Lapalingo wants proof of income with name from employer
22nd Jul. 2020, at 11:01 pm CEST#41
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
blackmamba wrote on 07/22/2020 at 10:44 pm
No one really knows what the arrangements or laws are in Malta vis a vis the casinos.
It's all always pure speculation.
I'll say it again: I pay once and have never gambled, 100 €.
Wins thereby 100,000€.
Why, please explain, do I have to prove my identity intensively because of the high sum
if 99.900€ come from the casino??? This is complete nonsense.
The casino must prove nevertheless rather to me, where it has the 99.900€, so that I am not involved in evt
Machinations with black money involved. What is the point of this?????
This would be a useful contribution for Christoph, as the legal situation in Malta is, or as the
Laws are implemented by the state and the MGA, instead of reporting from Knossi and Co.
What requirements are there for casinos? And why do I have to prove my not yet received win?
prove??? Please explain.
I hardly believe that the laws are like this, and are applied correctly. Because of my 100€ no one will
nobody will make himself in the shirt! That is 100pro a complete twisting of the laws in force, in order to pull payouts
to pull out!
If I have deposited 100,000€, then they can come to me with money laundering. But not so!
Huh? Did I miss something which casino behaves please in the situation described by you so?
The only thing that would happen in such a case is that the casino asks the Provider if everything is ok with the slot to exclude a technical error
no one will force you to prove your income because of 100 €
This post has been translated automatically
b****a
Forum posts:82Member has been banned
Lapalingo wants proof of income with name from employer
22nd Jul. 2020, at 11:08 pm CEST#42
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
gamble1 wrote on 07/22/2020 at 11:01 pm
Huh ? Did I miss something which casino behaves like this in the situation you described please ?
The only thing that would happen in such a case is the casino asks the Provider if everything is ok with the slot to exclude a technical error
no one will force you to prove your income because of 100 €
No, no one forces me, I can also leave the win
Then you have to read through here, what is demanded
is required.
And that casinos can basically demand the most impossible things, is certainly not new to you!
This post has been translated automatically
T****z
Forum posts:431The member deleted himself on23.04.2024
Lapalingo wants proof of income with name from employer
22nd Jul. 2020, at 11:15 pm CEST#43
1 Like
Liked this post: b****a
gamble1 wrote on 22.07.2020 at 23:01:no one will force you to prove your income because of € 100
He didn't say that you have to prove your income - but your identity.
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
Lapalingo wants proof of income with name from employer
22nd Jul. 2020, at 11:15 pm CEST#44
2 Likes
Liked this post: b****a, T****z
Kleinkariert wrote on 22.07.2020 at 22:33
There are rogue casinos and additionally the MGA / UKGC involved in all this nonsense. While the MGA and UKGC require the casino to follow up on unusual transactions, mostly for higher amounts, the rogue casinos use it to harass or stall people. The same with the Verification, limits, etc. the casinos turn everything to the bad for the player.
And if you think it can not get worse, then the MGA or from next year, the perhaps upcoming regulation of DE still a rib on top.
Kleinkariert well then they should blow us at the plane, then I go here in my casino in the small town da wirste not harassed and shitty
Lapalingo wants proof of income with name from employer
23rd Jul. 2020, at 12:18 am CEST#45
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
blackmamba wrote on 07/22/2020 at 11:08 pm
No, no one is forcing me, I can leave the win alone
Then you have to read through here what is here why
is required.
And that casinos can demand the most impossible things is certainly not new to you!
Sorry I read it wrong thought you meant income
As for the identity that is logical due to the protection of minors what but regardless of win or loss is made if you are u18 get in the loss case the Deposit again
But this is also the casino around the corner so and there is nothing at all reprehensible there it does not matter whether you want to play 100 € or 1 cent
This post has been translated automatically
b****a
Forum posts:82Member has been banned
Lapalingo wants proof of income with name from employer
23rd Jul. 2020, at 12:38 am CEST#46
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
gamble1 wrote on 07/23/2020 at 00:18 PM
Sorry misread thought you meant income
As for the identity that is logical due to the protection of minors what but regardless of win or loss is made if you are u18 get in the loss case the Deposit again
But this is also the casino around the corner so and there is nothing reprehensible at all there it does not matter whether you want to play 100 € or 1 cent
That is true. But how often is only controlled from a certain amount? The not even
comes from the depositor, but is win?
And in the thread here we are talking about a proof of income+naming employer for
relatively small amounts!
So again complete arbitrariness.
The one does it, the other not, the one says, I must, the other only from sum X.
So all this can not be true. Protection of minors and identification
are only of interest when it suits the casino. And for that, a personal ID and account details are sufficient.
They only start with other crap to drag the whole thing out.
But there, as I said, Christoph would be asked.
What does the legislator say, what does the MGA say.
Then one would know exactly what is really necessary, and what harassment!
Think about it: I pay 50€ and win 50,000€.
Why am I then controlled?????
That makes no sense at all!
And I bet that the law is not like that either. It is applied due to our ignorance
arbitrarily. The casino has to prove where it got the money from, not me with my
with my 50€ deposit. This is total nonsense.
My Perso+Bankverbindung, that I am also, they can have gladly. Everything else is nonsense!
They can do that after high deposits!
Lapalingo wants proof of income with name from employer
23rd Jul. 2020, at 01:54 am CEST#47
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
blackmamba wrote on 07/22/2020 at 10:44 pm
No one really knows what the arrangements/laws are in Malta vis a vis the casinos.
It's all always pure speculation.
I'll say it again: I pay once and have never gambled, 100 €.
Wins thereby 100,000€.
Why, please explain, do I have to prove my identity intensively because of the high sum
if 99.900€ come from the casino??? This is complete nonsense.
The casino must prove nevertheless rather to me, where it has the 99.900€, so that I am not involved in evt
Machinations with black money involved. What is the point of this?????
This would be a useful contribution for Christoph, as the legal situation in Malta is, or as the
Laws are implemented by the state and the MGA, instead of reporting from Knossi and Co.
What requirements are there for casinos? And why do I have to prove my not yet received win?
prove??? Please explain.
I hardly believe that the laws are like this, and are applied correctly. Because of my 100€ no one will
nobody will make himself in the shirt! That is 100pro a complete twisting of the laws in force, in order to pull payouts
to pull out!
If I have deposited 100,000€, then they can come to me with money laundering. But not so!
I don't know if they will make an extra agreement in between, but the regulation is known and documents are publicly available. You can read everything at https://www.mga.org.mt/legislations-regulations/. It takes only a little until one has read in something. The interest to have a summary of the regulation is as I have noticed in recent months here not so great, people do not like to inform themselves and rather try out. Whether this has changed now I do not know. If you are particularly interested in money laundering regulation, take a look at Money Laundering (e.g. at the bottom).
My post was actually very clear, but I'll explain it briefly: While the MGA requires such queries under special circumstances (e.g. someone who deposits a maximum of € 100 every week, changes his behavior abruptly and pays € 10,000 several times a day, converts it once and pays out), casinos misuse these queries under the pretext that you have to do it because of regulation. Therefore, such a query because of 100 € Deposit would also be ridiculous, stalling tactics and simply shows that the industry does everything to throw stones in the way of the player.
That you are taken for very stupid also show the promo emails, if a local store would do that, people would torch the store.
Lapalingo wants proof of income with name from employer
6th Sep. 2020, at 10:27 am CEST#49
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Guys, this all happens ONLY for YOUR safety. That's why the security department does it
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
Former Member
Lapalingo wants proof of income with name from employer
6th Sep. 2020, at 03:08 pm CEST#50
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
One reason why I don't play at this casino group
This is ridiculous
The normal verifications that take place everywhere, I find okay
But anything beyond that is just going too far
Lapalingo wants proof of income with name from employer
Nobody has liked this post so far
Huh? Did I miss something which casino behaves please in the situation described by you so?
The only thing that would happen in such a case is that the casino asks the Provider if everything is ok with the slot to exclude a technical error
no one will force you to prove your income because of 100 €
This post has been translated automatically
Lapalingo wants proof of income with name from employer
Nobody has liked this post so far
No, no one forces me, I can also leave the win
Then you have to read through here, what is demanded
is required.
And that casinos can basically demand the most impossible things, is certainly not new to you!
This post has been translated automatically
Lapalingo wants proof of income with name from employer
Liked this post: b****a
He didn't say that you have to prove your income - but your identity.
This post has been translated automatically
Lapalingo wants proof of income with name from employer
Liked this post: b****a, T****z
Kleinkariert well then they should blow us at the plane, then I go here in my casino in the small town da wirste not harassed and shitty
This post has been translated automatically
Lapalingo wants proof of income with name from employer
Nobody has liked this post so far
Sorry I read it wrong thought you meant income
As for the identity that is logical due to the protection of minors what but regardless of win or loss is made if you are u18 get in the loss case the Deposit again
But this is also the casino around the corner so and there is nothing at all reprehensible there it does not matter whether you want to play 100 € or 1 cent
This post has been translated automatically
Lapalingo wants proof of income with name from employer
Nobody has liked this post so far
That is true. But how often is only controlled from a certain amount? The not even
comes from the depositor, but is win?
And in the thread here we are talking about a proof of income+naming employer for
relatively small amounts!
So again complete arbitrariness.
The one does it, the other not, the one says, I must, the other only from sum X.
So all this can not be true. Protection of minors and identification
are only of interest when it suits the casino. And for that, a personal ID and account details are sufficient.
They only start with other crap to drag the whole thing out.
But there, as I said, Christoph would be asked.
What does the legislator say, what does the MGA say.
Then one would know exactly what is really necessary, and what harassment!
Think about it: I pay 50€ and win 50,000€.
Why am I then controlled?????
That makes no sense at all!
And I bet that the law is not like that either. It is applied due to our ignorance
arbitrarily. The casino has to prove where it got the money from, not me with my
with my 50€ deposit. This is total nonsense.
My Perso+Bankverbindung, that I am also, they can have gladly. Everything else is nonsense!
They can do that after high deposits!
This post has been translated automatically
Lapalingo wants proof of income with name from employer
Nobody has liked this post so far
I don't know if they will make an extra agreement in between, but the regulation is known and documents are publicly available. You can read everything at https://www.mga.org.mt/legislations-regulations/. It takes only a little until one has read in something. The interest to have a summary of the regulation is as I have noticed in recent months here not so great, people do not like to inform themselves and rather try out. Whether this has changed now I do not know. If you are particularly interested in money laundering regulation, take a look at Money Laundering (e.g. at the bottom).
My post was actually very clear, but I'll explain it briefly: While the MGA requires such queries under special circumstances (e.g. someone who deposits a maximum of € 100 every week, changes his behavior abruptly and pays € 10,000 several times a day, converts it once and pays out), casinos misuse these queries under the pretext that you have to do it because of regulation. Therefore, such a query because of 100 € Deposit would also be ridiculous, stalling tactics and simply shows that the industry does everything to throw stones in the way of the player.
That you are taken for very stupid also show the promo emails, if a local store would do that, people would torch the store.
This post has been translated automatically
Lapalingo wants proof of income with name from employer
Nobody has liked this post so far
same check received today from ElCarado, is yes same operator. Payout from 247€
Period 01.01.2019 until today selected under bookings. This came out with:
First Deposit was on 02.04.2019 with 30€ + welcome bonus.
Deposited 330€ there till today.
Then a check with pay stub and bank statement with money receipt is a bit exaggerated.
The stalling tactic is probably because I have paid out more than I have paid in
This post has been translated automatically
Lapalingo wants proof of income with name from employer
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Lapalingo wants proof of income with name from employer
Nobody has liked this post so far
This is ridiculous
The normal verifications that take place everywhere, I find okay
But anything beyond that is just going too far
This post has been translated automatically