... If it were that simple, then drug dealers could simply write on their website that it is the responsibility of the consumer whether drugs are legal in their own country or not.
Falcon again with the cross comparisons of horror. Oh man.
Falcon once again with the cross comparisons of horror. Oh man.
What's wrong with that comparison? If you already can't be neutral as a team member of Gamblejoe, then you should at least argue instead of throwing down a one-liner.
And you seriously think that T&Cs undermine national laws and EU laws? They can write in there what they want, helps them absolutely nothing. If it were that simple, then drug dealers could simply write on their website that it is the responsibility of the consumer whether drugs are legal in their own country or not.
And what are all the stores doing selling borderline drugs on the Internet ? Partly also illegal ? They write exactly that on the page ...... We live now in a digital time where you are not bound to national borders, of course, a site can protect themselves by something like this and just between us down here on GJ is the saying also think they do not write that if it would have no effect
Especially as a team member it would be understandable not to be neutral GJ lives from the casinos and from the player community basically you can be happy to discuss such negative things here at all what just speaks for the freedom of speech but you must find a topic still long not good
Apart from that what do you interpret into his statement? Where do his words express something that would deny a neutrality?
Falcon wrote on 06/13/2023 at 10:55 pm:
What's wrong with the comparison? If you already can't be neutral as a team member of Gamblejoe, then you should at least argue instead of throwing down a one-liner.
The comparison is good. Some people just live in a pink strawberry world.
Falcon wrote on 06/13/2023 at 10:55 pm:
What's wrong with the comparison? If you already can't be neutral as a team member of Gamblejoe, then you should at least argue instead of throwing down a one-liner.
I stopped being neutral on the topic when you started comparing casino employees to mafia members.
It already starts that in this topic we are in civil law, while in the area of drugs we are in the StGB and BtMG.
I stopped being neutral on the subject when you started comparing casino employees to mafia members.
It already starts that in this topic we are in civil law, while in drugs we are in StGB and BtMG.
Then you should learn to read, because I never wrote that. Feel free to show me the place where I would have called the employees of casinos mafia.
Thank you, you really do not need to explain to me which law is applied to the recoveries. A comparison is not an equation and my comparison was only about the fact that AGBs logically can not undermine any laws. And as an example I have chosen drugs, because then it becomes understandable for everyone what is meant. Well, or for almost everyone at least.
Landeskriminalamt wrote on 06/14/2023 at 13:30: it's AGB goddamnit!!!!!!! THERE ARE NO GTCS THERE ARE NO GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF BUSINESSSSS I'M RAPPING OUT . my schjreibtisch is shaking!!!!!
Even the dictionary has now included AGBs, so just as correct:
but now it is really enough now you take the AGBSSSauch noc in protection. ESI ST FALSCT. you do not need to discuss it!! it is plural! no matter what the Duden says this is only for stupid who do not master the spelling.
Then you should learn to read because I never wrote that. Feel free to show me the post where I would have called casino employees mafia.
Thank you, you really do not need to explain to me which law is applied to the recoveries. A comparison is not an equation and my comparison was only about the fact that AGBs logically can not undermine any laws. And as an example I have chosen drugs, because then it becomes understandable for everyone what is meant. Well, or at least for almost everyone.
I am convinced that you here equate the employees of the "illegal" casinos with employees of the mafia. I was bothered by that, as I know many Maltese working in the i-gaming industry, who are all great people and have the chances to earn really good money (compared to the classic Malta pay scale) for themselves and the family.
My one-liner may not have been optimal, but accusing me here of reading and comprehension problems is of course weak of you.
Your example with the drugs is simply absolute cheese and that I wanted to communicate to you in such a way. I am of the opinion that you lack the vision and you stiffen yourself too much in certain tendencies.
As a staff member, I have a neutral position here, of course, but Andre has now commented here and I'm allowed to do so. By the way: Unfortunately, I don't live in a pink strawberry world.
Landeskriminalamt wrote on 14.06.2023 at 13:59: but now it's really enough now you take the AGBSSSauch noc in protection. ESI ST FALSCT. you do not need to discuss it!! it is plural! no matter what the Duden says this is only for stupid who do not master the spelling.
or for those who constantly forget letters or do not master upper and lower case 😂😂🤦♀️
Malta, Liechtenstein, Switzerland, Monaco, Vatican State all the same they just want to earn more than the others to live well and happy.
Who invented it
Landeskriminalamt wrote on 14.06.2023 at 13:59: but now it's really enough now you take the AGBSSSauch noc in protection. ESI ST FALSCT. you do not need to discuss it!! it is plural! no matter what the Duden says this is only for stupid who do not master the spelling.
Now I have finally found here the topic that interests me burning. I too will try to recover at least a large part of my gambling losses by suing the online casino.
Problem is, however, that I no longer have all payment receipts and proof of deposits and withdrawals are therefore missing for the most part.
Now my question is. Do Online Casinos have to store the game history and thus also have a record of deposits and withdrawals?
If so, will they also give out this data if I no longer have my player name and my access data at some casinos, because I had locked myself there. Last but not least, the casinos know that they can be sued and will possibly refuse the release of this data.
From a temporal point of view, almost all casinos are legally still to prosecute because these 10 years statute of limitations are not yet around.
So I will only have a chance if I do not have to prove all account statements and deposits to casinos. If the lawyers insist on all proofs and account statements etc. then I have no chance. Many deposits were made via Paysafecard and of course I have not kept all of them.
In total, my gambling at all possible casinos amounts to about not quite 100,000 euros. Since I had also won well with under it will possibly also be a little less money.
So I should really get back 60 percent of it, then that would be a fortune. Only from one casino I have the entire game history including the Deposit and withdrawal data: Vulkan Vegas Casino.
Money back because of gambling law
Liked this post:
Hanshanshans
Falcon again with the cross comparisons of horror. Oh man.
This post has been translated automatically
Money back because of gambling law
Liked this post:
Blubbo33, 
Florian100
What's wrong with that comparison? If you already can't be neutral as a team member of Gamblejoe, then you should at least argue instead of throwing down a one-liner.
This post has been translated automatically
Money back because of gambling law
Nobody has liked this post so far
And what are all the stores doing selling borderline drugs on the Internet ? Partly also illegal ? They write exactly that on the page ...... We live now in a digital time where you are not bound to national borders, of course, a site can protect themselves by something like this and just between us down here on GJ is the saying also think they do not write that if it would have no effect
Especially as a team member it would be understandable not to be neutral GJ lives from the casinos and from the player community basically you can be happy to discuss such negative things here at all what just speaks for the freedom of speech but you must find a topic still long not good
Apart from that what do you interpret into his statement? Where do his words express something that would deny a neutrality?
This post has been translated automatically
Money back because of gambling law
Nobody has liked this post so far
The comparison is good. Some people just live in a pink strawberry world.
This post has been translated automatically
Money back because of gambling law
Nobody has liked this post so far
I stopped being neutral on the topic when you started comparing casino employees to mafia members.
It already starts that in this topic we are in civil law, while in the area of drugs we are in the StGB and BtMG.
This post has been translated automatically
Money back because of gambling law
Nobody has liked this post so far
Then you should learn to read, because I never wrote that. Feel free to show me the place where I would have called the employees of casinos mafia.
Thank you, you really do not need to explain to me which law is applied to the recoveries. A comparison is not an equation and my comparison was only about the fact that AGBs logically can not undermine any laws. And as an example I have chosen drugs, because then it becomes understandable for everyone what is meant. Well, or for almost everyone at least.
This post has been translated automatically
Money back because of gambling law
Liked this post:
Julian
This post has been translated automatically
Money back because of gambling law
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Money back because of gambling law
Nobody has liked this post so far
Even the dictionary has now included AGBs, so just as correct:
https://www.duden.de/rechtschreibung/AGBs
This post has been translated automatically
Money back because of gambling law
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Money back because of gambling law
Liked this post:
Hanshanshans, 
roccoammo11
I am convinced that you here equate the employees of the "illegal" casinos with employees of the mafia. I was bothered by that, as I know many Maltese working in the i-gaming industry, who are all great people and have the chances to earn really good money (compared to the classic Malta pay scale) for themselves and the family.
My one-liner may not have been optimal, but accusing me here of reading and comprehension problems is of course weak of you.
Your example with the drugs is simply absolute cheese and that I wanted to communicate to you in such a way. I am of the opinion that you lack the vision and you stiffen yourself too much in certain tendencies.
As a staff member, I have a neutral position here, of course, but Andre has now commented here and I'm allowed to do so. By the way: Unfortunately, I don't live in a pink strawberry world.
This post has been translated automatically
Money back because of gambling law
Liked this post:
Max_Bet, 
mowolum
or for those who constantly forget letters or do not master upper and lower case 😂😂🤦♀️
This post has been translated automatically
Money back because of gambling law
Nobody has liked this post so far
Who invented it
the good into the Pot the bad into the pot
This post has been translated automatically
Money back because of gambling law
Liked this post:
Max_Bet
Then start practicing spelling at your place.
This post has been translated automatically
Money back because of gambling law
Nobody has liked this post so far
Now I have finally found here the topic that interests me burning. I too will try to recover at least a large part of my gambling losses by suing the online casino.
Problem is, however, that I no longer have all payment receipts and proof of deposits and withdrawals are therefore missing for the most part.
Now my question is. Do Online Casinos have to store the game history and thus also have a record of deposits and withdrawals?
If so, will they also give out this data if I no longer have my player name and my access data at some casinos, because I had locked myself there. Last but not least, the casinos know that they can be sued and will possibly refuse the release of this data.
From a temporal point of view, almost all casinos are legally still to prosecute because these 10 years statute of limitations are not yet around.
So I will only have a chance if I do not have to prove all account statements and deposits to casinos. If the lawyers insist on all proofs and account statements etc. then I have no chance. Many deposits were made via Paysafecard and of course I have not kept all of them.
In total, my gambling at all possible casinos amounts to about not quite 100,000 euros. Since I had also won well with under it will possibly also be a little less money.
So I should really get back 60 percent of it, then that would be a fortune. Only from one casino I have the entire game history including the Deposit and withdrawal data: Vulkan Vegas Casino.
I played almost exclusively roulette.
For your answers I thank you already times
This post has been translated automatically