-
Patizi, on 15th May. 2024 at 06:37 am CEST
-
upola, on 30th Apr. 2024 at 08:14 am CEST
-
danny005, today at 12:24 am CEST
-
Malganes, yesterday at 11:42 pm CEST
-
Fabi19, yesterday at 11:02 pm CEST
-
nightforce1979, yesterday at 10:36 pm CEST
-
Hidaruma, yesterday at 10:33 pm CEST
-
Saphira, yesterday at 10:06 pm CEST
-
Kapykapy, yesterday at 10:00 pm CEST
-
Jenn-R, yesterday at 09:46 pm CEST
-
Jenn-R, yesterday at 09:39 pm CEST
-
Olli_Eule, yesterday at 08:50 pm CEST
-
Rainmann, yesterday at 07:01 pm CEST
-
Malganes, yesterday at 12:53 pm CEST
-
gagapapamama, yesterday at 12:16 pm CEST
-
Ariana, yesterday at 11:31 am CEST
-
Brezel, yesterday at 08:16 am CEST
-
parahund, yesterday at 02:47 am CEST
-
Imperium, on 19th May. 2024 at 11:42 pm CEST
-
Freakz0id, on 19th May. 2024 at 07:56 pm CEST
-
Rebella912, on 19th May. 2024 at 03:31 pm CEST
-
Pat1991, on 19th May. 2024 at 10:01 am CEST
-
Svenr, on 19th May. 2024 at 02:20 am CEST
-
Comingsoon19, on 18th May. 2024 at 07:17 pm CEST
-
Shiningstar216, on 18th May. 2024 at 06:07 pm CEST
-
Cheeseburger, on 18th May. 2024 at 04:16 pm CEST
Let's talk about...
Nobody has liked this post so far
Whether this question is hare-brained because of PSC cards is a moot point.
I haven't noticed it yet, but I don't feel compelled to attack and ridicule the questioner, who is a recent arrival at that.
After all, it was just a question. And even if he would be of the firm conviction and would make the assertion, one can answer quite factually to it.
Far too often jokes are made here at the expense of others, and they don't have to be.
And when they are not jokes, they are met with "subtle" attacks.
A few months ago, when some users were here who then logged off in rows, such things were also criticized by the admins and also by players here.
In the meantime, it seems that everyone has free rein to attack everyone, including newcomers (both new in the field of gaming or simply as a new user here).
Rules (sensible rules that serve to protect the individual and protect the forum) should be enforced consistently to provide guidance. Letting one person have their way, but blocking or editing the other creates confusion and negative emotions.
A distinction must be made between opinions and personal attacks on others.
This post has been translated automatically
Let's talk about...
Nobody has liked this post so far
And with you too?
This post has been translated automatically
Let's talk about...
Nobody has liked this post so far
I understand what you mean by that, but it's hard for me to eat such comparative reasoning à la "it's like that with the others, so it's quite normal that it's like that here too". Because I don't think it should be like that.
I find it surprising. Because I don't mind losing per se. Or to put it another way, I don't gamble primarily to win. Besides, and losing doesn't play a role here, there are also, to put it casually, winners here who are nevertheless grouchy on the road and, for example, predominantly rumble.
I don't know the threads and the numerous users you mention there. (Maybe it was reported in a flash and deleted right away, so I didn't catch that?! )
It is - as so often - a type thing. So type "human" and so...
You, for example, seem to me fun-free. I can't remember a single contribution from you that contained a wink, let alone a joke. Joy of gambling and all that. Nope, that's apparently not yours or you don't share it here. If you're logged in here, you're primarily interested in setting the record straight, proving, criticizing, defending, explaining, etc. But you know what - flap around or grin every now and then... That would suit you just fine, I'm sure.
This post has been translated automatically
Let's talk about...
Nobody has liked this post so far
With me it just went.... I had but last week also times for a few hours...
This post has been translated automatically
Let's talk about...
Nobody has liked this post so far
And again you make me the subject...You must love me very much.
This post has been translated automatically
Let's talk about...
Nobody has liked this post so far
1: The user was answered normally, there were isolated jokes, but that is understandable with such a question. The question is a bit paranoid.
2: The thread should have been in a different subforum. Namely, correctly, to the conspiracy theories. Why? Because the official answer to this question is clearly "no". Meaning, if one would actually win less with PSC than with other methods, then this would be a conspiracy on the part of the casinos and possibly involved payment service providers. Thus a theory regarding a conspiracy and a conspiracy theory. However, the creator of the thread has posted this in the subforum "Online Casinos General". Which is clearly a mistake. This is a common problem in this forum, which I have chalked up to before. Many more threads actually belong in this subforum. Not because they are completely outlandish, but simply because they are theories regarding conspiracies
3:That these users have logged off was 90% a win for the forum. Among other things, there were users who have strongly spread right-wing ideas. Users who really doubted EVERYTHING here, including Daniel's 50,000€ win at Videoslots, of which there is even a video, of which money 5000€ was distributed to the community and of which I and certainly some others have learned directly from a euphoric Daniel. It was a wave of unsubscribes which was good for the forum climate, at that time it ran here worse than today.
4: You really have to distinguish between opinion and attack. This is done by the forum management, not you. Your assessment was in the past simply often wrong
This post has been translated automatically
Let's talk about...
Liked this post: Caro
This post has been translated automatically
Let's talk about...
Nobody has liked this post so far
After I know most of your posts, I don't buy that you don't know why there was/is this discussion here. Ergo, I won't say anything more about it now.
(By the way, that was the first thing I did here as a language fetishist - I searched and cross-read your, the GJ team's, posts. And I was glad that all of you seem to be able to express yourselves very well. Because that was important to ME when I'm already in the legal gambler gray area...)
You already wrote that earlier. I find the hint important, because I did not discuss with Julian at that time, but I wrote back and forth a bit. However, I did not have his wasted working time on the screen. So for my next "warning" I will be a bit shorter in my reaction.
This post has been translated automatically
Let's talk about...
Nobody has liked this post so far
A conspiracy theory is something completely different and has nothing to do with attempts to manipulate OCs.
One can answer the question factually, which some did. Others had to dump mockery and scorn again.
And it is just about the fact that then the mood tilts, is logical.
I wasn't criticizing the unsubscribes. I too am glad that a lot of the right wingers and actual conspiracy theorists are gone.
and yet, at that time, more care was taken not to whistle at newcomers right away.
Today the hard core has a free hand here.
Wrong, it is not the forum management that decides what is an opinion or what is an attack, but the legal situation and also common sense.
The forum management decides what is edited. Whether it is right is a completely different matter.
Which assessments were wrong in your opinion?
And it is again strangely conspicuous that every time, when first factual is spoken or discussed, suddenly again something personal comes after it.
Why?
This post has been translated automatically
Let's talk about...
Nobody has liked this post so far
Edit: I really have neither time nor desire to get involved in another endless, unnecessary discussion
This post has been translated automatically