Max1303 wrote on Dec 02, 2019 at 6:17 pm
You don't have to provoke me. The fact that you are infinitely sad because you didn't win a 10 Euro Paysafe card speaks for itself .
I would still be interested in how many people have participated in the lottery today. I think if you knew the numbers, then that would vllt curb the resentment something.
Then also hold back with your statements something and everything is paletti and thanks for reporting my post! Thus it had worked
I would also be interested in the numbers and just because there are more members (even those who do not reach the 750 points per month) should also be the probability very low that people win twice
I begrudge everyone his win am also not a bad loser... just why do you let it happen that players can win twice and 3 times? Should we not exclude those who have already won so that as far as possible all win something this month? or most?
So from me also congratulations ne 😉 and times quite honestly ne it should not be blocked who have already won once, but probably rather which so go off and complain and rush because you're already so addicted that you do not begrudge anyone else to win and upset, although it is clearly shown in the description that anyone can be drawn and every day anew! What do you not understand about it? If now one of you hetz heads 2x in a row would have won then you would be nice and quiet and everything would be top ne! Think about how poor this is! 😉
Domkecore wrote on 02.12.2019 at 19:02 clock: So from me also congratulations ne 😉 and times quite honestly ne it should not be blocked who have already won once, but probably rather those who go off so and complain and rush because you are already so addicted that you do not begrudge anyone else to win and get upset, although it is clearly shown in the description that anyone can be drawn and every day anew! What do you not understand about it? If now one of you hetz heads 2x in a row would have won then you would be nice and quiet and everything would be top ne! Think about it how poor this is! 😉
To call someone an addict and poor just because you have a different opinion, really strong of you! I always thought a forum would be there to discuss things and possibly suggest improvements, but apparently something like that is not welcome because most users here just see the opportunity to vent their frustration in which they criticize other opinions so and quickly become personal. Before I had registered here I was a long time silent reader and had to find out since then that here basically an aggressive negative mood prevails as soon as someone is just different opinion
I asked if it would not be better to simply handle the action so that people who have already won can no longer win, but others who have not yet won. Instead of saying something about this matter, you are directly attacked with "bad loser", "addicted", "you should be excluded from the action" etc... Please? Grab yourselves by the head.
Just say something about this thing pro and con criticize this proposal, but my face stop treating people directly like dirt.
DrPepper wrote on Dec 02, 2019 at 7:14 pm
Calling someone an addict and poor just because you have a different opinion, really strong of you! I always thought a forum would be there to discuss things and possibly suggest improvements, but apparently something like that is not welcome because most users here just see the opportunity to vent their frustration in which they criticize other opinions so and quickly become personal. Before I had registered here I was a long time silent reader and had to find out since then that here basically an aggressive negative mood prevails as soon as someone is just different opinion
I asked if it would not be better to simply handle the action so that people who have already won can no longer win, but others who have not yet won. Instead of saying something about this matter, you are directly attacked with "bad loser", "addicted", "you should be excluded from the action" etc... Please? Grab yourselves by the head.
Just say something about this thing pro and con criticize this proposal, but my face stop treating people directly like dirt.
Well but if you are immediately upset if you are not or not yet pulled is in my eyes already pretty much a sore loser 😂😂😂
Why should the winners be blocked just because they won 😂😂😂😂
1232153 wrote on 02/12/2019 at 19:20
Well but if you immediately get upset when you were not or not yet pulled is in my eyes already pretty much a sore loser 😂😂😂
Why should the winners be blocked just because they won 😂😂😂😂
It's a sweepstakes WTF calm down 😂😂😂
Okay my fellow witty gambler then please show me where I complained once here in this thread that I didn't win. I would use more smileys if I were you, it seems all the more intellectual!
This is again the proof that you simply too fast on something answers without actually the contributions to have read. Once again for you... I have written that I would find it good if these players who have already won once would no longer be considered because it is A) A Christmas campaign and so maybe most have something from it. But I can understand you just you who has now been drawn the second time feels directly attacked by it and would like to have everything for himself
Nice action and, as always, not self-evident. Someone - I can't remember who - predicted that trouble would start at the latest when a person was drawn for the second time. It's quite embarrassing when resentment overshadows such well-intentioned actions. Personally, I couldn't care less if someone wins twice, three times or even every time. If I like the person, all the better
@dr.pepper
To insinuate that she would prefer to have everything for herself is completely abstruse
Saphira wrote on 02.12.2019 at 19:32: Nice action and as always not self-evident. Someone - don't remember who - already predicted that the trouble will start at the latest when a person is drawn for the second time. It's quite embarrassing when resentment overshadows such well-intentioned actions. Personally, I couldn't care less if someone wins twice, three times or even every time. If I like the person, all the better
@dr.pepper
To insinuate that she would like to have everything for herself is completely abstruse
The prophecy came from me! And I was right, but I must admit that I could look back on plenty of experience
Gamblejoe Advent Calendar
Nobody has liked this post so far
Then also hold back with your statements something and everything is paletti and thanks for reporting my post! Thus it had worked
I would also be interested in the numbers and just because there are more members (even those who do not reach the 750 points per month) should also be the probability very low that people win twice
I begrudge everyone his win am also not a bad loser... just why do you let it happen that players can win twice and 3 times? Should we not exclude those who have already won so that as far as possible all win something this month? or most?
This post has been translated automatically
Gamblejoe Advent Calendar
Liked this post:
Horsepower44
or you?
Congratulations to the winners but I think it is a clear fraud that I was not drawn in this contest
This post has been translated automatically
Gamblejoe Advent Calendar
Nobody has liked this post so far
This post has been translated automatically
Gamblejoe Advent Calendar
Nobody has liked this post so far
I was just thinking the same thing 😂😂😂😂
This post has been translated automatically
Gamblejoe Advent Calendar
Liked this post:
palme7777, 
Patizi, 
Saphira
This post has been translated automatically
Gamblejoe Advent Calendar
Nobody has liked this post so far
To call someone an addict and poor just because you have a different opinion, really strong of you! I always thought a forum would be there to discuss things and possibly suggest improvements, but apparently something like that is not welcome because most users here just see the opportunity to vent their frustration in which they criticize other opinions so and quickly become personal. Before I had registered here I was a long time silent reader and had to find out since then that here basically an aggressive negative mood prevails as soon as someone is just different opinion
I asked if it would not be better to simply handle the action so that people who have already won can no longer win, but others who have not yet won. Instead of saying something about this matter, you are directly attacked with "bad loser", "addicted", "you should be excluded from the action" etc... Please? Grab yourselves by the head.
Just say something about this thing pro and con criticize this proposal, but my face stop treating people directly like dirt.
This post has been translated automatically
Gamblejoe Advent Calendar
Liked this post:
Knochen, 
Patizi
Well but if you are immediately upset if you are not or not yet pulled is in my eyes already pretty much a sore loser 😂😂😂
Why should the winners be blocked just because they won 😂😂😂😂
It's a sweepstakes WTF calm down 😂😂😂
This post has been translated automatically
Gamblejoe Advent Calendar
Nobody has liked this post so far
Okay my fellow witty gambler then please show me where I complained once here in this thread that I didn't win. I would use more smileys if I were you, it seems all the more intellectual!
This is again the proof that you simply too fast on something answers without actually the contributions to have read. Once again for you... I have written that I would find it good if these players who have already won once would no longer be considered because it is A) A Christmas campaign and so maybe most have something from it. But I can understand you just you who has now been drawn the second time feels directly attacked by it and would like to have everything for himself
This post has been translated automatically
Gamblejoe Advent Calendar
Nobody has liked this post so far
@dr.pepper
To insinuate that she would prefer to have everything for herself is completely abstruse
This post has been translated automatically
Gamblejoe Advent Calendar
Nobody has liked this post so far
The prophecy came from me! And I was right, but I must admit that I could look back on plenty of experience
This post has been translated automatically