Julian wrote on 28.08.2022 at 15:59: There has been a dispute between the three influencers for some time via Twitter and YouTube.
Tanzverbot is considered a pretty big "casino enemy", and after Orangemorange and Scurrows accepted the casino deal, it went pretty round on the net about it.
It was somehow foreseeable that the meeting of them at Gamescom will not end well, especially after the stings on Twitter on the same day.
Is for me personally mega Cringe to watch, but nevertheless an interesting topic.
Have Christian already informed about it, maybe he can write a news article about it in the near future
Since some feel disturbed to fill the No Deposit thread it goes on here with discussions.So again Mr. Manager of CashiMashi, is the credit that is now there paid out or is everything simply canceled? The players have done nothing wrong in any case...
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
Chatterbox
5th Sep. 2022, at 09:57 am CEST#6462
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
I need to do more HomeOffice - some road users I just do not understand. man man man
I have not yet seen the video, only skimmed a few passages. This law firm often speaks highly of itself without mentioning that a positive verdict is far from sufficient. At least important aspects are addressed, which influence the court verdict.
Basically, I think the cooperation is good, but "Tanzverbot" as well as the majority of the population is very naive, so you should lower your expectations...
Royal777 wrote on 05.09.2022 at 15:34: I have not yet seen the video, just skimmed some parts. This law firm often talks highly of itself without mentioning that a Positive Verdict is far from enough. At least it mentions important aspects that influence the court verdict.
Basically I find the cooperation good, nevertheless "Tanzverbot" as well as the majority of the population is very naive, therefore one should throttle its expectations...
Just because you can do something theoretically does not mean that you should do it
Relatively current example bank charges
One could obligate the banks on repayment of the illegal fees that tells one each .... however did someone mention that thereby the account is most likely then gone ? I do not think
And so it is almost always yes you can sue the casinos for repayment yes you can a litigation financier 40% squeeze but whether you should do that is another matter
I can also drive on red through the intersection should I do that ? Rather not
supermode wrote on 05.09.2022 at 10:43: Tanzverbot now also has a cooperation with a law firm alà "we get your money back", he presents here from 10:00Min:
thanks for the info, habs from 10:00 few min angeguckt...... and switched off.
what exactly does it have to do with the topic now what he complains that other streamers get 100,000s to millions for oc stream deals and this is tolerated by twitch?
thought he wanted to take action against this?
instead, he's now filling his own pockets with the partner and getting money back blah blah (and a lot more subscribers because all the game addicts hit him up).
in principle, both sides are only selling hope:
the one hope for big wins
the other hope to get money back
it's just like everywhere else:
at the end of the day one side meets the other side with a grinning look at their respective account balance, shakes paw and treats itself to a bottle of champus all lemmings paid it
Iseedeadpeople wrote on 05.09.2022 at 16:59 is then just like everywhere else:
at the end of the day, one side meets the other with a grinning look at their respective account balances, shakes paws and treats himself to a bottle of champus all lemmings have paid it
Fits then also what I posted a few days ago after the Gamescom-Zoff, really inconvenient came for no one, best self-promotion...🤔
Iseedeadpeople wrote on 05.09.2022 at 16:59
thanks for the info, watched it from 10:00 few min...... and turned off.
what exactly does it have to do with the topic now what he complains that other streamers get 100,000s to millions for oc stream deals and this is tolerated by twitch?
thought he wanted to take action against this?
instead, he's now filling his own pockets with the partner and getting money back blah blah (and a lot more subscribers because all the game addicts hit him up).
in principle, both sides are only selling hope:
the one hope for big wins
the other hope to get money back
it's just like everywhere else:
at the end of the day one side meets the other with a grinning look at their respective account balance, shakes paws and treats itself to a bottle of champus all lemmings have paid
Beautifully written and exactly so it is.
Please make yourself a Twitter account and go purely into the discussions, I get me popcorn
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
good background info
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
Tanzverbot now also has a cooperation with a law firm alà "we get your money back", he presents here from 10:00Min:
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
Well you can think of it what you want but at least he stands by what he says
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post:
Hanshanshans
Basically, I think the cooperation is good, but "Tanzverbot" as well as the majority of the population is very naive, so you should lower your expectations...
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
Just because you can do something theoretically does not mean that you should do it
Relatively current example bank charges
One could obligate the banks on repayment of the illegal fees that tells one each .... however did someone mention that thereby the account is most likely then gone ? I do not think
And so it is almost always yes you can sue the casinos for repayment yes you can a litigation financier 40% squeeze but whether you should do that is another matter
I can also drive on red through the intersection should I do that ? Rather not
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post: Anonym,
Hanshanshans, 
RebellYell, 
supermode
thanks for the info, habs from 10:00 few min angeguckt...... and switched off.
what exactly does it have to do with the topic now what he complains that other streamers get 100,000s to millions for oc stream deals and this is tolerated by twitch?
thought he wanted to take action against this?
instead, he's now filling his own pockets with the partner and getting money back blah blah (and a lot more subscribers because all the game addicts hit him up).
in principle, both sides are only selling hope:
the one hope for big wins
the other hope to get money back
it's just like everywhere else:
at the end of the day one side meets the other side with a grinning look at their respective account balance, shakes paw and treats itself to a bottle of champus all lemmings paid it
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post: Anonym
Fits then also what I posted a few days ago after the Gamescom-Zoff, really inconvenient came for no one, best self-promotion...🤔
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
Beautifully written and exactly so it is.
Please make yourself a Twitter account and go purely into the discussions, I get me popcorn
This post has been translated automatically