Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Off topic & small talk: Nagging Corner (Page 114)

Topic created on 24th Apr. 2019 | Page: 114 of 174 | Answers: 1,739 | Views: 222,385
Stromberg
Legend
In the short term, employers and employees will have to share the costs of inflation for the time being. Otherwise, inflation will continue. And if all occupational groups were to demand 10 percent more money now, many small companies would face bankruptcy.
Personally, I think it would be appropriate to give more percentage to the low wage groups and less to the high salaries of civil servants, for example. (I think the civil servants' salaries are indirectly linked to this, even though civil servants are not allowed to strike).
On the other hand, the management floors should do without Bonuses, etc..

Find demands and manner of the strikes also not proportionate

This post has been translated automatically

frapi07
Expert


Stromberg wrote on 03/25/2023 at 22:21: In the short term, employers and employees will have to share the cost of inflation for now. Otherwise, inflation will continue like this. And if all professions demanded 10% more money now, many small businesses would face bankruptcy.
Personally, I think it would be appropriate to give more percentage to the low wage groups and less to the high salaries of civil servants, for example. (I think the civil servants' salaries are indirectly linked to this, even though civil servants are not allowed to strike).
On the other hand, the management floors should do without Bonuses, etc..

Find demands and manner of the strikes also not proportionate




Unfortunately, the low-wage earners always have the bitter afterglow. Especially now that the minimum wage has risen to 12€, you would think that they have more money to live on, but the reality is different. Nowadays, everything has become expensive, but the people who work the minimum wage and live alone have it the hardest. Since the work is really hardly worth it, because at the end of the month you have a few € more than if you would live on government assistance.

Your idea at the end is actually fair and find the idea also super, but also will never be so in reality. One notices it yes already with the delegates and your parliamentary allowance. What they get there for wage increases is really outrageous. Unfortunately, these are not the only ones who make their pockets full and would never do without. They do the same on the management level. What sums are paid there (especially in public broadcasting) is simply frightening.

This post has been translated automatically

Falko
Icon

frapi07 wrote on 25.03.2023 at 23:12:They do the same at the management level. What sums are paid there (especially in public broadcasting) is simply frightening.

It is also frightening that leaves like the picture just report that the public broadcasting wants to enforce the citizens 25.19 euros broadcasting fee from 2026 monthly to take. Now we already have to pay an outrageous 18.36 euros per month and the last increase is not so long ago.

This post has been translated automatically

Langhans
Expert

Falko wrote on 26.03.2023 at 00:16:

Frightening is also the leaves like the picture just report that the public broadcasting wants to enforce the citizens 25.19 euros broadcasting fee from 2026 monthly to take. Now we have to pay already outrageous 18.36 euros per month and the last increase is not so long ago.

I am almost certain that this will not go through. Even the last increase was highly controversial and almost failed because of the veto of (I think) Saxony-Anhalt. Since then, public perception of ÖR has continued to deteriorate significantly (Corona, RBB scandal, etc...). This will probably not happen even in sleepyhead Germany for the time being, although almost anything is conceivable here now

This post has been translated automatically

Falko
Icon

Langhans wrote on 03/26/2023 at 00:23 PM:#I am almost certain that this will not pass. Even the last increase was controversial to the very highest degree and almost failed due to the veto of (I think) Saxony-Anhalt. Since then, public perception of ÖR has continued to deteriorate significantly (Corona, RBB scandal, etc...). This will probably not happen even in sleepyhead Germany for the time being, although almost anything is conceivable here now

Yes my state Saxony Anhalt had rejected the last increase and never agreed to this increase. Then the public broadcasting moved before the Federal Constitutional Court in Karlsruhe and the decided despite vetoes of Saxony Anhalt, the increase is right. What if they end up going back to the Federal Constitutional Court for the 25.19 euros? That all federal states agree, I also doubt quite strongly. But already an absolute impudence to want to have so much coal, just do not get the neck full

This post has been translated automatically

Langhans
Expert

Falko wrote on 26.03.2023 at 00:54:

Yes my state Saxony Anhalt had rejected the last increase and never agreed to this increase. Then the public broadcasting moved before the Federal Constitutional Court in Karlsruhe and the decided despite vetoes of Saxony Anhalt, the increase is legal. What if they end up going back to the Federal Constitutional Court for the 25.19 euros? That all the states agree, I also doubt quite strongly. But already an absolute impudence to want to have so much coal, just do not get the neck full

I consider an increase in the current situation (generally just as little, but is only my opinion), in which people are specifically financially, no longer mediateable. In the society it rumbles more than ever...A partial guilt possesses also the ÖR, which besides internally and thus also in the external representation deeply into the mess rode. I'm not really deep into the subject, which affects the legislation, and I don't know exactly whether politics has a hand in this or whether their hands are tied.... But I think the parties would be well advised to publicly oppose an increase. This topic is polarizing, and the ailing government parties in particular are now dependent on every vote.

This post has been translated automatically

Donnie
Expert
The people must finally start to fight back, in whatever way.The destroy our whole country.What I already pay alone in heating costs is just sick, for a few months of heating thousands of euros a year where a few hundred used to be enough.The slightly older among us will still remember the D-Mark.If you times the prices of today converted you get a shock.You feel like in the wrong movie...

This post has been translated automatically

MisterL
Expert

Falko wrote on 18.03.2023 at 21:40: I have been drinking only tap water with effervescent powder or syrup for years. That also saves money and on top of that saves lugging heavy stuff. And I don't drink beer either.

think of the Pfas

drink almost no tap water at all

This post has been translated automatically

Denjo889
Experienced
there is still nothing to complain about

This post has been translated automatically

Hanshanshans
Expert
And on we go with the fun penalty shootout at Betano.
15 shots held...🙂
But was not the only bonus this week with fun factor.
Tipico once again, 25% odds boost, maximum bet...5 euros 😂 Honestly, I can pay the 1.25 out of my own pocket, then I can at least decide for myself how much I want to bet.
Well, customer amusement is certainly also a marketing strategy 🤔

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics2nd May. 2024 at 02:35 am CEST

GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.

© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately