when you have to cite money to demonstrate supposed superiority wonders who is the poor sausage here
Hahaha Ahmen! 🤌🏻🙏🏻 😂
However, I do not find good how the sausage is now made bad here, I like sausage !!! Vienna sausage, face sausage :=) Mortadella with peppers Fleischwurst with and without ... 😂🙌🏻😎
However, I do not find good how the sausage is now made bad here, I like sausage !!! Vienna sausage, face sausage :=) Mortadella with peppers Fleischwurst with and without ... 😂🙌🏻😎
Best that someone here times a good word for the poor sausages, now they are also happy again...😂
Xardas wrote on 02/26/2023 at 10:38 am:
by an email you composed without a lawyer with the offer to refund me 50% of my losses.
I will not name the casinos privately or here as this was part of the deal.
you do not need to name the casinos... because with these letters you have already betrayed yourself and actually not kept to your part of the agreement (silence), you now only need to write a letter with the 50% offer as you have done and send it to the casinos..
By the way a good tip
sigi36 wrote on 26.02.2023 at 18:56 clock:
you do not need to name the casinos... the with these letters you have already betrayed yourself and actually did not keep your part of the deal (silence), one needs now only a letter aufsetzten with the 50% offer as you have made it and send to the casinos...
By the way a good tip
I am also of the opinion that you are responsible for your own losses. That's why I don't think these return actions are okay.
With your order of magnitude and - that is the core point of the statement - that you are now game-free, I can understand it.
If you really - and forever - stop playing, which is definitely better in this dimension, I think it's understandable that you go this way of reclaiming.
I find your story funny on the one hand, because for the uninvolved observer it is very unrealistic.
How cool is the e-mail formulated, that a Provider jumps on it? Without a court?
What reason does a provider have to offer you an enormous settlement without legal recourse? Pure charity does not exist from casinos. They only want your money. So I can understand why they don't believe you.
I just ask.
Somehow it's a real shame that almost every thread here on GJ ends in bitching.
@blubbo33: Why do you attack him then (so I understand your post). It's a hard to believe story, but only the player and the casino know. What motivation does the player, who is not so often active here, to tell a lie?
Here is but everyone largely anonymous, brings him but no followers or so.
@Xardas: Why do you go on it and brag about your money?
Thanks @Melodie and @Hans for peaceful sausage contributions
Wutmaennchen wrote on 02/26/2023 at 19:18: @Xardas:
I agree in principle that you are responsible for your own game losses. That's why I don't find these retrieval actions in order.
With your scale and - that's the crux of the statement - that you are now game-free, I can understand it.
If you really - and forever - stop playing, which is definitely better in this dimension, I think it's understandable that you go this way of reclaiming.
I find your story funny on the one hand, because for the uninvolved observer it is very unrealistic.
How cool is the e-mail formulated, that a Provider jumps on it? Without legal basis? Without a court?
What reason does a provider have to offer you an enormous settlement without legal recourse? Pure charity does not exist from casinos. They just want your money. So I can understand why they don't believe you.
I just ask.
Somehow it's a real shame that almost every thread here on GJ ends in bitching.
@blubbo33: Why do you attack him then (so I understand your post). It's a hard to believe story, but only the player and the casino know. What motivation does the player, who is not so often active here, to tell a lie?
Here is but everyone largely anonymous, brings him but no followers or so.
@Xardas: Why do you go on it and brag about your money?
Thanks @Melodie and @Hans for peaceful sausage contributions
Simply because he is p**sed off at himself, I bet the guy is poor as a church mouse and tries to vent frustration here !
What is credible in his story!? How many have already got their money back!?
He is just trying to give hope to those who are already at the end!
If he was the nice and helpful type, he could have helped anyway or !?! Was there anyone here who has benefited from him ?
And who wants to help does not brag around but helps !
He comes in here from time to time and every time the same!
So you do not behave if you want to help constructively!
So stop believing such stories from the Paulanergarten!
Simply because he is mad at himself, I bet the guy is poor as a church mouse and tries to vent frustration here !
What is believable about his story !!! How many have already got their money back?
He is only trying to give hope to those who are already at the end!
If he was the nice and helpful type, he could have helped anyway or !?! Was there anyone here who has benefited from him ?
And who wants to help does not brag around but helps !
He comes in here from time to time and every time the same!
So you do not behave if you want to help constructively!
So stop believing such stories from the Paulanergarten!
How much money he has, we do not know and is in itself not relevant. That's why I didn't find the "bragging about money" cool.
I also wrote that the story is not credible.
But neither of us knows it. The argument that it brings the halfway inactive user here nothing to tell lies, I think is stronger than the fact that the story sounds unbelievable.
If something like this works out for even one player at one Provider, something is already won. Even if it sounds unrealistic.
As I said, the basis is that you are then forever away from spending money in the casino.
Wutmaennchen wrote on 26.02.2023 at 19:18: Somehow it's a real shame that now almost every thread here on GJ ends in bitching.
hach I'm glad that you have not mentioned me in your long list otherwise I would have had to listen to what I have noted in your opinion right or wrong or the question why I wrote something so or so.
in principle, you see and believe but also only what you want to see....such as that he is now free of play. but other posters who somehow express themselves with your text almost to patronize by asking why they do this and that here I think is very arrogant of you.
of course I know that you generally here only eternal peace between all users want, unfortunately, the quoted here will always be so, however, you confuse bitching with normal expression of opinion.
you, and also no other bring 1000 different anonymous user*innen under a hat (probably not even 5), except there is free beer, then as long as the barrel is empty
RiverSong wrote on 02/26/2023 at 19:58:
hach am i glad that you have not mentioned me in your long listing otherwise i would have had to listen to what i have noted in your opinion right or wrong or the question why i have written something so or so.
in principle, you see and believe but also only what you want to see....such as that he is now free of play. but other participants who somehow express themselves with your text almost to patronize by asking why they do this and that here I think is very arrogant of you.
of course I know that you generally here only eternal peace between all users want, unfortunately, the quoted here will always be so, however, you confuse bitching with normal expression of opinion.
you, and also no other bring 1000 different anonymous user*innen under a hat (probably not even 5), except there is free beer, then as long as the barrel is empty
If he wasn't free to play, it would be really bad if he made this up. Except that the story is hard to believe, which is just maybe ignorance (which player has already tried what Xardas described in the dimension?) there is no clue for me not to believe him or to attack him.
I don't know, I don't know him. And I believe him, without knowing it, that he is free of game.
Only he knows that.
Everyone always believes what he/she wants to believe, if you don't know.
From my point of view, that was not expressing an opinion in this thread, but bitching. Person A starts, person B continues.
The core message remains - if it works as Xardas has described it, and even if it works only 1 x, is already won.
A lot of money gambled away, chargeback possible?
Liked this post:
Falko, 
Hanshanshans, 
RiverSong, 
Saphira
Hahaha Ahmen! 🤌🏻🙏🏻 😂
However, I do not find good how the sausage is now made bad here, I like sausage !!! Vienna sausage, face sausage :=) Mortadella with peppers Fleischwurst with and without ... 😂🙌🏻😎
This post has been translated automatically
A lot of money gambled away, chargeback possible?
Liked this post:
Max_Bet, 
RiverSong, 
Saphira
Best that someone here times a good word for the poor sausages, now they are also happy again...😂
This post has been translated automatically
A lot of money gambled away, chargeback possible?
Liked this post:
Xardas
you do not need to name the casinos... because with these letters you have already betrayed yourself and actually not kept to your part of the agreement (silence), you now only need to write a letter with the 50% offer as you have done and send it to the casinos..
By the way a good tip
This post has been translated automatically
A lot of money gambled away, chargeback possible?
Nobody has liked this post so far
Good luck ❤
This post has been translated automatically
A lot of money gambled away, chargeback possible?
Nobody has liked this post so far
Sorry but this guy insinuates me here various things, there you can already sink a little to the level.
This post has been translated automatically
A lot of money gambled away, chargeback possible?
Nobody has liked this post so far
I am also of the opinion that you are responsible for your own losses. That's why I don't think these return actions are okay.
With your order of magnitude and - that is the core point of the statement - that you are now game-free, I can understand it.
If you really - and forever - stop playing, which is definitely better in this dimension, I think it's understandable that you go this way of reclaiming.
I find your story funny on the one hand, because for the uninvolved observer it is very unrealistic.
How cool is the e-mail formulated, that a Provider jumps on it? Without a court?
What reason does a provider have to offer you an enormous settlement without legal recourse? Pure charity does not exist from casinos. They only want your money. So I can understand why they don't believe you.
I just ask.
Somehow it's a real shame that almost every thread here on GJ ends in bitching.
@blubbo33: Why do you attack him then (so I understand your post). It's a hard to believe story, but only the player and the casino know. What motivation does the player, who is not so often active here, to tell a lie?
Here is but everyone largely anonymous, brings him but no followers or so.
@Xardas: Why do you go on it and brag about your money?
Thanks @Melodie and @Hans for peaceful sausage contributions
This post has been translated automatically
A lot of money gambled away, chargeback possible?
Liked this post:
RiverSong, 
Saphira
Simply because he is p**sed off at himself, I bet the guy is poor as a church mouse and tries to vent frustration here !
What is credible in his story!? How many have already got their money back!?
He is just trying to give hope to those who are already at the end!
If he was the nice and helpful type, he could have helped anyway or !?! Was there anyone here who has benefited from him ?
And who wants to help does not brag around but helps !
He comes in here from time to time and every time the same!
So you do not behave if you want to help constructively!
So stop believing such stories from the Paulanergarten!
This post has been translated automatically
A lot of money gambled away, chargeback possible?
Nobody has liked this post so far
How much money he has, we do not know and is in itself not relevant. That's why I didn't find the "bragging about money" cool.
I also wrote that the story is not credible.
But neither of us knows it. The argument that it brings the halfway inactive user here nothing to tell lies, I think is stronger than the fact that the story sounds unbelievable.
If something like this works out for even one player at one Provider, something is already won. Even if it sounds unrealistic.
As I said, the basis is that you are then forever away from spending money in the casino.
This post has been translated automatically
A lot of money gambled away, chargeback possible?
Liked this post:
Blubbo33
hach I'm glad that you have not mentioned me in your long list otherwise I would have had to listen to what I have noted in your opinion right or wrong or the question why I wrote something so or so.
in principle, you see and believe but also only what you want to see....such as that he is now free of play. but other posters who somehow express themselves with your text almost to patronize by asking why they do this and that here I think is very arrogant of you.
of course I know that you generally here only eternal peace between all users want, unfortunately, the quoted here will always be so, however, you confuse bitching with normal expression of opinion.
you, and also no other bring 1000 different anonymous user*innen under a hat (probably not even 5), except there is free beer, then as long as the barrel is empty
This post has been translated automatically
A lot of money gambled away, chargeback possible?
Nobody has liked this post so far
If he wasn't free to play, it would be really bad if he made this up. Except that the story is hard to believe, which is just maybe ignorance (which player has already tried what Xardas described in the dimension?) there is no clue for me not to believe him or to attack him.
I don't know, I don't know him. And I believe him, without knowing it, that he is free of game.
Only he knows that.
Everyone always believes what he/she wants to believe, if you don't know.
From my point of view, that was not expressing an opinion in this thread, but bitching. Person A starts, person B continues.
The core message remains - if it works as Xardas has described it, and even if it works only 1 x, is already won.
This post has been translated automatically