Ginax3 wrote on 15.08.2023 at 16:53: I also had the win and loss lists sent to me by 3 casinos and asked a law firm about getting money back. Now I have received an offer for at least one casino with 39% for the legal costs financier for a loss value of approx. 11000€. For the other two casinos, the amount in dispute of approx. 3200€ loss and 1000€ loss is probably too low. Perhaps someone knows of other providers for lower amounts in dispute with litigation cost financers.
Yes, I do. You are welcome to write to me privately.
gamble1 wrote on 15.08.2023 at 23:31:
Well 0 Risk is not quite right in all the contracts in the small print is something like "If it is necessary, a personal appearance in court is necessary" at least it is in all those I have seen so far
Who guarantees that I won't get one on the sack at some point? I mean, you're willingly admitting to illegal gambling and the saying "ignorance is not a defense" doesn't come from anywhere
Just to look at the topic of 0 risk from a different angle because the only risk you don't take is losing money
Tens of thousands of closed cases guarantee this, without anything like this ever happening. In all these cases, it's all about civil proceedings and it's obviously politically desirable that these decisions are made in the interests of the players.
It is not possible to dry up the black market by blocking sites because, firstly, there are legal hurdles and, secondly, a mirror website is immediately back online. You would never be able to keep up.
So the only way to get rid of the black market in the long term is exactly this way, in which the players can simply get their money back.
As someone has already written above, it is simply incredibly stupid not to get the money back. I'm not talking about the person as such, just the decision not to do it, not that anyone here feels personally attacked.
And you can say what you like, but someone who has gambled away tens of thousands or even hundreds of thousands in Online Casinos is SICK. They are not in control of their decisions, they are addicted to the point of no return and yes, that includes me of course. And what most people don't understand, who always argue with morality or the like, is that you could never have gambled away the money if these companies had complied with the law. Sure, there are still casinos and gambling halls, but a lot of people only play online and only got into gambling online in the first place. All the aggressive advertising and everything that goes with it makes people believe that it was all voluntary.
German legislation allows for clawbacks and litigation funders finance everything. So it couldn't be simpler.
I can only shake my head when people talk about morality while the dubious casino bosses are living the high life with your money. And many of the owners belong to organized crime. Sham structures are set up, no-names are installed as managing directors, etc. This opacity alone shows which people are probably pulling the strings in the background. Not all of them, of course, but many.
Money back because of gambling law
Nobody has liked this post so far
Yes, I do. You are welcome to write to me privately.
This post has been translated automatically
Money back because of gambling law
Liked this post:
Matara
Tens of thousands of closed cases guarantee this, without anything like this ever happening. In all these cases, it's all about civil proceedings and it's obviously politically desirable that these decisions are made in the interests of the players.
It is not possible to dry up the black market by blocking sites because, firstly, there are legal hurdles and, secondly, a mirror website is immediately back online. You would never be able to keep up.
So the only way to get rid of the black market in the long term is exactly this way, in which the players can simply get their money back.
As someone has already written above, it is simply incredibly stupid not to get the money back. I'm not talking about the person as such, just the decision not to do it, not that anyone here feels personally attacked.
And you can say what you like, but someone who has gambled away tens of thousands or even hundreds of thousands in Online Casinos is SICK. They are not in control of their decisions, they are addicted to the point of no return and yes, that includes me of course. And what most people don't understand, who always argue with morality or the like, is that you could never have gambled away the money if these companies had complied with the law. Sure, there are still casinos and gambling halls, but a lot of people only play online and only got into gambling online in the first place. All the aggressive advertising and everything that goes with it makes people believe that it was all voluntary.
German legislation allows for clawbacks and litigation funders finance everything. So it couldn't be simpler.
I can only shake my head when people talk about morality while the dubious casino bosses are living the high life with your money. And many of the owners belong to organized crime. Sham structures are set up, no-names are installed as managing directors, etc. This opacity alone shows which people are probably pulling the strings in the background. Not all of them, of course, but many.
This post has been translated automatically