Feedback: Suggestions for improvement and forum extensions all in here (Page 33)
Topic created on 06th May. 2017 | Page: 33 of 127 | Answers: 1,261 | Views: 189,860
F****7
Forum posts:6Member has been banned
Suggestions for improvement and forum extensions all in here
23rd May. 2019, at 10:05 am CEST#321
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
mmessner29 wrote on 22.05.2019 at 23:26: How about actually a user voting which casino is included next? You could put e.b 3. stk to choose from and everyone has to give a vote! We users have made individual experiences and can let these flow into the decision. Whether positive or negative.
can knicken!
A neutral overall ranking which is based exclusively on the experiences of independent players (the predefined criteria for a casino rating such as bonus offers or payout duration times completely left out) you will look in vain on this site (respect and respect nonetheless noted to GJ and your work) for life. The Affiliate income is just too attractive for that and the sports betting providers are just too picky or let's call it too stingy from the point of view of cooperating with such sites like GJ. A suitable word for the negative consensual agreement on collaborations would also be uninteresting.
From my view this is however unproblematic, as long as the Casinorankings are declared here also accordingly. At the latest, if the sometimes fairest and most positive providers are not even found here in the selection of winning picture uploads among hundreds of casinos, something like 'indicating alarm bells' should ring even with the very last still so naive online casino player. In the sense that the ranking may be justified, but the most important market leaders (especially sports betting providers) are completely missing.
Suggestions for improvement and forum extensions all in here
23rd May. 2019, at 11:43 am CEST#322
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Fritz2007 wrote on 05/23/2019 10:05 AM
In the sense that the ranking may be justified, however the most important market leaders (especially sports betting providers) are completely missing from it.
We have tried in the past to include well-known sports betting providers such as Tipico. However, it turned out that some sports betting providers do not even want their casino section (which we consider to be the most important) to be advertised. Therefore, we cannot include some bookmakers at all in the casino comparison.
This post has been translated automatically
F****7
Forum posts:6Member has been banned
Suggestions for improvement and forum extensions all in here
23rd May. 2019, at 01:05 pm CEST#323
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Is the listing/mention of the respective 'brands'/providers, e.g. in rankings with "evaluative" expressions of opinion/presentation (as published on pages like this one) already problematic for legal reasons?
So, for example, one of the most relevant market leaders in the field of online casino offers or sports betting online offers may not be listed by name in such rankings without their consent?
In the AGB's is already only for the players very exactly in how far they may take the brand name publicly in the mouth or not
Whereas a site without any commercial use should be allowed to list the experience values of one or more players with different casino providers theoretically also with name, or am I wrong?
Is it correct that from a corresponding commercial use / page content of a page first the consent of the respective Provider is required, even if it is only a non-binding listing without any partnerships?
Who can briefly but understandably enlighten me about the relevant legal situation? Thanks in advance
Who can either revise or confirm my previous Affiliategier submissions?
Suggestions for improvement and forum extensions all in here
23rd May. 2019, at 01:41 pm CEST#324
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
as a little information:
The user was banned because we found out that he was already registered in the forum in the past and was permanently banned by us.
Therefore, his new account will also be banned.
Suggestions for improvement and forum extensions all in here
4th Jun. 2019, at 02:33 am CEST#327
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Insa24 wrote on 03/06/2019 at 20:51: Mal ne question on the side:
Is this new or just me that I can't "edit" my forum posts afterwards?
So at least most of them
Lol..this has been going on for probably half a year now.
You can edit posts 5 min or so, then no more.
Suggestions for improvement and forum extensions all in here
19th Jun. 2019, at 01:10 pm CEST#328
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Quick question about the Communicator:
Is it possible that histories are completely deleted after a certain time? I just wanted to look up the name of a person with whom I had a conversation a long time ago. However, this conversation has completely disappeared. Now I also see that my oldest history is from 03/06/18. I thought I had older histories, but I'm not 100% sure when that was.
Then I noticed that I am missing other progressions as well. The ones I can remember were between me and already deleted members though. Do histories with users who have deleted themselves or been banned disappear after a certain time? Because I'm definitely missing 3+ histories there. On the other hand, I still have a history with a deleted account that I can view
Suggestions for improvement and forum extensions all in here
19th Jun. 2019, at 01:18 pm CEST#329
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Bone wrote on 06/19/2019 1:10 pm: Quick question about Communicator:
Is it possible that histories are completely deleted after a certain time? I just wanted to look up the name of a person I had a conversation with a long time ago. However, this conversation has completely disappeared. Now I also see that my oldest history is from 03/06/18. I thought I had older histories, but I'm not 100% sure when that was.
Then I noticed that I am missing other progressions as well. The ones I can remember were between me and already deleted members though. Do histories with users who have deleted themselves or been banned disappear after a certain time? Because I'm definitely missing 3+ histories there. On the other hand, I still have a history with a deleted account that I can view.
Yes bones, the histories of deleted / banned users disappear automatically.
Suggestions for improvement and forum extensions all in here
Nobody has liked this post so far
can knicken!
A neutral overall ranking which is based exclusively on the experiences of independent players (the predefined criteria for a casino rating such as bonus offers or payout duration times completely left out) you will look in vain on this site (respect and respect nonetheless noted to GJ and your work) for life. The Affiliate income is just too attractive for that and the sports betting providers are just too picky or let's call it too stingy from the point of view of cooperating with such sites like GJ. A suitable word for the negative consensual agreement on collaborations would also be uninteresting.
From my view this is however unproblematic, as long as the Casinorankings are declared here also accordingly. At the latest, if the sometimes fairest and most positive providers are not even found here in the selection of winning picture uploads among hundreds of casinos, something like 'indicating alarm bells' should ring even with the very last still so naive online casino player. In the sense that the ranking may be justified, but the most important market leaders (especially sports betting providers) are completely missing.
This post has been translated automatically
Suggestions for improvement and forum extensions all in here
Nobody has liked this post so far
We have tried in the past to include well-known sports betting providers such as Tipico. However, it turned out that some sports betting providers do not even want their casino section (which we consider to be the most important) to be advertised. Therefore, we cannot include some bookmakers at all in the casino comparison.
This post has been translated automatically
Suggestions for improvement and forum extensions all in here
Nobody has liked this post so far
So, for example, one of the most relevant market leaders in the field of online casino offers or sports betting online offers may not be listed by name in such rankings without their consent?
In the AGB's is already only for the players very exactly in how far they may take the brand name publicly in the mouth or not
Whereas a site without any commercial use should be allowed to list the experience values of one or more players with different casino providers theoretically also with name, or am I wrong?
Is it correct that from a corresponding commercial use / page content of a page first the consent of the respective Provider is required, even if it is only a non-binding listing without any partnerships?
Who can briefly but understandably enlighten me about the relevant legal situation? Thanks in advance
Who can either revise or confirm my previous Affiliategier submissions?
Greetings
This post has been translated automatically
Suggestions for improvement and forum extensions all in here
Nobody has liked this post so far
The user was banned because we found out that he was already registered in the forum in the past and was permanently banned by us.
Therefore, his new account will also be banned.
This post has been translated automatically
Suggestions for improvement and forum extensions all in here
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Suggestions for improvement and forum extensions all in here
Nobody has liked this post so far
Is this new or only with me so that I can no longer "edit" my forum posts afterwards?
So at least most
This post has been translated automatically
Suggestions for improvement and forum extensions all in here
Nobody has liked this post so far
Lol..this has been going on for probably half a year now.
You can edit posts 5 min or so, then no more.
This post has been translated automatically
Suggestions for improvement and forum extensions all in here
Nobody has liked this post so far
Is it possible that histories are completely deleted after a certain time? I just wanted to look up the name of a person with whom I had a conversation a long time ago. However, this conversation has completely disappeared. Now I also see that my oldest history is from 03/06/18. I thought I had older histories, but I'm not 100% sure when that was.
Then I noticed that I am missing other progressions as well. The ones I can remember were between me and already deleted members though. Do histories with users who have deleted themselves or been banned disappear after a certain time? Because I'm definitely missing 3+ histories there. On the other hand, I still have a history with a deleted account that I can view
This post has been translated automatically
Suggestions for improvement and forum extensions all in here
Nobody has liked this post so far
Yes bones, the histories of deleted / banned users disappear automatically.
This post has been translated automatically
Suggestions for improvement and forum extensions all in here
Nobody has liked this post so far
Okay do you know when too? Because the history with a deleted account I still have, others just not
This post has been translated automatically