Topic created on 19th Aug. 2019 | Page: 1 of 1 | Answers: 3 | Views: 1,720
j****1
Topic Creator
Forum posts:13Member has been banned
Uniform blocking
19th Aug. 2019, at 01:33 pm CEST#1
0 Likes
Nobody has liked this post so far
Hello together!
I found an older title from Christoph here, in which the MGA wants to implement a uniform
Blocking in all casinos with license MGA would like to implement, if one wants to be blocked in a casino
would like to be blocked. This was also already so
decided. How far is one then there, or on what depends that then? Was yes believe at the beginning of the
Year, or? And the idea is not bad.
Then the question of Verification, where there are often problems, and also affected me already.
Can you not when registering a minimum amount of, for example, a cent via instant Deposit,
Trustly etc deposit, and the casinos thus have all the data? Similar to the casinos without registration, where
all of which I have had very good experiences. Deposits and withdrawals were extremely
fast, you were verified with the deposit, and there was no stupid bonus garbage.
Clearly, you don't want to miss out on this so that funds are gambled away again, or funds are cancelled
because you have violated the bonus rules. But can't the MGA as the licensor
specify / prescribe? Otherwise there is no license. Or they are all in cahoots
In cahoots. If I were a licensor, I would know where most of the problems are, and I would
and would try to eliminate them.
We would also have less work, because of the less letters because of the non-paying for
for flimsy reasons
If players were the source of funding of the MGA + state subsidy would have (eg annually € 25 so that you can play in MGA casinos, verify once with MGA and done, the state then subsidizes for each player another € 25...) would certainly go more. Currently, the MGA earns on the wins of a casino with and in the award of licenses, the UKGC, on the other hand, earns a lot through the penalties that are awarded (therefore, the UKGC tends to overregulation to be able to collect more money).
The casinos are certainly doing something that could be compared to lobbying, because the MGA can set the rules if it wants to. Until something like this happens, years pass, if one would decide for it. Most recently, arbitration boards have been introduced to get rid of work, but when I look at what it takes on average to solve a problem ... (approx. 30-90 days), the fun goes out of it.
Playing online and always think at certain sums <Hoffentlich kommt jetzt nicht eine neue Anfrage>or <Hoffentlich geht es reibungslos durch>is very annoying, I know there is a small selection of casinos where it is rather unproblematic. But with the majority there are always huge problems from certain points for no reason. Each casino evaluates the same evidence differently and asks this at a different time, everything would be regulable by the MGA and yes in this the MGA and also the casinos has no interest. If there are problems then always to the disadvantage of the player, only with technical problems sometimes players benefit and then the players have also had bad luck in most cases.
If you Deposit and money does not appear almost nothing is done, you wait partly weeks. But if you get 15 € too much because you could still claim a bonus offer after the expiration of time then is acted in a flash. Immediately payout rejected, money is gone and the friendly text you were too late but you can choose one of the many other offers and you hope you enjoy his time + some hypocritical saying still on top like ( <Zögere nicht bei Problemen dich zu melden wir helfen dir gerne, damit du zufrieden bist geben wir jeden Tag mehr als 100 %!>usually some 25% 9000 Wager offer still as an advertising banner below)</Zögere>. <Zögere nicht bei Problemen dich zu melden wir helfen dir gerne, damit du zufrieden bist geben wir jeden Tag mehr als 100 %!>
It sounds almost as if the "license fee" is a kind of protection money. The MGA then protects
its casinos from unpleasant regulations. In this sense, the MGA would not be a
serious authority. The few who really take the trouble to write to the MGA,
and the MGA can't help but decide against a casino
It is undisputed that the MGA knows the tricks of Verification and Bonuses, and tolerates them
tolerates them. Ergo, the MGA is out for the casinos, and not for the players, right?
Uniform blocking
Nobody has liked this post so far
I found an older title from Christoph here, in which the MGA wants to implement a uniform
Blocking in all casinos with license MGA would like to implement, if one wants to be blocked in a casino
would like to be blocked. This was also already so
decided. How far is one then there, or on what depends that then? Was yes believe at the beginning of the
Year, or? And the idea is not bad.
Then the question of Verification, where there are often problems, and also affected me already.
Can you not when registering a minimum amount of, for example, a cent via instant Deposit,
Trustly etc deposit, and the casinos thus have all the data? Similar to the casinos without registration, where
all of which I have had very good experiences. Deposits and withdrawals were extremely
fast, you were verified with the deposit, and there was no stupid bonus garbage.
Clearly, you don't want to miss out on this so that funds are gambled away again, or funds are cancelled
because you have violated the bonus rules. But can't the MGA as the licensor
specify / prescribe? Otherwise there is no license. Or they are all in cahoots
In cahoots. If I were a licensor, I would know where most of the problems are, and I would
and would try to eliminate them.
We would also have less work, because of the less letters because of the non-paying for
for flimsy reasons
This post has been translated automatically
Uniform blocking
Nobody has liked this post so far
The casinos are certainly doing something that could be compared to lobbying, because the MGA can set the rules if it wants to. Until something like this happens, years pass, if one would decide for it. Most recently, arbitration boards have been introduced to get rid of work, but when I look at what it takes on average to solve a problem ... (approx. 30-90 days), the fun goes out of it.
Playing online and always think at certain sums <Hoffentlich kommt jetzt nicht eine neue Anfrage>or <Hoffentlich geht es reibungslos durch>is very annoying, I know there is a small selection of casinos where it is rather unproblematic. But with the majority there are always huge problems from certain points for no reason. Each casino evaluates the same evidence differently and asks this at a different time, everything would be regulable by the MGA and yes in this the MGA and also the casinos has no interest. If there are problems then always to the disadvantage of the player, only with technical problems sometimes players benefit and then the players have also had bad luck in most cases.
If you Deposit and money does not appear almost nothing is done, you wait partly weeks. But if you get 15 € too much because you could still claim a bonus offer after the expiration of time then is acted in a flash. Immediately payout rejected, money is gone and the friendly text you were too late but you can choose one of the many other offers and you hope you enjoy his time + some hypocritical saying still on top like ( <Zögere nicht bei Problemen dich zu melden wir helfen dir gerne, damit du zufrieden bist geben wir jeden Tag mehr als 100 %!>usually some 25% 9000 Wager offer still as an advertising banner below)</Zögere>. <Zögere nicht bei Problemen dich zu melden wir helfen dir gerne, damit du zufrieden bist geben wir jeden Tag mehr als 100 %!>
//supplement: So original message from the MGA: https://www.mga.org.mt/malta-gaming-authority-to-launch-a-unified-self-exclusion-system-for-its-remote-gaming-licensees/
And the last news I was aware of: https://www.mga.org.mt/the-mga-publishes-a-preliminary-market-consultation-document-to-request-information-on-projects-for-a-unified-self-exclusion-system/</Zögere></Hoffentlich></Hoffentlich>
This post has been translated automatically
Uniform blocking
Nobody has liked this post so far
its casinos from unpleasant regulations. In this sense, the MGA would not be a
serious authority. The few who really take the trouble to write to the MGA,
and the MGA can't help but decide against a casino
It is undisputed that the MGA knows the tricks of Verification and Bonuses, and tolerates them
tolerates them. Ergo, the MGA is out for the casinos, and not for the players, right?
This post has been translated automatically
Uniform blocking
Nobody has liked this post so far
Therefore, the thread is closed, should still be interested in discussing this topic then there is the possibility to create a new topic.
This topic was closed
This post has been translated automatically