Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Off topic & small talk: Let's talk about... (Page 21)

Topic created on 28th Jan. 2019 | Page: 21 of 22 | Answers: 214 | Views: 27,947
Knochen
Elite
Random wrote on 31.01.2019 at 18:35
So someone who so insists that you should not attack anyone, refers to human rights (in an online forum where there are kindergarten disputes ) and cites the Stbg, for such a one but you insult yourself quite often.


#bones

Conspiracy theory is a fighting term and no more, with which opponents are to be discredited
The term was invented by the CIA back when many doubts arose in the population about the Kennedy assassination.
This is verifiable, just by the way.
Since then, this term is used inflationary for every topic which does not fit those up there
And if one takes the word conspiracy theory per se then also each criminal investigator, public prosecutor etc. is by definition a conspiracy theorist.
Because these put up first also only theories and these are confirmed then due to facts or are rejected again.
Simply think more carefully about why we use which words in which context.
Always think for yourself and question everything you think you know.

I know the origin of this word, that was never the point. Words change their meaning in the course of time. Among other things, I am also concerned with the use in this forum. There is a special subforum here. In this forum, everything that is suspected by players but cannot be proven, should be discussed. It does not matter whether it is complete nonsense or possibly has a true core.

Conspiracy theory can be used without considering the origin, as it has been established in the meantime. For my sake, we can also delete the partial word "conspiracy", since this is actually not 100% correct, and simply switch to "theories". Or to "fraud theories", whoever prefers that. The key thing is that these are all just theories. And therefore belong in their own subforum

This post has been translated automatically

RiverSong
Legend

SevenEleven wrote on 01/28/2019 10:22 AM: ...
Let's talk about the use of the report button in forums (= snitching) using two examples: Paysafemaster and yours truly.

Paysafemaster was reported and deleted for making unfair PSC offers. In this forum, such a thing is simply dubbed "begging".

I wrote in a thread the other day (directed at user Kaffeelicht) that I thought he was in his early 20s and late pubescent based on his demeanor here on the forum à la (quote) "Come on, let's put our Schw**** on the table... Hihi, mine is longer." Julian took this as an example and told me that many (!) comments of mine were reported and that I should please watch my language in the future

In advance and VERY IMPORTANT: I do not want to discuss whether I was (un)rightly warned or Paysafemaster deleted. Also with Kaffeelicht itself I do not want to argue; his nick I have only mentioned for the sake of completeness

My basic opinion: also (like any forum owner) the GambleJoe crew can warn, delete, hype users at will - it's their forum. The owners have the power. They have certain ideas about their clientele and that is apparently to be covered as narrowly as possible. In general, I think: If you as a user do not like the respective forum policy, you should delete yourself. If you are a user who is always offended, you should be deleted by the forum crew. But everyone has to bear the consequences of his actions without complaint. If the forum dies out because the remaining 39 yes-men have nothing new to say, then that's the way it is. If I'm deleted as a user because I've opened my mouth too wide, then that's the way it is. Then no party (neither forum owner, nor user) needs to cry around. Those are the consequences of the respective action, which it is to be carried in each case like a man (hehe). Et basta!

So, what would I like to exchange now? I would, quite girl-like-curious *here-could-be-a-unicorn-emojie-stand*, soooo like to know who of you advocates denunciation in forums in the form of the report button?!

For what feels like 78 years I am/was (as a user and also as a moderator) on the road in the most diverse Internet forums - in politics, philosophy, sports, job, technical, crafts, pure girl, garden, pet and -zig general forums. In none of these forums I have/had been reported for my previous comments. Nor would a paysafemaster have been reported in my lifetime. But in this forum this happens and I wonder why?! (Frankly: Julian's feedback really surprised me too, because I've been reading along here for two years and actually it seemed pretty "free" to me here. But now after my registration I had to realize that none of the forums I know is as strictly managed as this one. But that in itself is not the point > see above)

So, maybe one of the report button clickers has the balls (for those who are bothered by the word "balls" *g* > maybe someone has the guts) and shares why he tattled on Paysafemaster or me? What was the deciding factor? For example, the word "tails"? Would you not have reported me if I had written "Come on, let's put our penises on the table... Hihi, mine is longer." I'm serious, by the way, so I'm really interested to know if the tails word was the deciding factor. And I have several questions in general: So...




  1. When did the tattletale mentality start with you? As early as kindergarten? Example: "Kevin said "bitch" to me." Or not until elementary school? Example: "Teacher, Schackeline writes with a pen and not a fountain pen."

  2. Would you also click the report button if it said User X has pressed the report button or would you prefer that the snitching is secret? (Rhetorical question, wa? *g*)

  3. Are you sometimes ashamed of your cowardly snitching mentality? Would you like to be cooler, more courageous?


Again, and seriously, I would really like to exchange with you, the voluntary forum police ( ). Maybe then it will become clear to me why, for example, I never (in any forum, no matter how hot and personally discussed there) ever reported any user. No matter how stupidly, fecal-language or below-the-belt some things were formulated - I would never have dreamed of telling on someone to the forum moderators. I would be ashamed of myself for such a cowardly, desperate, childish act. And I would feel unspeakably stupid.

So... maybe someone who has already clicked the report button (doesn't have to be because of Paysafemaster or me) will comment. If not... Julian, then I'd be interested in at least a little statistic on how many users have clicked the report button for this post here. *g*

Many greetings


PS. Too bad Paysafemaster, I was looking forward to your landbased casino experiment.


just for the sake of completeness, even if you are not interested --> gj is the most accommodating forum what exists
was / am in several, in one it really is, there are no public discussions about someone's lock or similar, tolerated. the person can contact the mod by pn, sometimes he comes back, sometimes not, this is strict but effective. and they have millions of users


This post has been translated automatically

RiverSong
Legend
seveneleven,
1. have you ever deleted yourself and are back at the start here?

rhetorical question

2. your opening post (the rest I have only roughly skimmed)
first I thought, hhmm has boredom and too much time

you accuse everyone in your opening post just times

--> gj, which you dedicate a whole big paragraph how strictly evil they are to the users and then write à but that's not the point (post I have already pure)

--> you really want to know the reporter and why this.....with examples even......

hhm, why only?

--> that was not it yet....as hoeness once said ... . have once studied psychology for a while, so I also looked at a few of your posts and see here is the solution in it.

with the report button and your realization that some have reported you, it all came back up and then this here

quotes 711 seveneleven
--> Maybe you should take the stick out of your butt too
--> Put the cane back in your pocket
--> still a third one recently which was probably addressed to me but quickly deleted by you, similar like
--> otherwise there is again with the stick on the palm of your hand

you have been in your time a mobbing or cane victim (as they used to say)

and now to your kindergarten and elementary school examples
i am right that you are the schackeline or the kevin (maybe you changed your name because of the example).
that the appearance of the report button (according to counter there are messages since the beginning, only in the background) and your previous frustration that someone has dared to report you and even several times,
--> are the trigger
--> has suddenly reminded you of the time from before, you have never overcome the trauma of the snitches against you.

if you wirklcih before your registration 2 years have read along and you still --> free <-- vorkamst dann hast du deine erlebnisse bis zur eröffnung des threads erfolgreich aber unbewusst unterdrückt.


du darfst mich jetzt gerne melden, ich bitte sogar darum, denn es deckt nur dein trauriges schicksal, welches ich nicht weiter vertiefen werde, auf und es sind keine beleidigungen o.ä. in meinem text

bevor du jetzt aber meinst zum angriff gegen mich übergehen zu müssen (so wie du auf fast jeden post hier mit nonsens geantwortet und versucht hast abzulenken (diesmal ist kaffeelichts analyse schon teilweise richtig)
-->I would have this and that and bla,


  1. i would not answer anymore

  2. it would confirm me completely,

  3. you deny it = confirmation

  4. you admit it = confirmation




do not fret
tomorrow is also again lottery and there you can forget everything for a short time, before you dedicate yourself probably afterwards again to this thread in which it is only about the therapy of your childhood trauma. wish you nevertheless much success thereby:-P


and i have already left you a few coins in an envelope so that you can buy some sweets

RiverSong</-->

This post has been translated automatically

upola
Legend
Amen.

This post has been translated automatically

9****f
Kind of sick

This post has been translated automatically

SevenEleven
Experienced

Coffee Light wrote on 01/31/2019 at 3:30 pm
And again you make me the subject...You must love me immensely.

For me it is normal that I engage directly with my interlocutor - in the case that was just you. That is, of course, I then choose as an example you and not the user SweetBumblebee1965, to explain certain statements that I make, if necessary in more detail. Why? Because that is m.E. only fair and because the chances are besides larger that one, if one argues directly with one another not at each other past talks. However, since you don't seem to grasp the personal level and (once again) just feel attacked (which I - seriously - find really unfortunate), it really doesn't make sense to deal with you in more detail in this way

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
@iseedeadpeople I have rarely read such a snooty, arrogant post. Apart from the fact that you are apparently too lazy to deal with capitalization, which hurts the eye and that it certainly does not interest anyone, whether you had a few months whatever tried to study, it would make more sense to formulate your assumptions and insults in a PM, than to expose yourself in such a way. What you had written there together, shows actually only that you just exactly the input post can not understand at all, that is not bad in itself, bad is when one from lack of understanding reasonless such a crap verzapft

This post has been translated automatically

SevenEleven
Experienced
Bone wrote on 01/31/2019 2:55 PM

Clearly, there is often a lot of frustration in a gamer forum due to losses in gameplay. But the other side is that gaming is just fun. Basically, no one will deny that. If you can't talk about the fun of the game here at all, then where can you talk about it? Because about the frustration of the game you can exchange in umpteen forums. There are some forums on the subject of gambling, where you can even exchange information only about your addiction and the resulting problems. And for the most part, they run more peacefully than this one.

I don't know, but it sounds logical that the frustration due to losses is decisive for the mood here. In the end, however, the reasons are beside the point... The fact is, I find it annoying that the fun of the game is slipping more and more into the background here


Nutty chat: A few weeks ago, I ended up with two casino employees in one or at the bar . I told them at some point that I had recently started playing online. They asked me if I was familiar with the topic (OC) and I told them with a proud chest that I am a user in the world's best (*g*) gambling forum and that you can feel quite safe/secure there - despite the legal gray area - because the forum operators and the team present themselves well and cleverly and they even help you if necessary when there are difficulties. Of course they immediately asked which forum I meant. I answered: "Well, which one - GambleJoe of course". Then they looked at each other for a moment, grinned and said: "But that's not the forum with the green bar, which is run by a Danny or something like that (they meant Daniel ), is it? Isn't that the forum where so many users just vent their frustrations and constantly claim that most OCs just cheat them anyway?" Of course I negated that etc. ... is also unimportant, what we then still so spoke, BUT what I wanted to get at...

... in this point one could speak just also of a business-damaging occurrence "of the GJ users" (I thought straight no better formulation, therefore in quotation marks). Which is why I, as the operator, would only tolerate a certain amount of - to put it bluntly - "Alles Betruuuuug"-crying. Because the two guys I met there are certainly not the only casino employees who know GambleJoe. Also in many Online Casinos, the term GJ should certainly not be completely unknown.

I, for one, am glad and grateful that this forum exists because it gives me a safe feeling when gambling or choosing OCs. And because that's the case, I'd never just 'etch around' here. And if I ever feel (almost) just cheated, I won't play anymore

Amen, right?

This post has been translated automatically

SevenEleven
Experienced
Iseedeadpeople wrote on 01/31/2019 21:54: seveneleven,
1. have you ever deleted yourself and are back at the start here?

rhetorical question

2. your opening post (the rest i just roughly skimmed)
first I thought, hhmm has boredom and too much time

you accuse everyone in your opening post just times

--> gj, which you dedicate a whole big paragraph how strictly evil they are to the users and then write à but that's not the point (post I have already pure)

--> you really want to know the reporter and why this.....with examples even......

hhm, why only?

--> that was not it yet....as hoeness once said ... . have once studied psychology for a while, so I also looked at a few of your posts and see here is the solution in it.

with the report button and your realization that some have reported you, it all came back up and then this here

quotes 711 seveneleven
--> Maybe you should take the stick out of your butt too
--> Pack the cane again
--> still a third one recently which was probably addressed to me but quickly deleted by you, similar like
--> otherwise there is again with the stick on the palm of your hand

you have been in your time a mobbing or cane victim (as they used to say)

and now to your kindergarten and elementary school examples
i am right that you are the schackeline or the kevin (maybe you changed your name because of the example).
that the appearance of the report button (according to counter there are messages since the beginning, only in the background) and your previous frustration that someone has dared to report you and even several times,
--> are the trigger
--> has suddenly reminded you of the time from before, you have never overcome the trauma of the snitches against you.

if you wirklcih before your registration 2 years have read along and you still --> free <-- vorkamst dann hast du deine erlebnisse bis zur eröffnung des threads erfolgreich aber unbewusst unterdrückt.


du darfst mich jetzt gerne melden, ich bitte sogar darum, denn es deckt nur dein trauriges schicksal, welches ich nicht weiter vertiefen werde, auf und es sind keine beleidigungen o.ä. in meinem text

bevor du jetzt aber meinst zum angriff gegen mich übergehen zu müssen (so wie du auf fast jeden post hier mit nonsens geantwortet und versucht hast abzulenken (diesmal ist kaffeelichts analyse schon teilweise richtig)
-->I would have this and that and bla,


  1. i would not answer anymore

  2. it would confirm me completely,

  3. you deny it = confirmation

  4. you admit it = confirmation




do not fret
tomorrow is also again lottery and there you can forget everything for a short time, before you dedicate yourself probably afterwards again to this thread in which it is only about the therapy of your childhood trauma. wish you nevertheless much success thereby:-P


and i have already left you a few coins in an envelope so that you can buy some sweets

SevenEleven

"I studied psychology for a while, so I also looked at a few of your posts and see that here is the solution."

You are probably right with your analysis of me. Oh, what am I saying... "probably"? ... CERTAINLY you are right. Absolutely even! After all, you have studied psychology for a while, so you can say something like above. (Puuuuh, luck had that you have not finished studying, otherwise I would have had here nothing more to laugh)

----------

"you are allowed to report me now, i even ask for it, because it only reveals your sad fate, which i will not deepen further, and there are no insults or similar in my text."

Eeeh, why should I report you? I don't understand. Seriously - I am zero bothered by your assessments of me. And I also hope the moderators don't delete your post. For all those who can think further than you can throw them, you have made it very clear what you have in you (not only in psychological knowledge (!) ).

Many greetings
Schackline-Kevin



Edit wg. line formatting *sigh









</-->

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
SevenEleven wrote on 02/01/2019 at 10:00 AM
"once studied psychology for a while, so additionally looked at a few of your posts and lo and behold here's the solution in there."

You are probably right in your analysis of me. Oh, what am I saying... "probably"? ... CERTAINLY you are right. Absolutely even! After all, you have studied
psychology for a while, so you can say something like above. (Puuuuh, luck had that you have not finished studying, otherwise I would have had here nothing more to laugh)

----------

"you are allowed to report me now, i even ask for it, because it only reveals your sad fate, which i will not deepen further, and there are no insults or similar in my text."

Eeeh, why should I report you? I don't understand. Seriously - I am zero bothered by your assessments of me. And I also hope the moderators don't delete your post. For all those who can think further than you can throw them, you have made it very clear what you have in you (not only in psychological knowledge (!) ).

Many greetings
Schackline-Kevin



Edit wg. line formatting *sigh










But for the fact that all the posts don't bother you, you answer them very extensively, dear Kevin

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics19th May. 2024 at 10:14 am CEST

GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately