Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Roulette in general: Roulette software with artificial intelligence or did I just have a bad day? (Page 3)

Topic created on 26th Apr. 2019 | Page: 3 of 4 | Answers: 35 | Views: 13,060
Stainberg
Visitor
No, no, I don't want to gloss over anything. On the contrary, I was naive enough to assume that at least the large OCs run 100% randomly

I've been playing for just 2 weeks and it's clear to me that this is not for me. I had set myself 450€, divided into 3 OCs, as a test limit. Currently I am including already made payouts still well in the plus.

The live tables are at least in my experience more reliable than the software variants, hence perhaps the impression of such naive trust. Blindly I trust the tables but also not

I do not hedge the 0. Currently I switch between red and black and double. Otherwise, I had only tried to bet 15 chips wild and play 10 rounds in auto mode. That was less crowned with success
I remembered your sentence that it makes little sense to double so high, only to run after 2 or 5€ win. However, I can't think of any better approaches that could pass as a strategy in any way.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym

Stainberg wrote on 01/05/2019 at 10:44: No no, I do not want to gloss over anything. On the contrary, I was naive enough to assume that at least the big OCs run 100% randomly.



I've been playing for just 2 weeks and it's clear to me that this is not for me. I had set myself 450€, divided into 3 OCs, as a test limit. Currently I am including already made payouts still well in the plus.

The live tables are at least in my experience more reliable than the software variants, hence perhaps the impression of such naive trust. Blindly I trust the tables but also not

I do not hedge the 0. Currently I switch between red and black and double. Otherwise, I had only tried to bet 15 chips wild and play 10 rounds in auto mode. That was less crowned with success
I remembered your sentence that it makes little sense to double so high, only to run after 2 or 5€ win. However, I can't think of any better approaches that could pass as a strategy in any way.

Well then it's good if you haven't lost control of your life yet (almost loosely based on 'Karlchen', who unfortunately is no longer).


Only with live Roulette the pressure is too big and every round must be occupied. I can take 'Forced Roulette' right away or


Machine games, even better: barrel open, barrel closed...Money gone. You have to think about it again.


If, I stay with the software. I have played months in the demo, then real money and currently I specify and optimize
my gameplay. Since I'm also 'new', I'm actually resisting the nonsensical doublings, no matter what they're called.
They all originate from several 'hundred years ago' and are long caught up with the digital world and software. To that extent
I see them as a signpost and important hint, but not to carry out a so-called strategy to the bitter end/ruin.
If you want to be reasonably successful, live roulette is the worst possible means in my opinion, because you lack all freedom and
if it is only the auto mode. And not without zero hedging anyway, which often enough 'pushes' up. Interesting at all
Stakes and for permanent wins. The staff is always happy about a whopping tronc. *lol*



This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
Something is wrong with the writing here. Try it. In the original it is good.
Maybe...... is also everything in english....not so good...times test, test....

This post has been translated automatically

DerWolf
Rookie
I would only play Roulette with/against real people. A computer software can do what it wants, it does not even require artificial intelligence but only very simple programming

This post has been translated automatically

Stainberg
Visitor
The topic has already been discussed.

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym

Only with live Roulette is the pressure too great and each round must be occupied. I can just as well take 'forced roulette' or

Automated games, even better: open the barrel, close the barrel...Money gone. You have to think about it again.

So sorry, but this is absurd nonsense. I've been playing roulette for years and you can take as long as you want to bet. Apart from the timeout of the casino website there is no reason to bet every coup




If you want to be reasonably successful, live roulette is the worst possible way in my opinion, as you lack all freedom

You don't really know much about this game, do you? Liveroulette is the only reliable way to cut pieces out of the permanence. Try to place EC bets on a Microgaming RNG. Have fun

I don't want to take away anyone's opinion or devalue people's topics, but unfortunately there is a lot of gross ignorance here. You should better ask experienced players. There you will be helped

This post has been translated automatically

DerWolf
Rookie

DocHoliday wrote on 05/23/2019 07:30 AM

You don't really know much about this game do you? Liveroulette is the only reliable way to cut chunks out of permanence. Why don't you try placing EC bets on a Microgaming RNG. Have fun

I don't want to take away anyone's opinion or devalue people's topics, but unfortunately there is a lot of gross ignorance here. You should better ask experienced players. There you will be helped




Your opinion in all honor, but opinions on the Internet are generally to be taken with a grain of salt. Experienced player? May be or not

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym
DerWolf wrote on 05/23/2019 at 7:27 pm


Your opinion in all honor but opinions in Internet are generally to be taken with caution. Experienced player? May or may not be

Yes, sure. I don't take anything from the net without checking it and I didn't take myself as a benchmark

It is here however no comparison to specialized information which one can attain gladly also by books.

This post has been translated automatically

Dbac79
Elite
what experience do you have to have? i can do the math and that's enough, if you're paid 35 to 1 and the chance is 1 in 37/38 experience doesn't help at all you need to look to the future

This post has been translated automatically

Anonym

Dbac79 wrote on 24.05.2019 at 01:56: what do you have to have experience? I can calculate and that's enough, if you are paid 35 to 1 and the chance is 1 in 37/38 brings experience purely nothing there is look into the future necessary

Find out by collecting your own. However, if someone here claims that live Roulette should be a bad tool for the game, it also needs no experience to understand that such a thing is simply nonsense


--out

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics4th May. 2024 at 07:43 pm CEST

GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately