evopower140 wrote on 29.07.2021 at 13:16 clock: Well that with the RTP I do not see now so quite so from my experience I must really say that I am thick in the minus at Platincasino and have the highest RTP at BOD
At NYspins and N1 I got more fat pictures so at Platin also in Freegames
Yes, of course RTP 100000 spins and so on
However, my experience is so and yes I play a lot and almost only BOD to 95% and have it at 56000 euros at Platin this year not even managed to make a 1000 plus hit
However, at N1 and Nyspins with much less bet already 11 times so it is for the most part further luck and not only the RTP
My speech, the RTP are in the first place not really responsible for whether and how much you win. In the first place, it is still, just luck
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
Online casinos without 5% slots tax or reduced RTP (85-91%)
31st Jul. 2021, at 10:39 pm CEST#94
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
TranceBabe wrote on 07/31/2021 at 10:26 PM
My speech, the RTP are not really responsible in the first place, if and how much you win. In the first place, it is still, just luck.
Still don't get it?
An RTP of 86% reduces the chance of a bit of luck by a factor of 3, simply because 3x more money is retained by the OCs.
An RTP of 86% reduces the chance of the quentschen luck by a factor of 3, because simply 3x more money is retained by the OCs.
As already mentioned in the other thread: I don't attach any importance to the RTP, because I haven't won more at the BoD slots with 96% than at the BoD slots with 86%. On the contrary. Understand now? 🙄
TranceBabe wrote on 07/31/2021 at 22:55
As already mentioned in the other thread: I don't put any value on the RTP, because I haven't won more at the BoD slots with 96% than at the BoD slots with 86% so far. On the contrary. Understand now? 🙄
Very one-sided view. Play 100 spins on a slot that only delivers 87% RTP and deducts taxes as a "reward". The whole thing then several times, then you will see the effect yourself
It's not even so much about wins. Your playtime will simply be drastically reduced and you'll butter up more money on average over time. You'll notice this at the latest when it becomes significantly more expensive to play per month, but some people don't seem to understand that
The Variance and the "luck factor" have nothing to do with it but only what the slot pays out on average in the return
Well have fun still using MGA OC with the "great new regulation".
TranceBabe wrote on 07/31/2021 at 22:55
As already mentioned in the other thread: I don't attach any importance to the RTP, because I haven't won more at the BoD slots with 96% than at the BoD slots with 86% so far. On the contrary. Understand now? 🙄
84% is the lowest version . A Curacao casino has even once compensated players because the game accidentally ran with the 84% setting instead of 94% as planned .
Funny that 84% and 87% versions are now almost standard for German in Malta casinos.
But I'm sure there are also fake versions somewhere that don't run on the Play and Go servers with an even lower RTP.
Maybe around 50% RTP I'm sure you will win more there than with this evil evil rip-off 96% version
Online casinos without 5% slots tax or reduced RTP (85-91%)
3rd Aug. 2021, at 07:34 am CEST#99
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
WhatAboutTism wrote on 01/08/2021 at 02:28 PM
Very one sided view. Play 100 spins on a slot that delivers only 87% RTP and deducts taxes as a "reward". The whole thing then several times, then you will see the effect yourself
It's not even so much about wins. Your playtime will simply be drastically reduced and you'll butter up more money on average over time. You'll notice this at the latest when it becomes significantly more expensive to play per month, but some people don't seem to understand that
The Variance and the "luck factor" have nothing to do with it but only what the slot pays out on average in the return
Well have fun still using MGA OC with the "great new regulation".
And who guarantees you that the rtp at the Curaçao booth is correct?
In addition, there is always the unpleasant feeling of not getting paid his win
Of course I understand your argument, nevertheless I agree with trance babe, with me it runs neither better nor worse than before. And whether that is already evident within a month, I also dare to doubt
How do you want to determine that?
The rtp refers to infinite spins that no one can track . And if a lowered rtp bothers me, I should rather stop completely
Or how do you explain all the winning pictures here, plus the megahits?
Blubbo33 wrote on 03.08.2021 at 07:34
And who guarantees you that the rtp is right at the curaçao pad?
In addition, there is always the unpleasant feeling of not getting paid his win
Of course I understand your argument, nevertheless I agree with trance babe, with me it runs neither better nor worse than before. And whether that is already evident within a month, I also dare to doubt
How do you want to determine that?
The rtp refers to infinite spins that no one can track . And if a lowered rtp bothers me, I should rather stop completely
Or how do you explain all the winning pictures here, plus the megahits?
Don't see any difference from before.
You don't need to be guaranteed that, you just need to check it yourself (if you know how it can be done)
In any case, it runs much better than in the Malta booths, and I now use 6 different Curacao OC
And about Curacao OC itself. Here, for understandable reasons, like Malta OC "praised", but I have in recent months even much more positive experiences with the "pöhsen" Curacao casinos made. This starts with the customer service and ends with the 3 minute payouts (even slightly higher amounts, in one case 2k). Malta OC were generally not that much better, only the licensing and the constant talk of "reputable" gave these OC simply the more positive veneer, because I may as well have made very negative experiences with Malta OC. You can find black sheep in every industry and at all locations
To claim that Curacao casinos are bad is a very far-fetched fallacy. It is up to the player to inform himself or do you think the "supervised" play as it is now propagated and implemented by the state makes the situation better for everyone here?
It's not about Player protection but as in all other cases where father state once again comes up with new laws "to protect its citizens" to enact rip-off and monopoly cementation, no more and no less. Why should we put up with this?
Your opinion in honor, but if a lowered RTP (as you call it) bothers me, I just do not stop but look for alternatives that do not limit me in my freedom of play, it's that simple
Online casinos without 5% slots tax or reduced RTP (85-91%)
3rd Aug. 2021, at 12:40 pm CEST#101
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Only that there are more black sheep of Curacao casinos than MGA licensed casinos.
And where exactly should you inquire Askgamblers?
With them, every casino is serious, the main thing that pay.
Why are no Curacao casinos included here, that has its reason.Do you think Gj would not like to pocket the commission
Online casinos without 5% slots tax or reduced RTP (85-91%)
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Online casinos without 5% slots tax or reduced RTP (85-91%)
Liked this post:
Blubbo33
My speech, the RTP are in the first place not really responsible for whether and how much you win. In the first place, it is still, just luck
This post has been translated automatically
Online casinos without 5% slots tax or reduced RTP (85-91%)
Nobody has liked this post so far
Still don't get it?
An RTP of 86% reduces the chance of a bit of luck by a factor of 3, simply because 3x more money is retained by the OCs.
This post has been translated automatically
Online casinos without 5% slots tax or reduced RTP (85-91%)
Nobody has liked this post so far
At VoodooDreams as well. 🤢
This post has been translated automatically
Online casinos without 5% slots tax or reduced RTP (85-91%)
Liked this post:
Blubbo33, 
Max_Bet
As already mentioned in the other thread: I don't attach any importance to the RTP, because I haven't won more at the BoD slots with 96% than at the BoD slots with 86%. On the contrary. Understand now? 🙄
This post has been translated automatically
Online casinos without 5% slots tax or reduced RTP (85-91%)
Liked this post:
bruffl, 
Klempo77, 
Krabbenburger, 
MisterL, 
RebellYell, u****n
Very one-sided view. Play 100 spins on a slot that only delivers 87% RTP and deducts taxes as a "reward". The whole thing then several times, then you will see the effect yourself
It's not even so much about wins. Your playtime will simply be drastically reduced and you'll butter up more money on average over time. You'll notice this at the latest when it becomes significantly more expensive to play per month, but some people don't seem to understand that
The Variance and the "luck factor" have nothing to do with it but only what the slot pays out on average in the return
Well have fun still using MGA OC with the "great new regulation".
This post has been translated automatically
Online casinos without 5% slots tax or reduced RTP (85-91%)
Liked this post:
ramb00, 
Saphira
84% is the lowest version . A Curacao casino has even once compensated players because the game accidentally ran with the 84% setting instead of 94% as planned .
Funny that 84% and 87% versions are now almost standard for German in Malta casinos.
But I'm sure there are also fake versions somewhere that don't run on the Play and Go servers with an even lower RTP.
Maybe around 50% RTP I'm sure you will win more there than with this evil evil rip-off 96% version
This post has been translated automatically
Online casinos without 5% slots tax or reduced RTP (85-91%)
Nobody has liked this post so far
And who guarantees you that the rtp at the Curaçao booth is correct?
In addition, there is always the unpleasant feeling of not getting paid his win
Of course I understand your argument, nevertheless I agree with trance babe, with me it runs neither better nor worse than before. And whether that is already evident within a month, I also dare to doubt
How do you want to determine that?
The rtp refers to infinite spins that no one can track . And if a lowered rtp bothers me, I should rather stop completely
Or how do you explain all the winning pictures here, plus the megahits?
Don't see any difference from before
This post has been translated automatically
Online casinos without 5% slots tax or reduced RTP (85-91%)
Liked this post:
Das_Phantom, 
NoSkill_NoKill
You don't need to be guaranteed that, you just need to check it yourself (if you know how it can be done)
In any case, it runs much better than in the Malta booths, and I now use 6 different Curacao OC
And about Curacao OC itself. Here, for understandable reasons, like Malta OC "praised", but I have in recent months even much more positive experiences with the "pöhsen" Curacao casinos made. This starts with the customer service and ends with the 3 minute payouts (even slightly higher amounts, in one case 2k). Malta OC were generally not that much better, only the licensing and the constant talk of "reputable" gave these OC simply the more positive veneer, because I may as well have made very negative experiences with Malta OC. You can find black sheep in every industry and at all locations
To claim that Curacao casinos are bad is a very far-fetched fallacy. It is up to the player to inform himself or do you think the "supervised" play as it is now propagated and implemented by the state makes the situation better for everyone here?
It's not about Player protection but as in all other cases where father state once again comes up with new laws "to protect its citizens" to enact rip-off and monopoly cementation, no more and no less. Why should we put up with this?
Your opinion in honor, but if a lowered RTP (as you call it) bothers me, I just do not stop but look for alternatives that do not limit me in my freedom of play, it's that simple
This post has been translated automatically
Online casinos without 5% slots tax or reduced RTP (85-91%)
Nobody has liked this post so far
And where exactly should you inquire Askgamblers?
With them, every casino is serious, the main thing that pay.
Why are no Curacao casinos included here, that has its reason.Do you think Gj would not like to pocket the commission
This post has been translated automatically