Topic created on 12th Dec. 2020 | Page: 22 of 23 | Answers: 226 | Views: 76,185
Anonym
Former Member
Class action AdvoFin - experiences?
23rd Feb. 2022, at 10:59 pm CET#214
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
LittleFu wrote on 23.02.2022 at 10:09: Gibt hier doch so einen Thread, wo einer auch seinen Geld über einen Anwalt zurück holen wollte,
and then complains that a casino does not want to pay out the win.
I call that karma....
Tonka Bean wrote on 23.02.2022 at 14:42: @Bohnensalat666: 🤦♀️
Of course that's the only reason I swore off men !
From that statement you can just tell how immature you are.
But I can live with it.👍
And yes I only win and beat every slot.
@Makbarbrother: Got it
Now don't get so upset and everything will be fine.
I too have left quite a bit of money in the stalls.
Annoyed, cursed and cried over losses - which were also partly violent.
About 100 € Bonus Buys etc...
But that's why I would never ask for my money back.
Love greetings
Far be it from me to quarrel with you here, but you have always written very provocative and judgmental texts (especially with me), which suggest that you have not read carefully or really did not understand what I said.
I have never attacked anyone in this forum from me, if at all only reacted.
How many posts from different people have I read here that have criticized or addressed exactly what I have addressed. And then it is now times unusual, if so humans come around the corner, who seem to be not concerned by the whole and someone as joke figure or frustrated type to stamp want and moral sermons ala "bet debts are honor debts" hold. But themselves join in exactly the same fun, just don't open their mouths
As already mentioned several times, it has simply changed drastically since the new conversions, which many here and probably also outside of the forum, have noticed.
As I said, if it were a fair game of chance I could understand people complaining about the "complainers". If it were fair, then there would not be such a mass of like-minded people who all complain about the same thing......
Is actually indisputable, because it is simply a fact how everything has turned for the worse. In the past, of course, you lost just as much, but you didn't have such severe dry spells and you weren't ripped off for months without a somewhat larger or larger win. Then you could actually still talk about gambling
There was also not such a flood of "bonus victims" (opaque terms and conditions, dubious tactics, etc.) All this has increased immensely since the regulations.
Therefore I can understand it, if people want to get their losses back. Why should I also be lenient with the casinos that just want to fleece me like a Christmas goose, partly try everything possible to not have to pay out my win etc.. And that's what you read en masse here.
Is it not justified to question how some people can take those very people in defense? To come back to my original post
I can not write it all in 2 sentences, so always such a mega text But that must be noted times
Makbarbrother wrote on 23.02.2022 at 23:56
It is far from me to quarrel with you here, but you have always written very provocative and judgmental texts (especially with me), which suggest that you have not read carefully or really did not understand what I said.
I have never attacked anyone in this forum from me, if at all only reacted.
How many posts from different people have I read here that have criticized or addressed exactly what I have addressed. And then it is now times unusual, if so humans come around the corner, who seem to be not concerned by the whole and someone as joke figure or frustrated type to stamp want and moral sermons ala "bet debts are honor debts" hold. But themselves join in exactly the same fun, just don't open their mouths
As already mentioned several times, it has simply changed drastically since the new conversions, which many here and probably also outside of the forum, have noticed.
As I said, if it were a fair game of chance I could understand people complaining about the "complainers". If it were fair, then there would not be such a mass of like-minded people who all complain about the same thing......
Is actually indisputable, because it is simply a fact how everything has turned for the worse. In the past, of course, you lost just as much, but you didn't have such severe dry spells and you weren't ripped off for months without a somewhat larger or larger win. Then you could actually still talk about gambling
There was also not such a flood of "bonus victims" (opaque terms and conditions, dubious tactics, etc.) All this has increased immensely since the regulations.
Therefore I can understand it, if people want to get their losses back. Why should I also be lenient with the casinos that just want to fleece me like a Christmas goose, partly try everything possible to not have to pay out my win etc.. And you read that en masse here.
Is it not justified to question how some people can take those very people in defense? To come back to my original post
I can not write all this in 2 sentences, therefore always such a mega text But this must be noted times
I can understand both sides:
- People who want to get the money back because you think it was unfairly expired and
-People who criticize this behavior.
If we are honest, there is no gambling game that is "fair". Blackjack is in itself the most "fair" game and even there the house has a small advantage over the players. Any game of chance is designed to lose in the long run, and I think if it were to be run fairly, it would have to be 50/50 - anything less (even 50.01 and 49.99) I would call unfair.
Even in sports betting there is no fairness. In the case of wrong decisions, the sports bets are not refunded, but are counted as lost. The best example was the match between Barca and PSG, where Barca came back from 4:0 down. One of those goals was a clear swallow by Suarez (and a very bad one, as he appears to have been choked). Had that penalty not been given, PSG might have gone further. While it wouldn't have changed the final result of this game, there were certainly people who had "who qualifies" bets on PSG. If you specifically made that bet and actually won a lot of money, then I would also consider that unfair and want to take action if necessary.
In turn, I understand the people who criticize this double standard. If the exact opposite had happened, these players would certainly not have tried to sue the casinos. I am also of the opinion that we, as adults, should know what risks gambling conceals
frapi07 wrote on 02/24/2022 at 00:23 PM
I can understand both sides:
- People who want to get the money back because you think it was unfairly run and
-People who criticize this behavior.
If we are honest, there is no gambling game that is "fair". Blackjack is in itself the most "fair" game and even there the house has a small advantage over the players. Any game of chance is designed to lose in the long run, and I think if it were to be run fairly, it would have to be 50/50 - anything less (even 50.01 and 49.99) I would call unfair.
Even in sports betting there is no fairness. In the case of wrong decisions, the sports bets are not refunded, but are counted as lost. The best example was the match between Barca and PSG, where Barca came back from 4:0 down. One of those goals was a clear swallow by Suarez (and a very bad one, as he appears to have been choked). Had that penalty not been given, PSG might have gone further. While it wouldn't have changed the final result of this game, there were certainly people who had "who qualifies" bets on PSG. If you specifically made that bet and actually won a lot of money, then I would also consider that unfair and want to take action if necessary.
In turn, I understand the people who criticize this double standard. If the exact opposite had happened, these players would certainly not have tried to sue the casinos. I am also of the opinion that we, as adults, should know what risks gambling conceals.
Yes, except that most people who sue casinos don't get hung up on an unfair event, but on the general process. And there it was just, as many here have already expressed in different threads, a few years ago still something different. These messages are still appearing now, where everyone is complaining about exactly the same thing
One has just earlier always in between, if one has sunk 2k, after a few weeks times a 1k hit or similar made. Was then still not in the plus, but you have not ONLY been exempt, namely what is now the case and in addition these conspicuous minimal wins and "Fast Free Games", which really add up immeasurably. In addition, the whole avoidance strategies and bonus traps of the casinos
On the basis of this, you can understand it, because then the statement no longer applies: "You knew what you were getting into". Yes, I got involved in "gambling", but not to be fooled from start to finish. After all, gambling means that I'm also lucky sometimes and not just ripped off. But that is now the case.
And that's why I have no sympathy for the casinos and can live with the fact that they feel the same suffering.
Class action AdvoFin - experiences?
Nobody has liked this post so far
grins I have to laugh, really cool said.
This post has been translated automatically
Class action AdvoFin - experiences?
Liked this post: Anonym,
CashOut, 
Matara, 
moody
Far be it from me to quarrel with you here, but you have always written very provocative and judgmental texts (especially with me), which suggest that you have not read carefully or really did not understand what I said.
I have never attacked anyone in this forum from me, if at all only reacted.
How many posts from different people have I read here that have criticized or addressed exactly what I have addressed. And then it is now times unusual, if so humans come around the corner, who seem to be not concerned by the whole and someone as joke figure or frustrated type to stamp want and moral sermons ala "bet debts are honor debts" hold. But themselves join in exactly the same fun, just don't open their mouths
As already mentioned several times, it has simply changed drastically since the new conversions, which many here and probably also outside of the forum, have noticed.
As I said, if it were a fair game of chance I could understand people complaining about the "complainers". If it were fair, then there would not be such a mass of like-minded people who all complain about the same thing......
Is actually indisputable, because it is simply a fact how everything has turned for the worse. In the past, of course, you lost just as much, but you didn't have such severe dry spells and you weren't ripped off for months without a somewhat larger or larger win. Then you could actually still talk about gambling
There was also not such a flood of "bonus victims" (opaque terms and conditions, dubious tactics, etc.) All this has increased immensely since the regulations.
Therefore I can understand it, if people want to get their losses back. Why should I also be lenient with the casinos that just want to fleece me like a Christmas goose, partly try everything possible to not have to pay out my win etc.. And that's what you read en masse here.
Is it not justified to question how some people can take those very people in defense? To come back to my original post
I can not write it all in 2 sentences, so always such a mega text But that must be noted times
This post has been translated automatically
Class action AdvoFin - experiences?
Nobody has liked this post so far
I can understand both sides:
- People who want to get the money back because you think it was unfairly expired and
-People who criticize this behavior.
If we are honest, there is no gambling game that is "fair". Blackjack is in itself the most "fair" game and even there the house has a small advantage over the players. Any game of chance is designed to lose in the long run, and I think if it were to be run fairly, it would have to be 50/50 - anything less (even 50.01 and 49.99) I would call unfair.
Even in sports betting there is no fairness. In the case of wrong decisions, the sports bets are not refunded, but are counted as lost. The best example was the match between Barca and PSG, where Barca came back from 4:0 down. One of those goals was a clear swallow by Suarez (and a very bad one, as he appears to have been choked). Had that penalty not been given, PSG might have gone further. While it wouldn't have changed the final result of this game, there were certainly people who had "who qualifies" bets on PSG. If you specifically made that bet and actually won a lot of money, then I would also consider that unfair and want to take action if necessary.
In turn, I understand the people who criticize this double standard. If the exact opposite had happened, these players would certainly not have tried to sue the casinos. I am also of the opinion that we, as adults, should know what risks gambling conceals
This post has been translated automatically
Class action AdvoFin - experiences?
Nobody has liked this post so far
I just wanted to know, purely out of interest
This post has been translated automatically
Class action AdvoFin - experiences?
Liked this post: Anonym,
CashOut
Yes, except that most people who sue casinos don't get hung up on an unfair event, but on the general process. And there it was just, as many here have already expressed in different threads, a few years ago still something different. These messages are still appearing now, where everyone is complaining about exactly the same thing
One has just earlier always in between, if one has sunk 2k, after a few weeks times a 1k hit or similar made. Was then still not in the plus, but you have not ONLY been exempt, namely what is now the case and in addition these conspicuous minimal wins and "Fast Free Games", which really add up immeasurably. In addition, the whole avoidance strategies and bonus traps of the casinos
On the basis of this, you can understand it, because then the statement no longer applies: "You knew what you were getting into". Yes, I got involved in "gambling", but not to be fooled from start to finish. After all, gambling means that I'm also lucky sometimes and not just ripped off. But that is now the case.
And that's why I have no sympathy for the casinos and can live with the fact that they feel the same suffering.
This post has been translated automatically
Class action AdvoFin - experiences?
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Class action AdvoFin - experiences?
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Class action AdvoFin - experiences?
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Class action AdvoFin - experiences?
Nobody has liked this post so far
Did you get anything back?
This post has been translated automatically
Class action AdvoFin - experiences?
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically