So who plays with pocket money is in the best case not 18, ie gambling prohibited
Who does not pursue any activity receives in the best case funds from the state, which serve then but rather to secure your livelihood, say you should not play
Is the question fun?
If casinos want to have a proof, from which source your money comes... You will hardly send your Hartz IV bescheid there, right?
So to be more precise:
Platin Casino asked me for proof. I deposited about 25k there. The reason given was that I had losses of 6k in December. As proof I took a win from another casino. The catch is that this must not be older than 3 months
So let's assume I use the money from a win older than 3 months ago and have nothing else to show, what then?
DerHamburger87 wrote on 04.03.2021 at 18:47: So who plays with pocket money is in the optimal case no 18, speak gambling prohibited
Who does not pursue any activity receives in the optimal case funds from the state, which then serve but rather to secure your livelihood, speak you should not play
Is the question fun?
If casinos want to have a proof, from which source your money comes... You will hardly send your Hartz IV bescheid there, right?
Also Hartz4ler may play casino even their complete money verhauen, just as it is no problem to give his notice in the casino because nothing can happen, except just that the money you have won is simply credited
NoBonusUser wrote on 04/03/2021 at 23:45: So to be more precise:
Platin Casino asked me for proof. Deposited about 25k there. The reason given was that I had losses of 6k in December. As proof I took a win from another casino. The catch is that this must not be older than 3 months
So let's assume I use the money from a win older than 3 months ago and have nothing else to show, what then?
Wow, this really shows how narrow-minded, unrealistic and arbitrary this Source of Funds crap is carried out by some casinos.
I've been through this insane circus several times
It could be that you had a big win half a year ago, then have not paid for a long time and then zockst again.
Then the origin of the money is of course your win 6 months ago.
If that is the origin of your money you can prove it, then persevere and show them the receipts. If it is longer than 3 months ago, then that is still the origin of the deposited money whether they like it or not.
They can not demand from you documents that do not exist.
Did you Deposit with the bank account or with Ewallets ?
Krabbenburger wrote on 05.03.2021 at 00:44
Wow this really shows again how narrow minded, out of touch with reality and arbitrary this Source of Funds crap is done by some casinos .
I've been through this insane circus several times
It could be that you had a big win half a year ago, then have not paid for a long time and then zockst again.
Then the origin of the money is of course your win 6 months ago.
If that is the origin of your money you can prove it, then persevere and show them the receipts. If it is longer than 3 months ago, then that is still the origin of the deposited money whether they like it or not.
They can not demand from you documents that do not exist.
Did you Deposit with the bank account or with Ewallets ?
I am with you! Thank you!
Have always deposited via Trustly
That's exactly how it was with me. I then had the win paid out directly in cash, so that I can not gamble away so quickly. Accordingly, no proof of assets
Proof of income/assets
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Proof of income/assets
Liked this post:
Sarkasto, 
supermode
Is the thread serious?
This post has been translated automatically
Proof of income/assets
Liked this post:
Katyanoack
Who does not pursue any activity receives in the best case funds from the state, which serve then but rather to secure your livelihood, say you should not play
Is the question fun?
If casinos want to have a proof, from which source your money comes... You will hardly send your Hartz IV bescheid there, right?
This post has been translated automatically
Proof of income/assets
Nobody has liked this post so far
I study and am financed by my parents
This post has been translated automatically
Proof of income/assets
Liked this post:
Sarkasto
This post has been translated automatically
Proof of income/assets
Nobody has liked this post so far
Platin Casino asked me for proof. I deposited about 25k there. The reason given was that I had losses of 6k in December. As proof I took a win from another casino. The catch is that this must not be older than 3 months
So let's assume I use the money from a win older than 3 months ago and have nothing else to show, what then?
This post has been translated automatically
Proof of income/assets
Liked this post:
NoBonusUser
This post has been translated automatically
Proof of income/assets
Liked this post:
NoSkill_NoKill
Also Hartz4ler may play casino even their complete money verhauen, just as it is no problem to give his notice in the casino because nothing can happen, except just that the money you have won is simply credited
This post has been translated automatically
Proof of income/assets
Liked this post:
Niroht, 
NoBonusUser
Wow, this really shows how narrow-minded, unrealistic and arbitrary this Source of Funds crap is carried out by some casinos.
I've been through this insane circus several times
It could be that you had a big win half a year ago, then have not paid for a long time and then zockst again.
Then the origin of the money is of course your win 6 months ago.
If that is the origin of your money you can prove it, then persevere and show them the receipts. If it is longer than 3 months ago, then that is still the origin of the deposited money whether they like it or not.
They can not demand from you documents that do not exist.
Did you Deposit with the bank account or with Ewallets ?
This post has been translated automatically
Proof of income/assets
Nobody has liked this post so far
I am with you! Thank you!
Have always deposited via Trustly
That's exactly how it was with me. I then had the win paid out directly in cash, so that I can not gamble away so quickly. Accordingly, no proof of assets
The 3-month rule is completely out of place here
I just don't know what to do.
This post has been translated automatically