Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Off topic & small talk: Chatterbox (Page 647)

Topic created on 14th Jan. 2019 | Page: 647 of 1162 | Answers: 11,616 | Views: 1,461,914
Falko
Icon

Royal777 wrote on 15.09.2022 at 13:46:In principle, ALG 2 has only been renamed, a far-reaching reform is still missing. As a single person I had in the last 10 years a few times social welfare and both the social pressure and the treatment of a Hartz 4 recipient are unbearable. At disgust hardly to surpass if I hear the opinions that the working people want to decide on the expenditure of welfare recipients

Although there should be a clear financial difference between working and unemployed, but not at the expense of the unemployed. For several decades, prices and compulsory costs have been rising, but wages have stagnated, while state support in all areas is not worth mentioning.

Each year 500,000 new graduates and nevertheless employers look to ten thousand times in vain for specialists, while the ratio at unemployed graduates rises. It is bizarre that we are supposedly dependent on skilled workers from abroad.


And when you were in the Harz 4 reference then really the office took over your complete heating costs, or is that not true in such a way? That triggers now just in the social networks an outcry that the citizen's benefits rise by 53 euros with the justification that the recipients except the electricity get everything paid so allegedly also the complete gas bill. I thought but so far, the office pays only a limited amount monthly in heating costs and that this financial share does not create the complete heating costs to cover, how was it with you where you have put in there?

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Falko wrote on 15.09.2022 at 14:47

And when you were in the Harz 4 reference has then really taken over the office your complete heating costs, or is that not true? That triggers just now in the social networks an outcry that the citizen's benefits increase by 53 euros with the justification that the recipients except the electricity get everything paid so allegedly also the complete gas bill. I thought but so far, the office pays only a limited amount monthly in heating costs and that this financial share does not create the complete heating costs to cover, how was it with you where you have put in there?

Of course, the office had taken over the heating costs, but I also lived very frugally and modestly. In addition, there are a lot of factors that you have to take into account, so you can not generalize this
Meanwhile the agency for work has a surplus in the two-digit billion range. For the working person it does not play a role whether nobody or 10 million are unemployed, at the tax nothing will change noticeably. In addition, it is well known that the money also flows abroad.

Unemployed people get paid quite a bit and rightly so! In addition, there is the approximately 450€ for single people

Food, beverages, tobacco 34,70% 155,82 €
Leisure, entertainment, culture 9,76% 43,82 €
Post and telecommunications 8,94% 40,15 €
Clothing, shoes 8,30% 37,26 €
Housing, energy, housing maintenance 8,48% 38,07 €
Interior decoration, household appliances and objects 6,09% 27,35 €
other goods and services 7,98% 35,77 €
Transport 8,97% 40,27 €
Healthcare 3,82% 17,14 €
Accommodation and catering services 2,61% 11,73 €
Education 0,36% 1,62 €
Total 100% 449,00 €



But I also have to emphasize that despite ALG 2 I had enough money to fulfill luxurious needs (casino, internet, soccer, Netflix). Nevertheless the disadvantages outweigh...
Those responsible should lift the corresponding gas/oil sanctions and good is, the Greens supported NS 2 at that time, despite the Caucasus war.

It's all about power, they want to weaken the East, while the Americans have not pronounced any significant sanctions against Russia, they put the Europeans under pressure and we nod everything off...

This post has been translated automatically

Falko
Icon

Royal777 wrote on 15.09.2022 at 17:21
Of course the office had taken over the heating costs, but I also lived very frugally and modestly. In addition, there are lots of factors that you have to take into account, so you can not generalize this
Meanwhile the agency for work has a surplus in the two-digit billion range. For the working person it does not play a role whether nobody or 10 million are unemployed, at the tax nothing will change noticeably. In addition, it is well known that the money also flows abroad.

Unemployed people get paid quite a bit and rightly so! In addition, there is the approximately 450€ for single people

Food, beverages, tobacco 34,70% 155,82 €
Leisure, entertainment, culture 9,76% 43,82 €
Post and telecommunications 8,94% 40,15 €
Clothing, shoes 8,30% 37,26 €
Housing, energy, housing maintenance 8,48% 38,07 €
Interior decoration, household appliances and objects 6,09% 27,35 €
other goods and services 7,98% 35,77 €
Transport 8,97% 40,27 €
Healthcare 3,82% 17,14 €
Accommodation and catering services 2,61% 11,73 €
Education 0,36% 1,62 €
Total 100% 449,00 €



But I also have to emphasize that despite ALG 2 I had enough money to fulfill luxurious needs (casino, internet, soccer, Netflix). Nevertheless the disadvantages outweigh...
Those responsible should lift the corresponding gas/oil sanctions and good is, the Greens supported NS 2 at that time, despite the Caucasus war.

It's all about power, they want to weaken the East, while the Americans have not pronounced any significant sanctions against Russia, they put the Europeans under pressure and we nod everything off...

Azerbaijan has just directly invaded Armenia. And my does not hear a word from the West where Azerbaijan is condemned for it. A few weeks ago, even the head of the EU was in Azerbaijan and signed a gas deal there. And at the beginning of September even German military officers visited Azerbaijan. I ask myself now even the question, whether the West has even threaded this current war between Armenia and Azerbaijan, because it also brings Russia in distress? In any case, it is very hypocritical to give up the business with one aggressor and then continue the same business with the other aggressor

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym

Falko wrote on 15.09.2022 at 18:36

Just Azerbaijan directly invaded the country Armenia. And my hears no word from the West where Azerbaijan is condemned for it. A few weeks ago even the head of the EU was in Azerbaijan and signed a gas deal there. And at the beginning of September even German military officers visited Azerbaijan. I ask myself now even the question, whether the West has even threaded this current war between Armenia and Azerbaijan, because it also brings Russia in distress? In any case, it is very hypocritical to give up the business with one aggressor and then continue the same business with the other aggressor

Both in the recent past and currently there are dozens of wars, from most of them you hear nothing. Of course Germany is involved in most wars, active or inactive. Just google, then you will quickly find serious sources.

Either way, you have to accept it. Therefore, crisis preparedness for a few weeks is more important than ever.

This post has been translated automatically

Caro
Expert
Evening you two, since you are talking "alone" about political issues, I would ask you to continue the conversation via Communicator. I know it is the chat corner and here (almost) everything can be discussed, but I think that GambleJoe is not the right place for it. Thanks for your understanding.

This post has been translated automatically

Saphira
Expert
Sooner or later, however, it will affect the Gamblejoe forum as people realize that they can no longer afford to gamble because life is becoming unaffordable

This post has been translated automatically

gamble1
Legend

Saphira wrote on 15.09.2022 at 23:20: Sooner or later it will also affect the Gamblejoe forum, when people realize that they can no longer afford to gamble, because life is becoming unaffordable

Yes but I think Caro just wanted to say that exclusively political topics over several pages is a bit too much of a good thing

This post has been translated automatically

Falko
Icon

gamble1 wrote on 15.09.2022 at 23:28:Yes but I think Caro just wanted to say that exclusively political topics over several pages is a bit too much of a good thing

But then look at the whole thread. Since is written but hardly and certainly not page-long about political issues. And at that time Julian had set up this chat corner and written in the opening thread > Here you have the opportunity to talk about all the topics that are off topic

This post has been translated automatically

Saphira
Expert
Certain topics, such as the crisis provision mentioned by Royal777, which people are extremely moved by at the moment due to the current situation, simply cannot be separated from politics because it is causally responsible for them. Could be wrapped in nice satire fairy tales, so that it does not sound too much like criticism

This post has been translated automatically

Bluff
Expert
Does pokerstars area sports betting work for you?

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics27th Apr. 2024 at 03:53 pm CEST

GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately