Langhans wrote on 05.03.2024 at 20:43:
Aaaaaahhh....gradually I'm starting to snack on the subject So this ominous PIN didn't come from Paysafe, but was sent with the ID card at the time. Mine is dated 2018. Oh dear,...in which drawer should I start 6 years retroactively That will be wild tomorrow...I don't feel like it, but it has to be done. Thanks, Stromi. Edit: But first try the short official channels via a phone call with Paysafe.
I still have the option of identifying myself with IDnow in my account. You don't need an app or PIN for this. Simply hold your ID and your face up to the camera and it's done in just a few minutes.
You can have a look to see if you have this option too!
In my account there is still the possibility to identify yourself with IDnow. You don't need an app or PIN for this. Simply hold your ID and your face up to the camera and it's done in just a few minutes.
Have a look to see if you have this option too!
Ahoy,
exactly. The process with "IDnow" was relatively quick for me too. Download the app, hold your ID in, scan your face and you're good to go
In my account there is still the possibility to identify yourself with IDnow. You don't need an app or PIN for this. Simply hold your ID and your face up to the camera and it's done in just a few minutes.
You can have a look to see if you have this option!
Thanks for the advice. I'm already stuck with my nose in this "case" again Unfortunately, I'm inevitably redirected to this Authada story with PIN etc. in the upgrade menu (as expected, I didn't find the letter with the PIN in the quick run-through). There are actually all sorts of options listed here https://www.paysafecard.com/de/support/question/101/welche-dokumente-kann-ich-zum-nachweis-des-wohnsitzes-nutzen/ that are officially suitable for personal identification and I could certainly find some of them......I'll wait until they are supposedly available by phone from 11.00 a.m. and ask what we can do there. Maybe they'll take pity on a technical woodchipper like me, who can deliver all kinds of documents wonderfully, but is the ultimate user crutch on a cell phone
Only on the phone or have you also tried it on the computer? I have several options on the computer. In the app, I am also automatically redirected to one method.
DieWunderharke5000 wrote on 06.03.2024 at 10:18 am: Only tried on the phone or also on the computer? I have several options on the computer. In the app I am also automatically redirected to a method.
I'm on the desktop...I always give my cell phone a wide berth if possible
frapi07 wrote on 05.03.2024 at 21:56:
Here's part two, sorry again.
it had felt like that. I've mentioned before that Blubbo often leaves an unfriendly impression, but I can't find anything objectionable about that as long as he never crosses a certain line. Sometimes you can't mention certain things any other way. Blubbo was very annoyed by the interactions between the two users and made it seem that way. As Xavi22 pointed out, there are situations in real life where people admonish others. Some ask nicely, some scold. No matter how you draw the attention of others to misconduct, as the "guilty party" you should always try to understand whether you are really in the wrong or in the right and then react accordingly.
" Old butterfly ......
I now read Torah and lauer in every theead !
It's great that you are both here but can you clarify your private matters somewhere else?
I think most people here are not interested in your private life!
It really sucks to read about you in every thread, like in kindergarten!"
I admit that the last two sentences (especially the last sentence) were unnecessary and possibly provoked Mr. Lauer, but otherwise there's nothing to complain about here. I think it was an unfavorable situation. It was Sunday, it was already evening, you might already be thinking about Monday and a bit annoyed. But what prompted me to write that you were trying to educate Blubbo is that you pointed out his unfriendly behavior but didn't mention Mr. Lauer's misconduct in return. Saphira wrote a very good post here and got to the heart of the matter. Both were unnecessarily provocative, but Mr. Lauer went over the top with his private message. I can also understand that you think you could have put it more nicely, but I did that and it didn't help. Mr. Lauer could not admit his misconduct despite a nice and factual statement and stubbornly defended his behavior and that of his wife and then blamed us for the fact that the woman then deleted herself.
I hope you and the other admins can now understand the situation a little better. I speak only for myself, what Blubbo has to say/write, he is welcome to post it himself in a post.
I was also shocked that things escalated so much. Mainly because I took a factual approach here and Mr. Lauer immediately went to a personal level.
Finally, I would like to appeal to you once again and ask you, if Mr. Lauer ever decides to reactivate his account, that you admonish him but also give him a second chance. I was the first to cry out for a ban, but after sleeping on it for a night and realizing that he deleted his bad and unfair rating himself, I have nothing against him returning.
Thank you for your time and your answers.
I can understand everything you've written very well, and your description of Mr. Lauer is definitely understandable.
It is therefore somewhat difficult for me to continue to respond to your content, as I think that everything has been said and there is nothing more to add.
I can therefore only thank you once again for the time you have taken and for your explanations.
frapi07 wrote on 05.03.2024 at 16:29:
That one could be nicer, I also agree with you. I always try to express my opinion objectively and nicely. At least 90% of my posts are written and sent under these aspects.
I just wanted to emphasize this sentence again positively, because I can really only agree with it and find the whole thing really very good and that is no longer a matter of course these days.
frapi07 wrote on 06.03.2024 05:06:
What Blubbo has written in the past should stay in the past. Has nothing to do with the case of Mr. Lauer. That's another reason why I think it's good that you don't want to go into more detail here.
But lest this be misunderstood, I only brought it up because you mentioned it earlier in your post.
At the time, it was only important to me to present the whole thing truthfully.
Blubbo33 wrote on 05.03.2024 at 22:08:
Apparently you in the team or you alone have had quite a bit on your plate as far as I'm concerned, if you take sentence after sentence to heart!
In this context, I would like to briefly mention that although the first text on this topic two days ago was formulated together with the team, yesterday's text was written by me alone and is therefore also solely attributable to me.
It was important to me at the time to contribute my own opinion on this topic.
So before this rubs off on the whole team, I would like to emphasize once again that I alone am responsible for yesterday's text.
Blubbo33 wrote on 05.03.2024 at 22:08:
Furthermore, a few sentences are written about Lauer but a huge statement about my former and current behavior!
From that point of view, I can really understand that it may have come across as a bit provocative to you, but that was honestly not my intention.
The reason why I responded so little to Mr. Lauer is that his behavior doesn't need to be discussed in my eyes.
It was a stupid reaction from him, that's all you can say about it in my opinion.
To be honest, I had tried to put a positive spin on my statement to you.
Apparently the whole thing didn't really go down well with you though, which I think is a shame.
frapi07 wrote on 05.03.2024 at 21:56:
Also, in closing, I would like to appeal to you once again and ask that if MrLauer ever decides to reactivate his account that you admonish him but also give him a second chance. I was the first to cry out for a ban, but after sleeping on it for a night and realizing that he deleted his bad and unfair review himself, I have no objection to him returning.
Thank you for your opinion on this case.
Whether Mr. Lauer will one day apply for reactivation and how we will ultimately handle it, I think the future will tell.
But I think a little time to take a deep breath after such an action certainly can't hurt.
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
And I am the smartest😂
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
Smart people please go to the dark corner
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post:
Langhans
I still have the option of identifying myself with IDnow in my account. You don't need an app or PIN for this. Simply hold your ID and your face up to the camera and it's done in just a few minutes.
You can have a look to see if you have this option too!
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
Ahoy,
exactly. The process with "IDnow" was relatively quick for me too. Download the app, hold your ID in, scan your face and you're good to go
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
Thanks for the advice. I'm already stuck with my nose in this "case" again Unfortunately, I'm inevitably redirected to this Authada story with PIN etc. in the upgrade menu (as expected, I didn't find the letter with the PIN in the quick run-through). There are actually all sorts of options listed here https://www.paysafecard.com/de/support/question/101/welche-dokumente-kann-ich-zum-nachweis-des-wohnsitzes-nutzen/ that are officially suitable for personal identification and I could certainly find some of them......I'll wait until they are supposedly available by phone from 11.00 a.m. and ask what we can do there. Maybe they'll take pity on a technical woodchipper like me, who can deliver all kinds of documents wonderfully, but is the ultimate user crutch on a cell phone
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Liked this post:
frapi07
I think it's great that you both included these statements in your posts...
Shows a lot of mutual respect and decency, that's the way it should be.👍
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
I'm on the desktop...I always give my cell phone a wide berth if possible
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
Thank you for your time and your answers.
I can understand everything you've written very well, and your description of Mr. Lauer is definitely understandable.
It is therefore somewhat difficult for me to continue to respond to your content, as I think that everything has been said and there is nothing more to add.
I can therefore only thank you once again for the time you have taken and for your explanations.
I just wanted to emphasize this sentence again positively, because I can really only agree with it and find the whole thing really very good and that is no longer a matter of course these days.
But lest this be misunderstood, I only brought it up because you mentioned it earlier in your post.
At the time, it was only important to me to present the whole thing truthfully.
In this context, I would like to briefly mention that although the first text on this topic two days ago was formulated together with the team, yesterday's text was written by me alone and is therefore also solely attributable to me.
It was important to me at the time to contribute my own opinion on this topic.
So before this rubs off on the whole team, I would like to emphasize once again that I alone am responsible for yesterday's text.
From that point of view, I can really understand that it may have come across as a bit provocative to you, but that was honestly not my intention.
The reason why I responded so little to Mr. Lauer is that his behavior doesn't need to be discussed in my eyes.
It was a stupid reaction from him, that's all you can say about it in my opinion.
To be honest, I had tried to put a positive spin on my statement to you.
Apparently the whole thing didn't really go down well with you though, which I think is a shame.
Thank you for your opinion on this case.
Whether Mr. Lauer will one day apply for reactivation and how we will ultimately handle it, I think the future will tell.
But I think a little time to take a deep breath after such an action certainly can't hurt.
Let's see what happens (what will happen).
This post has been translated automatically
Chatterbox
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically