Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Sports betting in general: General sports betting thread 2021 (Page 395)

Topic created on 17th Aug. 2019 | Page: 395 of 600 | Answers: 5,996 | Views: 753,997
u****n
Blubbo33 wrote on 20/06/2021 at 19:33
And what is your junk statement I had not goosens on the bill? If you had him on the bill, would be clear that Germany wins?

You couldn't and can't have had him on the bill

What is a scrap statement? I said that his performance was above average and not necessarily to be expected. At least I didn't expect him to make 2 assists and 1 goal. Had there been a Halstenberg instead, it remains questionable whether there would have been the same result or whether Germany would have won. We can only speculate about that.

This post has been translated automatically

u****n
Blubbo33 wrote on 06/20/2021 at 19:36
So much for your analysis

After all, I give my opinion and my analysis here, whether someone does something with it or not, but I do not give a damn😁 at least I have the balls to do so and do not just come around the corner to laugh at someone if an analysis was wrong LOL 😂

This post has been translated automatically

Blubbo33
Elite
Exactly it is and remains speculation, like almost every game, there you can pull out statistics and compare until you turn black . You were the one who wrote how great Portugal is and so on

Surely it could have happened that way, but I think if you defend something like that vehemently and try to prove it, you run the Risk of looking stupid

When I read your dispute between you and patizi, I thought to myself hopefully he does not fall on the nose

And the problem is when I then read again I have predicted that the Turks bring nothing etc. I can only shake my head

If you are such a clairvoyant, you would have left out Portugal.

I can also make 10 statements here and the probability would be high that 8 of them sit.

I just find it silly when you write to others, I told you that they can do nothing but a day before completely failed. Then rather hold back.

This post has been translated automatically

Blubbo33
Elite
unicorn wrote on 20.06.2021 at 19:43
After all, I give here my opinion and my analyses preis, whether someone starts something with it or not, I do not give a damn😁 at least I have the balls to do so and do not just come around the corner to laugh at someone if an analysis was wrong LOL 😂

Wow well then congratulations on such great balls, did not know that you have to muster this incredible courage for such statements

I'm not laughing at you, just find your analyses grottig, because they had no significance, and even more so if you defend them to the blood and they do not stand nearly

This post has been translated automatically

u****n
Blubbo33 wrote on 20.06.2021 at 19:51: Exactly it is and remains speculation, like almost every game, there you can get out statistics and compare until you turn black . You were the one who wrote how great Portugal is etc

Surely it could have happened that way, but I think if you defend something like that vehemently and try to prove it, you run the Risk of looking stupid

When I read your dispute between you and patizi, I thought to myself hopefully he does not fall on the nose

And the problem is when I then read again I have predicted that the Turks bring nothing etc. I can only shake my head

If you are such a clairvoyant, you would have left out Portugal.

I can also make 10 statements here and the probability would be high that 8 of them sit.

I just find it silly when you write to others, I told you that they can do nothing but a day before completely failed. Then rather hold back.

Yes I said Turkey is junk, which have now 3 times convincingly proven.

I also said that I think a lot of Portugal and also still remain with the statement that they can beat anyone on good days. That didn't work out yesterday okay, but I'm still convinced that they'll advance and maybe they'll meet Germany again in the further course and who knows how it will turn out if it's a knockout game on neutral ground and not in Munich...

Apart from that I am not a friend of any cautious formulations. Here I always say it directly, maybe provocative for some, but then I just fall on my face. This is a forum, that is there to discuss. For me, this was not a dispute with Patizi but a normal discussion where everyone presented and defended his own statistics. That's what a forum is for. If everyone here would be afraid to give an analysis of a match, then we would not need this whole thread

This post has been translated automatically

Blubbo33
Elite
Well that Portugal can beat anyone, I don't need much idea for that, I can say that about Germany, Italy etc. too

But now I know at least your attitude to your statements and know what I have to think of it

This post has been translated automatically

u****n
Blubbo33 wrote on 20.06.2021 at 20:12: Well that Portugal can beat anyone, for that I do not need much idea, I can say that of Germany, Italy, etc. also

But now I know at least your attitude to your statements and what to think about it.

Then that would be clarified, thank you

This post has been translated automatically

Patizi
Elite
unicorn wrote on 20.06.2021 at 18:30
Normally I would have stepped in here and stopped you. But for strategic reasons because of the betting game I didn't do it 😂
Have but here already said in advance that the Turks will be the biggest scam of the EM LOL

Had seen that no one has gone to the Turks. Thought there that one vlt can land a big point. Well, so it was a shot in the oven. Haha

This post has been translated automatically

u****n
And here comes my next groundbreaking analysis

In my opinion, the Ukraine-Austria match is the safest X of the entire European Championship. Netherlands is already safe group leader, North Macedonia safe group last. Ukraine and Austria are in 2nd and 3rd place with 3 points each.
If the two teams would now agree on an X, both would almost certainly enter the next round with 4 points (Austria as 3rd). However, as soon as someone wants to step out of line and go for the win, the Risk arises that one of the two teams takes the third place with only 3 points, which would still make them tremble for the entry into the round of 16.

In general, no one will want to win this game, as the 2nd placed team has to play safely against Italy, who are probably perceived as the most unpleasant opponent so far. As the 3rd placed, on the other hand, it would not yet be clear against whom it would go in the round of 16. Then the group winners of 3 different groups come into question

Also the bookmakers probably know that there could possibly be an agreement between the two and rate the X "only" with 2.00 odds

I have already given an analysis in this directions, where it was about possible collusion, here when the last matchday in France was coming up. At that time it worked out, so it's up to everyone whether he does something with the analysis or throws it in the trash 😂

This post has been translated automatically

Blubbo33
Elite
unicorn wrote on 20.06.2021 at 20:38: And here comes already my next breakthrough analysis

Ukraine-Austria game in my opinion the safest X of the whole EM. Netherlands is already safe group first, North Macedonia safe group last. Ukraine and Austria are in 2nd and 3rd place with 3 points each.
If the two teams would now agree on an X, both would almost certainly enter the next round with 4 points (Austria as 3rd). However, as soon as someone wants to step out of line and go for the win, the Risk arises that one of the two teams takes the third place with only 3 points, which would still make them tremble for the entry into the round of 16.

In general, no one will want to win this game, as the 2nd placed team has to play safely against Italy, who are probably perceived as the most unpleasant opponent so far. As the 3rd placed, on the other hand, it would not yet be clear against whom it would go in the round of 16. Then the group winners of 3 different groups come into question

Also the bookmakers probably know that there could possibly be an agreement between the two and rate the X "only" with 2.00 odds

I have already given an analysis in this directions, where it was about possible collusion, here when the last matchday in France was coming up. At that time it worked out, so it's up to everyone whether he does something with the analysis or throws it in the garbage 😂

I throw them in the trash, the only thing where you might be right is that from the 75 min. no one goes full risk. Have not seen a game where both close a non-attack pact

There is too much at stake. And to wait 75 minutes is too risky. And I even say that both want to win the game

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics4th May. 2024 at 09:07 am CEST

GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately