Kleinkariert wrote on 21.02.2020 at 20:55: I personally find the blocking of Marc a pity, the insults were not so great but 30 days for an actually very active and helpful user I find extreme.
see the same. my God the young has just his days and böbelt bischen rum. That would have settled again. But one of the most active users, who writes many constructive contributions, to ban, is unwise and shows a lack of foresight @ Admins
He may have been a little more abusive and gruff with his answers from time to time
But just in the online world, everyone should have enough thick skin to stand over such things, especially since it was not really violent insults he has let from him
I am here already longer in the forum on the move, but have me only recently registered and must say that just Marc has stood out ...Extremely active and constructive contributions / advice.
One who knows what he's talking about and seems to have a lot of experience to help.
It would be a pity if he now turns his back on the forum
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
Member blocking
21st Feb. 2020, at 11:32 pm CET#53
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
upola wrote on 21.02.2020 at 13:02: Herould stay as you are....stay critical and say your opinion.
Arxxx creeps are running around here enough.
upola, we will become friends if this continues
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
Member blocking
21st Feb. 2020, at 11:38 pm CET#54
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Seniorfips wrote on 02/21/2020 at 1:12 pm
I hope you at least use the handkerchief I gave you
we are not used to anything else from mr. p., but is that really all you can think of as an answer after someone tells you that he feels hurt by your (quite harsh and unjustified) k omments? chapeau. too bad. well
redfoxx wrote on 21.02.2020 at 23:38
one is not used to anything else from mr. p., but is that really all you can think of as a response after someone tells you that they feel hurt by your (rather harsh and unjustified) k omments? chapeau. too bad. well
:D now really another one arrives where everything was already done. Herould wants MarcT to be unlocked, who has been banned for insults. But then can't even stand tougher comments without insults? *Applause applause
This post has been translated automatically
B****g
Forum posts:9Member has been banned
Member blocking
21st Feb. 2020, at 11:43 pm CET#56
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Begbie wrote on 21.02.2020 at 22:47
see the same. my God the young has just his days and böbelt bischen rum. That would have settled again. But to ban one of the most active users, who writes many constructive contributions, is unwise and shows a lack of foresight @ Admins
These admins are just POWERFUL! And just also part of the Gambling addiction OC business
They do it just like the casinos: Arbitrarily.
And in the end they don't help. GJ is just an advertising web page for casinos under the guise of an "independent" "evaluation page". Now and then they help - but in the end the operators finance their own gambling addiction.
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
Member blocking
21st Feb. 2020, at 11:47 pm CET#57
1 Like
Liked this post: B****g
on topic:
it is quite justified to discuss the banishment of Marc in a separate thread. probably such a topic is worth more than any "achtung-betrug" post
i find by the way also, that the sanction in no relation to the "misconduct" stands, already not there (as it was already noticed by others here) comments with far awesome expressions were waved through. Justification was often the allegedly so valuable freedom of speech
Somehow, most of those who take him here in defense leave out that he, as mentioned by Christoph, was already warned 3 times before. Who does not let it even then may now really not wonder that is acted.
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
Member blocking
21st Feb. 2020, at 11:48 pm CET#59
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Seniorfips wrote on 21.02.2020 at 23:41
:D now really another one arrives, where everything was already done. Herould wants MarcT to be unlocked, who has been banned for insults. But then can't even stand tougher comments without insults? *Applause applause*
completely illogical
This post has been translated automatically
s****e
Forum posts:18Member has been banned
Member blocking
21st Feb. 2020, at 11:59 pm CET#60
1 Like
Liked this post: B****g
redfoxx wrote on 02/21/2020 at 11:47 pm: on topic:
it is quite justified to discuss the banning of Marc in a separate thread. probably such a topic is worth it more than some "achtung-betrug" post
i find by the way also, that the sanction in no relation to the "misconduct" stands, already not there (as it was already noticed by others here) comments with far awesome expressions were waved through. Justification was often the allegedly so valuable freedom of speech
At the end of the day, GJ is a company that has to make money.
A call to write bad reviews or cancel accounts is one of the worst things that can happen to GJ
the worst thing that can happen to GJ.
Other casino operators are also reading along here, and could be deterred by this,
or terminate existing agreements. Who wants bad press?
That will be the main reason for the blocking. One sells it just differently.
You could have explained it more plausibly or advised against joining the opinion of a single user
of a single user. If that would not have brought anything, you could have seen further.
But I think the casinos want in advance that such a thing does not happen.
If it does happen, it is expected that action is taken quickly, and that is what GJ did.
That one winds itself here, since one was conscious itself that one disgruntled some regular users, knew
GJ with security, was to be taken however with the image damage which can be expected with the consideration.
At the end of the day, it's not about friendships or nice things, but about money.
Member blocking
Liked this post: B****g, v****2
see the same. my God the young has just his days and böbelt bischen rum. That would have settled again. But one of the most active users, who writes many constructive contributions, to ban, is unwise and shows a lack of foresight @ Admins
This post has been translated automatically
Member blocking
Liked this post: B****g
But just in the online world, everyone should have enough thick skin to stand over such things, especially since it was not really violent insults he has let from him
I am here already longer in the forum on the move, but have me only recently registered and must say that just Marc has stood out ...Extremely active and constructive contributions / advice.
One who knows what he's talking about and seems to have a lot of experience to help.
It would be a pity if he now turns his back on the forum
This post has been translated automatically
Member blocking
Nobody has liked this post so far
upola, we will become friends if this continues
This post has been translated automatically
Member blocking
Nobody has liked this post so far
we are not used to anything else from mr. p., but is that really all you can think of as an answer after someone tells you that he feels hurt by your (quite harsh and unjustified) k omments? chapeau. too bad. well
This post has been translated automatically
Member blocking
Nobody has liked this post so far
:D now really another one arrives where everything was already done. Herould wants MarcT to be unlocked, who has been banned for insults. But then can't even stand tougher comments without insults? *Applause applause
This post has been translated automatically
Member blocking
Nobody has liked this post so far
These admins are just POWERFUL! And just also part of the Gambling addiction OC business
They do it just like the casinos: Arbitrarily.
And in the end they don't help. GJ is just an advertising web page for casinos under the guise of an "independent" "evaluation page". Now and then they help - but in the end the operators finance their own gambling addiction.
This post has been translated automatically
Member blocking
Liked this post: B****g
it is quite justified to discuss the banishment of Marc in a separate thread. probably such a topic is worth more than any "achtung-betrug" post
i find by the way also, that the sanction in no relation to the "misconduct" stands, already not there (as it was already noticed by others here) comments with far awesome expressions were waved through. Justification was often the allegedly so valuable freedom of speech
This post has been translated automatically
Member blocking
Liked this post: Anonym,
gagapapamama, 
Klempo77, 
Matthias, 
Nik89, 
Patizi, 
sippi
This post has been translated automatically
Member blocking
Nobody has liked this post so far
completely illogical
This post has been translated automatically
Member blocking
Liked this post: B****g
At the end of the day, GJ is a company that has to make money.
A call to write bad reviews or cancel accounts is one of the worst things that can happen to GJ
the worst thing that can happen to GJ.
Other casino operators are also reading along here, and could be deterred by this,
or terminate existing agreements. Who wants bad press?
That will be the main reason for the blocking. One sells it just differently.
You could have explained it more plausibly or advised against joining the opinion of a single user
of a single user. If that would not have brought anything, you could have seen further.
But I think the casinos want in advance that such a thing does not happen.
If it does happen, it is expected that action is taken quickly, and that is what GJ did.
That one winds itself here, since one was conscious itself that one disgruntled some regular users, knew
GJ with security, was to be taken however with the image damage which can be expected with the consideration.
At the end of the day, it's not about friendships or nice things, but about money.
This post has been translated automatically