Privacy settings

We use a number of cookies on our website. Some are essential, while others help us improve our portal for you.

Privacy settings

Here is an overview of all the cookies we use. You can choose to accept whole categories or view more information and select only certain cookies.

Essential (6)

Essential cookies enable basic functions and are necessary for the website to function properly.

Statistics (3)

Statistics cookies collect information anonymously. This information helps us to understand how our visitors use our website.
If the statistics cookies are subsequently deselected, they will remain on the computer until the expiry date. However, they are neither updated nor evaluated.

Off topic & small talk: Chatterbox (Page 1107)

Topic created on 14th Jan. 2019 | Page: 1107 of 1171 | Answers: 11,708 | Views: 1,478,292
frapi07
Expert

Chatterbox

16th Mar. 2024, at 02:53 pm CET#11155
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
Donnie wrote on 16.03.2024 at 14:46: Just make an appointment🤣

We'll debate live and stream it on Youtube/Twitch

Judges will then be the admins of GJ

Seats will also be available on site. However, admission costs 45 GJ-Coins.



Playmaus wrote on 16.03.2024 at 14:47:
Yes, by withdrawing I mean that I don't just write nonsensical posts.but of course I'm still active.why should I leave.I think it's good here.and I'm grateful to gamblejoe for doing something like this to ensure the users.I don't want to argue with anyone here now.so I'm for peace.

Your choice of words was then unfavorable. I misunderstood you because of that. But I'm glad you meant something else. For me, withdrawing means "adios amigos, I only write rarely or not at all". Nobody wants to argue with you. At least that's not what I read.

This post has been translated automatically

Playmaus
Amateur

Chatterbox

16th Mar. 2024, at 03:10 pm CET#11156
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

frapi07 wrote on March 16, 2024 at 2:53 pm:
Your choice of words was poor then. I misunderstood you because of that. But I'm glad you meant something else. For me, withdrawing means "adios amigos, I only write rarely or not at all". Nobody wants to argue with you. At least that's not what I read.

All good ...I wish you all a wonderful Saturday and hope that we get along well in the future and have a pleasant time here in the forum

This post has been translated automatically

Hanshanshans
Expert

Chatterbox

16th Mar. 2024, at 03:51 pm CET#11157
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
A suggestion to avoid future discussions about the "100 posts" mark...
Perhaps regulate the qualification for remuneration of ratings via the activity points?
How many points are necessary for this is of course up to GJ. Then there will be less "spasmodic" posting. Points can also be collected by winning pictures/videos, logging in daily, etc.

This post has been translated automatically

BinGOLDiG
Expert

Chatterbox

16th Mar. 2024, at 04:02 pm CET#11158
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

Andre wrote on 16.03.2024 at 11:03: Moin together,

i want to briefly go back to the 100 posts topic, since my name has also been mentioned here (thanks for that Malganes )

I just want to make it clear that we're not going to stand here and say "rules are rules, there's nothing we can do". We have really looked into this issue for a long time and tried to find the best possible solution. We have to find a balance between rewarding regular users and attracting new users, and unfortunately there are also users who exploit this system. Exploitation =/= forbidden and the Playmaus case is the best example of this. Her posts in the forum were all comprehensible and even if she posted them all once a day, it's not forbidden. I wouldn't know how to proceed as a moderator. Should I simply delete posts? Where do we end up then? If completely closed threads are brought up, I would of course intervene. I mean, that was the case with Playmaus once and I wrote something about it.

On a very emotional level, I have to say that it really annoys me and with every "case" you hope that it's not just a collection of 100 posts, but a new, active user.

Do you have any ideas/suggestions on how to adjust this with ratings?


My suggestion would be to simply do away with the 100 posts and distribute the remuneration for casino ratings equally to everyone.

Only that the rewards are limited to a certain period of time (e.g. 12 weeks from publication at gamblejoe).
This way, nobody can take advantage of the reward system and all members can meet again on an equal footing!

This post has been translated automatically

frapi07
Expert

Chatterbox

16th Mar. 2024, at 04:04 pm CET#11159
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

Hanshanshans wrote on 16.03.2024 at 15:51: A suggestion to avoid future discussions about the "100 posts" mark...
Maybe regulate the qualification for the remuneration of ratings via the activity points?
How many points are necessary for this is of course up to GJ. Then there will be less "spasmodic" posting. Points can also be collected with winning pictures/videos, logging in daily, etc.

Great idea, but I don't think it would solve the problem either. Then other areas will be bombarded. Winning pictures, like at the end of the month, will then be uploaded more often, more "congratulations" posts will be made on the winning pictures, etc etc. You can assign a maximum number of points per day, but there will be days when not just one user will do it. Especially if you set daily point limits, users will log in, do their things and then log out.



I'm curious to see if and how GJ will act.

This post has been translated automatically

R3hab
Expert

Chatterbox

16th Mar. 2024, at 04:28 pm CET#11160
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
What do you get for a rating from the casino again? 10€ or?

I think everyone should be allowed to write reviews straight away, and it should be possible to check the legitimacy of the reviews to see if the user has actually played there.

These 100 posts are nonsense or don't help the climate, for example it didn't interest me either
I did notice that someone was collecting contributions.

It should be important that users don't take advantage of it, that should be worked on.

This is marketing money that GJ invests in new users, I have the feeling from time to time that some multi accounts are also at the start here, like everywhere else

This post has been translated automatically

Hanshanshans
Expert

Chatterbox

16th Mar. 2024, at 04:33 pm CET#11161
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far
frapi07 wrote on 16.03.2024 at 16:04:Great idea, but I don't think it would solve the problem either. Then other areas will be bombarded. Winning pictures, like at the end of the month, will then be uploaded more often, more "congratulations" posts will be made on the winning pictures, etc. etc.

These areas of GJ are often used to collect points anyway. However, this would spread out the "activity" more to create the conditions for remuneration.

I'm sure everyone feels differently, but I'd rather have a few (unnecessary) pictures or comments than superfluous posts in the forum.

@Rehab...I've already spoken to someone from the GJ team about whether you could/should ensure that users have actually played with the rated provider. In terms of data protection, this is difficult or even impossible to implement.

This post has been translated automatically

roccoammo11
Expert

Chatterbox

16th Mar. 2024, at 05:14 pm CET#11162
0 Likes

Nobody has liked this post so far

R3hab wrote on 16.03.2024 at 16:28: What do you get for a rating from the casino again? 10€ or?

I think everyone should be allowed to write reviews immediately, you should be able to check the legitimacy of the reviews to see if the user really played there.

These 100 posts are nonsense or don't help the climate, for example it didn't interest me either
I noticed that someone was collecting reviews.

It should be important that users don't take advantage of it, that should be worked on.

This is marketing money that GJ invests in new users, I have the feeling from time to time that some multi accounts are also at the start here, like everywhere else

You get a maximum of 5€ per rating & gj has the possibility to end this campaign at any time..I think the conditions as they are now are very well adapted & for most people this is far too long-term a goal to grab a few gj coins..so several times..at least I hope...

This post has been translated automatically

frapi07
Expert

Chatterbox

16th Mar. 2024, at 05:21 pm CET#11163
2 Likes

Liked this post: Avatar von Langhans Langhans, Avatar von R3hab R3hab

R3hab wrote on 16.03.2024 at 16:28: What do you get for a rating from the casino again? 10€ or?

I think everyone should be allowed to write reviews immediately, you should be able to check the legitimacy of the reviews to see if the user really played there.

These 100 posts are nonsense or don't help the climate, for example it didn't interest me either
I noticed that someone was collecting reviews.

It should be important that users don't take advantage of it, that should be worked on.

This is marketing money that GJ invests in new users, I have the feeling from time to time that some multi accounts are also at the start here, like everywhere else

2,50€ and from a certain rank then 5€.

Yes, for this you would need data such as name, address, year of birth... as @Hanshanshans already wrote, this is difficult to implement and also violates the data protection regulation.

The hurdle for being paid for reviews is not only the 100 posts, but also being registered for 6 months. I already wrote in the announcement that most people will just wait for these 6 months and then write these 100 reviews in a desperate attempt. Some will just be stupid and write the posts within a very short time, some will be a bit smarter and take things more slowly.

This hurdle was introduced because many fake accounts had been set up. I think at the time it was necessary to be verified in order to get €5 per review. But I don't remember 100%. But GJ said that some people even went to the trouble of forging IDs and changing their appearance (bald head/wig etc.). That was the purpose of this hurdle. Only GJ can answer whether all this has decreased.

I completely agree with you on the point that new users are an investment, which is why I also think that they could also provide a little more traffic for their GJ coins. Which is better: to be quiet for 6 months and then quickly write 100 posts or to write a constant 50 posts for 6 months? I think the second would be more economically viable.

Hanshanshans wrote on March 16, 2024 at 4:33 pm:
Those areas of GJ are often used to collect points anyway. However, this would spread out the "activity" more to create the conditions for remuneration.

I'm sure everyone feels differently, but I'd rather have a few (unnecessary) pictures or comments than superfluous posts in the forum.

@Rehab...I've already spoken to someone from the GJ team about whether you could/should ensure that users have actually played with the rated provider. In terms of data protection, this is difficult or even impossible to implement.

Correct, but it is limited. It only gets a little bad at the end of the month (who doesn't know the 5-10 cents winning pictures). I also wrote "congratulations" a few times because I wanted to reach the number of points. But I stopped doing that and am more active in the forum. I can understand that not everyone has the time, but you can get the points quickly if you want to.

Pictures are preferably clear, but many good pictures would then "go under" because of that. I'm assuming the worst case scenario here. I don't think we've ever had a wave of spam like this before. Usually it was always a user who was a little more active. But even that sometimes gets on the nerves of some (including me).

This post has been translated automatically

Malganes
Top Member

Chatterbox

16th Mar. 2024, at 11:54 pm CET#11164
2 Likes

Liked this post: Avatar von Lionking Lionking, Avatar von Max_Bet Max_Bet
Playmaus wrote on 16.03.2024 at 15:10:

All good ...I wish you all a wonderful Saturday and hope that we get along well in the future and have a pleasant time here in the forum.

1. I apologize for making fun of your ratings.
2. Yes, it was initially quite noticeable and a bit annoying how and at what intervals you wrote your posts, I don't think I'm alone in that.
3. No one is telling you how to write your future posts or how to write them. Just be yourself and that's fine^^
4. I misjudged you at the beginning and it's the way you communicate in other parts of your life.
5. I too hope we will get along well in the future.
6. Have a great time on this forum and here's to getting along well with me/us

This post has been translated automatically

Hot Topics9th May. 2024 at 10:29 am CEST

Jackpots
0
Miscellaneous
0
Miscellaneous
0
GambleJoe is aimed exclusively at user whose allowed to play legally with his current location in online casinos and does not violate the current law.
It is the responsibility of the user to inform himself about the current legal situation. Gambling is prohibited for children and adolescents under the age of 18.
GambleJoe is a registered trademark with the EUIPO of GJ International Ltd.
© 2012-2024 GambleJoe.com
✕

Forgotten your password?

Create a new password here

  • 1. Fill in the 3 fields carefully and click on the green button
  • 2. Check your email inbox for a message from GambleJoe
  • 3. Click on the confirmation link in the email and your new password will be active immediately