Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Off topic & small talk: Platincasino is so lying!!! Don't let them cheat us (Page 5)

Topic created on 05th Jun. 2021 | Page: 5 of 6 | Answers: 59 | Views: 8,634
u****n
Tolinski wrote on 06/06/2021 at 14:18


Sure, I get what I pay for, but pokerstars confiscated 6000 from me and Unicorn (how fitting) first limited me after the first night I had n run and then directly banned me and confiscated my wins.




who is actually not limited at Unikrn? It's enough to win three euros with one euro and you are limited to 6 cents maximum stake, at least that's how it was for me. We don't even need to talk about a run

This post has been translated automatically

T****i
unicorn wrote on 06.06.2021 at 14:47
who is actually not limited at Unikrn yet? It's enough to win three euros with one euro and you are limited to 6 cents maximum stake, at least that's how it was for me. We do not even need to talk about a run

what exactly changes the essence of the basic statement?

nothing at all, right.

the fact remains: the providers do what they want with us, so I have no problem with the users exploiting any gray areas that the law allows.

That's why I still have no understanding for the fact that the OP is so hostile here.

This post has been translated automatically

ErikS
Amateur
I don't understand why casinos with EU licenses are often seen as "evil" rip-offs.
They offer a service and who plays will lose on average 5% / pay fee
With the lottery it is 50%

A little personal responsibility would not hurt. There will always be a few people who do not have themselves under control. (and I don't want to downplay that!) But then we'd have to ban pretty much everything in the world!

So be glad that it is regulated. The 100 euros you gamble away does not belong to the casino. But 5%. The gaming Provider still gets something from it. From this they pay their employees / license and what I know everything else.

This post has been translated automatically

Katharina2
Top Member
Tolinski wrote on 06.06.2021 at 14:18
ok,let's look at the emotional/moral level.

If I bet with a private person, lose, and then get the idea to invoke the law and not pay because he can not claim the money anyway, I'm the biggest asshole in the world, no question.

But when I gamble with a company whose business concept is to offer people illegal gambling, my sense of honor is somehow limited.

Sure, I get what I pay for, but pokerstars confiscated 6000 from me and Unicorn (how appropriate) limited me after the first night I had a run and then directly banned me and confiscated my wins.

Illegal gambling is now a kind of predator business, you eat or you get eaten.
The corporate sharks eat the customer fish by refusing payouts, blocking accounts or exploiting obvious gambling addictions, and are eaten by customers who withdraw their deposits/direct debits.



Well summarized. There is nothing more to add to this. You are and will remain the ruler
over deposits and withdrawals, verifications and random generators. The almost only correct
correct execution in the explanations to the GlüStV 2021. This will never change
change. Have a nice evening...... .

This post has been translated automatically

T****i
Catherine2 wrote on 06/06/2021 at 18:56
Well summarized. Nothing more to add to this. They are and will remain rulers
over deposits and withdrawals, verifications and random generators. The almost only,
correct execution in the explanations to the GlüStV 2021. This will never change
change. Have a nice evening...... .

#honorarycatharina

This post has been translated automatically

u****n
Tolinski wrote on 06/06/2021 at 14:18
ok,let's look at the emotional/moral level.

If I bet with a private person, lose, and then get the idea to invoke the law and not pay because he can not claim the money anyway, I'm the biggest asshole in the world, no question.




Beware of this swindler. Spits size sounds but does not keep even word see livewetten Thread

Edit: insult removed

This post has been translated automatically

Dutch78
Top Member
unicorn wrote on 06/06/2021 at 14:44
Why can't costs for possible lawsuits in the future be accrued? That's the whole point of accruals, isn't it, costs in the future that are highly certain to occur but whose amount cannot be accurately determined?

You are already answering your own question to some extent. Possible litigation and litigation cost provisions are mutually exclusive. The main focus here is on contingent. This provision is only permissible if the proceedings are already pending before the court, i.e. this provision can only be made if the proceedings are pending.

Of course, it cannot and must not be formed for lawsuits or proceedings that do not even exist yet.

Otherwise, you have defined the provision correctly, that are the uncertain liabilities, the pension is the best example for this.costs in the future, which occur with a high degree of certainty and whose amount can not be determined exactly applies but just with regard to the provision for litigation costs only for current cases.

However, I do not quite understand the IFRS, which is not only mandatory for accounting in Malta for casinos, but for all companies in the EU, which are obliged to group accounting and at the same time capital market-oriented or listed, so also for German companies. All other companies in Germany that are required to prepare consolidated financial statements can choose whether to do so in accordance with the German Commercial Code (HGB) or IFRS.

But now I'm out, too much déjà vu, dry as dust and more than boring for the uninvolved

P.S.: Hope yet that your Austria private bet was settled promptly and the PSC has already changed hands, you can still use the Interwetten voucher for the final tonight. Cross your fingers.

This post has been translated automatically

u****n
Dutch78 wrote on 06/06/2021 at 20:41

Now I'm out too, too much déjà vu, dry as dust and more than boring for the uninvolved

P.S: Hope yet that your Austria private bet was settled promptly and the PSC has already changed hands,since you can still use the Interwetten voucher for the final tonight. Cross your fingers.

So it looks with me unfortunately also. Too long ago and is also no longer in my area of expertise:D

With the private bet, I obviously ran into a cheater, nothing changes hands anymore

This post has been translated automatically

Katharina2
Top Member
Tolinski wrote on 06/06/2021 at 19:03
#honoredcatharina

Thanks, for the flowers and don't mind the few users who regularly
cross and shoot up threads. They don't get it and can't even begin to understand the word
'decency' anywhere near spelling it. It's amusing all the same.

This post has been translated automatically

Katharina2
Top Member
To the matter itself and contribution Nr.1: has of course Platincasino the right on its
Side, but at least until 30.6.2021. It is the same casino that currently without complaint
pays out over 100000K currently to a German player, according to a post,
here on GJ. Without Verification torture and other antics. This is of course no guarantee
for coming times, only in this nebulous reclaim scene brings us alone
the GlüStV 2021 and lawyers those before validity of the GlüStV (starting from 1.7.2021) already
with all might want to intersperse. Within the country they are successful with it,
only DE is not Europe and does not replace the whole world. Especially since gambling
become very unattractive and casinos are completely canceled, except for LC's.

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics22nd May. 2024 at 01:14 am CEST

GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately