The most important thing in a casino is the Verification and the payout.
How many games and which manufacturers are available, I can also see before I sign up.
Therefore, this should be considered much more in the evaluation.
Matthias wrote on 21.02.2020 at 14:39: Just by the way, we are always open to suggestions for improvement.
It would be cool if they are constructive suggestions, so not just "the rating system needs to be improved".
Feel free to suggest what you think a casino rating should consist of, we'll discuss it at the next team meeting.
Could you include the category " Verification " in the ratings? That one can evaluate there e.g. the duration, similarly as with the payout
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
Member blocking
21st Feb. 2020, at 06:07 pm CET#43
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
RebellYell wrote on 02/21/2020 at 16:23
Could you include the section " Verification " in the ratings? That one can evaluate there zb. the duration, similarly as with the disbursement
good idea ! Why e.g. one needs in some (why actually only in some ??) OC's
you need a bank statement from the LAST THREE MONTHS for Verification ?? (Spinia....e.g. ...) does not work at all...
Matthias wrote on 21.02.2020 at 14:39: Just by the way, we are always open to suggestions for improvement.
It would be cool if they are constructive suggestions, so not just "the rating system needs to be improved".
Feel free to suggest what you think a casino rating should consist of, we'll discuss it at the next team meeting.
By the way, I wrote that the weighting of the points to be evaluated should be different
And I also wrote that payout and Verification should probably be the most important
I personally find the blocking of Marc a pity, the insults were not so great but 30 days for an actually very active and helpful user I find extreme. 7 days or 14 days would have been appropriate. Instead of such hardships should reduce the warning frequency and rather ban for short periods than in one fell swoop.
//
About the rating system I have already written that you would have to break it down more and weight it differently. But since it becomes too difficult and it could be too exhausting for some to evaluate at all is my suggestion:
- Remove fun factor and first payout and <Verifizierungsdauer>replace</Verifizierungsdauer> with <Verifizierungsdauer>
- Rename subsequent payout to payout duration (the initial payout is then calculated by Verification duration + payout duration)
- Rename the item Game Selection/Platform to Game Selection and if desired list Platform as a single item
- Weight payout and verification with 25% each, then these together make 50% of the total rating
- Divide bonus into frequency and condition or frequency and quality and weight quality more than frequency
But the weighting could also be made more accurate by a user survey. The reviews are already mostly honest, I just want the stars so the overall rating reflects the test report.</Verifizierungsdauer>
This post has been translated automatically
B****g
Forum posts:9Member has been banned
Member blocking
21st Feb. 2020, at 09:19 pm CET#46
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Kleinkariert wrote on 21.02.2020 at 20:55: I personally find the blocking of Marc a pity, the insults were not so great but 30 days for an actually very active and helpful user I find extreme. 7 days or 14 days would have been appropriate. Instead of such hardships, you should reduce the warning frequency and rather ban for short periods than in one fell swoop.
Am new here and have previously followed the current developments with interest. My opinion is
Whoever bans such an active user and OC friend defender for so long must be pretty arrogant. But who can afford it
BergZwerg wrote on 21.02.2020 at 21:19
Am new here and have previously followed the current developments with interest. My opinion is
Who locks such an active user and OC friend defender so long must be pretty arrogant. But who can afford it
Do not be angry with me but this smells so much like double account
This post has been translated automatically
B****g
Forum posts:9Member has been banned
Member blocking
21st Feb. 2020, at 09:29 pm CET#48
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
gamble1 wrote on 21.02.2020 at 21:27
Don't be mad at me but this smells so much like a double account
No. How can I be angry with you? For your sense of smell you can nothing
BergZwerg wrote on 21.02.2020 at 21:19
Am new here and have previously followed the current developments with interest. My opinion is
Who locks such an active user and OC friend defender so long must be pretty arrogant. But who can afford it
Yes, he was active and I have read several of his contributions with pleasure. Just because he also has ahung of. But I was all the more shocked when his manner changed direction.
But had he not written yesterday that he only wanted to participate in the Payesafeaktionen and then is gone anyway?
Mammon wrote on 02/21/2020 at 9:58 pm
Yes, he was active and I enjoyed reading quite a few of his posts. Just because he has ahung of. But I was all the more shocked when his manner changed direction.
But hadn't he written yesterday that he only wanted to participate in the Payesafe actions and then he's gone anyway?
I was also shocked how he has suddenly changed on the one hand I can understand him very well and yes he was not to all shit just to those who had it so deserved in his view
But I also understand the GJ team that they have reacted so
All in all you can say you can't be sure if they are trolls or people who are really looking for help and if you invest a lot of energy to help someone and then only stupid stuff or trolls come it's a real pity and marc was always a helpful but I think he also invested too often the energy in the wrong people
Member blocking
Nobody has liked this post so far
How many games and which manufacturers are available, I can also see before I sign up.
Therefore, this should be considered much more in the evaluation.
This post has been translated automatically
Member blocking
Nobody has liked this post so far
Could you include the category " Verification " in the ratings? That one can evaluate there e.g. the duration, similarly as with the payout
This post has been translated automatically
Member blocking
Nobody has liked this post so far
good idea ! Why e.g. one needs in some (why actually only in some ??) OC's
you need a bank statement from the LAST THREE MONTHS for Verification ?? (Spinia....e.g. ...) does not work at all...
This post has been translated automatically
Member blocking
Nobody has liked this post so far
By the way, I wrote that the weighting of the points to be evaluated should be different
And I also wrote that payout and Verification should probably be the most important
This post has been translated automatically
Member blocking
Liked this post: B****g
//
About the rating system I have already written that you would have to break it down more and weight it differently. But since it becomes too difficult and it could be too exhausting for some to evaluate at all is my suggestion:
- Remove fun factor and first payout and <Verifizierungsdauer>replace</Verifizierungsdauer> with <Verifizierungsdauer>
- Rename subsequent payout to payout duration (the initial payout is then calculated by Verification duration + payout duration)
- Rename the item Game Selection/Platform to Game Selection and if desired list Platform as a single item
- Weight payout and verification with 25% each, then these together make 50% of the total rating
- Divide bonus into frequency and condition or frequency and quality and weight quality more than frequency
But the weighting could also be made more accurate by a user survey. The reviews are already mostly honest, I just want the stars so the overall rating reflects the test report.</Verifizierungsdauer>
This post has been translated automatically
Member blocking
Nobody has liked this post so far
Am new here and have previously followed the current developments with interest. My opinion is
Whoever bans such an active user and OC friend defender for so long must be pretty arrogant. But who can afford it
This post has been translated automatically
Member blocking
Liked this post: Anonym,
Nik89, 
Saphira
Do not be angry with me but this smells so much like double account
This post has been translated automatically
Member blocking
Nobody has liked this post so far
No. How can I be angry with you? For your sense of smell you can nothing
This post has been translated automatically
Member blocking
Liked this post: B****g
Yes, he was active and I have read several of his contributions with pleasure. Just because he also has ahung of. But I was all the more shocked when his manner changed direction.
But had he not written yesterday that he only wanted to participate in the Payesafeaktionen and then is gone anyway?
This post has been translated automatically
Member blocking
Nobody has liked this post so far
I was also shocked how he has suddenly changed on the one hand I can understand him very well and yes he was not to all shit just to those who had it so deserved in his view
But I also understand the GJ team that they have reacted so
All in all you can say you can't be sure if they are trolls or people who are really looking for help and if you invest a lot of energy to help someone and then only stupid stuff or trolls come it's a real pity and marc was always a helpful but I think he also invested too often the energy in the wrong people
This post has been translated automatically