Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Feedback: Member blocking (Page 7)

Topic created on 21st Feb. 2020 | Page: 7 of 13 | Answers: 120 | Views: 18,863
B****g
startpage wrote on 02/21/2020 at 11:59 pm
At the end of the day GJ is a business, what needs to bring in money.

A call to write bad reviews, or cancel accounts, is among
the worst thing that can happen to GJ.
Other casino operators are also reading along here, and could be put off by this,
or let existing agreements expire. Who wants bad press?

That will be the main reason for the blocking. One sells it just differently.

You could have explained it more plausibly or advised against joining the opinion of a single user
of a single user. If that would not have brought anything, you could have seen further.

But I think the casinos want in advance that such a thing does not happen.
If it does happen, it is expected that action is taken quickly, and that is what GJ did.

That one winds itself here, since one was conscious itself that one disgruntled some regular users, knew
GJ with security, was but when weighing with the image damage was to cope with.
Ultimately, it is not about friendships or niceties, but about money.




It's clearly about GJ being an extension of the casinos

This post has been translated automatically

x00NY
Elite
redfoxx wrote on 21.02.2020 at 23:48
completely illogical


It is logical, however with an IQ of 10 it is of course hard to understand. My condolences, you can share the handkerchief with him...

This post has been translated automatically

Saphira
Expert
To all those who are now shedding tears and getting upset: it's just a forum. Life takes place outside.

This post has been translated automatically

s****e
redfoxx wrote on 02/21/2020 at 11:47 pm: on topic:

it is quite justified to discuss the banning of Marc in a separate thread. probably such a topic is worth it more than some "achtung-betrug" post

i find by the way also, that the sanction in no relation to the "misconduct" stands, already not there (as it was already noticed by others here) comments with far awesome expressions were waved through. Justification was often the allegedly so valuable freedom of speech


The misconduct was from GJ view the largest, which one can permit oneself, i.e. to a Boykottaufruf and/or to a
Call to rate the casino badly. There it goes to the core of making money here. This makes ratings a farce, and therefore uninteresting for casinos to be listed here
to be listed here. That is just a supergau from an entrepreneur's point of view. The insults are in my opinion not at all
so relevant. Sure, they don't have to be, but you don't have to block for that. But it can be just
wonderfully push forward.

This post has been translated automatically

Saphira
Expert
startpage wrote on 22/02/2020 at 00:34
From GJ's point of view, the lapse was the biggest one you can get away with, namely to a call for a boycott or a
Call to rate that casino poorly. There it goes to the core of making money here. This makes ratings a farce, and therefore uninteresting for casinos to be listed here
to be listed here. That is just a supergau from an entrepreneur's point of view. The insults are in my opinion not at all
so relevant. Sure, they don't have to be, but you don't have to block for that. But it can be just
wonderfully push forward.

Hm ... that leads to the conclusion that Marc should have acted more subtly to lead the boycott to success. Maybe the intelligence wasn't enough after all?

This post has been translated automatically

s****e
Saphira wrote on 02/22/2020 at 00:58 PM
Hm ... that suggests that Marc should have acted more subtly to make the boycott a success. Maybe the intelligence wasn't enough after all then?

No one is saying that he is intelligent. When you're that good at gambling, it casts a not-so-good
Shadow ahead. Think the time and energy he spent here, invested in a job, would probably be
better invested. The number of posts in such a short time suggests boredom.
As you said so well: this is only a forum, life takes place outside.
But to each his thing. If that was his world, then so be it.

I think you can't do something like that subtly. The "fake ratings" would have to look realistic, and so almost every
almost every casino gets at least an average score. If it is not, or it is recognized as a fake,
it will not be accepted as a rating.
So it is simply impossible. Of course, you can deduct a point here and there, but that's not enough.

In addition, he would have had to write to "trusted" people by PN, whether they would pull along with something, but not publicly.
That was really not smart.

But he was frustrated, because one had apparently dared here to contradict him. Probably he provoked it.
Always remember: Pride comes before the fall......

This post has been translated automatically

Saphira
Expert
startpage wrote on 22.02.2020 at 01:21
Is no one saying that he is intelligent. When you are so well versed in gambling, it casts a not so good
Shadow ahead. Think the time and energy he spent here invested in a job would probably be
better invested. The number of posts in such a short time suggests boredom.
As you said so well: this is only a forum, life takes place outside.
But to each his thing. If that was his world, then so be it.

I think you can't do something like that subtly. The "fake ratings" would have to look realistic, and so almost every
almost every casino gets at least an average score. If it is not, or it is recognized as a fake,
it will not be accepted as a rating.
So it is simply impossible. Of course, you can deduct a point here and there, but that's not enough.

In addition, he would have had to write to "trusted" people by PN, whether they would pull along with something, but not publicly.
That was really not smart.

But he was frustrated, because one had apparently dared here to contradict him. Probably he provoked it.


Always remember: Pride comes before a fall......



Well, it doesn't mean you're stupid just because you happen to know about gambling. Along the way there may be x other talents in any fields. Just find it borderline when you only focus on one and the same thing. Worst case scenario: gambling, jungle camp, Bild newspaper, gambling, jungle camp, Knossi stream, gambling, etc. Some may feel addressed here. Personally, it is important to me to continue to develop. That's why I find this whole debate here just absurd, because illusory world. Can times reinsehen and go on ...

Think, three quarters of the people here are unemployed and have boredom during the day. Then you can also bite on such a topic, if the search for daily freespins is then exhausted. Maybe it has also a bissl to do with reality denial. Then such topics as here also seem highly dramatic. Nothing else happens.

By the way, he has denied intelligence to others. To what extent this is true, I do not know. I think he is a smart guy and could move a lot. But please not here.

True, such a call probably can't work subtly here. Maybe it would be better for him to find a place where his skills are appreciated. Profession halt.




This post has been translated automatically

v****2
@startrape

"Nobody is saying that he is intelligent. When you're that good at gambling,
it casts a not-so-good shadow."

is klar digger...you know what obviously does not cast a good shadow ahead...
if one such a garbage like you here absondert. what are those please for bourgeoisie
prejudices...so honestly the sentence could come from my father ! from that times
apart from that i bet 10:1 that someone like marc has more skills like you and that
in almost all areas.

@saphira

you are me also so a hänchen...for that you yourself so much rumlungerst here
you take the mouth quite full (and no that is not an ambiguous sexist
remark) and funnily enough it sounds to me : gambling, dschungelcamp, bildzeitung, gambling,
dschungelcamp, knossi-stream, zocken etc. hard after self-reflection

so much only in addition...alaaf and good night


This post has been translated automatically

gamble1
Legend
People almost everyone here is just on 180 just a tense tone quarrel with everyone and everything what's going on at once with all of you ????

A forum is not everything right but a forum is also a small community you get to know after a time (even if mostly only virtually) and you like each other or not but what is slowly going on here is just sad

Envy, hate, trolls that has become the order of the day here and one rushes on everything and everyone who either does not represent the majority or any trolls heat up the atmosphere so that all the heads hit each other?

Come down all times

This post has been translated automatically

Quietscheentchen
Experienced
Saphira wrote on 22.02.2020 at 01:53
Well, it doesn't immediately say you're stupid because you happen to know about gambling. Along the way there may be x other talents in any fields. Just find it borderline when you only focus on one and the same thing. Worst case scenario: gambling, jungle camp, Bild newspaper, gambling, jungle camp, Knossi stream, gambling, etc. Some may feel addressed here. Personally, it is important to me to continue to develop. That's why I find this whole debate here just absurd, because illusory world. Can times reinsehen and go on ...

Think, three quarters of the people here are unemployed and have boredom during the day. Then you can also bite on such a topic, if the search for daily freespins is then exhausted. Maybe it has also a bissl to do with reality denial. Then such topics as here also seem highly dramatic. Nothing else happens.

By the way, he has denied intelligence to others. To what extent this is true, I do not know. I think he is a smart guy and could move a lot. But please not here.

True, such a call probably can't work subtly here. Maybe it would be better for him to find a place where his skills are appreciated. Profession halt.





Your contributions are often very pretentious and this counts once again among them ... I find it incredible that here the majority of you is titled as unemployed, even if it were so, this does not mean that one is therefore less value or here before boredom only nonsense writes ...
That someone is appreciated in his profession with his abilities, I have not yet experienced ... quite the opposite....
For me, personal development includes more ...


This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics20th Apr. 2024 at 09:38 am CEST

GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately