Have recently seen an interesting video at the citizen's money someone has had a claim of 1800-1900 € in comparison, someone in retail has a monthly salary of 1550 € + 200 € allowance from the office but works shifts and also on Saturdays
Where is there please the incentive to go to work it is simply a fact the majority of people do not have a job where they quickly earn 3k a month and even if they have one it is usually associated with a lot of stress and responsibility
Since only an adjustment of the salaries helps most people make themselves broken for nothing everyone must be paid according to the performance point
Never gets a single person so much citizen's money, except perhaps in extremely expensive cities with high rents.Yes that with the adjustment of salaries fine and good.But then rise at the same time also again the prices, often wage increases but again completely eaten away.It is a vicious circle that will no longer end
Again to those who get Bürgergeld:There are also many who still want to have a little self-respect and do not go to the table,want to look well-groomed,live well-groomed,want to have a social life and that costs more money than an all day RTL watcher who washes only twice a week
from the citizen's money is just no life in a beautiful villa with pool and spa possible, also the purchase in a delicatessen is not appropriate. And you can wash every day because hot and cold water is paid by the office.
Unfortunately, I know enough people who have really given up and after they have filled their fridge once for 50 € then sit 5 days in the pub or Spielo and then 25 days complain that the money is impossible to lead a normal life.
One can lead quite with few financial means a filled life, engage oneself socially, do sports, pursue hobbies that do not cost the world. Under circumstances one could write even times a few applications or simply blindly with companies before-speak whether they look for perhaps coworkers for an occupation which one can exercise.
But that is all gray theory.
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
verified
Former Member
Nagging Corner
31st Jan. 2023, at 11:32 am CET#755
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
gamble1 wrote on 31.01.2023 at 10:37 am:
There helps only an adjustment of the salaries most people make themselves broken for nothing everyone must be paid according to the performance point
I see exactly the same. The salaries must be adjusted to the citizen money but not the citizen money to the salaries.
And if employees think that there is no incentive to work because of the citizen's income, then they should either not go to work, vote for another party or look for another job.
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
verified
Former Member
Nagging Corner
31st Jan. 2023, at 11:36 am CET#756
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
wettibernd wrote on 31.01.2023 at 11:12 am:
from the citizen's money is just no life in a beautiful villa with pool and spa possible, also the purchase in a delicatessen is not appropriate. And you can wash every day because hot and cold water is paid by the office.
Then there should be no reason to complain. If you have work, then you can afford a villa with a pool.
I am convinced that trash TV is mostly watched by teenagers and the working population. In any case, it is mainly from these people that you hear constant conversations about the broadcasts from the stations.
Unemployed people rather deal extensively with literature, however, the working person himself does not notice that, because he has no time for such things and rather turns on the Glotze after work and suddenly one is also already 70 years old and notices that the striving (= working) for money was rather pointless....
I see it exactly the same way. The salaries must be adjusted to the citizen money but not the citizen money to the salaries.
And if employees think there is no incentive to work because of the citizen's income then they should either not go to work, vote for another party or look for another job.
I see it simply so if someone makes nothing he should still be able to live in dignity but if someone makes something then he must also be able to allow himself a luxury and one has to make sure that this person has no worries about how he pays his rent or fills the refrigerator because this person usually provides 40 hours of work every week
It brings us nothing if we have only studied executives if in the same breath the people the products manufacture because of too little wage simply no more Bock have but that one must explain such a thing at all shows how blinded our system is
I see it exactly the same way. The salaries must be adjusted to the citizen's money but not the citizen's money to the salaries.
And if employees think there is no incentive to work because of the citizen's income then they should either not go to work, vote for another party or look for another job.
Mmm yes, that would improve the situation of course, if people then also stop working... 🤔
The bottom line is that it would be desirable to give the people who can't work a dignified life. And to give the people who don't want to work a fat kick in the ass.
Only who should reliably select that...
Royal777 wrote on 31.01.2023 at 11:36 am:
Then there should be no reason to complain. If you have work, then you can afford a villa with a pool.
I am convinced that trash TV is mostly watched by teenagers and the working population. In any case, it is mainly from these people that you hear constant conversations about the broadcasts from the stations.
Unemployed people rather deal extensively with literature, however, the working person himself does not notice that, because he has no time for such things and rather turns on the Glotze after work and suddenly one is also already 70 years old and notices that the striving (= working) for money was rather senseless.
Daring thesis... Is not to accumulate millions, only to be able to live well from it and to be able to provide for his family... Do not see what should be pointless...
That unemployed people are more inclined to literature than working people, you justify how?
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
verified
Former Member
Nagging Corner
31st Jan. 2023, at 11:51 am CET#760
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Stromberg wrote on 01/31/2023 at 11:44 AM:
Mmm yes, that would improve the situation of course if people then also stop working... 🤔
That's the crux of the matter, people wouldn't stop. Because after a few months at the latest, they realize how shitty it is to be unemployed. Alone the pressure from the intolerant uninhibited society would burden one more than the insufficient citizen's income...
Donnie wrote on 31.01.2023 at 10:51 am: There are also many who still want to have a little self-respect and do not go to the table, want to look well-groomed, live well-groomed, want to have a social life and that costs more money than an all day RTL viewer who washes only twice a week
tafel has long since had nothing to do with being out of shape. your own shame is unnecessary.
on the other hand, there are unfortunately those who try to cheat even there, register several times or other tricks that should not be written publicly and then sell the goods and or distribute to unauthorized relatives.
thus the really needy is also still minimized.
This post has been translated automatically
Anonym
verified
Former Member
Nagging Corner
31st Jan. 2023, at 12:02 pm CET#762
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Stromberg wrote on 01/31/2023 at 11:49 AM:
That unemployed people are more inclined to literature than working people, you justify how?
Most unemployed sit at home and occupy themselves extensively with literature, what else should they do?
Which person would voluntarily watch TV for several hours a day? Apart from pensioners and very limited people.
Meanwhile, there are so many clichés about the unemployed that are not true at all.
Nagging Corner
Nobody has liked this post so far
Never gets a single person so much citizen's money, except perhaps in extremely expensive cities with high rents.Yes that with the adjustment of salaries fine and good.But then rise at the same time also again the prices, often wage increases but again completely eaten away.It is a vicious circle that will no longer end
This post has been translated automatically
Nagging Corner
Liked this post:
RiverSong, 
Saphira
from the citizen's money is just no life in a beautiful villa with pool and spa possible, also the purchase in a delicatessen is not appropriate. And you can wash every day because hot and cold water is paid by the office.
Unfortunately, I know enough people who have really given up and after they have filled their fridge once for 50 € then sit 5 days in the pub or Spielo and then 25 days complain that the money is impossible to lead a normal life.
One can lead quite with few financial means a filled life, engage oneself socially, do sports, pursue hobbies that do not cost the world. Under circumstances one could write even times a few applications or simply blindly with companies before-speak whether they look for perhaps coworkers for an occupation which one can exercise.
But that is all gray theory.
This post has been translated automatically
Nagging Corner
Nobody has liked this post so far
I see exactly the same. The salaries must be adjusted to the citizen money but not the citizen money to the salaries.
And if employees think that there is no incentive to work because of the citizen's income, then they should either not go to work, vote for another party or look for another job.
This post has been translated automatically
Nagging Corner
Nobody has liked this post so far
Then there should be no reason to complain. If you have work, then you can afford a villa with a pool.
I am convinced that trash TV is mostly watched by teenagers and the working population. In any case, it is mainly from these people that you hear constant conversations about the broadcasts from the stations.
Unemployed people rather deal extensively with literature, however, the working person himself does not notice that, because he has no time for such things and rather turns on the Glotze after work and suddenly one is also already 70 years old and notices that the striving (= working) for money was rather pointless....
This post has been translated automatically
Nagging Corner
Liked this post: Anonym,
Max_Bet
I see it simply so if someone makes nothing he should still be able to live in dignity but if someone makes something then he must also be able to allow himself a luxury and one has to make sure that this person has no worries about how he pays his rent or fills the refrigerator because this person usually provides 40 hours of work every week
It brings us nothing if we have only studied executives if in the same breath the people the products manufacture because of too little wage simply no more Bock have but that one must explain such a thing at all shows how blinded our system is
This post has been translated automatically
Nagging Corner
Liked this post:
wettibernd
Mmm yes, that would improve the situation of course, if people then also stop working... 🤔
The bottom line is that it would be desirable to give the people who can't work a dignified life. And to give the people who don't want to work a fat kick in the ass.
Only who should reliably select that...
This post has been translated automatically
Nagging Corner
Nobody has liked this post so far
Daring thesis... Is not to accumulate millions, only to be able to live well from it and to be able to provide for his family... Do not see what should be pointless...
That unemployed people are more inclined to literature than working people, you justify how?
This post has been translated automatically
Nagging Corner
Nobody has liked this post so far
That's the crux of the matter, people wouldn't stop. Because after a few months at the latest, they realize how shitty it is to be unemployed. Alone the pressure from the intolerant uninhibited society would burden one more than the insufficient citizen's income...
This post has been translated automatically
Nagging Corner
Liked this post:
Hanshanshans
tafel has long since had nothing to do with being out of shape. your own shame is unnecessary.
on the other hand, there are unfortunately those who try to cheat even there, register several times or other tricks that should not be written publicly and then sell the goods and or distribute to unauthorized relatives.
thus the really needy is also still minimized.
This post has been translated automatically
Nagging Corner
Nobody has liked this post so far
Most unemployed sit at home and occupy themselves extensively with literature, what else should they do?
Which person would voluntarily watch TV for several hours a day? Apart from pensioners and very limited people.
Meanwhile, there are so many clichés about the unemployed that are not true at all.
Edit by Sabine: font color adjusted
This post has been translated automatically