-
roccoammo11, yesterday at 06:25 pm CEST
-
Max_Bet, yesterday at 08:10 am CEST
-
roccoammo11, on 11th May. 2024 at 11:42 am CEST
-
Rasmik12, on 11th May. 2024 at 09:32 am CEST
-
gamble1, on 11th May. 2024 at 09:05 am CEST
-
T0uchTheSky, on 10th May. 2024 at 11:18 pm CEST
Cashimashi Payroll
Nobody has liked this post so far
no, it could also have put the nice Dealer next door under your pillow
This post has been translated automatically
Cashimashi Payroll
Nobody has liked this post so far
That is the question of the questions where is not conclusively clarified now times casino independently said
One has already said that then a written statement is enough but some just not because I then spontaneously only a receipt of the bank that has received the amount that could possibly also hold up as proof because now since mid-2021 the obligation to provide proof for amounts over 10,000 € exists if they are deposited in Germany in cash (even piecemeal)
I always like to say if everything is ok for the bank, the casino must actually worry little because it is the daily bread of banks to manage funds and also to check and certainly in orders of magnitude where we and the casinos can not imagine
This post has been translated automatically
Cashimashi Payroll
Nobody has liked this post so far
If it is already there, sorry have not read everything
This post has been translated automatically
Cashimashi Payroll
Nobody has liked this post so far
that is different from casino to casino I think times. with me wants to have boombang vip casino that already with a Deposit of only 20 €
This post has been translated automatically
Cashimashi Payroll
Nobody has liked this post so far
Hey Blubbo33, I had already once such a case, that is a few months ago, but the player had always packed the money monthly aside. Speak withdrawn from the account. Then the casino asked for the account statements, because it is evident there that a cash withdrawal has taken place. The player has sent the account statements and it was in the last 6 months (as he has stated) not a single cash withdrawal found... yes the end of the song was, he has not received his money because the origin of the money could not be determined.
This post has been translated automatically
Cashimashi Payroll
Liked this post: garfield68
So nonsense....if the user would simply send the documents that are required of him, the money would have long been on his account. But if the player sends now for the 3rd time the same document, which was rejected already 2 times before...yes what should I still say to it. More like here in the forum, via Communicator, via e-mail from the manager etc to explain the x times, we can not.
This post has been translated automatically
Cashimashi Payroll
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Cashimashi Payroll
Nobody has liked this post so far
When the SOW is pending, it is only necessary to prove that you have a regular income.
If the payments made are significantly higher in relation to the source of income mentioned, one must prove an additional source of income.
It is sufficient to declare that you have saved money, if you can prove it.
This is how the MGA prescribes it, I still have the mail from EveryMatrix from back then.
This is mandatory for all casinos that are MGA-licensed.
If a casino has its own regulations, they do not act according to the templates, these provisions are not firmly anchored in the respective terms and conditions, ie for each player to clearly see, they are ineffective and null and void.
To put it clearly, the deposits made do not have to be covered by the proof of income.
@Jackson77 sees it right, it is ultimately only the purest arbitrariness of the casino.
The casino must pay out the funds, there is no way around it.
The casino can demand whatever it wants.
This post has been translated automatically
Cashimashi Payroll
Nobody has liked this post so far
https://www.mga.org.mt/wp-content/uploads/02072020_FIAU-Sector-Specific-Guidance-Document.pdf
@Jubla2014 I agree with you that you have to prove (IN FORM OF DOCUMENTS) that you have a regular income (in this case) but the player does not! The player has not submitted any proof to date, let alone bank statements showing salary receipt. I'm talking my head off here....
and no, Jackson77 is wrong here. As I wrote, if the player sends the wrong document for the 3rd time, it is clear that it takes longer, as if he simply sends the documents that are requested from him...what is not to understand?
Edit: If the player would simply send the requested documents to the casino (bank statements for the last 3 months + salary statements), the case would have been closed long ago. And I'll explain to you now why there are 3 months in the room, because the player has made very high deposits over this period.
This post has been translated automatically
Cashimashi Payroll
Liked this post: gamble1
A, except for the salary receipt, blackened proof should be sufficient or?
This post has been translated automatically