Topic created on 06th Jun. 2020 | Page: 11 of 13 | Answers: 127 | Views: 18,728
Anonym
Former Member
pictures task
22nd Jun. 2020, at 09:40 pm CEST#122
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Thanks for the Tip, regarding Rumgenöle and bashing and that you can also google, I'm really glad that you exist.
And just because it saves me halfway, here is my answer.
I was for the Latino wins, I had not noticed that he cedes his win to Mowolum, hence my comment that Mowolum was considered again. So I assumed that Latino (although he had 6 likes) was passed over. My mistake, the thread where it says that Latatino cedes his win to Mowolum, I apparently overlooked. You have exposed me, I am unable to read and understand what is written . I hope that I can still participate in your competitions in the future, please do not withdraw your favor from me.
MatthiasderDicke wrote on 22.06.2020 at 21:40: Thanks for the Tip, regarding Rumgenöle and bashing and that you can also Googeln, am really glad that there are you .
And just because it saves me half way, here is my response .
I was for the Latino wins, I had not noticed that he cedes his win to Mowolum, hence my comment that Mowolum was considered again. So I assumed that Latino (although he had 6 likes) was passed over. My mistake, the thread where it says that Latatino cedes his win to Mowolum, I apparently overlooked. You have exposed me, I am unable to read and understand what is written . I hope that I can still participate in your competitions in the future, please do not withdraw your favor from me.
see, apart from your intended irony, that's a reasonable statement. everyone likes something different, but then accuse me of always winning the same (although you still owe me the proof where I have already announced redfoxx as a winner?)
and yes, above it is also already, her picture answer had a lot of effort, was perfectly interpreted and another two points --> that counts for me and since I have organized it and it is my money I must (may) also decide. or should I soon leave the decision to someone else from here? would be an idea or?
you can make your own raffle, then you realize how time-consuming it is to determine the winner
Iseedeadpeople wrote on 22.06.2020 at 21:49
siehste, apart from your intentional irony, that's a reasonable statement. everyone likes something different, but then accuse me of always winning the same (although you still owe me the proof where I have already announced redfoxx as a winner?)
and yes, above it is also already, her picture answer had a lot of effort, was perfectly interpreted and another two points --> that counts for me and since I have organized it and it is my money I must (may) also decide. or should I soon leave the decision to someone else from here? would be an idea or?
you can do your own raffle, then you realize how time-consuming it is to determine the winner
I found the Ergebniss of Redfoxx also not bad, but have now given my Like to Latino and you had already decided in advance that Redfoxx wins the 25, - Euro, as we now know and yes of course the financier decides who wins, but I think I have never claimed otherwise. I have merely pointed out that the winner or winners are already determined to a certain extent. If in the near future a winner makes a lottery, those will win who are in some way sympathetic to the organizer, a logical thing just, no one gives something to someone he does not like . As an example, maybe the monthly lottery here, there are also people who win nothing, no matter how they stretch and others win 3-4 times in a row, just because they defend each hinterfotzigkeigkeit of some scumbag casino. That's just to explain my comments.
MatthiasderDicke wrote on 22.06.2020 at 22:33
I found the Ergebniss of Redfoxx also not bad, but have now given my Like to Latino and you had already decided in advance that Redfoxx wins the 25, - Euro, as we now know and yes of course the financier decides who wins, but I think I have never claimed otherwise. I have only pointed out that the winner or winners are already determined to a certain extent. If in the near future a winner makes a lottery, those will win who are in some way sympathetic to the organizer, a logical thing just, no one gives something to someone he does not like . As an example, maybe the monthly lottery here, there are also people who win nothing, no matter how they stretch and others win 3-4 times in a row, just because they defend each hinterfotzigkeigkeit of some scumbag casino. That's just to explain my comments.
and that's where your little mistake, the gj monthly draw is randomly based and no matter who writes what wins just randomly one or not.
everything else you have to ask gj
and in my lotteries it is just not so that I let the win who is sympathetic to me, I'm stubbornly neutral, that the 25er already on the sa or so was fixed was because the picture task was finished and I could not communicate it because of the ongoing like task otherwise the user would have thought --> the has already won then I link someone else --> so all the same chance, understood?
so, the like task I had to stick to my rules, but then changed it in your favor, because as you can read above I ignored the likes in the opening post otherwise there would have been no 2x10s. for no one.
besides, you can think that I can not stand certain people here for good reason anyway and still cheeseburger has won and got his psc, because he got the most with 4 likes --> so, nothing personal advantages of anyone with me.
and now my suggestion, you think of a small simple game, I give the 1x10 or 2x10 as prize money and pull it through from start to finish, so you as the organizer --> just so you see what you have to pay attention to everything, especially in the beginning so in addition to all other obligations --> meanwhile I have routine also because it's fun.
for today i am out, feel free to pn me with your decision
Have the paysafe successfully received from cheeseburger of which he owes me now only 9 more, will now get me a big döner from mehmets döner inna south, because G stands for Gönnen
MatthiasderDicke wrote on 22.06.2020 at 22:33
I found the Ergebniss of Redfoxx also not bad, but have now given my Like to Latino and you had already decided in advance that Redfoxx wins the 25, - Euro, as we now know and yes of course the financier decides who wins, but I think I have never claimed otherwise. I have only pointed out that the winner or winners are already determined to a certain extent. If in the near future a winner makes a lottery, those will win who are in some way sympathetic to the organizer, a logical thing just, no one gives something to someone he does not like . As an example, maybe the monthly lottery here, there are also people who win nothing, no matter how they stretch and others win 3-4 times in a row, just because they defend each hinterfotzigkeigkeit of some scumbag casino. That's just to explain my comments.
Are you seriously accusing the GJ team of cheating? So according to the motto of the random generator is fake and the winners are already fixed?
Iseedeadpeople wrote on 22.06.2020 at 22:58
and that's where your little mistake lies, the gj monthly raffle is random based and no matter who writes what wins just randomly one or not.
everything else you have to ask gj
and in my lotteries it is just not so that I let the win who is sympathetic to me, I'm stubbornly neutral, that the 25er already on the sa or so was fixed was because the picture task was finished and I could not communicate it because of the ongoing like task otherwise the users would have thought --> the has already won then I link someone else --> thus all the same chance, understood?
so, the like task I had to stick to my rules, but then changed it in your favor, because as you can read above I ignored the likes in the opening post otherwise there would have been no 2x10s. for no one.
besides, you can think that I can not stand certain people here for good reason anyway and still cheeseburger has won and got his psc, because he got the most with 4 likes --> so, nothing personal benefits of anyone with me.
and now my suggestion, you think of a small simple game, I give the 1x10 or 2x10 as prize money and pull it through from start to finish, so you as the organizer --> just so you see what you have to pay attention to everything, especially in the beginning so in addition to all other obligations --> meanwhile I have routine also because it's fun.
for today i am out, feel free to pn me with your decision
With the card for cheeseburger you have kept up appearances, the lottery must look at least halfway as if everyone could win . Thank you for your offer, but I do not want to make up a raffle, even with PSC provided by you .
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
pictures task
23rd Jun. 2020, at 06:37 am CEST#136
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
gamble1 wrote on 23.06.2020 at 00:18
Are you just seriously insinuating the GJ team fraud ? So according to the motto of the random generator is fake and the winners are already fixed?
Of course not, that's all just coincidence and in a random generator you can not program a few names, so that they then win, that is not feasible in a computer program. No, no, it's like with slots, you can't program anything, because the players would lose almost all the time, so if you could program it that way. But that is not possible at all.
Boh, you must be very frustrated.
The casinos are not running, you won't win any PSC at Gj either.
Life can be hard sometimes...... but also sometimes fair.
pictures task
Nobody has liked this post so far
And just because it saves me halfway, here is my answer.
I was for the Latino wins, I had not noticed that he cedes his win to Mowolum, hence my comment that Mowolum was considered again. So I assumed that Latino (although he had 6 likes) was passed over. My mistake, the thread where it says that Latatino cedes his win to Mowolum, I apparently overlooked. You have exposed me, I am unable to read and understand what is written . I hope that I can still participate in your competitions in the future, please do not withdraw your favor from me.
This post has been translated automatically
pictures task
Nobody has liked this post so far
see, apart from your intended irony, that's a reasonable statement. everyone likes something different, but then accuse me of always winning the same (although you still owe me the proof where I have already announced redfoxx as a winner?)
and yes, above it is also already, her picture answer had a lot of effort, was perfectly interpreted and another two points --> that counts for me and since I have organized it and it is my money I must (may) also decide. or should I soon leave the decision to someone else from here? would be an idea or?
you can make your own raffle, then you realize how time-consuming it is to determine the winner
This post has been translated automatically
pictures task
Liked this post:
Jenn-R
I found the Ergebniss of Redfoxx also not bad, but have now given my Like to Latino and you had already decided in advance that Redfoxx wins the 25, - Euro, as we now know and yes of course the financier decides who wins, but I think I have never claimed otherwise. I have merely pointed out that the winner or winners are already determined to a certain extent. If in the near future a winner makes a lottery, those will win who are in some way sympathetic to the organizer, a logical thing just, no one gives something to someone he does not like . As an example, maybe the monthly lottery here, there are also people who win nothing, no matter how they stretch and others win 3-4 times in a row, just because they defend each hinterfotzigkeigkeit of some scumbag casino. That's just to explain my comments.
This post has been translated automatically
pictures task
Liked this post:
Jenn-R
This post has been translated automatically
pictures task
Nobody has liked this post so far
and that's where your little mistake, the gj monthly draw is randomly based and no matter who writes what wins just randomly one or not.
everything else you have to ask gj
and in my lotteries it is just not so that I let the win who is sympathetic to me, I'm stubbornly neutral, that the 25er already on the sa or so was fixed was because the picture task was finished and I could not communicate it because of the ongoing like task otherwise the user would have thought --> the has already won then I link someone else --> so all the same chance, understood?
so, the like task I had to stick to my rules, but then changed it in your favor, because as you can read above I ignored the likes in the opening post otherwise there would have been no 2x10s. for no one.
besides, you can think that I can not stand certain people here for good reason anyway and still cheeseburger has won and got his psc, because he got the most with 4 likes --> so, nothing personal advantages of anyone with me.
and now my suggestion, you think of a small simple game, I give the 1x10 or 2x10 as prize money and pull it through from start to finish, so you as the organizer --> just so you see what you have to pay attention to everything, especially in the beginning so in addition to all other obligations --> meanwhile I have routine also because it's fun.
for today i am out, feel free to pn me with your decision
This post has been translated automatically
pictures task
Liked this post:
garfield68, 
Saphira
Mashallah
Edit: font color adjusted
This post has been translated automatically
pictures task
Nobody has liked this post so far
Are you seriously accusing the GJ team of cheating? So according to the motto of the random generator is fake and the winners are already fixed?
This post has been translated automatically
pictures task
Liked this post:
Jenn-R
With the card for cheeseburger you have kept up appearances, the lottery must look at least halfway as if everyone could win . Thank you for your offer, but I do not want to make up a raffle, even with PSC provided by you .
This post has been translated automatically
pictures task
Nobody has liked this post so far
Of course not, that's all just coincidence and in a random generator you can not program a few names, so that they then win, that is not feasible in a computer program. No, no, it's like with slots, you can't program anything, because the players would lose almost all the time, so if you could program it that way. But that is not possible at all.
This post has been translated automatically
pictures task
Nobody has liked this post so far
The casinos are not running, you won't win any PSC at Gj either.
Life can be hard sometimes...... but also sometimes fair.
This post has been translated automatically